Will crockett be banned for calling your president a pedo?
 

Old GFY rules:
Illegal Sites and pedo. Don't post links to illegal sites. Calling someone a Pedo, Referring to them as a Pedo, Stating they promote Pedo, posting of Pedo links, and Death Threats are now grounds for immediate banning. Pedo material should also not be posted on GFY. This should be sent to ASACP | Association of Sites Advocating Child Protection. Violations will be warning first, banning if violation is repeated.

https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-p...on-2020-a.html

https://i.imgur.com/e9P7MXG.jpg

Good question op

You really are little bitch.. Can't argue the facts so you resort to this...

Court documents where 13 year old girl states Trump raped her... It's public record dumb fuck...

https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000...8-b6fe46f40000


Not only was there testimony by the victim but also a witness..

In June, 1994 while performing my duties as a recruiter of adolescent women to attend Mr. Epstein's parties, I met a 13-year-old adolescent woman, the Plaintiff in this matter, at the Port Authority in New York City who said that she had come to New York City in the hope of starting a modeling career.


6. I persuaded the Plaintiff to attend a series of parties of Mr. Epstein that took place during the summer of 1994. I told her that, if she would join me at the parties, she would be introduced to people who could get her into the modeling profession and she would be paid for attending.

7. It was at these series of parties that I personally witnessed the Plaintiff being forced to perform various sexual acts with Donald J. Trump and Mr. Epstein. Both Mr. Trump and Mr. Epstein were advised that she was 13 years old.

8. I personally witnessed four sexual encounters that the Plaintiff was forced to have with Mr. Trump during this period, including the fourth of these encounters where Mr. Trump forcibly raped her despite her pleas to stop.

Haha..... Banned by who?

He and bladewire and a few others have destroyed this place and no one cared. Too late to save it now.

OMG it's COURT RECORD!!!! That means it's THE TRUTH!!! It's not like anyone can just say anything and file it with the courts, you idiots!

crockett wins again!

Not only did the girl testify to that but also her manager testified under oath.. Your Pedo king used his lawyer to threaten them and make the girl fear for her life and her family's life until she dropped the case..

Trump was never found guilt.. the victim was on record stating she dropped the charges because she was in fear for her safety..

So fuck off..

This is what Red Hats now defend...



Plaintiff was subject to acts of rape, sexual misconduct, criminal sexual acts,
sexual abuse, forcible touching, assault, battery, intentional and reckless infliction of emotional
distress, duress, false imprisonment, and threats of death and/or serious bodily injury by the
Defendants that took place at several parties during the summer months of 1994. The parties
were held by Defendant Epstein at a New York City residence that was being used by Defendant
Epstein at 9 E. 71st St. in Manhattan. During this period, Plaintiff was a minor of age 13 and
was legally incapable under New York law of consenting to sexual intercourse and the other
sexual contacts detailed herein. NY Penal L § 130.05(3)(a). The rapes in the first, second, and
third degrees; sexual misconduct; criminal sexual acts in the first, second, and third degrees;
sexual abuse in the first, second, and third degrees; and forcible touching (and, on information and belief, predatory sexual assault) detailed herein are unlawful under New York law, e.g., NY
Penal L § 130.20-130.52, and 130.55-130.65 (and, on information and belief, 130.95) and
constitute the torts of, inter alia, assault, battery, false imprisonment, and intentional or reckless
infliction of emotional distress, including threats of force and serious bodily harm, under New
York law. In addition, 18 U.S. Code § 2255 provides Plaintiff with a civil remedy for personal
injuries because Plaintiff, while a minor, was a victim of violations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1591, 2421,
2422(b), and 2423(a) and she suffered personal injury as a result of such violations. Declaration
of Plaintiff Jane Doe, Exhibit A hereto; Declaration of Tiffany Doe, Exhibit B hereto;
Declaration of Joan Doe, Exhibit C hereto; Jane Doe, Tiffany Doe, and Joan Doe are each
pseudonyms as each woman wishes anonymity. Tiffany Doe, a witness, was an employee of
Defendant Epstein. Exh. B. Joan Doe, a witness, was a childhood classmate of Plaintiff who, in
the 1994-95 school year, was told by Plaintiff that Plaintiff was subject to sexual contact by the
Defendants at parties in New York City during the summer of 1994. Exh. C.

Crockette has never been wrong about Trump with the only exception being every single time.

More particularly, Plaintiff was unrelentingly threatened by each Defendant that, were she ever to reveal any of the details of the sexual and physical abuse caused to her by Defendants, Plaintiff and her family would be physically harmed if not killed. The duress has not terminated and the fear has not subsided. The duress is an element of or inherent in the underlying causes of action complained of herein. The duress and coercion exerted by Defendants has been such as to have actually deprived Plaintiff of her freedom of will to institute suit earlier in time, and it rose to such a level that a person of reasonable firmness in Plaintiff's situation would have been unable to resist. Exhs. A and B.

23. Both Defendants let Plaintiff know that each was a very wealthy, powerful man
and indicated that they had the power, ability and means to carry out their threats. Indeed, Defendant Trump stated that Plaintiff shouldn’t ever say anything if she didn’t want to disappear like Maria, a 12-year-old female that was forced to be involved in the third incident with Defendant Trump and that Plaintiff had not seen since that third incident, and that he was capable of having her whole family killed. Exhs. A and B.



like Maria, a 12-year-old female that was forced to be involved in the third incident with Defendant Trump and that Plaintiff had not seen since that third incident

Let that sink in....

You need to read the docs again https://www.courtlistener.com/docket...4/doe-v-trump/

I guess $$$$ unraped her or what?

Its also in court record that Bill Clinton is a serial rapist. I don't recall you accepting that testimony as being God's word

You're strangely selective in your fake moral outrage

She stated she was in fear for herself and her family.. This was stated publicly...


OJ's gloves didn't fit so he wasn't guilty right?


If it was a sham and all lies then why didn't Trump counter sue like he has a long fucking history of doing? Why is it this one case he let drop off the face of the Earth with out trying to sue them back?

According to the rules if Donald Trump was actually a forum member he should be banned.

GFY Republicans support & defend pedophiles now.

Wow

WTF!

"This was stated publicly" .. she also said she made it all up, so what story is true?
Apart from you wanting to belive the one story that fits your agenda, what other reason is there?

“Must protect my pedophile king at all costs”

^^ one of the top quotes on Reddit for the article talking about this because Red Hats are defending Trump all the same.. This is what Republicans have become.. The party of pedos, rapists, Nazi, crooks and liars..

Dude, you know that is not how it is - dont sell yourself that short. This is not like with Donny Pauling

Nice to see American politics is just as toxic as the UKs just now. When the left dont get what they want ( Trump & Brexit ), true colours come out. Vile bullies determined to intimidate anyone who doesnt adhere to their way of thinking. Totally unable to accept that different people have the right to think and vote anyway they choose. Will literally sink to any level rather than admit defeat. This thread illustrates everything i just wrote.

No she didn't... That is a absolute 100% tabloid headline. She did not state that.. That's bull shit you Trump apologist tried to push..


PROVE IT..

User GFED called me a pedophile a few days ago here.

Nothing was done.

Nobody will be banned for calling chump a pedophile

When you elect a rapist as president this is what you get..

Like the majority (not all) of EU citizens, I do not agree with Trump. But this is not about him. It's about you calling him a Pedo with no prove to back it up.

I dont have to prove anything, its you that brings the claims, not me.

I ONLY have to prove you called him a pedo, and I did that already with a screenshot.

Yes so is death threats.. Vendildo, onwebcam & onhunglow have all stated people they disagree with should be shot.. good thing there is no "illegals" here right?

I provided proof.. it's fucking court record liar... Epistien Trump's accomplice is now in jail for raping kids & child porn.. Is that also fake news?

Was it reported?

I meant that the rules are constricted to forum members, so yeah, death threats are grounds for banning as well.

No, the court record says there is no case. I linked to it less then 15 minutes ago.

It's a court document.. the girl was in fear for her life and dropped the case.. are you dense? It's still public record. It's part of public record that both Trump & Epistien threatened to kill her if she went public..

Not true, the public records show she droped the claims, nothing more.
You are making the last part up because it fits your agenda

You are just lying at this point.. I posted the complaint.. It's states in it that she was threatened.. You are just arguing in bad faith and lying..

Trump would walk into the Miss Teen USA dressing room so he could see them undressed. Some were as young as 15. Any guy who does that is a pedo

READ the document again. She claimed to be threatend in 1994 - she have not given any reason for dropping the claim now

Let me copy it for you:

The duress imposed on me by Defendants not to ever reveal any of the details of the sexual and
physical abuse caused to me by Defendants has not terminated and the fear it has instilled in me has not
subsided. Unfortunately, making matters worse for me, I was subjected to daily painful reminders of
the horrific acts of Defendant Trump via mass media coverage of him starting last summer that, over a
short period of time, became continuous and unavoidable.

Short for you, She claimed to be threatend in 1994, but because of the media-storm last year, she was reminded of what she claimed happened... but she now took it back.

leaving for dinner.... hate on

Calling someone a pedo means calling someone on this board a pedo.

It surely doesn't apply to someone who isn't on this board, isn't in our industry, has been accused of rape a dozen times, and was just accused in court of raping a thirteen year old girl.

So, no.

Not to mention Epstien is quite literally a "convicted" pedo and is now in jail for it a "2nd" time...

Because they can not "legally" drop a case because of fear or threats from the defendants.. and no that does not say she admitted to making it up.. but outside pressure was too much for her to continue..

Again you are lying..



I was subjected to daily painful reminders of the horrific acts of Defendant Trump via mass media coverage of him starting last summer that, over a short period of time, became continuous and unavoidable.

a 13 year old junky at a sex party... it is clear she was there to read the bibles in the back room.

So this is what you have now become? Defending Trump by calling his rape accuser a "13 year old junky at a sex party".. This is how deprived you have become. Congrats on your quest of becoming 100% cult member..


So mr doesn't think for a moment of what he says before he says it.. What would that then say about Trump & Epstein that they had a 13 year old "junky" hanging around at a sex party?

Also why was a 13 year old girl even "working" at Trump's resort? That in and of it's self violates federal child labor laws..

one word "credibility" you spend your days with this bullshit?? get out and enjoy something you like. hell do something you don't usually do.