GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   International law requires all porn sites to have a .xxx URL ending (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1047917)

GFED 11-30-2011 01:39 PM

International law requires all porn sites to have a .xxx URL ending
 
Do you think it will happen?
We all know already how ignorant most of the general public is.

Just recently the public was led to believe that a school teacher "hosted" a pornographic website from her school's laptop computer. Maybe there was some pictures stored on the computer but I doubt that the website was "hosted" from it.

There was also a man accused of browsing child pornography while flying on an airplane. Do you seriously think anyone could be that dumb?

So what would it take to convince the general public that .xxx should be a requirement for adult web sites? I don't think it would take much convincing at all.

Being a gun advocate I'm glad to have the NRA fight for my rights to own firearms.
But who's going to fight for our rights as an adult industry. Should we be segregated from the rest of the public?

Quote:

Porn sites right now use their addresses many times to trick an individual to wander into it, they then place code that does not allow you to back out, forcing you sometimes to turn off your PC.
http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/art...7#.TtaTAVawUgp

I reluctantly came along into the world wide web in the late 90s after the downfall of online BBS. I have NEVER "accidentally" wandered into a porn site.

So how long until a petition like this becomes a new law?
http://www.causes.com/causes/179734-...children/about

Paul Markham 11-30-2011 01:42 PM

Who cares if the general public thinks it's the law? They will type in the wrong domain TLD and then see it's not working. Re type it with .com at the and and find it work.

This is the type in traffic, the rest follow links.

TheDA 11-30-2011 01:44 PM

DVTimes??? You log-in with the wrong nick?

uno 11-30-2011 01:45 PM

I'm pretty sure that's always been the end-game for .xxx proponents.

DWB 11-30-2011 01:47 PM

The sooner the better. Lets just get it over with.

GFED 11-30-2011 01:54 PM

Yes, I'll probably be buying some .xxx domains myself. It's not that big of a deal to me. But I don't think it's right to be forced into it. And I do foresee this happening.

I remember this topic about five years ago. There was a lot more resistance from the industry. But I guess now the majority agrees with it.

Paul Markham 11-30-2011 01:57 PM

Does anyone suspect a mole?

nextri 11-30-2011 02:00 PM

What is international law?

Roald 11-30-2011 02:03 PM

After that the next issue will be "family friendly" ISPs blocking xxx alltogether.

2intense 11-30-2011 02:05 PM

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:thumbsup
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDA (Post 18595627)
DVTimes??? You log-in with the wrong nick?


WarChild 11-30-2011 02:09 PM

Yeah I'm sure the UN is all over it. Violated will be prosecuted in The Hague!

I seriously wonder how some of you manage to get through the day and remember to continue breathing.

spazlabz 11-30-2011 02:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GFED (Post 18595651)
Yes, I'll probably be buying some .xxx domains myself. It's not that big of a deal to me. But I don't think it's right to be forced into it. And I do foresee this happening.

I remember this topic about five years ago. There was a lot more resistance from the industry. But I guess now the majority agrees with it.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh
Seriously? All I have seen is resistance to xxx, just not a whole lot anyone can do to stop it from being approved now. But very few have come out to say they'd be buying those domains. That petition you showed was started in 2008 and has raised an OMG whopping $789.82 in that time. I don't think there is much of a threat of xxx being required for our industry under international law. But there is a miniscule chance it could become US law at some point in the future

Scott McD 11-30-2011 02:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDA (Post 18595627)
DVTimes??? You log-in with the wrong nick?

I was about to ask the same thing...

_Richard_ 11-30-2011 02:22 PM

didn't a few countries ban .xxx?

baryl 11-30-2011 02:28 PM

move to .XXX or receive a strongly-worded letter from the U.N.

cordoba 11-30-2011 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WarChild (Post 18595680)
Yeah I'm sure the UN is all over it. Violated will be prosecuted in The Hague!

I seriously wonder how some of you manage to get through the day and remember to continue breathing.

Not sure why you think this is so absurd. Lobby groups will force the UN to eventually tag this requirement on to some 'protecting children on the internet' treaty, and all governments who sign up to it will have to pass new legislation accordingly.

The reason why, for example, hardcore Manga is becoming illegal nearly everywhere is because of a UN treaty.

Wizzo 11-30-2011 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WarChild (Post 18595680)
Yeah I'm sure the UN is all over it. Violated will be prosecuted in The Hague!

I seriously wonder how some of you manage to get through the day and remember to continue breathing.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

GregE 11-30-2011 03:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DWB (Post 18595635)
The sooner the better. Lets just get it over with.

We're all gonna die someday too. Are you in a hurry to get that "over with" as well? :upsidedow

V_RocKs 11-30-2011 05:04 PM

lame drama

wehateporn 11-30-2011 05:13 PM

They'll try their best to force us all to .XXX by using all types of dirty tactics and lies

Think of the children! Force all adult sites on to triple-x domains, says Family First

Fortunately, we've got Manwin on our team

Porn sites (Manwin) sue internet regulator over .xxx web address

alias 11-30-2011 05:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 18595655)
Does anyone suspect a mole?

Shillaber.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roald (Post 18595668)
After that the next issue will be "family friendly" ISPs blocking xxx alltogether.

Rather likely. :2 cents:

Rochard 11-30-2011 05:17 PM

We are so screwed.

pornmasta 11-30-2011 05:20 PM

this is technically a non sense.
You can use ips instead of domain.

pornmasta 11-30-2011 05:22 PM

Try this, it is a porn website, it is illegal, there is no xxx extension:

209.222.138.10

These extensions ARE USELESS (and worthless)

This is only a fucking troll to sell expensive domains extensions...

pornmasta 11-30-2011 05:27 PM

And now, paste this in your address bar and push on ENTER:

http://3521022474

You don't need a domain name to make a website work, you can anyway access to it without using a domain name (whatever you own or not a domain name)
So all these stories are just a bunch of crap. So now stop this shit.

rowan 11-30-2011 10:22 PM

The problem with moving "all" porn sites is... how do you define what a porn site is?

If 5% of youtube's vids are adult in nature, does that mean they're a porn site?

I can see plenty of governments blocking XXX sites, but I can't see how you would mandate that adult sites move to that TLD.

porno jew 11-30-2011 10:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rowan (Post 18596504)
The problem with moving "all" porn sites is... how do you define what a porn site is?

If 5% of youtube's vids are adult in nature, does that mean they're a porn site?

I can see plenty of governments blocking XXX sites, but I can't see how you would mandate that adult sites move to that TLD.

same way they determine in germany with their strict online porn laws.

eGawd 12-01-2011 01:13 AM

what the fuck is an international law
Quote:

Originally Posted by GFED (Post 18595612)
Do you think it will happen?
We all know already how ignorant most of the general public is.

Just recently the public was led to believe that a school teacher "hosted" a pornographic website from her school's laptop computer. Maybe there was some pictures stored on the computer but I doubt that the website was "hosted" from it.

There was also a man accused of browsing child pornography while flying on an airplane. Do you seriously think anyone could be that dumb?

So what would it take to convince the general public that .xxx should be a requirement for adult web sites? I don't think it would take much convincing at all.

Being a gun advocate I'm glad to have the NRA fight for my rights to own firearms.
But who's going to fight for our rights as an adult industry. Should we be segregated from the rest of the public?


http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/art...7#.TtaTAVawUgp

I reluctantly came along into the world wide web in the late 90s after the downfall of online BBS. I have NEVER "accidentally" wandered into a porn site.

So how long until a petition like this becomes a new law?
http://www.causes.com/causes/179734-...children/about


Paul Markham 12-01-2011 04:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roald (Post 18595668)
After that the next issue will be "family friendly" ISPs blocking xxx alltogether.

I suspect that will come first. ISPs will offer people a connection that includes a "Net Nanny" type block on what they serve up.

The take up will be interesting and then the effect on traffic and the further effect on sign ups.

seeandsee 12-01-2011 05:05 AM

that would be ultra stupid to do it...

Relentless 12-01-2011 05:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roald (Post 18595668)
After that the next issue will be "family friendly" ISPs blocking xxx alltogether.

Not just ISPs, entire countries.
India for example is already on record saying the will block all .xxx sites

Dirty Dane 12-01-2011 05:57 AM

There would be much less easy access to porn if they enforced copyrights instead.

Adraco 12-01-2011 06:11 AM

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh
Quote:

Originally Posted by WarChild (Post 18595680)
Yeah I'm sure the UN is all over it. Violated will be prosecuted in The Hague!

I seriously wonder how some of you manage to get through the day and remember to continue breathing.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Yeah, "international law", OP is indeed a funny guy!

Paul Markham 12-01-2011 07:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Relentless (Post 18596865)
Not just ISPs, entire countries.
India for example is already on record saying the will block all .xxx sites

Shit!!!!!

That's where my one last remaining member lives. :1orglaugh

Mutt 12-01-2011 08:21 AM

anybody inside this industry who supported and aided .XXX becoming a reality is a fucking scumbag who should be ostracized.

it's a real concern that countries could make it illegal/criminal to operate adult content sites on anything but .XXX domains. it would be an easy argument for religious and family values types - just like cities have zoning by-laws that restrict where adult entertainment establishments can operate. then it could be followed by ISP's getting the idea to by default not include access to .XXX domains to their customers and charge them extra if they opt in for .XXX access.

the .XXX scam is pretty brilliant i will admit.

Barry-xlovecam 12-01-2011 08:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pornmasta (Post 18596136)
And now, paste this in your address bar and push on ENTER:

http://3521022474

You don't need a domain name to make a website work, you can anyway access to it without using a domain name (whatever you own or not a domain name)
So all these stories are just a bunch of crap. So now stop this shit.

This will get messy with IPv6 (coming soon)

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...ding_zeros.svg

However, shortened redirection URLs could be substituted (10 for a dollar a year >:O) )

raymor 12-01-2011 09:20 AM

It's coming. The Clintons supported and Bill Clinton signed into law COPA, CDA, CDA II ... They are still powerful, heck she's secretary of state and was nearly president. The Supremes wouldn't let them outright ban porn, no matter how many times they tried. How does anyone think they AREN'T angry about thrice being denied a porn ban and won't go for the next best thing, forcing free speech that's "not appropriate for children" into the .xxx ghetto.

Heck just this year, in May, Clinton suggested a US censorship board to censor news on the internet:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Clinton
it would have to be an independent federal agency that no president could countermand or anything else because people wouldn?t think you were just censoring the news and giving a different falsehood out ... That is, it would be like, I don?t know, National Public Radio or BBC or something like that.

http://www.techdirt.com/articles/201...ry-truth.shtml

RyuLion 12-01-2011 09:41 AM

Hahahhahahhaha!

raymor 12-01-2011 09:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roald (Post 18595668)
After that the next issue will be "family friendly" ISPs blocking xxx alltogether.


That and more was two months ago. In October, the UK prime minister announced that when you sign up for internet service you'll now have to explicitly opt-in to have access to any "inappropriate content". So you actually have to call them and basically say "I'm a perv" or you're limited to only what regulators feel is family friendly.

magicmike 12-01-2011 11:11 AM

Move your porn site to international waters to be safe. Our state of the art hosting barge has you covered. No pesky laws to worry about. We're constantly on the move to stay safe from Somali pirates, rouge waves and more.

http://www.boathost.com/


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:30 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123