The $77 Billion Fighter Jets That Have Never Gone to War
 

‎$77 Billion spent in defense for no reason, but we need to urgently cut hundreds of millions from health, research, and education budgets instead. Yeah, that makes sense...

Story here...

http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/77-bil...ry?id=13322450

yeah from what I understand it really is not fond of water so they don't fly it in the rain




but it looks REALLY COOL, so we'll keep it, who wants an educated public any way LOL

The F22 is a cool plane and it's not one thats needed right now, it's just too good. If you read up on the plane, it's far more advanced than we need.
It has a BOB Black Out Button , that when pushed, makes the plane do an extreme U turn which will black out the pilot and then fly the plane level and straight till the pilot regains his wits. Just to out run a issle, of which there are no missle capable yet of catching it.

Like it or not, it's the military budget that brings in most of the new advancements in tech we see each year, like the internet

i agree with you but it would be nice if they made attempts to cut back a little bit and give a few extra billion for the schools and research too. Seems like every government gets gouged when it comes to military spending unfortunately.

I think we need to develop a "Black Out Button" for our current government.

$77 Billion is TWICE the budget cut figure the asswipes in Washington are currently fighting over - for planes that will never be used.

It's time to restart this government - with NO lobbyists and NO special interests.

The American people really need to reclaim their country, and I don't mean through some fake, corporate controlled, Tea Bagger movement either.

So much waste in the military industrial complex.

the military is the biggest welfare queen of them all

I agree with you 100%

Both sides are guilty of prioritizing corporate and special interests, over the real interests of the American people.

There are plenty of assholes on both sides of our totally corrupt two party puppet government, no argument here.

Until we elect a non-corporatist this will never end. And even then it is doubtful that it will end for a long time.

There's been enough sadness since da terrible events of 7-11.

we had all better hope those f-22s aren't needed for what they do.

I love the F22 and glad we have them, i wish had another 187 of them in the fleet. Seeing how our government is spending about $10 Billion per day and these planes cost $77 Billion that's just under 8 days of what we are spending up in Washington right now. In the long run these things will pay off, and with the 5th generation improvements they are worth every penny when they go into action.

The president is only elected for 4 to 8 years.

Our current system of corruption is much stronger than any one single person.

Even if Obama (or anyone) really wants to fix the broken system going in, they are quickly told how things are really going to play out, and within weeks they are whistling a different tune.

The bottom line is that the "people" no longer effect or direct the government at all. If a bunch of people want to donate $25 or $50 each, towards the potential candidate of their choice, how much influence are they getting when corporations can donate $millions to get their way instead?

We need to restart this system...

it will never end :2 cents:

We need to make the federal government as small as possible. There is no reason for a rational thinking person who knows that the government is corrupt and run by the banks, wall street and big business to want to grow the power of the government. No matter who is the one growing it or if it "is a good idea" at the time. :2 cents:

Having planes like this is a deterrent and is something I believe in, nobody has a plane that would stand a chance against it.

Having a military presence in almost every country in the world it seems is way more costly and a better place to start.

While I agree that a better solution of the way we run our government is needed, it's going to take more time to do that when we have a president that wants to inflate the government instead of scaling it back

Stop voting for republicans and democrats. Thats our action item it seems. Fine with me!

I see no problem with having them but I do see a problem with having so many and then not using them at all.

You have to fix the system before you can make that argument.

The current system is: Big Money Interests vs The People's Interests

Big corps do not want government getting in the way of their profit. They want to rape the people without any checks and balances whatsoever.

The Big Money People do not want environmental regulations. They do not want alternative energy research. They do not want subsidized healthcare that takes away from their profit. They do not want banking regulations, etc.

Without an all-out system change the government is the only entity that stands between the people, and all-out corporate control.

I don't like big government either, but unless we restart from scratch, a balance is still needed, however it can be achieved.

Who are you afraid of?

These overpriced, useless planes, are a deterrent against whom?

haha this better not be true

edit: omfg hahahaha

Same reason we have trident submarines, the most powerful weapon we have, carries up to 24 ICBMs

Makes the F22 look like a bi plane

i think this is immensely important to consider when trying to sort out the f22

this project began with a early 1980s view on the enemy as we understood it. the pentagon gets rolling on projects like these that take decades to implement. and in the decades since the beginning of the raptor, the enemy evolved. we still have a threat the f22 can deal with (north korea, as per the article).

What other comparable plane are you using to determine they are overpriced in your opinion? Did you even bother to read the the very article you posted? It clearly explains why the F22 was designed, do you not comprehend the concept of generational military assets? Honestly man, why do you bother posting an article and bitch about it when you don't even understand it...trolling or attention whore you pick.

pisses me off that they spend this kind of money on jets and war.. that money could be good for so many things

:mad::mad::mad:

fucking hippies

First of all you didn't answer the questions at all, but then, just to make your point even weaker, you go on to state that we already have weapons that we are not using as deterrents. So this justifies buying more overpriced toys with taxpayer money, how?

Only an illusion of a balance will be created. It is necessary for the states and the people to reclaim their rights from the federal government and demand that it is smaller. (not saying state governments are without corruption, but at least you can move out of a state 'easily')

You can not have these people controlling it and expect a balance. Maybe you are talking about a balance between Federal and State and The People. If that is the case you are right. But for that balance to happen the Federal and state governments MUST get smaller.

:2 cents:

So the $4.08 billion per day our government is spending is not enough for you?

I know, it is unbelievable right?
source
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...070903020.html

I did answer your question, you just don't have an understanding of what a deterrant is.

military strength or an ability to defend a country or retaliate strongly enough to deter an enemy from attacking.

No one will strike a country that has the ability to remove them from the map, thats what a Trident submarine can do and they are on deployment

As far as the F22, it was designed before the modern warfare tactics had changed. Personally I think they should improve on the warthog platform

http://www.motifake.com/image/demoti...1222988755.jpg

Should our tax dollars be used to pay for alternate energy research, or for subsides for Big Oil?

Should our tax dollars be used to supplement health care for people in need, or for supplements and breaks for Big Pharma?

Should our tax dollars be used to safeguard clean water, food, and air, or for Wall Street bailouts and bonuses?

For infrastructure issues here in the US, or for rebuilding Afghanistan?

Do we cut off medicare and medicaid, or give tax breaks for the rich instead, etc....

You still haven't answered, so I ask again...

Who are you afraid of?

And these overpriced, useless planes, are a deterrent against whom?

We are cutting all services here, yet we just sent another £650 million to Pakistan for some reason.

You couldn't make the shit up...

It's just a jobs program. Nothing more, nothing less.

the A10 is a bad ass little tank killer. My dad was in the USAF when they were first doing tests on it and told me about how when the .50 cal on the nose burped it cracked the air frame! Lots of re-engineering had to be done but I think it is one of the most effective fixed wing aircraft the US has

No one, that's the point.

If you're holding an AR-15 in a room full of guys holding broomsticks, who are you going to be afraid of?

It's been thru a lot changes, but you can shoot half it's wing off and it can still get the pilot home

It does not have a .50 cal on its nose.

We already have the NREL that is %100 government funded.

We already have Obama Care...Duh!

We already have some 3,000 EPA safeguards in place.

We already did stimulus packages, TARP, state bailouts and the shovel ready jobs Obama ran on as a campaign promise.

We already have hospitals that by law treat people with no medicare and medicaid and or insurance.

In conclusion you just want more of the same, more big government, more spending and more government control.

At the risk of getting involved in this thread, this statement is false. If it were true, then the US would never have been attacked on 9/11.

When you have a country, or group of people, who believe martyrdom is the way to eternal bliss, then a threat of death is hardly a deterrent.

While not a US citizen, I think the US military budgets almost certainly have areas where money is better spent on other things on domestic soil versus foreign soil.