GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Cheshire's Famous (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=87096)

Jakk 11-08-2002 11:25 AM

Cheshire's Famous
 
Found elsewhere on the web...

Cheshire

Fletch XXX 11-08-2002 11:26 AM

Nice.

I knew someone would.

:smokin

Cheshire 11-08-2002 11:26 AM

oh no

cherrylula 11-08-2002 11:28 AM

oh boy

That is the exact reason I have never posted any of my personal pics on here. I have tons of really funny drunk party pics of friends. But they would end up with someone else's fucking (cj) logo on them, that is what I fear.

Cheshire 11-08-2002 11:30 AM

::searching for the non-existant release I signed::

Sly_RJ 11-08-2002 11:30 AM

How do they get away with branding and profiting from an image that was created and edited by someone else?

RATBOY 11-08-2002 11:31 AM

Oh shit. That's fucked up...


























I HAVE NO POPCORN!!!

Fletch XXX 11-08-2002 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Sly_RJ
How do they get away with branding and profiting from an image that was created and edited by someone else?
Hah.

Has not rotten and countless 'priceless' sites done the same?

All rottens shit is stolen, hell I know some of the companies who own some photos in their fuck of the month club.

Name of the game on those shock humor sites.

Mutt 11-08-2002 11:32 AM

hey Cheshire.....................KACHING!

do you know how much a copyright infringement is worth? LOTS!


plus in this case they've subjected you to at least 50,000 dollars worth of embarassment. Go to your doctor today and tell him you're having trouble sleeping and you're having panic attacks that all your friends and family will see that picture. I think we're up to about a $250,000 judgement now.

Sly_RJ 11-08-2002 11:33 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Fletch XXX


Hah.

Has not rotten and countless 'priceless' sites done the same?

All rottens shit is stolen, hell I know some of the companies who own some photos in their fuck of the month club.

Name of the game on those shock humor sites.

No, have no idea. I don't visit those sites.

How have they not gotten shut down from massive law suits?

ServerGenius 11-08-2002 11:33 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Cheshire
::searching for the non-existant release I signed::
Donīt worry that site has next to nothing in traffic....maybe 5
people will see it..

DynaMite :Graucho

ZoiNk 11-08-2002 11:34 AM

Mmmm, lawsuits for liable or slander, profiting off of others without written concent, adult orientated pictures without proof the model is over 18, etc :)
Yummy!
ZoiNk

Mutt 11-08-2002 11:34 AM

they all must get tons of C & D letters every week. They'll post anything you send them, no questions if it's yours.

Even some big corporate sites do it. IFilm used to have a huge section of Triumph the Insult Comic Dog, now it's disappeared.

ServerGenius 11-08-2002 11:34 AM

If for some reason it does hit off....I suggest asking for a raise
since you are making a huge contribution in promoting GFY.

I bet Lensman will be proud!

DynaMite :thumbsup

Sly_RJ 11-08-2002 11:35 AM

Posting it is one thing. But branding? Pure bull shit.

Fletch XXX 11-08-2002 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Sly_RJ
Posting it is one thing. But branding? Pure bull shit.
As i said, rotten.com has been doing this for yeeeears.

It doesnt really matter.

You can slap a URL on anything.

So your lawyer contacts him, he takes the pic down and you get nada.

;)

twistyneck 11-08-2002 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mutt
hey Cheshire.....................KACHING!

do you know how much a copyright infringement is worth? LOTS!


plus in this case they've subjected you to at least 50,000 dollars worth of embarassment. Go to your doctor today and tell him you're having trouble sleeping and you're having panic attacks that all your friends and family will see that picture. I think we're up to about a $250,000 judgement now.

I would doubt that. She posted the pic herself, didn't she? There goes the embarrassment argument. I'm not saying it's not actionable but I doubt it's worth a lot of money.

I do think it is sad though. Cheshire is such a pretty girl and I hate to see things like that.

Sly_RJ 11-08-2002 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Fletch XXX


As i said, rotten.com has been doing this for yeeeears.

It doesnt really matter.

You can slap a URL on anything.

So your lawyer contacts him, he takes the pic down and you get nada.

;)

True. They probably have someone on staff just to comply with C&D's, haha.

Mutt 11-08-2002 11:40 AM

what? she didn't post a picture of herself like that.

somebody here Photoshopped it and i'm sure she didn't ask him to do it. So the lawsuit is alive.

Putting their logo on it even makes it more scummy.

What they've done with their hundreds of thousands of page views is much worse than other things i've seen people sue over and get paid big damages.

Fletch XXX 11-08-2002 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mutt
what? she didn't post a picture of herself like that.


She has posted it since it was done.

Hell we have all laughed at it, have we not?

Agreed, it sucks its there, but this is why I say youll never see my face on the internet.

Never

;)

[illnet]-Romeo 11-08-2002 11:45 AM

Look at it this way Cheshire...

At least you're wearing your GFY shirt :1orglaugh

RATBOY 11-08-2002 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by twistyneck


I would doubt that. She posted the pic herself, didn't she? There goes the embarrassment argument. I'm not saying it's not actionable but I doubt it's worth a lot of money.

I do think it is sad though. Cheshire is such a pretty girl and I hate to see things like that.

I think a lot has to be said about the CONTEXT in which the image itself is being portrayed. She posted the same pic on this board amongst collegues. Not for pee-on surfers with no appreciation of the actual person. Cheshire posted the pic for people to see who already had a mindset of what her character is. Anyone who sees her after seeing that pic first has a pre-concieved defaming image in thier head of her. Would you be able to look at her and hold a conversation seriously after seeing that first and knowing who it is?

Yeah, I think it is a good case of defamation of character.

But it is also pretty funny and the actual chances of her being seriously hurt by this is arguable. C'mon Cheshire, give it up, it is a LITTLE funny...

cherrylula 11-08-2002 11:46 AM

Maybe she should go with it, and start posting more pics so she could do an entire site with that theme? No doubt it would be a hit. :1orglaugh

(sorry Cheshire)

Mutt 11-08-2002 11:52 AM

i rarely visit CJ. First movie i clicked on 'Biscuit Girl' or something like that, obviously a paid listing, the paysite it leads to is one of those movie archive sites with not a MB of content paid for, all stolen vids.

Cheshire 11-08-2002 11:53 AM

I think I've already proved I have the ability to laugh at myself ~ and like Sly told me, maybe I'll even get a few dates out of that pic, lol. :thumbsup


(I like that idea cherry :winkwink: )

Fletch XXX 11-08-2002 11:59 AM

And I would be weary of what you write in your email as no doubt he may post that too!

http://consumptionjunction.com/feat/hatemail/


:winkwink:

RATBOY 11-08-2002 12:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Cheshire
I think I've already proved I have the ability to laugh at myself ~ and like Sly told me, maybe I'll even get a few dates out of that pic, lol. :thumbsup


(I like that idea cherry :winkwink: )

I am going to bring it up again. When are you going to bust out with your own website. I'd pay good cash to join, and I hardly EVER join paysites.

Cheshire 11-08-2002 12:02 PM

Maybe Consumption Junction wants to contact me about that ~ as they may owe me a little positive attention right about now

:winkwink:

Sly_RJ 11-08-2002 12:04 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by RATBOY


I am going to bring it up again. When are you going to bust out with your own website. I'd pay good cash to join, and I hardly EVER join paysites.

If she did, the mystery of Cheshire would disappear. What's more fun? Imagining someone naked, or seeing it?

cherrylula 11-08-2002 12:08 PM

Who says she needs to get naked? We'll just keep pasting random body parts (genitalia) on her face, neck, arms, etc.

She'll be the cutest digital freak ever. :1orglaugh

Cheshire 11-08-2002 12:08 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Sly_RJ
If she did, the mystery of Cheshire would disappear. What's more fun? Imagining someone naked, or seeing it?
touching it

Quote:

Originally posted by cherrylula
She'll be the cutest digital freak ever. :1orglaugh
I'm flattered, lol :winkwink:

Sly_RJ 11-08-2002 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Cheshire

touching it

Licking it.

RATBOY 11-08-2002 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Cheshire

I'm flattered, lol :winkwink:

I agree. Touching it would. But just seeing it and touching MYSELF ain't too bad an idea I reckon.:Graucho

SleazyDream 11-08-2002 12:12 PM

i saw that to be just a wee bit mean................

Fletch XXX 11-08-2002 12:16 PM

People with the right TOS can be mean.

"Consumption Junction does not control the Content posted via the Web site and does not guarantee the accuracy, integrity, appropriateness or quality of any Content. Under no circumstances will Consumption Junction be liable in any way for any Content, including, but not limited to, any loss or damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of any Content posted, emailed or otherwise transmitted to Consumption Junction."

ServerGenius 11-08-2002 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Fletch XXX
People with the right TOS can be mean.

"Consumption Junction does not control the Content posted via the Web site and does not guarantee the accuracy, integrity, appropriateness or quality of any Content. Under no circumstances will Consumption Junction be liable in any way for any Content, including, but not limited to, any loss or damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of any Content posted, emailed or otherwise transmitted to Consumption Junction."

Just because they write it......doesnīt mean they can get away
with it aswell....:winkwink:

DynaMite

Redbone 11-08-2002 12:22 PM

It's gone now. I'm glad, but I'm also sad (I never saw it).

Those bastards!

Fletch XXX 11-08-2002 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by DynaSpain


Just because they write it......

I know, but it obviously protects them with enough leeway to get around any kind of real lawsuit man.

;)

TeraBabes 11-08-2002 12:24 PM

I'm seeing "File removed."

I assume it was the pic of Cheshire with the slight modifications to her mouth/head?

EscortBiz 11-08-2002 12:26 PM

I want to see it


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:41 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123