your PATRIOTS suck ! :) Kuwait switches to Egiptyan AMON
 

You anty-rocket systems Patriot suck a dick
All of them could not peleng and intercept iraqian ancient Assamud2
They even have not seen it !

ReAlly STUPID techniques :1orglaugh because it's AMERICAN :1orglaugh
Rockets that fall in any country except IRAQ (the whole fucking region under attack
And anti-rocket systems that hit coalition aircraft, instead of Iraqian rockets :1orglaugh

Kuwait is switching to egyptian AMON now.. I strongly recommend them russian S-300 (the best anti-EVERY-FUCKING-AIR-TARGET system ever available in the WORLD) - and russian anti-rocket TOR's and Tunguska.
Whatever that exists in the air - will be ripped on very low pieces :Graucho
Even american F117 (which you consider "invisible :Graucho ) and ballistic nuclear warheads (which speed is 4.7 kilometres per second)

HEH u sale short icq uins with those AA rockets?

This is where the feature of "Cannot create a thread with under 100 posts" should come in to play. Actually, there are a lot of morons with over 500 posts, so I guess that doesn't do much either.

I didn't even read your post buddy, after you say "anty-rocker"...you've proved your own ignorance. Anybody that uses caps and mispells words the way you do is not worth conversing with. Hopefully your post count stays at one and you don't pollute the world with your ignorance.

the russian s300 uses the vast cellphone network of the world? impressive!

yeah thats actually pretty cool
the cell phone towers can locate the stealth plane
so us army wasted gazillions of dollars on nothing..

Cell phone network? "GUIDANCE - SECURE COMMAND GUIDANCE FLAP LID RADAR" from http://www.softwar.net/rfed.html.

"Launch data and initial guidance for the missiles is provided by a 36N85 (export designation 30N6E1) vehicle-mounted engagement radar, which has three scanning modes for engaging aircraft at ranges between 3?5km and 150km, and for engaging ballistic missiles to a maximum range of 40km." from http://cns.miis.edu/research/cyprus/s300tdms.htm

wasted? doubtful, that plane was in full operation before a lot of people on this board were born, including myself. we got our use out of it, and they're bringing up a replacement that won't be detectable.

If either of you are trying to say that either of our main two planes in action: B2 or F-117 are ineffective because "cell phone towers can detect them" are obviously misinformed. The entire Desert Storm mission in Baghdad was carried out by nothing but F-117's...all undetected, with perfect strikes. So far in Iraqi Freedom, the B2's and F-117's have had perfect missions as well...

Okay Idiots :1orglaugh

Specially for you

S-300pm and S-400

http://military.sinor.ru/C300/C400a1.jpg

http://military.sinor.ru/C300/C300pmu1.jpg

By the way - on the international exhibition of weapons in Abu-Dabi americans did not dare to compare Patriots with russian S-300 (because they knew, that their "patriots" suck and never will get a single fucking buyer if potential buyers will see, that S-300 beat patriot by EVERY characteristics

yankees never stop try to get the parts of s-300 and get how can it do the incredible things that it does - but fail :1orglaugh

So fuck off :321GFY

Is this why Afghanistan kicked your ass?

At least us "idiots" can link images correctly.

Patriot successfully engaged a British jet at over a dozen meteres. When Microsoft updates their software Patriot will again be envy of some minor wasteland countries.

I really don't have the time or patience to deal with you...you're seriously trying to say that Russian technologies are better than American technologies? Bragging and arrogance aside, it's well known and documented that the United States of America has the most sophisicated weapons on the world (even enemies, including Iraq, admit to this).

Heh, you dumb ass :1orglaugh

In Yugoslavia F-117 was hit by OLD (built in 1950s...) S-200
Even this old russian system could hit F-117, so what can we say about S-300 then ? :Graucho
Your "stealth" aicraft are seen for russian radars for a very long time already :1orglaugh and USA know that

Don't say a word about IRAQ - there are no any contemporary air-defence system's at all.. Only old shit

1 S-300 system can defend a territory of Poland or Romania (from 24 aircraft fighters, attacking from all sides at the same time)
So what will do 10 s-300 with your aviation ? :1orglaugh

I am totally sure, that if Iraq had several S-300 systems - you'd never attacked it , cause all of your aircraft was on the bottom of the sea a long time already :1orglaugh

Unfortunately you've already gone beyond your 1 post quota...it's a shame.

i didn't say it's ineffective. but, eventually when more countries catch on, it will become less effective. it must be somewhat of a concern, or the government would not be trying to come up with a new design..

We need more moderators on this board to stop dumbass no-life morons like this fucktard to start idiotic threads like this

Why is it "idiotic" for you? :) Because it shows you that american techniques SUCK ? :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Whatta stupid asshole :1orglaugh

So trying your best to prevent loss of civilian lives is considered sucking? Oh that's right, you fuckin cheatskis don't value human life too much.
How's that mecca-cola doin for you? You brainwashed yet?

Yeah, technology is advancing...nothing good will last forever. I believe even our latest F-22 has some stealth technologies while maintaining the capabilities of our F15/F16/F18s (even better than those actually). I'd imagine the US Gov't has though of all these things about 1000x deeper than you or I ever have.

yes, the f22 is an amazing aircraft. as far as "maintaining capabilities", it surpasses those. it can fly circles around an f16. i'm not aware of any "stealth capabilities" on it, but the thrust vectoring is pretty sweet.

Holy shit !
Who says about "saving lives" ??
AMericans, who are bombing civilian iraqi people and killing 60-80 of women a children there per every single fucking day ?

FUCK OFF, bastard ! :321GFY

F22 sucks too :1orglaugh

If you had any facts at all to back up what you say, you'd gain a little bit of credibility (perhaps, but I doubt it). The F22 is the most advanced aircraft in the world today.

Anti-tank missile Kornet can penetrate up to 3.9 feet of armor and can be launched from as far away as 5,500 yards. One man can kill 2 tanks each minute.

Ýòè ëþäè äóìàþò, ÷òî îíè èìåþò òàêóþ âûñøóþ òåõíîëîãèþ. Äåéñòâèòåëüíî èõ ìèêðî÷èïû ñäåëàíû â Àçèè è èõ ïðîãðàììíîì îáåñïå÷åíèè, ñäåëàííîì â Èíäèè.  ó÷åíûõ âåðøèíû äâàäöàòè ëåò âîçâðàùàþòñÿ â èõ ðîäíûå ñòðàíû è ñòðîÿò ïðåâîñõîäÿùåå îðóæèå äëÿ èõ ðîäèíû.

ban for excessive and abusive smiley usage

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh
Ah yes, for sure :1orglaugh

None of your aircraft can repeat the tricks that do russian MIG-31 and SU-35 :winkwink:
NONE !

know what's funny? several years ago we stole one of the russian fighters, i think it was the mig23. we thought it was this great technological wonder, we get it back here, start taking it apart, and what do we find?

it's controlled by vacuum tubes.

My smiles are making you angry ? :1orglaugh
Just because there is nothing for YOU to smile about ? :glugglug

Feel free to hop in a MIG-31 or SU-35 in a dogfight with a F-22 so we can cleanse the gene pool a bit.

Which can be more rugged under war conditions so your point is?

You know what's the saddest thing about DeeDal?

I bet he misses the good old days of communism. I bet he's still brainwashed and calls his parents comrade. I bet he's one of those nostalgics about the good old powerful soviet union era.

This technological wonder was built in July 1967, you stupid piece of shit :1orglaugh

Nope, I don't miss it :)
The Russia became the most powerful country in military aspect in the years of USSR, but communism was an utopia

We will develop in the right way now.. Let's wait some :)

BTW. Do you know that PRO has been built in Russia 30 years ago ? :1orglaugh

You are trying to build your own PRO now - suck and fail :) can't hit any fucking target (even that you launch yourself) :Graucho

until they pop out or break. i wouldn't exaclty call solid-state electronics unreliable.

always wondered how they can fit all that stuff into the plane....


is it still considered treason to export transistors to russia? that's what i was always told when i was younger. i would hope not by this day and age.

that's about the time that the stealth was introduced. and the f16. not entirely sure, but probably the f15 and f14 as well. i have my doubts the f18 is that old though.

oh shit, don't forget the space shuttle.

Yes your new bosses, the russian mob sure has it's people's interests to heart

http://www.hot.ee/mastap/bush_files/timecover.jpg