Perfection Girls = SCAM
 

There is an old saying, "Good things happen to good people." I do not feel bad for any situation that Jeff from Perfection Girls finds himself in. He should trying taking care of business with his models first and then worry about the rest. It's just funny how he can go around and buy space, ads, traffic, and whatever else, but some of his models haven't been paid in MONTHS.

Trying taking care of the girls who are making you the money and good things may happen!

You mean this person?... http://board.gofuckyourself.com/show...threadid=87169



Should I have
<img SRC="http://members.shaw.ca/billy1-99/pics/popcorn.gif">
for breakfast?

Wow, this guy has really had his name dragged through the virtual mud this past week.

Hey Mr. Smith, hit me on icq please: 125586484

Jeff is a liar, a thief, and has no respect for the people who make him his money. He doesn't even return phone calls and makes up ridiculous lies to attempt to cover his tracks. He has bounced several checks to his models and then blames it on some mysterious "bank error"??

Personally, I would not do business with him or would, at minimum, collect payment in CASH and Up Front!

I'm kinda surprised he didn't make some attempt at damage control on here.

How can you be behind on paying models? Doesn't everyone pay them cash on the spot?

Guilt maybe:helpme

He pays his models monthly + percentage of sales. His checks bounce, he avoids phone calls, and changes his number so people can't contact him.

He is giving legitimate webmasters a bad name.

Always pay per shoot, by the hour.

I agree... girls that do this need $$ on the spot and don't have time to wait for a check. All my girls get paid the same day, including the single girl sites I have. It's alot easier and cheaper :2 cents:

some of these sleazy operators work % deals with girls on websites, a % of the revenues. Usually the girl winds up with shit, or even ZERO, nada, nothing.

U hear that John Stevens you fucking scumbag thief, soon every model who logs on to OMP is going to know your game bitch. Time for you to see how I do business when I'm pissed cocksucker. :feels-hot

I don't want to be " partner" with a model.

I shoot the stuff, they sign the release, provide proper ID, they get cash on the spot, and they are out of my life... unless I call them for another shoot.

If you can't pay them now, you probably won't be able to pay them later anyway....

HA!

Hell no.

Who wants to fuck Jeff in the ass and make a site of it?

Whatever yo do threat your ladies with respect got dammit!
:2 cents:

Although I do not support the percentage thing...Some of the smarter models have asked for it. I still tell them no. My point is that just because somebody offers a percentage does not automatically make them sleazy.....Just stupid and possibly broke or they would pay the model up front.

Yeah..."threat them with respect got damnit!"

How many webmasters/producers routinely refer to models as whores, sluts, bitches, hoes, whatever......?

If that's not showing respect then I do not know what is. :thumbsup

I have to disagree with this.

We have, a few times, opted to pay models a percent of the revenue rather than a flat fee.

Why would we do this? Because the only group of people that are more transient than strippers and nude models are, well, transients.

If a model is outstanding, and we want to make sure that we are able to contact them again for more work, we will offer them a percentage. When they know they have a check coming each month, they always let us know where they are. Also, models paid on a percentage, are willing to be more "aggressive" than they might have been for a flat fee.

Case in point, Sabrina and Katrina, 18 year old identical twins, swapping spit.

http://www.webvirgins.com/ppics/sextion01/snkat085.jpg

this is true for sure. i have two girls who want paysites, and i will have to pay them a % of revenues, because that is what they believe is fair. I'd rather pay them a decent amount per month but in their mind they think they are going to do better, which they may, so I see their point. My worry is that they are not going to be able to understand the costs of running their sites, they'll look at the number of members and do some elementary math and go 'WTF? The site makes $10,000 a month, where's my 5 grand?'.

That's one of many reasons. I am pretty sure that most people here are familiar with Toni Freeland by now. The site is based on her but she does not get a percentage. We pay her a set figure per shoot and she gets a completion bonus for every so many updates we shoot. This completion bonus makes her more apt to return and continue shooting so she can hit the next "land mark" and get the extra money. Having her under contract for a set number of updates also helps. :)

Another way to keep the girls comming back, in the case of a single girl type of site, is to put them on a weekly webcam show and pay them $X each week for being there. We are starting this next week with Toni and in the future, we intend to allow her to upsell members for a 1 on 1, private show and give her a percentage of the upsell.

If she gets lazy on the private shows, we still maintain our profits from the regular site subscriptions.....In this case, it will only hurt her if she begins to slack off.

No. Company cheque at the end of the day after the shoot at the same time as release and ID info is sorted, witnessed and photographed. :2 cents:

Why would you pay them cash? You're missing out on the write-off.

You make sure you've got a receipt... the accountant figures all that shit out. It's called model expense

Sly was figuring when the guy said 'pay cash' it was under the table off the books.

:thumbsup :thumbsup

Twin sisters kissing is sexy.

Yep. :)

We do.

I think a bounced check might be invalidating the model release as well. But then if he has no money, what are the girls to do? No poing in trying to get blood out of a stone, best thing to do is cut off his supply of girls. Inform the agents and if he's getting girls via advertising get the girls to complain to the papers he uses.

You sort the ID out at the END of the day?

Paul is right... Failure to pay up the terms of the model release could invalidate the entire model release, and thus his (or his customers') right to use those photos. Pay upfront, its much simpler.

ditto that shit! :Graucho

This troubles me. I am told the same thing, twice.

The ID is checked before the shoot begins for obvious reasons but is photographed with the model holding it when the release is filled out. We photograph the model holding his/her ID, holding the model release and the check as well.

I am very familiar with TF. My main breadwinner.
WOW! The site gets even better!

Thanks for the feedback. I am happy it is doing well for you. :glugglug

Bump for Dana....

These guys will never learn :(

:BangBang:

bump