HOMOS LOSE: A&E lifts it suspension of Phil Robertson on Duck Dynasty.
 

http://www.deadline.com/2013/12/a-du...ing-in-spring/

Gays, the whinny little bitches of America... they're used to getting stuff on their faces.

I will have a bigger laugh when your mother is gang raped by a group of aids ridden vandals and they fill her moldy cunt and asshole with poisoned jizz. :thumbsup

Oh and if she is already dead - good. :1orglaugh

From the article:
"It had been slated to resume production in the spring, so today?s decision, which A+E said was made ?after discussions with the Robertson family, as well as consulting with numerous advocacy groups,? reverts to the show?s original filming schedule. The groups whose cooperation A+E sought are said to include GLAAD, which blasted Robertson?s initial anti-gay comments, and NAACP"

Here is what happened for real: A&E was given the green light from GLAAD and other gay groups as long as they make some large donations. That's how the shakedown happens kids.:2 cents:

We're taking our country back faggots. Go back in the closet you mentally ill scumbags.

+1
 

Dude what did his mother do to you? :)

:thumbsup

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Good luck with that...

Everyone got what they wanted here.

A&E got attention that will likely transfer into higher ratings as the new shows air. The Robertson family had tons of people run out and buy a bunch of their shit as a show of support so they got more money. GLADD and other groups likely got a donation from A&E or some kind of other deal with them and GQ got its name everywhere.

It is the media working the viewers/consumers like a finely tuned instrument.

Fags going nuts with the Phil reinstatement.

:1orglaugh Meltdown all over CNN, MSLSD, and ABC. :banana

i can better understand now your *Anyone else feel like a loser because they are too stupid for intellectually rigorous fields?* thread.

and the first two people to reply are gayer then gay

How does that work?..

This is my reply to the other thread Baddog posted about this before - Just for reference -

it was all a huge PR stunt and it worked

even got people on a porn board talking about it

:1orglaugh

You bet!! :thumbsup

Which leaves you for being the biggest fucktard to reply in this thread! :thumbsup

I read an article yesterday that this fuck was "talking about his religion". At what point in time did religion promote hatred against others?

A friend of mine recently found religion, which caused a huge problem for the family. He now hates all gays, yet his brother has been living as an openly gay man for the past fifteen years. Opps. Jackass.

And it goes over most peoples heads, :thumbsup

God has been telling people to kill other people in his name for a long, long time.

Her name...

So what? Do any of you guys care one way or the other? It's a TV show for fucks sake!

I don't get what is so bad about being gay. Religions are outdated. A lot of gay guys are better people than straight guys. Gay guys don't have the ego and "pump my chest" mentality like straight "tough guys".

GFY WINS : When over the top shock jock of a poster gets put on ignore

http://m2.gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1129712

today Dec 28th 2013 a shit was not given

WTF did they loose egzackly, what he said is not offensive .!

Is there something in the Constitution that says you have the right to not be offended? You'd think so the way people whine these days.

Looks like I found the classy part of GFY, sweet!

This is a good sign. Maybe if a few companies would stand up to small special interest groups then others would have the balls to say "fuck off" also. I can't believe I'm siding with a major corporation, but nobody should have the ability to dictate what we hear, or don't hear -- or get offended by.

Fuck Robertson also for being a caveman.

What people fail to understand is that we are born with certain basic emotions and moral senses. "Gay is bad" isn't a construction of man or religion. It exists in your brain when we are born. We evolved as a species. Homosexuality, whether you have an opinion on the right or wrong or are indifferent, still poses an evolutionary problem and there is zero evolutionary benefit to either the individual or group.

Monotheistic religions are nothing more than sets moral laws which are precisely what allowed people to live in larger and larger groups. The rules combined with the sense of "being watched all the time" coupled with "you'll go to hell if you fuck up" turn out to be insanely powerful motivators for positive behavior in groups. In fact, any cult that is based on religious beliefs of one sort or another has an infinitely greater survival rate than those whose beliefs do not incorporate religion. Religions encourage positive behavior, charity, benevolence, binds people together and so on to a much greater degree than anything else, or a lack of religion. Pointing to a few radical Muslims who live in caves and are understandably unhappy and violent, does not demonstrate that throughout history, religion has played a central role in allowing people to live in larger communities more successfully. It has been a key player in developing cooperative behaviors that have never been rivaled by any species in the history of the world. Apes still don't even cooperate. Two chimps will not pick up a log and move it together, for the benefit of each or others.

Most of those senses of right, wrong, fair, unfair, profane and so on are what we are born with. They are not learned. A 6 month old infant has a sense of right and wrong, feels empathy and compassion, understands fair and unfair and possesses a basic moral foundation and forms basic moral judgments. [A good book on that subject] It's not learned. The only thing that is learned is how we fully develop those pre-existing frameworks.. but we never spontaneously decide that putting poop in food is a good idea or that incest or bestiality is fine based on reason. We use reason to expand our ideas of why those things are wrong.

What interests me about these conversations is watching how perplexed people are, attempting to apply reason to overcome what are innate human traits. No amount of reason will convince you poop is good to eat, touch and play with. No amount of reason will convince you incest is perfectly ok (another innate moral judgement). No amount of reason will convince you that playing with a dead body is fine to do. That eating rotten food is fine. Emotions like disgust are innate and serve a purpose (whether you agree with that purpose or not). Just as no amount of reason is going to convince ALL people that being gay is ok. The reaction is not rational. It's an intuitive moral judgement which happens before conscious awareness. Everything we express unconsciously such as intuitive judgement's are instantaneous, what follows afterwards once consciousness comes into play is just a clumsy post hoc rationalization to rationalize that emotion. It will rarely make any logical sense. This is how we all go about our day. Reason and rational judgement, has very little to do with anything.

Here is a truly disturbing thing for those who profess to have no problem with gays or blacks that your unconscious brain and intuitive emotional reactions reveal about your "better than thou" character when tested. You're lying. This has been tested to death. Those who claim to have no bias, have at best, only a slightly smaller negative emotional reaction in testing to those who admit bias or are proud of their bias. The primary difference is simply how one denies/hides it and others admit it.

I am not defending monotheistic religion... just pointing out their purpose and motive.

I could not agree with you more and as usual you have stated in a clear and concise way that core of the motives of both sides in a logical way. The only problem that I have with this Duck shit is that he used religion as a basis for his statements and most people...unlike you, do not understand that they have innate behaviors that are exploited and manipulated by religions, government, even corporations.

That is the truly unfortunate aspect of this and one that I personally feel compelled to speak out about and try to educate others about. If everyone understood this..really understood it we would be much better off as a species. That will probably not happen since we evolved to have leaders who exploit and the masses who are quite happy to mindlessly follow without questioning why.

a biased post.

:winkwink:


:1orglaugh

I look at it very differently.

I look at all the stupidity and see that there is in fact a great deal of balance when you remove yourself from the discussion. The idiocy is on both sides. The arguments are almost always retarded and seemingly pointless - but the fact is that the more retarded things get, the more definitively the center is defined. The more definitively, "normal" can be defined. The mean is determined largely by the extremes.

If everyone agreed, if everyone was reasonable, if everyone was on the same page and thought the same, we would likely die off quite quickly. How does that society where every single individual believes peace and love and good will ultimately win, fight off a Nazi invasion? Doesn't this require vigorous debate? Doesn't vigorous debate require diverse views and opinions and beliefs? In the interest of vigorous debate... wouldn't those views have to be absurd in order that people experience a strong enough emotional response to get involved? As it is, we are very changeable. We are crazy. We are unpredictable. We are irrational. We are illogical. We have people who can't wait for war... we have people who abhor war. All the arguments have to be heard for a decision to be made and ultimately, more often than not, the best or correct decision wins.

We are essentially mindless zombies living under the effects of a number of complex illusions to convince us of the contrary, because nothing more is needed. Your brain doesn't need to "think". It simply needs to survive and reproduce its genes. Everything else is just busy mental work for self important idiots. The sad part is that you and I are also cogs in that machine. Two lug nuts on a Prius, debating as if we matter so much, we directly influence traffic patterns in a 10,000,000 person city, the nation and the world... and every time a car drives by missing 2 lug nuts, we pretend we didn't notice.

.

.

.

.

Too many words. Cliff notes anyone?

What did he say? Got a link to the unedited text?

.

.

CLIFF NOTES FROM HIS POST

.

.

Robertson has got a Master's degree in Education and is a millionaire.

You are a broke nobody sucking cocks for a living.

He said that as a man, female vagina is more appealing to him than a mans ass hole.

i always think that people that write long, elaborate text on the internet to convince others of their opinion, had parents that didn't allow them to speak at the dinner table