![]() |
america bombing israel
why doesnt america bomb israel and north korea for thier weapons of mass destruction?
is bush a pussy? israel has nukes and other wmd's and attacks its niegbours on a daily basis. north korea has nukes but doesnt attack anyone... hmm wait a minnute america has nukes too.........i forgot, bush is god right? so hes allowed? fucking hypocrites:thumbsup |
go away
|
america doesn't bomb israel coz they are one of the best consumers for americas weaponsales... :321GFY
|
that would be my wet dream!
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
America is stopping the spread of WMD's, yet they funded Israel in getting theirs. Perhaps it has something to do with the media?
|
Quote:
Hussain was hand picked by the CIA, and was the best friend the US had had since Batista. Hussain invaded Iran for the US. He thought he had the permission of the US to acquire Kuwait. What a fuck up. For all the adminstration's lies about wanting democracy, they truely want stable, loyal dictatorships. Unfavourable elections like the recent one in Spain are a real pain in the ass. :rasta |
USA with patriot act is like USSR
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
and made a conflict the rest took its own obvious toll |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
SEARCHING..you are a fucking moron! Isreal is our ally..dumbass!... bombing them would be like us bombing ourselves..geezus fuckin' christ
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
dont argue with "theking" and "dav555id"
those are the most dumbest political arguying morons on the whole board both talking shit, when they have no clue, on what continent the USA is located |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The U.S. provided financial aid, military intelligence, and actual military planning to Iraq at a time when the Reagan administration was well aware that Iraq was using chemical weapons against Iran. One anonymous inside source told the New York Times that the Pentagon ?wasn't so horrified by Iraq's use of gas. It was just another way of killing people ? whether with a bullet or phosgene, it didn't make any difference.? The facts surrounding U.S. covert support for Iraq and its awareness that Iraq had been using chemical warfare against the Iranians, and perhaps the Kurds, offers serious implications to the current Bush administration's argument for 'regime change' in Iraq. One of the main premises of the administration's argument is that Saddam Hussein must be removed from power because he is 'evil' - referring of course to the allegation that Saddam Hussein 'gassed his own people.' USA knew it all along, but never acted, only after many years later, when Bush had to finish some business |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Full List Of 24 U.S. Weapons Suppliers To Iraq:
"Of course we know the Iraqis have weapons of mass destruction. We have the receipts." A = nuclear program, B = bioweapons program, C = chemical weapons program, R = rocket program, K = conventional weapons, military logistics, supplies at the Iraqi Defense Ministry and the building of military plants. U.S. CORPORATIONS: 1 Honeywell (R, K) 2 Spectra Physics (K) 3 Semetex (R) 4 TI Coating (A, K) 5 Unisys (A, K) 6 Sperry Corp. (R, K) 7 Tektronix (R, A) 8 Rockwell (K) 9 Leybold Vacuum Systems (A) 10 Finnigan-MAT-US (A) 11 Hewlett-Packard (A, R, K) 12 Dupont (A) 13 Eastman Kodak (R) 14 American Type Culture Collection (B) 15 Alcolac International (C) 16 Consarc (A) 17 Carl Zeiss - U.S (K) 18 Cerberus (LTD) (A) 19 Electronic Associates (R) 20 International Computer Systems (A, R, K) 21 Bechtel (K) 22 EZ Logic Data Systems, Inc. (R) 23 Canberra Industries Inc. (A) 24 Axel Electronics Inc. (A) |
Quote:
i bet this monkey (theking) was never outside USA |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
what's up with all these threads lately? Someone needs a new hobby.
|
Quote:
theking, let me know me if that's not true :winkwink: |
Quote:
1953: U.S. overthrows Prime Minister Mossadeq of Iran. U.S. installs Shah Pahlavi as dictator 1954: U.S. overthrows democratically-elected President Arbenz of Guatemala. 200,000 civilians killed 1963: U.S. backs assassination of South Vietnamese President Diem. 1963-1975: American military kills 4 million people in Southeast Asia. September 11, 1973: U.S. stages a coup in Chile. Democratically-elected President Salvador Allende assassinated. Dictator Augusto Pinochet installed; 5,000 Chileans killed 1977: U.S. backs military rulers of El Salvador. 70,000 Salvadorians and four American nuns killed 1980s: U.S. trains Osama bin Laden and fellow terrorists to kill Soviets. CIA gives them $3 billionÊ 1981: Reagan administration trains and funds 'contras' 30,000 Nicaraguans die. 1982: U.S. provides billions in aid to Saddam Hussein for weapons to kill Iranians. 1983: White House secretly gives Iran weapons to kill Iraqis. 1989: CIA agent Manuel Noriega (also serving as president of Panama) disobeys orders from Washington. US invades Panama and removes Noriega 3,000 Panamanian civilian casualties 1990: Iraq invades Kuwait with weapons from the U.S. 1991: U.S. enters Iraq. Bush Sr. reinstates dictator of Kuwait. 1991- present: American planes bomb Iraq on a weekly basis. U.N. estimates 500,000 Iraqi children die from bombings and sanctions. 1998: Clinton bombs "weapons factory" in Sudan. Factory turns out to be making aspirin. 2000-01: U.S. gives Taliban-ruled Afghanistan $245 million in "aid." September 11, 2001: Osama bin Laden uses his CIA training to 'allegedly' murder 3,000 people. ~ 'Bowling For Columbine', Michael Moore what part of this you do not understand? 1982: U.S. provides billions in aid to Saddam Hussein for weapons to kill Iranians. 1983: White House secretly gives Iran weapons to kill Iraqis. ~ Sources: The History Channel, Twentieth Century Atlas, Israeli government, Federation of American Scientists, International Rescue Committee, International Institute for Strategic Studies (citing World Military and Social Expenditures), World Priorities. |
Quote:
theking, let me know me if that's not true :winkwink: |
Quote:
|
In Iraq, a decade of harsh sanctions under US pressure has strengthened Saddam while leading to the death of hundreds of thousands of Iraqis - perhaps more people "than have been slain by all so-called weapons of mass destruction throughout history", military analysts John and Karl Mueller wrote in Foreign Affairs in 1999.
Washington's present justifications to attack Iraq have far less credibility than when President Bush No. 1 was welcoming Saddam as an ally and a trading partner after the Iraqi leader had committed his worst brutalities - as in Halabja, where Iraq attacked Kurds with poison gas in 1988. At the time, the murderer Saddam was more dangerous than he is today. As for a US attack against Iraq, no one, including Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, can realistically guess the possible costs and consequences. Radical Islamist extremists surely hope that an attack on Iraq will kill many people and destroy much of the country, providing recruits for terrorist actions. They presumably also welcome the "Bush doctrine" that proclaims the right of attack against potential threats, which are virtually limitless. The President has announced that: "There's no telling how many wars it will take to secure freedom in the homeland". That's true. Threats are everywhere, even at home. The prescription for endless war poses a far greater danger to Americans than perceived enemies do, for reasons the terrorist organisations understand very well. Twenty years ago, the former head of Israeli military intelligence, Yehoshaphat Harkabi, also a leading Arabist, made a point that still holds true. "To offer an honourable solution to the Palestinians, respecting their right to self-determination - that is the solution of the problem of terrorism," he said. "When the swamp disappears, there will be no more mosquitoes." http://www.theage.com.au/articles/20...115935105.html |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Saddam is just a typical spawn of CIA in a same way as Osama. Everyone remembers the time when States were supporting Taliban and Al'Quaeda in Afghanistan. BTW, the local TV is going to show Rembo III on Saturday. I'll watch it for sure (it's very curiously to see good American superhero Rembo helping peaceful Taliban people to get rid of Russians and accumulate some power to bomb NY on 9/11).
|
Quote:
ahhh please.... silly americans did not know that they were selling your excuse is soo pathetic, why dont you attack china, they make a lot of soap!! it is dangereous because from glucose you can make bombs and dynamite!! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:43 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123