GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Police can now search your mobile phone without a warrant (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1059638)

$5 submissions 03-01-2012 03:52 PM

Police can now search your mobile phone without a warrant
 
But hey, it's limited, right? :winkwink: How bad can it get? We have to trade some freedom for SECURITY, right? :helpme

http://venturebeat.com/2012/03/01/wa...-phone-search/

Voodoo 03-01-2012 03:54 PM

Without security, we can't have freedom. We need Big Brother to tell us what we need. Absolute Power Liberates Absolutely! In Gov We Trust!

$5 submissions 03-01-2012 04:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Voodoo (Post 18794723)
Without security, we can't have freedom. We need Big Brother to tell us what we need. Absolute Power Liberates Absolutely! In Gov We Trust!

All Hail the Government. We exist only because of the Collective. Freedom can only come from total and utter slavery to the Will of the Collective.:Oh crap

combson 03-01-2012 04:01 PM

Good old USA is becoming police state.!

Jman 03-01-2012 04:02 PM

Just make a scrambler app if you ever get stop and have time, click on app and police can't see shit.

Robbie 03-01-2012 04:05 PM

The cops have got to be able to...catch you when you call your cocaine dealer or pot dealer...er, I mean stop terrorism by taking away all of your privacy.

sandman! 03-01-2012 04:07 PM

time to look for a blackberry security program

lol

$5 submissions 03-01-2012 04:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 18794798)
The cops have got to be able to...catch you when you call your cocaine dealer or pot dealer...er, I mean stop terrorism by taking away all of your privacy.

Gotta give them something to do when they're not shutting down lemonade stands

Rochard 03-01-2012 04:11 PM

I really believe that if you have nothing to hide, you have no worries. Police can search my phone at will. All they'll find is text messages from my wife asking me what kind of fast food she wants me to bring home.

LiveDose 03-01-2012 04:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 18794868)
I really believe that if you have nothing to hide, you have no worries. Police can search my phone at will. All they'll find is text messages from my wife asking me what kind of fast food she wants me to bring home.

Fast food? Michelle Obama isn't going to like that one bit. I would be concerned. You better look for that scrambler program.

Robbie 03-01-2012 05:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 18794868)
I really believe that if you have nothing to hide, you have no worries. Police can search my phone at will. All they'll find is text messages from my wife asking me what kind of fast food she wants me to bring home.

I don't know...I don't think it's any of the govt.'s business what is on your phone, or in your pocket, or what you read, or what you watch or think or have in your home.

I don't have a damn thing to "hide", but it really, really pisses me off to have a fucking cop talk to me like I'm a child and command me to obey him and give up every bit of privacy.

But I guess our society is starting to get used to it. First they made it legal for cops to search our cars back in the 1980's. And ever since then it's just creeped up more and more...so now people that don't remember what freedom feels like, just think it's "normal" to have to piss in a cup at their work, or have cops search them, or have TSA at the airport search them.

My guess is that George Washington or Thomas Jefferson wouldn't have put up with that kind of thing. It's definitely not the country I grew up in anymore in terms of freedom and liberty.

2012 03-01-2012 05:25 PM

they hate us for our freedom !

Fletch XXX 03-01-2012 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 18795176)

My guess is that George Washington or Thomas Jefferson wouldn't have put up with that kind of thing.

No and they would have most likely had a very eloquent way of insulting those who would not understand that they fought a revolution so we could have freedom and to give it away like that pisses on that sacrifice our founding fathers made.

an eloquent insult is not enough.

Robbie 03-01-2012 05:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fletch XXX (Post 18795202)
No and they would have most likely had a very eloquent way of insulting those who would not understand that they fought a revolution so we could have freedom and to give it away like that pisses on that sacrifice our founding fathers made.

an eloquent insult is not enough.

My guess is they would have found a rope and the nearest tree and started hanging politicians for treason who made these kind of laws.

bronco67 03-01-2012 05:48 PM

Are hoping to find an Ak47 in my Droid?

seeandsee 03-01-2012 05:52 PM

when we get chips under our skin, they can blow you out in 1 click

woj 03-01-2012 05:58 PM

so how would it work if the phone is password protected?

DBS.US 03-01-2012 06:30 PM

Remember this next time you text a affiliate program looking for your money.

onwebcam 03-01-2012 06:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by seeandsee (Post 18795234)
when we get chips under our skin, they can blow you out in 1 click

They already have the GPS coordinates of your front door thanks to the census workers. :thumbsup

TheSquealer 03-01-2012 06:50 PM

I guess no one can read. The court did not rule that police could search the contents of a mobile phone.

MattPIVO 03-01-2012 07:13 PM

What happens if my iPhone has a security code which I "forgot" as I got pulled over?

AllAboutCams 03-01-2012 07:30 PM

i hope that does not come here

Spunky 03-01-2012 07:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by woj (Post 18795242)
so how would it work if the phone is password protected?

Give it to them or be tazed or beaten

Socks 03-01-2012 08:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 18794868)
I really believe that if you have nothing to hide, you have no worries. Police can search my phone at will. All they'll find is text messages from my wife asking me what kind of fast food she wants me to bring home.

So opt in yourself, leave the rest of us alone.

The problem is that things change that we can't forsee, and suddenly the things that were once commonplace could be outlawed. Imagine the US decided the public can't own guns anymore, and a half a million people stand up and say I'm not giving you my gun. The police start going door to door doing gun searches, and people fight back, martial law is ordered, etc. Cops are getting shot. Suddenly you might have something to hide, because something you think is your right is taken away. You might look back and wonder why you gave away your rights, because you couldn't predict the future.

Socks 03-01-2012 08:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by woj (Post 18795242)
so how would it work if the phone is password protected?

http://www.mcsira.com/WEB/8888/NSF/W..._Userguide.pdf

http://www.suite400magazine.com/wp-c...04/6503549.jpg

SuckOnThis 03-01-2012 08:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 18794868)
I really believe that if you have nothing to hide, you have no worries. Police can search my phone at will. All they'll find is text messages from my wife asking me what kind of fast food she wants me to bring home.

Why don't you volunteer to let the govt put cameras up throughout your home? You've got nothing to hide.

SleazyDream 03-01-2012 08:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 18794868)
I really believe that if you have nothing to hide, you have no worries. Police can search my phone at will. All they'll find is text messages from my wife asking me what kind of fast food she wants me to bring home.

after having items seized by a search warrant due to a dirty cop in the past, I totally disagree.

I had nothing to hide. They took equipment that I had to replace while they investigated a crime at a next door business and that seizure cost me a lot of money. I filed for damages, it was a total scam. I had to file for total amount within 30 days of seizure to get covered for lost equipment, but the equipment was seized for almost 2 months. I didn't know total costs till after 2 months for the replacement rental equipment, but when I initially filed (after 2 weeks and within time frame), I was told I had to wait and to submit final bills when I got them. My claim was denied on the basis of being filed too late even though I had proof of initially filing within the time frame.

Turns out the warrant was bad. The cop lied on the application to get the warrant. now I'll always demand to see the application for search warrant before allowing entry, to ensure correct facts were given to the judge. Trust police, never again. EVER. Even if I have nothing to hide.

candyflip 03-01-2012 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MattPIVO (Post 18795336)
What happens if my iPhone has a security code which I "forgot" as I got pulled over?

It was just ruled this week that they can not force you to unlock an encrypted HDD. Not sure how that would apply to a locked smartphone.

raymor 03-01-2012 09:48 PM

I really want to jump on the bandwagon here. As a teenager I was known for telling cops "yes, I DO mind if you take a look there. I need to get going, so am I under arrest, or am I free to go?" Yet, Squealer is right on the facts:

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 18795307)
I guess no one can read. The court did not rule that police could search the contents of a mobile phone.

The court ruled that cops can NOT search the phone, they can ONLY get the phone number. We can probably still find reasons to disagree with the ruling, but he's right - the headline is definitely misleading.

Barry-xlovecam 03-01-2012 10:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by woj (Post 18795242)
so how would it work if the phone is password protected?

http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/201112268.pdf

Unless you are given full immunity they can't find you in contempt.

Violation of the US PATRIOT act might be an exception?
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JOHN DOE

Nos. 11-12268 & 11-15421
February 2012
p 36
Quote:

III. We hold that Doe properly invoked the Fifth Amendment privilege. In response, the Government chose not give him the immunity the Fifth Amendment and 18 U.S.C. § 6002 mandate, and the district court acquiesced. Stripped of Fifth Amendment protection, Doe refused to produce the unencrypted contents of the hard drives. The refusal was justified, and the district court erred in adjudging him in civil contempt. The district court’s judgment is accordingly REVERSED. SO ORDERED.

oscer 03-01-2012 10:38 PM

Invasion of Privacy is all i see

alextokyo 03-01-2012 11:40 PM

Time to delete all the Al Queda members, drug dealers and CP hookups from my contact list.

Oh no wait, I live in Crapan, where the police do what the fuck they want anyway. Nevermind. :2 cents:

gimme-website 03-02-2012 12:23 AM

These devices or something simular are being used in my country (Finland).
They are typicly pulled out when a kid is caught with a joint and they want to know where he bought his weed from.

Jakez 03-02-2012 12:29 AM

Last week a cop was trying to get into a friends iphone and my friend told him he forgot the password. The cop kept saying how they have a 'program' in their car that can get into the phone regardless and my friend just kept calling his bluff and telling him to go do it. Eventually the cop just got pissed off and handed him his phone back. Fuck the police.

MattPIVO 03-02-2012 12:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gimme-website (Post 18795688)
These devices or something simular are being used in my country (Finland).
They are typicly pulled out when a kid is caught with a joint and they want to know where he bought his weed from.

That's pretty much insane........I'm replacing my iPhone with a walkman and using pay phones. I have no issues at all with the police force, but at some point that is sort of ridiculous.

martinsc 03-02-2012 01:32 AM

that's fucked up......

CurrentlySober 03-02-2012 01:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 18795307)
I guess no one can read. The court did not rule that police could search the contents of a mobile phone.

Why bother to read and let the facts get in the way of some GFY righteous outrage?

DWB 03-02-2012 03:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 18795216)
My guess is they would have found a rope and the nearest tree and started hanging politicians for treason who made these kind of laws.

:2 cents::2 cents:

Paul Markham 03-02-2012 03:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 18794798)
The cops have got to be able to...catch you when you call your cocaine dealer or pot dealer...er, I mean stop terrorism by taking away all of your privacy.

Exactly.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 18795176)
I don't know...I don't think it's any of the govt.'s business what is on your phone, or in your pocket, or what you read, or what you watch or think or have in your home.

Does that include the real thing, pictures of and information about these items? Dead bodies, CP, abused children, cocaine, heroin, a drug factory, stolen good, Nuclear bombs, pirated content, etc?

for someone who argues for stronger laws in one thread, then argues against them in another I seriously wonder if you're fully thinking this through.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 18795216)
My guess is they would have found a rope and the nearest tree and started hanging politicians for treason who made these kind of laws.

Unless you were a slave as the freedom laws didn't apply to them. They were owned and no one was taking the freedom to own slaves away from anyone.

In fact when did they need a search warrant to enter someones house and search it. Or go through the pockets of a suspected criminal? I'm pretty sure if in their time they suspected a man of spying for the English they didn't go looking for a search warrant before going through his pockets.

Paul Markham 03-02-2012 04:15 AM

The situation has always been the same. What is reasonable?

Quote:

A U.S. federal appeals court ruled today that police officers can search a cell phone without a warrant.

The searches are to be limited to the device?s number; having the number enables officers of the law to request other, more specific information from carriers, such as call histories.

The case involved a drug bust in Indiana, where police used the numbers of cell phones found on the scene of a drug bust to track down and link together key players in a drug ring.
Is it reasonable to search phones found on the scene of a drug bust?

If a child is suspected by neighbors of being abused, is it reasonable for the police to intervene. Or best to wait until it might be too late?

Like all laws, the problem is in the application of them. Doesn't mean do away with laws.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:03 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123