Who wants me to bring back months of $100 PPS payouts for IwantU.com?
 

Convince me and I just might do it :)

I'll build you the castle you want!!

I want $100/PPS again ....

I post once every couple of years on GFY, but if that's what it takes to get the $100 pps payouts back then here goes. That was one of the best promos I've ever participated in. IwantU is a solid company.

So, hell yes, bring back the $100 payouts!

:thumbsup

Saturday morning bump for $100 PPS. Bump this thread and lets bring it back. :thumbsup

Dude Ill send u hookers!!!!!!!!!! and Beer!!!!!! and and

oh wait u live in costa rica home of cheap hookers and cheap beer

Errrrrrrr

Just do it dude!!!!!!!

:1orglaugh

hows your trip going

Well if that isn't a solid reason I don't know what is :)

back to page 1 :)

You will see increase in traffic, I will be sending ya traffic ... but hey, make it from middle of next month, Oct.

And ya, how about $101 PPS? ... would be the highest of highest and $101 sounds even better.

Ok, I want $101 to send traffic now. lol

Sounds good to me!

I'll suck you off behind a dumpster...or I'll just be sincerely grateful. Your choice :thumbsup

If you do it, I wont kill my daughter's pet hamster.

Yeah, ppl are get creative. Keep them coming! Lets get this deal!! :thumbsup

what do you pay now? I will sign up to your program and add you in my members area. right now there is only 2 ads in the whole members area. I will make a page just for it and well what else?

they pay $50+ PPS right now and it goes up from there depending on volume

do it and i'll mow your lawn for a week.

Ok so far we have for Keith:

A castle
Hookers and beer
More traffic
A BJ behind the dumpster
A saved Hamster
A banner in a members area
1 week of lawn services

We need more!!!!!!!!!

and a partridge in a pear tree.....

Wow - I expected this thread to be huge right now!??!!!

Ordinarily you need 280 joins to get 100 bucks per. Varius is offering 100 bucks no matter how many you send. THIS IS FUCKING AWESOME. My grandma could earn a couple hundred bucks a day - AND SHES FUCKING DEAD.

Sorry grammy.

It would be a great news :thumbsup

well..... $100 PPS was unprecedented the first time around and the fact that that did it for 100 days was even more amazing

so if they bring it back, that would be crazy

but i dont think my granma would start doing TGP, galleries etc just because of this. Sure its easy money but...

See post number 4 ... dood joined in Aug 2002 and less than 25 posts. so if this deal will bring peeps out of the woodwork, u know its good news.

if you guys can afford it and it made you guys money then do it again :)

OH, ME! ME! ME! ... lol

The new sliding payscale is pretty nifty but nothing beats the unprecedented $100 PPS.

I'm currently working on launching 8 new co-brands (Private Labels) after mild success with my first one. So, 100$ PPS would sure light a fire under my ass.

I wonder how well you cleaned up during the last promo? Hmm...

u can take some tips from this awesome private label:

http://hornyadult.net

clean huh? :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Oh no :1orglaugh

Not as clean as http://www.cuckoldpersonals.net/

Nicccccccccccccccccccccccce :thumbsup

Although - and I hate to say it here - no one is offering a co-branded solution that works as well as it could. A couple of tweaks and I'd create one or two myself.

Monday morning bump for $100 PPS :)

iwantu has several new templates available or you can hire a designer and go for any look you want like I did.

I shouldn't have written that last night, not here - I was just tired. IWantU is one of my top sponsors and they're incredibly good in every way. Whether they offer 50 bucks or 100 per signup we'll all still benefit hugely from them being around.

The problem, however, with co-brands is not a HUGE problem. I'm not talking about the way they look (and wow some of them look AMAZING); I'm referring to how they work from a surfer's perspective. I can see charge-backs being a problem currently as well as retentions being lower than they need to be.

Join a co-brand, think like a surfer (a niche surfer in the case of the cuckold site), and then you will see the problem.

You can completely change every aspect of the tour you want, as long as you keep the link syntax the same and the join form field names, that's it.

I have had my cobrand since they were 1st offered. You say to think like a surfer and then say you will get more charge backs and worse retention. On PPS retention is not an issue to you it would be for the program though. As far as charge backs I have had a total of 19 deductions and most were for bad checks. Out of 3527 sales that is 0.0054%.

I wish I hadn't opened my mouth because I have a lot of respect for IWantU and it seems like I'm having a go at their program. I just see flaws in the co-brand. Instead of being mysterious (translated, too lazy to do this before now), I'll let you know what I think are the problems - for anyone who cares enough to read this anyway. :1orglaugh

You're a surfer who's into the cuckold niche, for example. That's your niche. The thing that gets your juices flowing. So what do you do? Well, you join a cuckold personals site of course! Now I'm not bashing the posted site, fuck now, I don't want him and his buddies bashing me. I'm just using this as an example.

So our guy joins the cuckold personals site. Only when he finishes joining he winds up on a totally different site, totally different name and appearance, and gets a confirmation email from this totally different site. He's thinking, what the fuck?!!!

Now, I ask you this : Will this surfer respond as efficiently to our goals as we would like? I'm referring to signing up, staying a member for the longest time possible, and not charging back. Will he do those things efficiently from our point of view.

Personally, if I was that guy, I would be feeling these things :

- Distrust
- Confusion

HOWEVER, does it mean the co-brand model must necessarily lead to LESS THAN optimum results (because i'm sure we all make money with co-brands)?

Of course not!

We just need to tweak.

Let the surfer KNOW that it is a co-brand. That is the key. Getting someone to signup to one site and then giving them something else is not gonna be efficient. Its like me going to buy a bmw and getting a merc. They're both nice cars but, what the fuck drugs is the car dealer on?!!!

Solutions:

1. Let surfer know it's a co-brand (there are lots of positive ways to do so that can work in your favor and make you look cool)

2. Continue the co-brand throughout the user-experience of the surfers joining the co-brand.

- If they enter through the cuckold door, let their cookie (or whatever techie thing we can do) allow them to see a different site than iwantu members.

- Let the email be from the cobrand name.

Those are my thoughts. I've never ran a co-brand so I'd be the first to admit being wrong if I am. However what I do have a lot of experience in is looking at dating sites from the POV of the comsumer. And right now I see co-brands as being flawed - BUT easily fixed.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh I give you more traffic too

Anyway - this isn't the thread to discuss co-brands. Please start a new thread and I can discuss it there. I feel bad for bringing it up. Like I said I was tired.

IWantU rocks. Solid sites, almost frighteningly good conversions and retentions, and the support cracking too. I could go on but my foot is getting in the way of talking lol.

:)

Thanks for the bumps :)

Your issue is not with a cobrand but that your traffic is too specialized for the site that has the cobrand. Like sending Peter to see Paul's site when he was looking for Mary. :upsidedow

Your welcome and not at all. But really it should be discussed elsewhere.

My issue is with optimum results, efficiency. If you read through my little essay above (most I ever wrote on gfy lol) you will see my point, I'm sure. I run general and specialized sites and manage huge traffic flows. This is not the point. The point is when you promise someone one thing and give them something else, you create an inefficient situation.