![]() |
Okay, dumb ass Michael Moore Supporters, What were you saying now??
Moore admits it was all a publicity stunt, eh? Fuck him.
What were all you supporters saying? |
no comment
|
publicity stunt or george bush....hmmmm i wonder which I'll take...
|
I'm sure he does
|
Quote:
"That's like saying, Rush Limbaugh, or John Kerry." There is no "choice" between the two. |
lol a stunt?... Disney CEO Michael Eisner confirmed what Moore was saying yesterday on TV...
Now I hope you have a news link backing you up? |
:helpme
|
Quote:
Here you go, ignorant one: Moore admits Disney 'ban' was a stunt By Andrew Gumbel in Los Angeles 07 May 2004 Less than 24 hours after accusing the Walt Disney Company of pulling the plug on his latest docu.mentary in a blatant attempt at political censorship, the rabble-rousing film-maker Michael Moore has admitted he knew a year ago that Disney had no intention of distributing it. The admission, during an interview with CNN, undermined Moore's claim that Disney was trying to sabotage the US release of Fahrenheit 911 just days before its world premiere at the Cannes film festival. Instead, it lent credence to a growing suspicion that Moore was manufacturing a controversy to help publicise the film, a full-bore attack on the Bush administration and its handling of national security since the attacks of 11 September 2001. Continued Here: http://news.independent.co.uk/world/...p?story=518901 |
Thanks for spreading the word.:drinkup :drinkup
|
Quote:
|
In other words, manufactured drama for his manufactured "docu.mentaries". What an idiot!
|
umm. so what?
|
Quote:
|
still better than bush
|
Quote:
You're a fucking moron. Michael Moore has NO relevance to this year's election. Do you honestly think that simply because he's a liberal, he's somehow associated with our next President (John Kerry, if I could have my choice)?? So, I guess the Unabomber, as a liberal, should somehow be thrown into the mix with a line as ignorant as yours: The Unabomber, or George Bush ?? It doesn't compute, asshat! "George Bush or John Kerry?" makes sense. "Liar Michael Moore or George Bush" makes no sense. There is no relation whatsoever between the two. |
Quote:
|
gee, someone has their knickers in a twist
:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh |
"But Moore's publicity stunt, <b>if</b> that is what is, appears to be working"
LOL And the guy start by "Moore <b>admits Disney 'ban' was a stunt</b> " .... Cant you make the difference between a serious journalist and an idiot giving his opinion on a subject... !? His article proves noting... nice try... p.s. go check out other sites.. cnn.. foxnews.. drudge... if you see nothing.. ask yourself some SERIOUS questions... lol |
Give Bush a break hes a decent dictator
|
Publicity "stunt" = get publicity for your project. So...?
Besides, Miramax backed the project anyway because they thought Disney would change its mind. So the news appears to be that Disney won't do it despite Miramax thinking it would. |
Quote:
Michael Moore's actions, on the other hand, prove quite a bit. He's still manufacturing data to promote HIMSELF. He really has no other agenda. You sound almost as ignorant as Rush Limbaugh's supporters. Think for yourself, man. And if you must know, I am NOT a Bush supporter (at least not the Yale educated kind... I particularly like the unshaven Bush I see around here from time to time). My vote will be for John Kerry this year (although I wish Wesley Clark was the nominee). |
Quote:
|
Bush's life is a publicity stunt
|
Everything that fat sack of shit does is a publicity stunt. If being Right Wing Conservative russled some feathers and was the "little man" he'd be all over it like a fat bitch on a ding dong!
|
Do you read the first three lines and pass stupid judgements?
Read the whole story first. This is the end....... The only thing that's new here is in Disney's reaffirmation of their previously stated position," one well-placed source said on condition of anonymity. "Miramax never said it was distributing the film, even if people assumed it would find a way." The source also denied that Fahrenheit 911 was causing any significant personal friction between Mr Eisner and Mr Weinstein, pointing out that they could hardly be getting along worse as it is. "There's plenty of other issues to have catfights over," he said. Mr Moore was not immediately available to answer the charge that he was creating controversy for promotional purposes. He is still at work finalising the print he will take to Cannes. _ |
Quote:
"The admission, during an interview with CNN..." Moore doesn't need to be around "answer any charges" if he's already made "an admission". |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
You're letting that fat fucking lying piece of shit off easy!:1orglaugh |
I fucking hate Michael Moore. That loud mouth bitch needs to do something more constructive with his time than make low quality movies.
|
I never liked him. Don't know why so many people thought he was an activist... he was just feeding off of controversy to get attention. He's no better than a board troll :1orglaugh
|
Quote:
AMEN! |
Whatever not like it's a big deal compared to all the lies told ppl
|
I siad he was faking yesterday... neener neener neener.
I think he has been talking to pimpdog... you know, any publicity is good publicity. |
It seems he's in need of publicity, even bad ones!
|
Here's another news story about it:
http://www.antimusic.com/news/04/may/item20.shtml antiTainment NEWS: Michael Moore Lied About Disney Ban 05-06-04 Keavin . Michael Moore made a big stink earlier this week when he accused Disney of pulling the plug on his latest film, ?Fahrenheit 911?. He decried Disney?s decision not to distribute the film as politically motivate censorship. However, Moore was crying wolf. He admitted in a CNN interview that he knew a year ago that Disney would not distribute the film, according to a report from independent.co.uk. Moore told CNN, "Almost a year ago, after we'd started making the film, the chairman of Disney, Michael Eisner, told my agent he was upset Miramax had made the film and he will not distribute it." The lightning rod film producer claims that he had a contract with Disney for distribution, but according to independent.co.uk, a source close to Miramax (the subsidiary involved in the film) said that the deal was for financing, not for distribution. Moore?s admission prompts the question, why all the outrage now? Easy answer? Publicity baby! The film is set to premier at the Cannes Film Festival later this month. The politically charged film can easily generate controversy and press on it?s own. It is reportedly an attack film against the Bush administration that questions the President?s handling of the War on Terror and the events surrounding the 9/11 attacks. According to some news outlets, the film even attempts to link the Bush family with the family of Osama Bin Laden, in pure Michael Moore style. This publicity stunt may backfire. If Moore will take a year old event and use it to drum up publicity, it might lead to questions regarding the credibility of some of the issues covered in his film and the spin Moore puts on them. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
:Graucho |
The quote in the article does not match the headline!
Michael Moore says he was assured by Miramax that the movie would be distributed - that the problems would be worked out by now. The headline is right wing propaganda. Read the article! |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:30 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123