GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Damn Rockefellar Was Rich (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1134934)

Robbie 03-03-2014 11:37 AM

Damn Rockefellar Was Rich
 
When he died in 1937 he was the first guy to be worth over a billion dollars.

He had a little over 1.4 billion dollars in 1937 dollars (before the feds devalued the dollar).

That's worth 340 BILLION dollars in todays world!!! Holy shit!

And he gave away 550 Million (in 1937 dollars) of it to charities, unions, churches, education funds, etc.

That would be about half of it!

His personal wealth was 1/65th of the U.S. economy in 1937!

HelmutKohl 03-03-2014 11:41 AM

That is almost Mitt Romney comparable.:1orglaugh

wehateporn 03-03-2014 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HelmutKohl (Post 20003036)
That is almost Mitt Romney comparable.:1orglaugh

The two family's are close :2 cents:

Robbie 03-03-2014 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HelmutKohl (Post 20003036)
That is almost Mitt Romney comparable.:1orglaugh

Romney is a pauper comparatively. lol

Compare THE richest man in the world today: Bill Gates.
He is worth 76 billion dollars.

Even he doesn't come close to Rockefeller with 340 billion dollars (in todays money)

mineistaken 03-03-2014 11:45 AM

New world order family

wehateporn 03-03-2014 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 20003040)
Romney is a pauper comparatively. lol

Compare THE richest man in the world today: Bill Gates.
He is worth 76 billion dollars.

Even he doesn't come close to Rockefeller with 340 billion dollars (in todays money)


and the money that Rothschild, Rockefeller and the British Royal Family have makes Gates look skint :2 cents:

mineistaken 03-03-2014 11:56 AM

By the way why there is no first name in this thread? There were lots of Rockefellers...

sandman! 03-03-2014 11:57 AM

damm thats alot of $$$$ :2 cents::2 cents::2 cents:

Wizzo 03-03-2014 12:00 PM

and when asked how much money is enough? He said, "just a little bit more!" :pimp

Rochard 03-03-2014 12:01 PM

$340 billion. Holy fucking shit.

If I had $100 million I could never spend that. WTF could you spend that on - Houses?

seeandsee 03-03-2014 12:09 PM

Can i get something from that dead rich grandpa? :)

BlackCrayon 03-03-2014 12:10 PM

they weren't called robber barons for nothing.

Robbie 03-03-2014 12:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mineistaken (Post 20003062)
By the way why there is no first name in this thread? There were lots of Rockefellers...

John D. of course. He was the richest...the guy who owned Standard Oil.

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackCrayon (Post 20003091)
they weren't called robber barons for nothing.

The amazing thing is that he gave away more money than the richest guy on Earth in 2014 has ever even had.

ilnjscb 03-03-2014 12:24 PM

yet ... when he golfed he played with used balls over water hazards. He said anyone who played with new balls must be "very rich" ---- being that rich is a mindset not a goal.

BlackCrayon 03-03-2014 01:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 20003107)
John D. of course. He was the richest...the guy who owned Standard Oil.



The amazing thing is that he gave away more money than the richest guy on Earth in 2014 has ever even had.

yeah i didn't know that. did he give it away after he died or before? is anyone worth that these days?

poncabare 03-03-2014 02:04 PM

I think your low on the number, history channel states his wealth to be 660 billion in today's dollars.

Lykos 03-03-2014 02:25 PM

He was FUCKING rich :)

Jel 03-03-2014 02:40 PM

read 'Titan' :thumbsup

http://www.amazon.com/Titan-Life-Joh...dp/1400077303/

punker barbie 03-03-2014 02:45 PM

Did you watch Men Who Built America recently?

MaDalton 03-03-2014 02:50 PM

i'd settle for 1% of his daily interest per month

pimpmaster9000 03-03-2014 02:52 PM

rockefeller was probably the richest american ever...it was absurdly difficult to be a billionaire back then and he is truly the richest person in the last 100 years...

historically speaking, the rothschilds were actually trillionares...its the biggest personal wealth ever accumulated...second only to ramzes the great, this was "empire wealth" and was basically everything worth shit in the known world = ramzes took it...


my favorite character from history is emperor musa of mali :1orglaugh and I quote:

"Musa spent so much gold, particularly in Egypt, that the price of the rare metal was devalued and caused the economy of that nation to be devastated for years."

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

georgeyw 03-03-2014 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by punker barbie (Post 20003247)
Did you watch Men Who Built America recently?

I watched that, all of those men got away with murder to build their fortunes! It was insane what they did, zero ethics, kill or be killed mentality.

Joshua G 03-03-2014 08:36 PM

well nobody is going to match his feat since several of his business practices were criminalized thanks to him.

He is both the triumph of libertarianism, & a cause of its failure.

:2 cents:

Phoenix 03-03-2014 08:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 20003073)
$340 billion. Holy fucking shit.

If I had $100 million I could never spend that. WTF could you spend that on - Houses?

laws...country finances..and monopolies

mineistaken 03-03-2014 09:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by georgeyw (Post 20003275)
I watched that, all of those men got away with murder to build their fortunes! It was insane what they did, zero ethics, kill or be killed mentality.

I am in to the 4th episode of 8 and I am yet to see a murder. Even if I missed something it is definitely not "all" of them.
By the way I was expecting more shady deals and violence, I think it may be sugarcoated a lot.

Robbie 03-03-2014 09:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JoshGirls Josh (Post 20003568)
well nobody is going to match his feat since several of his business practices were criminalized thanks to him.

He is both the triumph of libertarianism, & a cause of its failure.

:2 cents:

How die he have anything to do with libertarians? The Libertarian Party was founded in 1971.
He died in 1937. lol

He was a straight up capitalist...period. He didn't believe in 1/100th of what Libertarians are for. He was just really, really good at making money.

I doubt very seriously he was pro-gay marriage, anti-war on drugs, pro-choice for abortion, anti-big govt. (hell he was one of the guys who REALLY owned the govt.).

But yeah, many regulations did come into play...but not because of his personal beliefs.

The reality is that he was a pioneer of industry that was breaking new ground. Regulation HAD to be put in place as there was nothing like Standard Oil before.

Electricity had made kerosene lamps pretty much obsolete. He put his people to work on finding something to do with the "waste" product of refining oil. Turned out that "waste product" was gasoline and his fortune went through the stratosphere.

It was all new. Never done before.

They had great successes and they did some things wrong too. Thus the regulations.

There is no way that ANYBODY would have been able to do it any other way. Nobody yet know WHAT to regulate about the oil industry and the new combustion engine, etc.

They figured it out as they went along.

Joshua G 03-03-2014 10:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 20003592)
How die he have anything to do with libertarians? The Libertarian Party was founded in 1971.
He died in 1937. lol

He was a straight up capitalist...period. He didn't believe in 1/100th of what Libertarians are for. He was just really, really good at making money.

I doubt very seriously he was pro-gay marriage, anti-war on drugs, pro-choice for abortion, anti-big govt. (hell he was one of the guys who REALLY owned the govt.).

But yeah, many regulations did come into play...but not because of his personal beliefs.

The reality is that he was a pioneer of industry that was breaking new ground. Regulation HAD to be put in place as there was nothing like Standard Oil before.

Electricity had made kerosene lamps pretty much obsolete. He put his people to work on finding something to do with the "waste" product of refining oil. Turned out that "waste product" was gasoline and his fortune went through the stratosphere.

It was all new. Never done before.

They had great successes and they did some things wrong too. Thus the regulations.

There is no way that ANYBODY would have been able to do it any other way. Nobody yet know WHAT to regulate about the oil industry and the new combustion engine, etc.

They figured it out as they went along.

my comment was not really directed at libertarianism as the modern day belief system, but rather the fact that business in the late 19th century was laizze faire, i.e. completely devoid of any government regulation, & therefore the ideal of libertarians for an economic system free from government restraint. The giant fortunes of the gilded age were a triumph of a business climate unfettered by government.

but it was not about regulations catching up to new business practices. The things John D did were criminalized. i really cant do justice about what im saying in a paragraph. The way he ran his business was considered immoral, deceitful, & ultimately made criminal acts. Thats a step beyond just regulations catching up to a new business.

Robbie 03-03-2014 10:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JoshGirls Josh (Post 20003602)
The way he ran his business was considered immoral, deceitful, & ultimately made criminal acts. Thats a step beyond just regulations catching up to a new business.

Elaborate on what you're saying. :)

"Criminal acts" is pretty broad. Since those days, the govt. has also made damn near EVERYTHING a "criminal act" lol

We aren't "allowed" by law to get high. Or to give a girl money to have sex. Or to get in our car without wearing a seat belt. Etc., etc.

So just for a good GFY history lesson...go through and pick out every bad thing that Rockefeller ever did.

I was just shocked to find out that he gave away over half of his fortune to charities. He probably did more "good" than 100 million people combined. But I guess that's overlooked today.

I had no idea he had given that much money to help people.

I'm like you and was raised being taught how "evil" he was.

That's the two things that caught me by surprise.
1) How horribly devalued the Federal Govt. has made our money.
2) That Rockefeller gave more money to people than anybody on Earth ever did before or since.

John-ACWM 03-04-2014 01:50 AM

Good thing he gave money for charity.

BettingHandle 03-04-2014 02:08 AM

Damn, John was 97 years old when he died.

HerPimp 03-04-2014 02:24 AM

Rothschild Dynasty makes the Rockefellars look like lemonade stand money.

Captain Kawaii 03-04-2014 02:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 20003622)
Elaborate on what you're saying. :)

"Criminal acts" is pretty broad. Since those days, the govt. has also made damn near EVERYTHING a "criminal act" lol

We aren't "allowed" by law to get high. Or to give a girl money to have sex. Or to get in our car without wearing a seat belt. Etc., etc.

So just for a good GFY history lesson...go through and pick out every bad thing that Rockefeller ever did.

I was just shocked to find out that he gave away over half of his fortune to charities. He probably did more "good" than 100 million people combined. But I guess that's overlooked today.

I had no idea he had given that much money to help people.

I'm like you and was raised being taught how "evil" he was.

That's the two things that caught me by surprise.
1) How horribly devalued the Federal Govt. has made our money.
2) That Rockefeller gave more money to people than anybody on Earth ever did before or since.

Sometimes old wealth mongers get scared as they home in on death. Maybe he was trying to avoid meeting the devil. lol.

Joshua G 03-04-2014 06:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 20003622)
Elaborate on what you're saying. :)

"Criminal acts" is pretty broad. Since those days, the govt. has also made damn near EVERYTHING a "criminal act" lol

We aren't "allowed" by law to get high. Or to give a girl money to have sex. Or to get in our car without wearing a seat belt. Etc., etc.

So just for a good GFY history lesson...go through and pick out every bad thing that Rockefeller ever did.

I was just shocked to find out that he gave away over half of his fortune to charities. He probably did more "good" than 100 million people combined. But I guess that's overlooked today.

I had no idea he had given that much money to help people.

I'm like you and was raised being taught how "evil" he was.

That's the two things that caught me by surprise.
1) How horribly devalued the Federal Govt. has made our money.
2) That Rockefeller gave more money to people than anybody on Earth ever did before or since.

sorry but i wont go through a history lesson on why rockefellers business practices were outlawed. those answers are publicly available to anyone who wants to find them.

a lot of life is about perspective. is john rockefeller a good man for being so philanthropic, or is he a bad man for the methods he employed to make it. Much like todays political divide, ones opinion is formed in part by the type of information one is sympathetic to.

i believe in the last line from the movie Lord of War. Evil wins. the strong prey on the weak. murderers become leaders. women get raped. Life is unfair. The rule of law is mans attempt to curb the power of being bad so that there is some semblance of justice, equal protection under the law, equal opportunity for all, etc.

This is why rockefellers business methods were outlawed, so that other people cannot do what he did.

:)

BlackCrayon 03-04-2014 07:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 20003622)
Elaborate on what you're saying. :)

"Criminal acts" is pretty broad. Since those days, the govt. has also made damn near EVERYTHING a "criminal act" lol

We aren't "allowed" by law to get high. Or to give a girl money to have sex. Or to get in our car without wearing a seat belt. Etc., etc.

So just for a good GFY history lesson...go through and pick out every bad thing that Rockefeller ever did.

I was just shocked to find out that he gave away over half of his fortune to charities. He probably did more "good" than 100 million people combined. But I guess that's overlooked today.

I had no idea he had given that much money to help people.

I'm like you and was raised being taught how "evil" he was.

That's the two things that caught me by surprise.
1) How horribly devalued the Federal Govt. has made our money.
2) That Rockefeller gave more money to people than anybody on Earth ever did before or since.

before you make him out to be a hero and a saint, think about how many people died because of standard oil.

TheDA 03-04-2014 07:47 AM

..........................

Mutt 03-04-2014 08:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackCrayon (Post 20003984)
before you make him out to be a hero and a saint, think about how many people died because of standard oil.

How many people did Standard Oil murder during Rockefeller's time?

I just read his wikipedia entry, he was a religious man, gave 10% of his earnings to the church from the time he was an enterprising boy.

He was ruthless in business believing his company could run the oil industry better than 1000 smaller independent companies and he was correct about that, the result was regular people getting oil products at a reasonable price. He believed industry like life in general was governed by Darwinism, survival of the fittest. As time went on he accepted that this was not a popular opinion and rolled and continued to profit with the punches.

Along with Andrew Carnegie he literally invented modern philanthropy, the greatest contributor to the establishment of medical science, wiped out two killer diseases.
His family were staunch abolitionists on slavery and endowed several African American colleges in the South.

If the wikipedia is more or less a basic biography of the man he was a great man. The good he brought to this world far outweighed his transgressions.

Relentless 03-04-2014 08:41 AM

Robbie,

His wealth was worth much more than that. In that era there were no regulations, no forensic accountants, nobody to keep powerful people in check.

sperbonzo 03-04-2014 08:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JoshGirls Josh (Post 20003568)
well nobody is going to match his feat since several of his business practices were criminalized thanks to him.

He is both the triumph of libertarianism, & a cause of its failure.

:2 cents:

There was nothing even REMOTELY libertarian about Rockefeller. NOT EVEN CLOSE. He used the power of government (force) to build every business he had, [through land grants, subsidies, etc...], and used the power of government (force) to keep out all of his potential competitors at the same time, [through regulations, favoritism, etc...].

He was a corporatist. Anyone that thinks he was libertarian does not have the slightest clue what libertarianism is....




...and those same practices that he used through government are being used CONSTANTLY today. They haven't gone anywhere. The government is still totally run by corporatists.

.:2 cents:



.

Why 03-04-2014 12:35 PM

son of a lifelong conman, what do you expect?

Robbie 03-04-2014 01:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Why (Post 20004445)
son of a lifelong conman, what do you expect?

The father was an elixir selling con man, the sons founded Standard Oil (pretty much the entire oil industry).

Not sure how one thing has anything to do with the other? Except maybe the son's (like most kids do), wanted to be the exact opposite of what their dad was?


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:05 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123