Is this Olsen Twins Upskirt with NO PANTIES a fake? (Pic)
 

I'm sure this has been posted before, but I just saw it for the first time. It must be a fake:

http://themaxx.com/offensive/pages/p....ooh .jpg.php

Hahah nice hotlink image :)

looks real to me

LOL

:1orglaugh


http://images.themaxx.com/mirror.php...ture...ooh.jpg

Fuck, even posting the link didn't work. Here it is:



http://www.donovanphillips.com/image...ns-upskirt.jpg

lol

I didnt need to see that

Darn , sure looks real

No fucking way. Has to be a fake. If not time to squeeze one off.

If it was a fake, it was a REALLY GOOD JOB!

fake for sure.. :2 cents:

Why, because the idea of it being real is too good to be true?

Either it's a fake, or there's a 95% chance that you posted a picture of underage pussy. Good going, sparky.

Any idea where this was taken?

If it is a fake then it is a mighty good one. Also notice the pink tank-top she is wearing, she isn't wearing a bra and you can make out her nipples too.

**IF** that were true, it's not a pornographic photo, and therefore not illegal. Ever heard of Jock Sturges? No? You can get his books on Amazon.com or at Barnes and Noble. His subjects are all under 18 and are all nude, but no pornographic. Don't believe me? Look in the photography section the next time you're in Barnes and Noble. Or just look here on Amazon.com :

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/AS...881270-6631866

Legs have too much meat on them to belong to either Olsen twin...

Excellent! :winkwink:

looks good to me :winkwink:

when you sit the back of your leg gets flattened and the "meat" gets pushed out making it appear larger

The higher up her skirt the lighter it gets. Now the photographer took this pic standing higher than her. The upskirt part looks like a flash is taken from below. A flash from above (this is the case here) wouldve been partly blocked by the skirt and instead of getting lighter there it shouldve gotten darker.

Who said anything about it being illegal?

However, would you consider it a good idea to post artistic nudes of underage girls on the world's leading porn webmaster board in terms of PR, good taste, etc?

Underage pussy, whether legal or illegal, does not belong on industry-related boards. Simple as that.

And the one on the left looks fucking scary. Fuck these chicks look weird, yuck.

If it is fake I'd still like to see the original. :Graucho

If you're offended by this photo, which may or may not have been taken after the girls turned 18, move along. Seriously. Who knows when this photo was taken. I'm saying it was taken after they turned 18. You may fantasize that it was before if you wish.

My guess is the whole bottom part is fake. I dont think those are her legs. The skin color looks totally different than the rest of her body.

Maybe im wrong tho.

I'm not offended by it, I just think it's kinda dumb to post it here.

Aside from that... don't you shoot content? Always nice to hear people who create content say sensible stuff like "Who knows when this photo was taken. I'm saying it was taken after they turned 18.".

:1orglaugh

You're grasping at straws, asshole. These are celebrities we're talking about here. These are shots that would likely have been taken by the papperazzi, if real. These are photos that will not be subject to 2257 laws. These girls are 18 years old, but it doesn't really matter in a situation like this... stop trying to stir shit. Is that all you're good for?

You see from a mile away that it is fake.

Its a fake for sure.
Looks like they are on the subway.
Now ask yourself, why would 2 chicks who are worth bout 300,000,000 dollars be on the subway?

So fake it's funny

That's a weak argument. There are a million different ways to explain such a thing.

Please explain.

Sometimes it amazes me how utterly devoid of intelligence some people are. You are one of those people, as you have quite aptly proven in this thread.

Like I already said, this is not about the law. This is about how "on the biggest adult webmaster board in the world people post pictures of underage nudity" will sound to the average consumer/voter being rallied up against the porn industry by some Asshahahahaha-like asshole.

And no, "but it's ok, they're celebrities!" does not make it sound better. Neither does "but they're pictures of fake underage nudity!". And, not too surprisingly, "I have no clue but I say they're 18+ in that picture" doesn't make it much better either.

The porn industry needs to keep as far away as possible from possible minors. If not because of the law, at least because of PR. Anyone with half a brain should realize that.

Moron.

looks like a really good fake, her legs are too thick and tanner than the rest of her body.

Give it up, dumb fuck. You're just being argumentative.

punkworld, man you're reaching way to far .... there is nothing illegal about that pic if it is real.

NO shit its fake! Those girls legs are going to be skinny as shit

So yeah, lunch on me fellas. Why can't we all just be friends?:Graucho

Actually, in this case I'm not. I'm just annoyed by the fact that some people don't seem to see how a public webmaster board is different than a surfer board in that it also acts as a representation of the entire industry.

Anything you say here can and will be used by those fighting against the industry. Staying away from borderline stuff is always a good idea in such situations.