Do you believe that the United States landed on the moon
 

I personally don't think that anyone has ever been to the moon. In fact, I don't believe that a spacecraft can even leave the orbit of the Earth, because of the Van Allen radiation belt. What do you think? And why.

:sleep

we didn't land on the moon

the moon landed on us

your a douche

Its an interesting theory and I wouldnt put it past us to have staged something like that. Especially in light of the race to beat the Russians to it...

I really have no reason though to not believe it.

Not sure, it's kind of weird that you can't see the landing spot and the american flag on the moon. Even from the best telescopes we have on earth that can see all the way to other planets and beyond. :helpme

I think that by now we've been to the moon, but the first "landing" was faked.. look at all the social pressures we had from the soviet union. had they been on the moon first NASA would've lost a lot of funding. it was one big stretch to get some cash if you ask me. :Graucho

yes i agree no crafts have left the earth, all the satelites were put in space by a group of martian men trying to spy on the gov'ts.

NO U FUCKING SLAPFUCK IDIOT WE DID!

I've never seen that first hand, if I ever do, then I will have no doubts. But right now there is way too much shit that doesn't make sense.

I didn't say anything about satellites fuckface. I said the moon. There is a difference, obviously there are machines that can orbit Earth.

:1orglaugh

read wat u said u inbred hawaiin monkey:


STOOOOOPID

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

ill agree with the person who said u were a douche.

It's the people of the US,
not the US.

Exactly, "Leave the orbit of the Earth." Satellites ARE WITHIN THE EARTHS ORBIT. And I am not Hawaiian, I just live here. Dumb mother fucker.

:1orglaugh

i did saw the Conspiracy story about such biggest hoax ever made.

Somebody's mad because they just realized they're a dumbass. Sorry MetaMan.

saw it too, but why would they do that

It was during the Cold War, the Soviets had already sent a satellite into orbit and the American people were getting nervous that we were behind in technology. That's the Cliff Notes version.

where the fuck is your brain at, seriously, how the fuck do u think the mars rover reaches mars?

it left the orbit! WOW awesome!

Obviously I don't believe that shit either. This is what's wrong with this fucking country, no one questions ANYTHING. The media tells you one thing and you believe it like it's the fucking word of God. The government lies to it's people all the time, all governments do. Stop believing everything you see on TV and hear on the radio.

We are all in the Matrix

look dude i seriously dont care, ive had this argument with a few of my idiot friends who will belive any conspiracy that a star trek fag will put infront of their faces.

USA or many other of the 1st world countries can easily build technology to leave earths orbit.

it sound like somethin US would do.
They scam shit just to say "they are the shit"

I do belive the moon landing was fake 2!
I don't beleive they ever landed on teh moon. First off the Russians were the first to send a rocket to space. USA didn't like that at all, so the president at the time promissed the USA that they will land on the moon before the '70's, it's so stupid to promisse something like that in the first place. And just in the nick of time in '69 (keeping the promissed time) the Americans are on the moon! It's bullshit, its a big hoax! The reason they did it, is cuz they felt threathend by the fack that the russians are flying around the world and ofcourse NASA, they would have been bankrupt if they didnt' come up with some bullshit! I'm fucking tired and prolly not making much sense but the main idea is there so fuck u, u brainwashed fuckers! I dont belive anything anymore until I see it with my own EYES!

I've never seen an episode of star trek or star wars or any of that scifi shit. Apparantly you do care, otherwise you wouldn't keep posting about it. As far as I am concerned, this debate is over between you and me. The following picture explains why, please keep it in mind.

http://csbd.org/argue/argue.jpg

Thank you, finally someone with some fucking sense. Isn't it odd that Neil Armstrong's footprint left a 2 inch crater, while the landing pod whatever with thousands of pounds of thrust didn't leave a crater at all? Start questioning shit.

Lensman is my hero

I've heard that the "set up" might have been done by Stanley Kubrick.... gossip ? I guess we'll never know for sure :winkwink:

I heard that too.


Stanley Kubrick was a genius. :2 cents:

Last time I checked, he made a footprint, not a "crater". And how do you know the lander didn't leave marks in the lunar soil? I mean who stayed behind to photograph it after it took off?

Some people on this thread are fucking idiots.

I'll leave it up to you readers to decide who. Have fun!

jesus a lot of stupid people

A footprint is a crater, the picture of the footprint shows clearly that it had left an indentation on the surface of "the moon." The lunar lander thing landed vertically, so it would have to have had thrust to land softly. Also, the flag in the picture is blowing, and there is no wind on the moon. :2 cents:

Can you start a good thread for once?

Before anyone else has a chance to dispute the definition of a "crater," here is what the word crater means according to dictionary.com

cra*ter

1. A bowl-shaped depression at the mouth of a volcano or geyser.


2. A bowl-shaped depression in a surface made by an explosion or the impact of a body, such as a meteoroid.


3. A pit; a hollow.

HAHA. Yeah, cause you've been here for a day and seen all my thread posts. :321GFY