I have a lot of respect for Tulsi Gabbard. She's the only one who could challenge President Trump
 

She's the only Democrat candidate who is anti-war and supportive of America's working class.

The rest of the candidates on that stage were complete lunatics, yelling at each other in Spanglish about giving abortion rights to trannies.

Tulsi is a throwback to when Democrats were relatively decent.

But the party has moved way past her, and wants nothing to do with her pro-America and anti-war politics. She appears to have won the debate among the rank-and-file voters, but the party apparatus is dead set against her.

Just like Bernie in 2016. The only question is will she do the same as Bernie, and run away with a smile a bag of cash? Or will she maintain her integrity and fight to the end?

She did a good job last night but apparently she is anti-gay... Someone posted some pretty convincing video I remember.

She simply cannot get the nomination. She may be this month's Buttigieg, i.e. a flash in the pan.

Joe Biden is a weak candidate (you'll see) but Warren is not. Maybe this became a little more of a race.

She's not anti-gay, she just doesn't think we need to base our entire national discourse around anal sex.

You're right that Buttplug is a flash in the pan. He's dumb and useless, and nobody likes him, except for people who want to signal how pro-gay they are.

Warren is a self-righteous scolding lecturing schoolmarm who has all kinds of great ideas about how you should be living your life. No thanks.

The next 10 Dems are debating tonight. Lets see how they do.

I like Tulsi Gabbard...but she came off as flat, rehearsed and unappealing. That was her shot and she blew it.

Castro stood out to me. Booker stood out also but I don't like that guy.

I'm immediately turned off by Beto O Rouke. he looked way out of his depth and the pandering to Latinos by answering in Spanish was cheesy and well as stupid considering there was barely enough time to answer questions.

It was a mess. Too much talking over each other and way too little time to talk. This will go much better once the herd is thinned.

Waiting for the Democrat that's for the people and tells us how they are going to make things better by raising our taxes. But what do I know, last Democratic president that lowered taxes was JFK

Trump raised our taxes and lowered them for the top 1%.

Facts are like Kryptonite to Trump supporters like you.

Marianne Williamson is right up there with Tulsi

lets see who will keyword you best...they will all do the "Lie to Voter Optimization" LVO...jerrymander regions x and y are concerned about issues z...pretend to care about z and offer magic bean solution...blue states will always vote blue...red will vote red...the swing states rule the elections...what they want, they "get"...the rest of the USA can go fuck itself...anyway, it is an amusing partial auction-democracy process...

Well, let's see how they do tonight.

See my post below :thumbsup

She will win, I have predicted it here more then 6 months ago. The only one who can beat Trump !

She was 19 and listenned to her anti gay dad...that is different now :2 cents:

:thumbsup:thumbsup

only of she breaks from the dems. the grievance stuff attached to the dems will kill her chances. :2 cents:

the fact you can't separate the person from the sports team is why your thoughts on politics have no meaning.

Nobody will listen to you if you are unwilling to at least accept there needs to be an opposition.

Also OP? there is no pro war candidates... the only war mongers left are a few establishment types in congress, a large handful of senators and a few of your presidents henchmen who have invested interests.

be careful...
according to twitter, Russia loves her, and anyone posting anything positive about her is a Russian bot.

and that video is why I like her. But when you stack her against a field of strong personalities she gets lost in the background. That won't even get her to the primary.

I've been a supporter of Tulsi from the launch of her campaign. I've donated - so put my money where my mouth is!

She is the only anti-war candidate that it legitimately willing and able to stand up to the MIC - and that means the Deep State that is all in on endless wars.

You know that she is legitimately a threat to the deep state and the Military Industrial Complex exactly because she is being branded as a "Russian stooge" by the establishment....

I hope that others who believe in peace and hope for the long-term survival of the human race will also donate a few bucks to her campaign.

That's a lie

Any idiot can see how all the alt-right hate nics on GFY & other alt-right platforms are pushing for Tulsi Gabbard. Seth Rogan, RT, Brietbart, the Intercept, Stormfront, they all love Tulsi Gabbard

She's an actual warrior and that's usually what makes someone anti-war.

Yes indeed, everyone that wants the human race to survive is behind her.
Russiaphobes - the alt left - that can't believe that Clinton could possibly have lost because she was bad (recall that Clinton planned to force Russia out of Syria by forcefully bombing all Russian military bases and air defences - which would certainly have resulted in nuclear exchange) only those blinded alt-leftists and the military complex call her a Putin puppet because she will bring about peace and detent (and give us poor humans a few more years possibly...)

That's a lie

Another lie.

Thanks for proving my point :thumbsup

dumb ass :2 cents:

Tulsi was the only candidate asked a blatant attack question last night, as if she’s the only one with “baggage.”

"The News" has tried to sabotage her campaign from the beginning, yet people actually like her anti-war pro-America message and don't really care about the gay stuff.

LOL but props for perseverance. It just shows you that no matter how unlikely a prospect, there will always be someone who fervently believes it.

If you need that many quote fingers to say things....

She seems like she has some buyers, but she can't win this cycle.

Two things tonight: Harris for the win, and Joe Biden is, as I have said here may times, a weaker candidate than he seems by the current polls. He looked and sounded like he belonged in a rest home. Best case scenario for him is a slow loss of support. RN Warren would take the spot, but she'd get slaughtered in the general. I truly believe Sen. Harris is the only one who could win decisively, were she allowed to win the nomination.

I love how a NBC commentator said the winner of the first Democrat debate was Trump. I watched a little of it, very boring and again, no American flags

#Kamala2020

After witnessing last night's debate, the circular firing squad Obama talked about is in full swing.

are you referencing 'liars'?

Agreed she would make an amazing President but she lacks one vital component, experience and we have all seen what happen when you elect someone without experience ?

No obscure female candidate touting free health care for illegals and Gun control can beat Trump.. If Clinton couldn't do it then none of them have even a slim chance.

In fact.. none of them.. male or female have even a slim chance.

Only Clinton would still have a slim chance... and she'd still probably lose again.

Sleepy Joe

I'm not talking about experience. No matter how qualified someone is, if the crucial charisma component is missing it will be difficult to rise above the others.

Chump did it and he has the charisma of a two week old turd

They said Hillary Clinton had no charisma and she won the popular vote by 3,000,000 over Trump.

Yeah, Obama was a disaster.