GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Okay, dumb ass Michael Moore Supporters, What were you saying now?? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=283149)

Donny 05-06-2004 04:07 PM

Okay, dumb ass Michael Moore Supporters, What were you saying now??
 
Moore admits it was all a publicity stunt, eh? Fuck him.

What were all you supporters saying?

pornstar2pac 05-06-2004 04:07 PM

no comment

Thong Sniper 05-06-2004 04:08 PM

publicity stunt or george bush....hmmmm i wonder which I'll take...

Rich 05-06-2004 04:10 PM

I'm sure he does

Donny 05-06-2004 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Thong Sniper
publicity stunt or george bush....hmmmm i wonder which I'll take...
Another dumb ass speaks. Michael Moore and the comparison you made to Bush do not computer.

"That's like saying, Rush Limbaugh, or John Kerry."

There is no "choice" between the two.

xxxdesign-net 05-06-2004 04:12 PM

lol a stunt?... Disney CEO Michael Eisner confirmed what Moore was saying yesterday on TV...

Now I hope you have a news link backing you up?

KMR Stitch 05-06-2004 04:12 PM

:helpme

Donny 05-06-2004 04:15 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by xxxdesign-net
lol a stunt?... Disney CEO Michael Eisner confirmed what Moore was saying yesterday on TV...

Now I hope you have a news link backing you up?


Here you go, ignorant one:


Moore admits Disney 'ban' was a stunt
By Andrew Gumbel in Los Angeles
07 May 2004

Less than 24 hours after accusing the Walt Disney Company of pulling the plug on his latest docu.mentary in a blatant attempt at political censorship, the rabble-rousing film-maker Michael Moore has admitted he knew a year ago that Disney had no intention of distributing it.

The admission, during an interview with CNN, undermined Moore's claim that Disney was trying to sabotage the US release of Fahrenheit 911 just days before its world premiere at the Cannes film festival.

Instead, it lent credence to a growing suspicion that Moore was manufacturing a controversy to help publicise the film, a full-bore attack on the Bush administration and its handling of national security since the attacks of 11 September 2001.

Continued Here:

http://news.independent.co.uk/world/...p?story=518901

spentrent 05-06-2004 04:17 PM

Thanks for spreading the word.:drinkup :drinkup

baddog 05-06-2004 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by DonovanPhillips
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/...p?story=518901
without even reading the article I have to laugh, because you know it just kills them to no be able to blame it on Bush

Donny 05-06-2004 04:19 PM

In other words, manufactured drama for his manufactured "docu.mentaries". What an idiot!

slackologist 05-06-2004 04:19 PM

umm. so what?

Thong Sniper 05-06-2004 04:19 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by DonovanPhillips
Another dumb ass speaks. Michael Moore and the comparison you made to Bush do not computer.

"That's like saying, Rush Limbaugh, or John Kerry."

There is no "choice" between the two.

no it's like saying, Michael Moore's publicity stunt, no matter how retarded it is, he and the liberal party INCLUDING JOHN KERRY is still a much sweeter pill to swallow than George Bush and his circus of lies. you fuckin' dig you brainwashed speedbag with bitch-tits?

skillfull 05-06-2004 04:20 PM

still better than bush

Donny 05-06-2004 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Thong Sniper
no it's like saying, Michael Moore's publicity stunt, no matter how retarded it is, he and the liberal party INCLUDING JOHN KERRY is still a much sweeter pill to swallow than George Bush and his circus of lies. you fuckin' dig you brainwashed speedbag with bitch-tits?

You're a fucking moron. Michael Moore has NO relevance to this year's election. Do you honestly think that simply because he's a liberal, he's somehow associated with our next President (John Kerry, if I could have my choice)??

So, I guess the Unabomber, as a liberal, should somehow be thrown into the mix with a line as ignorant as yours:

The Unabomber, or George Bush ??

It doesn't compute, asshat!

"George Bush or John Kerry?" makes sense.

"Liar Michael Moore or George Bush" makes no sense. There is no relation whatsoever between the two.

Donny 05-06-2004 04:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by skillfull
still better than bush
Like the other fuckhead that said something similar, you don't seem to realize Michael Moore is NOT running for President. It is NOT Michael Moore vs. George Bush in November, idiot.

slackologist 05-06-2004 04:24 PM

gee, someone has their knickers in a twist
:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

xxxdesign-net 05-06-2004 04:25 PM

"But Moore's publicity stunt, <b>if</b> that is what is, appears to be working"

LOL And the guy start by "Moore <b>admits Disney 'ban' was a stunt</b> " ....

Cant you make the difference between a serious journalist and an idiot giving his opinion on a subject... !?

His article proves noting... nice try...


p.s. go check out other sites.. cnn.. foxnews.. drudge... if you see nothing.. ask yourself some SERIOUS questions... lol

flashfire 05-06-2004 04:27 PM

Give Bush a break hes a decent dictator

richard123 05-06-2004 04:28 PM

Publicity "stunt" = get publicity for your project. So...?

Besides, Miramax backed the project anyway because they thought Disney would change its mind. So the news appears to be that Disney won't do it despite Miramax thinking it would.

Donny 05-06-2004 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by xxxdesign-net
"But Moore's publicity stunt, if that is what is, appears to be working"

LOL And the guy start by "Moore admits Disney 'ban' was a stunt" ....

Cant you make the difference between a serious journalist and an idiot giving his opinion on a subject... !?

His article prove notings... nice try...

You are right. His article proves nothing.

Michael Moore's actions, on the other hand, prove quite a bit. He's still manufacturing data to promote HIMSELF. He really has no other agenda.

You sound almost as ignorant as Rush Limbaugh's supporters.

Think for yourself, man.

And if you must know, I am NOT a Bush supporter (at least not the Yale educated kind... I particularly like the unshaven Bush I see around here from time to time). My vote will be for John Kerry this year (although I wish Wesley Clark was the nominee).

slackologist 05-06-2004 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by flashfire
Give Bush a break hes a decent dictator
He'll pick up the sympathy vote for sure.. he appears pathetic enough.

flashfire 05-06-2004 04:31 PM

Bush's life is a publicity stunt

Rob 05-06-2004 04:31 PM

Everything that fat sack of shit does is a publicity stunt. If being Right Wing Conservative russled some feathers and was the "little man" he'd be all over it like a fat bitch on a ding dong!

JBdeB 05-06-2004 04:42 PM

Do you read the first three lines and pass stupid judgements?

Read the whole story first.

This is the end.......



The only thing that's new here is in Disney's reaffirmation of their previously stated position," one well-placed source said on condition of anonymity. "Miramax never said it was distributing the film, even if people assumed it would find a way." The source also denied that Fahrenheit 911 was causing any significant personal friction between Mr Eisner and Mr Weinstein, pointing out that they could hardly be getting along worse as it is. "There's plenty of other issues to have catfights over," he said.


Mr Moore was not immediately available to answer the charge that he was creating controversy for promotional purposes. He is still at work finalising the print he will take to Cannes.

_

Donny 05-06-2004 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by JBdeB
Do you read the first three lines and pass stupid judgements?

Read the whole story first.

This is the end.......



The only thing that's new here is in Disney's reaffirmation of their previously stated position," one well-placed source said on


condition of anonymity. "Miramax never said it was distributing the film, even if people assumed it would find a way." The source also denied that Fahrenheit 911 was causing any significant personal friction between Mr Eisner and Mr Weinstein, pointing out that they could hardly be getting along worse as it is. "There's plenty of other issues to have catfights over," he said.


Mr Moore was not immediately available to answer the charge that he was creating controversy for promotional purposes. He is still at work finalising the print he will take to Cannes.

_

Maybe you missed this part:

"The admission, during an interview with CNN..."

Moore doesn't need to be around "answer any charges" if he's already made "an admission".

Ecstasy Glass 05-06-2004 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Thong Sniper
no it's like saying, Michael Moore's publicity stunt, no matter how retarded it is, he and the liberal party INCLUDING JOHN KERRY is still a much sweeter pill to swallow than George Bush and his circus of lies. you fuckin' dig you brainwashed speedbag with bitch-tits?
:1orglaugh

Donny 05-06-2004 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by flashfire
Give Bush a break hes a decent dictator
Maybe you should make this comment in a thread that's actually about George Bush. This thread is about Michael Moore lying again, just like he did on "Bowling for Columbine".

escorpio 05-06-2004 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by DonovanPhillips
In other words, manufactured drama for his manufactured "docu.mentaries". What an idiot!
Are you calling Michael Moore an IDIOT !?!?!











You're letting that fat fucking lying piece of shit off easy!:1orglaugh

Shoehorn! 05-06-2004 05:15 PM

I fucking hate Michael Moore. That loud mouth bitch needs to do something more constructive with his time than make low quality movies.

zzgundamnzz 05-06-2004 05:17 PM

I never liked him. Don't know why so many people thought he was an activist... he was just feeding off of controversy to get attention. He's no better than a board troll :1orglaugh

Donny 05-06-2004 05:19 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by zzgundamnzz
I never liked him. Don't know why so many people thought he was an activist... he was just feeding off of controversy to get attention. He's no better than a board troll :1orglaugh
Can I get an Amen?

AMEN!

Doctor Dre 05-06-2004 05:25 PM

Whatever not like it's a big deal compared to all the lies told ppl

dirtyone 05-06-2004 05:32 PM

I siad he was faking yesterday... neener neener neener.


I think he has been talking to pimpdog... you know, any publicity is good publicity.

reynold 05-06-2004 05:44 PM

It seems he's in need of publicity, even bad ones!

Donny 05-06-2004 05:59 PM

Here's another news story about it:

http://www.antimusic.com/news/04/may/item20.shtml

antiTainment NEWS: Michael Moore Lied About Disney Ban



05-06-04 Keavin
.
Michael Moore made a big stink earlier this week when he accused Disney of pulling the plug on his latest film, ?Fahrenheit 911?. He decried Disney?s decision not to distribute the film as politically motivate censorship. However, Moore was crying wolf. He admitted in a CNN interview that he knew a year ago that Disney would not distribute the film, according to a report from independent.co.uk.
Moore told CNN, "Almost a year ago, after we'd started making the film, the chairman of Disney, Michael Eisner, told my agent he was upset Miramax had made the film and he will not distribute it."

The lightning rod film producer claims that he had a contract with Disney for distribution, but according to independent.co.uk, a source close to Miramax (the subsidiary involved in the film) said that the deal was for financing, not for distribution.

Moore?s admission prompts the question, why all the outrage now? Easy answer? Publicity baby! The film is set to premier at the Cannes Film Festival later this month. The politically charged film can easily generate controversy and press on it?s own. It is reportedly an attack film against the Bush administration that questions the President?s handling of the War on Terror and the events surrounding the 9/11 attacks. According to some news outlets, the film even attempts to link the Bush family with the family of Osama Bin Laden, in pure Michael Moore style.

This publicity stunt may backfire. If Moore will take a year old event and use it to drum up publicity, it might lead to questions regarding the credibility of some of the issues covered in his film and the spin Moore puts on them.

Donny 05-06-2004 06:01 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by DonovanPhillips
This publicity stunt may backfire. If Moore will take a year old event and use it to drum up publicity, it might lead to questions regarding the credibility of some of the issues covered in his film and the spin Moore puts on them.
Yep, just like the spin he put on Columbine. Ridiculous lies.

baddog 05-06-2004 06:08 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by JBdeB
Mr Moore was not immediately available to answer the charge that he was creating controversy for promotional purposes. He is still at work finalising the print he will take to Cannes.

_

So what? He already said it to CNN, you think he has to respond to every paper that comes up and asks for further comment?

EviLGuY 05-06-2004 06:18 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by DonovanPhillips
Moore admits it was all a publicity stunt, eh? Fuck him.

What were all you supporters saying?

That bastard.. I feel like the time I found out the tooth fairy was actually my mom. I killed the bitch.

:Graucho

Mr.Fiction 05-06-2004 06:25 PM

The quote in the article does not match the headline!

Michael Moore says he was assured by Miramax that the movie would be distributed - that the problems would be worked out by now.

The headline is right wing propaganda. Read the article!


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:30 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123