Extremely Important 2257 Matter

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 2
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 template Next
  • davecummings
    Confirmed User
    • Oct 2003
    • 2922
    #1

    Extremely Important 2257 Matter

    The Free Speech Coalition is helping us to help ourselves in this affront--see their two opening page articles, and PLEASE/PLEASE/PLEASE make it a priority to thoroughly read the article(s) and to make a submission to FSC and/or DOJ; their "Industry Headlines--Guide for Public Comments" was posted today, and is loaded with ammo for us to use. Today's FSC posting Guide is VERY important!

    Please do it now--go to http://www.freespeechcoalition.com/ .

    Maybe it might be helpful if we also posted our submissions here, too? It might help us all garner valuable additional info to use in this fight?

    Don't let yourself down (or the other GFY members) by putting this off, or not stepping up to the plate.

    Secondary Producers could be (indeed "are", based upon the pending new 2257 Proposed Regulations) subject to DOJ 2257 attack just like Primary Producers presently are -- we ALL need to fight this. Let's get some hits, perhaps some home runs, but don't strike out by not being a team player in this attack upon American's Constitution and Adult Entertainment.

    Fight this, fight it hard!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


    Dave Cummings

    P.S. Just in case any Court action by FSC ends up being applicable only to Free Speech Boalition members, perhaps everyone should be an FSC member and financially support this FSC action on our behalf!
    Dave Cummings
    www.davecummings.com
    www.davecummings.tv
    San Diego

    Email--- [email protected]
    Tags: None
    • snaker
      Confirmed User
      • Mar 2005
      • 1281
      #2
      Thank You Mr. Cummings, I will be joining today.
      My Best Sponsors: Naughty Revenue | Get Score Cash | Thick Cash

        Comment

        • Flynn
          pr0's goat screwed me
          • Jan 2002
          • 2083
          #3
          Thank you
          blah blah blah

            Comment

            • Catalyst
              Confirmed User
              • Jun 2003
              • 3243
              #4
              reading now..

                Comment

                • geeknik
                  l337 h4x0r!#%
                  • Feb 2005
                  • 8364
                  #5
                  I'll check it out, but as a secondary producer, if push comes to shove, I'll just quit posting sexually explicit photos and videos on my site. Text links for the win! =)
                  hacker 4 hire.

                    Comment

                    • RP Fade
                      Confirmed User
                      • Sep 2003
                      • 3343
                      #6
                      Thanks for the reminder, we are submitting our comments.
                      HomemadeCash.com - Homemade & GF sites powered by NScash.com
                      HomemadeVideoPass.com - The only all homemade mega site
                      OurHomemadePorno.com - Real couples fucking on camera
                      Contact ICQ: 400-786-531 Email: fade AT nscash.com

                        Comment

                        • Sands
                          Confirmed User
                          • Feb 2007
                          • 3134
                          #7
                          http://www.freespeechcoalition.com/F...view&coid=1073

                          Good stuff

                            Comment

                            • halfpint
                              GFY's Halfpint
                              • Jun 2007
                              • 15223
                              #8
                              Is there a british equivalent to the FSC ?

                              Get FREE website listings on Cryptocoinshops.net

                                Comment

                                • davecummings
                                  Confirmed User
                                  • Oct 2003
                                  • 2922
                                  #9
                                  Originally posted by halfpint
                                  Is there a british equivalent to the FSC ?
                                  I recommend that you email either [email protected] or [email protected] to ask that question; then, post the answer here for all of us to be informed, too. Thanks!

                                  Dave
                                  Dave Cummings
                                  www.davecummings.com
                                  www.davecummings.tv
                                  San Diego

                                  Email--- [email protected]

                                    Comment

                                    • RawAlex
                                      So Fucking Banned
                                      • Oct 2003
                                      • 9465
                                      #10
                                      Originally posted by geeknik
                                      I'll check it out, but as a secondary producer, if push comes to shove, I'll just quit posting sexually explicit photos and videos on my site. Text links for the win! =)

                                      Wow. What a plan. What images are you going to use on banners? Thinkinb about running just "non-sexual" images? You could still get a 2257 visit and be asked to prove that the images don't come from a set that requires 2257, and that includes sexually suggestive, evne if the models are fully clothed.

                                      Good luck. It's nice not to be American for this one.

                                        Comment

                                        • Snake Doctor
                                          I'm Lenny2 Bitch
                                          • Mar 2001
                                          • 13449
                                          #11
                                          Originally posted by davecummings
                                          Secondary Producers could be (indeed "are", based upon the pending new 2257 Proposed Regulations) subject to DOJ 2257 attack just like Primary Producers presently are -- we ALL need to fight this. Let's get some hits, perhaps some home runs, but don't strike out by not being a team player in this attack upon American's Constitution and Adult Entertainment.

                                          Fight this, fight it hard!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
                                          Hi Dave.

                                          Unfortunately the proposed "regulations" have nothing to do with whether or not secondary producers will be required to keep records and have them available for inspection.
                                          Congress already took care of that by rewriting the law.

                                          Unlike the 1st time, the DOJ is not overstepping it's bounds by trying to rewrite the statute, this time they are merely enforcing the statute based on congressional intent.

                                          IMO the best we can hope for with our comments is to make the cross referencing and other such requirements less burdensome.
                                          sig too big

                                            Comment

                                            • tony299
                                              lurker
                                              • Aug 2002
                                              • 57021
                                              #12
                                              Thanks for posting this maybe you will motivate others.

                                                Comment

                                                • tony299
                                                  lurker
                                                  • Aug 2002
                                                  • 57021
                                                  #13
                                                  bump this is important.

                                                    Comment

                                                    • ProjectNaked
                                                      Confirmed User
                                                      • Jul 2004
                                                      • 4309
                                                      #14
                                                      was I imagining their site being down last week???

                                                        Comment

                                                        • pornguy
                                                          Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                          • Mar 2003
                                                          • 62912
                                                          #15
                                                          Originally posted by RawAlex
                                                          Wow. What a plan. What images are you going to use on banners? Thinkinb about running just "non-sexual" images? You could still get a 2257 visit and be asked to prove that the images don't come from a set that requires 2257, and that includes sexually suggestive, evne if the models are fully clothed.

                                                          Good luck. It's nice not to be American for this one.

                                                          Haha. Not American. Do you NON Americans really believe that this will NOT effect you??? If you do, then a rock has more brains. Just ask the guys that were the owners of the online gambling that was outlawed in the US. they lived in England, and now they are in jail in the US.
                                                          PornGuy skype me pornguy_epic

                                                          AmateurDough The Hottes Shemales online!
                                                          TChicks.com | Angeles Cid | Mariana Cordoba | MAILERS WELCOME!

                                                            Comment

                                                            • Mr. Cool Ice
                                                              Confirmed User
                                                              • Aug 2006
                                                              • 1289
                                                              #16
                                                              Originally posted by pornguy
                                                              Just ask the guys that were the owners of the online gambling that was outlawed in the US. they lived in England, and now they are in jail in the US.
                                                              Because they were AMERICAN.

                                                              If you are not American and do not host or bill in the USA, like it or not, you will not be touched. They do not have the funds, recourses or authority to touch or inspect NON-US citizens. If you know anything about international law, you know this to be true.

                                                              Mock me if you will, but mark my words.
                                                              NUR COOL UND GEIL

                                                                Comment

                                                                • Juilan
                                                                  Sultan of Swing
                                                                  • Feb 2004
                                                                  • 15141
                                                                  #17
                                                                  Originally posted by Lenny2
                                                                  Hi Dave.

                                                                  Unfortunately the proposed "regulations" have nothing to do with whether or not secondary producers will be required to keep records and have them available for inspection.
                                                                  Congress already took care of that by rewriting the law.

                                                                  Unlike the 1st time, the DOJ is not overstepping it's bounds by trying to rewrite the statute, this time they are merely enforcing the statute based on congressional intent.

                                                                  IMO the best we can hope for with our comments is to make the cross referencing and other such requirements less burdensome.
                                                                  Can that be enforced by law? I mean isn't this regulation EX POST FACTO (after the fact) which is expressly prohibited by the United States Constitution...

                                                                  Article 1, Section 9, United States Constitution says "No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed."
                                                                  My Best Converting VOD Sponsor |

                                                                    Comment

                                                                    • BlondeBecks
                                                                      Confirmed User
                                                                      • Mar 2007
                                                                      • 361
                                                                      #18
                                                                      Bump...I am still drafting my comments........as a secondary producer this could seriously impact me............I'm still working on how to edit "THIS IS FUCKING BULLSHIT!!!!!!!!" into something more acceptable.

                                                                      HardcoreHotel.com

                                                                        Comment

                                                                        • Snake Doctor
                                                                          I'm Lenny2 Bitch
                                                                          • Mar 2001
                                                                          • 13449
                                                                          #19
                                                                          Originally posted by Juilan
                                                                          Can that be enforced by law? I mean isn't this regulation EX POST FACTO (after the fact) which is expressly prohibited by the United States Constitution...

                                                                          Article 1, Section 9, United States Constitution says "No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed."
                                                                          From the new regulations.


                                                                          In accordance with current law, the
                                                                          proposed rule retains July 3, 1995, as
                                                                          the effective date of the rule?s
                                                                          requirements for secondary producers.
                                                                          (The current regulations, published in
                                                                          2005, adopted July 3, 1995, as the
                                                                          effective date of enforcement of section
                                                                          2257 based on the Court?s order in
                                                                          American Library Association v. Reno,
                                                                          No. 91?0394 (SS) (D.D.C. July 28,
                                                                          1995)). The one exception is that the
                                                                          proposed rule would not penalize
                                                                          secondary producers for failing to
                                                                          maintain required records in connection
                                                                          with those acts of production that
                                                                          occurred prior to the effective date of
                                                                          the Act. While the law would permit the
                                                                          Department to apply the statute and
                                                                          regulations to actions that occurred
                                                                          prior to that date, the Department has
                                                                          determined that the rule shall not apply
                                                                          in such circumstances to avoid any
                                                                          conceivable ex post facto concern.
                                                                          sig too big

                                                                            Comment

                                                                            • Rochard
                                                                              Jägermeister Test Pilot
                                                                              • Dec 2001
                                                                              • 75733
                                                                              #20
                                                                              This will never ever stand up in court. You can't hold someone else responsable for what someone else is doing.
                                                                              Herschel Savage
                                                                              Brooklyn, NY

                                                                                Comment

                                                                                • Snake Doctor
                                                                                  I'm Lenny2 Bitch
                                                                                  • Mar 2001
                                                                                  • 13449
                                                                                  #21
                                                                                  Originally posted by Rochard
                                                                                  This will never ever stand up in court. You can't hold someone else responsable for what someone else is doing.
                                                                                  If you think that's what this law does then I think you don't understand it.

                                                                                  I'd like to point out that I do not like this law and I wish it wasn't the law, but if you think it makes you responsible for what someone else does, or you think it's ex post facto, or you think the regulations that have just been proposed are "the DOJ attacking us" then you really don't understand the law and need to retain counsel.
                                                                                  sig too big

                                                                                    Comment

                                                                                    • bobby666
                                                                                      boots are my religion
                                                                                      • Nov 2005
                                                                                      • 21765
                                                                                      #22
                                                                                      ...so much to read .....

                                                                                        Comment

                                                                                        • mikesouth
                                                                                          Confirmed User
                                                                                          • Jun 2003
                                                                                          • 6334
                                                                                          #23
                                                                                          The whole problem with 2257 altogether is that you are being forced to prove yourself innocent of a crime that never happened.

                                                                                          It would seem to me the whole thing is unsonstitutional on that basis alone.

                                                                                          I know 2257 has yet to be challeneged in a real criminal case and Im not sure exactly where the FSC stands ot trying to get the whole thing tossed.

                                                                                          I think if the FSC wants support they should be a bit more forthright with their books and recordkeeping. Almost every complaint I have heard about them is based on the notion that there is no fiscal accountability.
                                                                                          Mike South

                                                                                          It's No wonder I took up drugs and alcohol, it's the only way I could dumb myself down enough to cope with the morons in this biz.

                                                                                            Comment

                                                                                            • DaddyHalbucks
                                                                                              A freakin' legend!
                                                                                              • Feb 2004
                                                                                              • 18975
                                                                                              #24
                                                                                              Originally posted by RawAlex
                                                                                              Wow. What a plan. What images are you going to use on banners? Thinkinb about running just "non-sexual" images? You could still get a 2257 visit and be asked to prove that the images don't come from a set that requires 2257, and that includes sexually suggestive, evne if the models are fully clothed.
                                                                                              The government could also ask to inspect your colon to make sure there are no images hidden there, but at some point --probably when they might ask for documentation on non-sexually explicit images --it becomes so ridiculously unconstitutional and absurd that a first year law student could prevail against the government.
                                                                                              Boner Money

                                                                                                Comment

                                                                                                • tony299
                                                                                                  lurker
                                                                                                  • Aug 2002
                                                                                                  • 57021
                                                                                                  #25
                                                                                                  Originally posted by mikesouth
                                                                                                  The whole problem with 2257 altogether is that you are being forced to prove yourself innocent of a crime that never happened.

                                                                                                  It would seem to me the whole thing is unconstitutional on that basis alone.
                                                                                                  Your very right but I doubt they will ever arrest someone just on a clerical error. The girl is of age but the person forgot to cross reference the one extra time, I cant see them going thru the expense and hoping a jury will convict. It seems they are using it to add a cherry to a bunch of charges.

                                                                                                    Comment

                                                                                                    • Snake Doctor
                                                                                                      I'm Lenny2 Bitch
                                                                                                      • Mar 2001
                                                                                                      • 13449
                                                                                                      #26
                                                                                                      Originally posted by mikesouth
                                                                                                      The whole problem with 2257 altogether is that you are being forced to prove yourself innocent of a crime that never happened.

                                                                                                      It would seem to me the whole thing is unsonstitutional on that basis alone.

                                                                                                      I know 2257 has yet to be challeneged in a real criminal case and Im not sure exactly where the FSC stands ot trying to get the whole thing tossed.

                                                                                                      I think if the FSC wants support they should be a bit more forthright with their books and recordkeeping. Almost every complaint I have heard about them is based on the notion that there is no fiscal accountability.
                                                                                                      I agree, there are constitutional challenges to be made against the statute based on the 1st, 4th, and 5th amendments.

                                                                                                      However, until those challenges are made this law is what we have to live with.
                                                                                                      sig too big

                                                                                                        Comment

                                                                                                        • JFK
                                                                                                          FUBAR the ORIGINATOR
                                                                                                          • Jan 2002
                                                                                                          • 67373
                                                                                                          #27
                                                                                                          Originally posted by davecummings
                                                                                                          The Free Speech Coalition is helping us to help ourselves in this affront--see their two opening page articles, and PLEASE/PLEASE/PLEASE make it a priority to thoroughly read the article(s) and to make a submission to FSC and/or DOJ; their "Industry Headlines--Guide for Public Comments" was posted today, and is loaded with ammo for us to use. Today's FSC posting Guide is VERY important!

                                                                                                          Please do it now--go to http://www.freespeechcoalition.com/ .

                                                                                                          Maybe it might be helpful if we also posted our submissions here, too? It might help us all garner valuable additional info to use in this fight?

                                                                                                          Don't let yourself down (or the other GFY members) by putting this off, or not stepping up to the plate.

                                                                                                          Secondary Producers could be (indeed "are", based upon the pending new 2257 Proposed Regulations) subject to DOJ 2257 attack just like Primary Producers presently are -- we ALL need to fight this. Let's get some hits, perhaps some home runs, but don't strike out by not being a team player in this attack upon American's Constitution and Adult Entertainment.

                                                                                                          Fight this, fight it hard!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


                                                                                                          Dave Cummings

                                                                                                          P.S. Just in case any Court action by FSC ends up being applicable only to Free Speech Boalition members, perhaps everyone should be an FSC member and financially support this FSC action on our behalf!

                                                                                                          Thanks Dave

                                                                                                          FUBAR Webmasters - The FUBAR Times - FUBAR Webmasters Mobile - FUBARTV.XXX
                                                                                                          For promo opps contact jfk at fubarwebmasters dot com

                                                                                                            Comment

                                                                                                            • zeruel
                                                                                                              Confirmed User
                                                                                                              • Apr 2007
                                                                                                              • 1387
                                                                                                              #28
                                                                                                              thanks for the info...

                                                                                                                Comment

                                                                                                                • Tom_PM
                                                                                                                  Porn Meister
                                                                                                                  • Feb 2005
                                                                                                                  • 16443
                                                                                                                  #29
                                                                                                                  Here's the Bump back to page 1.
                                                                                                                  43-922-863 Shut up and play your guitar.

                                                                                                                    Comment

                                                                                                                    • markkernes
                                                                                                                      Registered User
                                                                                                                      • Dec 2002
                                                                                                                      • 12
                                                                                                                      #30
                                                                                                                      FSC Equivalent In England

                                                                                                                      Originally posted by halfpint
                                                                                                                      Is there a british equivalent to the FSC ?
                                                                                                                      The closest thing the Brits have to Free Speech Coalition, since they have no constitutionally-guaranteed free speech rights, is Feminists Against Censorship. A good person to ask about it is Avedon Carol, who I believe is an officer of the group. Her excellent website, through which you can contact her, is The Sideshow ... which I'm not allowed to post the URL of, since I don't post here often.

                                                                                                                      Mark Kernes

                                                                                                                        Comment

                                                                                                                        • markkernes
                                                                                                                          Registered User
                                                                                                                          • Dec 2002
                                                                                                                          • 12
                                                                                                                          #31
                                                                                                                          Re: Extremely Important 2257 Matter

                                                                                                                          Originally posted by mikesouth
                                                                                                                          The whole problem with 2257 altogether is that you are being forced to prove yourself innocent of a crime that never happened.

                                                                                                                          It would seem to me the whole thing is unsonstitutional on that basis alone.

                                                                                                                          I know 2257 has yet to be challeneged in a real criminal case and Im not sure exactly where the FSC stands ot trying to get the whole thing tossed.
                                                                                                                          FSC will be filing a lawsuit to "get the whole thing tossed" for, among other reasons, the very one you state above, as soon as the new regulations are in final form. It will also file for an injunction against enforcement of the requirement that secondary producers keep IDs, since secondary producers do not deal directly with performers.

                                                                                                                          Mark Kernes

                                                                                                                            Comment

                                                                                                                            • markkernes
                                                                                                                              Registered User
                                                                                                                              • Dec 2002
                                                                                                                              • 12
                                                                                                                              #32
                                                                                                                              Re: Extremely Important 2257 Matter

                                                                                                                              Originally posted by Lenny2
                                                                                                                              Unlike the 1st time, the DOJ is not overstepping it's bounds by trying to rewrite the statute, this time they are merely enforcing the statute based on congressional intent.

                                                                                                                              IMO the best we can hope for with our comments is to make the cross referencing and other such requirements less burdensome.
                                                                                                                              FSC's future lawsuit will be against 18 U.S.C. §2257 itself, since the Adam Walsh Act changes have been incorporated into that law. The lawsuit will attempt to get rid of the entire recordkeeping and labeling law, or at least the criminal penalties attendant thereto, in part because it creates an unconstitutional shifting of the burden of proof onto the (prospective) defendants, who must prove that their performers are not minors.

                                                                                                                              Mark Kernes

                                                                                                                                Comment

                                                                                                                                • RP Fade
                                                                                                                                  Confirmed User
                                                                                                                                  • Sep 2003
                                                                                                                                  • 3343
                                                                                                                                  #33
                                                                                                                                  bump again...

                                                                                                                                  people who live abroad and think that this does not affect them are foolish. Sure, you wont have the feds knocking on your door but they might knock on the door of the sponsor you promote, the tgp you trade with or the webmasters that you work with.

                                                                                                                                  As the 2257 panel of lawyers and experts said at Xbiz, this has nothing to do with CP. Out of the 1500 or so inspections so far, NOT ONE SINGLE CP violation has been sighted. They are out to destroy us and make our lives miserable. And this is just means to an end..

                                                                                                                                  Please understand this, no matter where you are or what you do..
                                                                                                                                  HomemadeCash.com - Homemade & GF sites powered by NScash.com
                                                                                                                                  HomemadeVideoPass.com - The only all homemade mega site
                                                                                                                                  OurHomemadePorno.com - Real couples fucking on camera
                                                                                                                                  Contact ICQ: 400-786-531 Email: fade AT nscash.com

                                                                                                                                    Comment

                                                                                                                                    • davecummings
                                                                                                                                      Confirmed User
                                                                                                                                      • Oct 2003
                                                                                                                                      • 2922
                                                                                                                                      #34
                                                                                                                                      It's nice to see and have the expertise and legal acumen of Mark Kernes posting here, especially on this ultra-important matter. IMO, Mark is one VERY sharp and well-informed person, and someone who has a gift for translating the legal stuff into understandable info for us folks.

                                                                                                                                      Thanks, Mark!!!

                                                                                                                                      Dave
                                                                                                                                      Dave Cummings
                                                                                                                                      www.davecummings.com
                                                                                                                                      www.davecummings.tv
                                                                                                                                      San Diego

                                                                                                                                      Email--- [email protected]

                                                                                                                                        Comment

                                                                                                                                        • Humpy Leftnut
                                                                                                                                          Confirmed User
                                                                                                                                          • Apr 2007
                                                                                                                                          • 1292
                                                                                                                                          #35
                                                                                                                                          Very good thread. I think it's about time the industry shifted in any way it can out of the USA, to places where Government will let us run our legal businesses without fear of going to jail. We've always known to follow the laws, but this is getting out of hand.

                                                                                                                                          We've already seen many European and Canadian webmasters adopting 2257 anyways, even though they're only connected by business and aren't US citizens. I'd still rather that, so if there are any small clerical errors or a missing document, there's no fear of jailtime.
                                                                                                                                          Last edited by Humpy Leftnut; 07-31-2007, 12:05 PM.
                                                                                                                                          Humpy Leftnut - Pornsumer Reviews

                                                                                                                                            Comment

                                                                                                                                            • Snake Doctor
                                                                                                                                              I'm Lenny2 Bitch
                                                                                                                                              • Mar 2001
                                                                                                                                              • 13449
                                                                                                                                              #36
                                                                                                                                              Originally posted by markkernes
                                                                                                                                              FSC's future lawsuit will be against 18 U.S.C. §2257 itself, since the Adam Walsh Act changes have been incorporated into that law. The lawsuit will attempt to get rid of the entire recordkeeping and labeling law, or at least the criminal penalties attendant thereto, in part because it creates an unconstitutional shifting of the burden of proof onto the (prospective) defendants, who must prove that their performers are not minors.

                                                                                                                                              Mark Kernes
                                                                                                                                              That's great news, I'm very glad to hear it.
                                                                                                                                              sig too big

                                                                                                                                                Comment

                                                                                                                                                • Snake Doctor
                                                                                                                                                  I'm Lenny2 Bitch
                                                                                                                                                  • Mar 2001
                                                                                                                                                  • 13449
                                                                                                                                                  #37
                                                                                                                                                  Originally posted by markkernes
                                                                                                                                                  FSC's future lawsuit will be against 18 U.S.C. §2257 itself, since the Adam Walsh Act changes have been incorporated into that law. The lawsuit will attempt to get rid of the entire recordkeeping and labeling law, or at least the criminal penalties attendant thereto, in part because it creates an unconstitutional shifting of the burden of proof onto the (prospective) defendants, who must prove that their performers are not minors.

                                                                                                                                                  Mark Kernes
                                                                                                                                                  That's great news, I'm very glad to hear it.
                                                                                                                                                  sig too big

                                                                                                                                                    Comment

                                                                                                                                                    • halfpint
                                                                                                                                                      GFY's Halfpint
                                                                                                                                                      • Jun 2007
                                                                                                                                                      • 15223
                                                                                                                                                      #38
                                                                                                                                                      Originally posted by davecummings
                                                                                                                                                      I recommend that you email either [email protected] or [email protected] to ask that question; then, post the answer here for all of us to be informed, too. Thanks!

                                                                                                                                                      Dave
                                                                                                                                                      Ok thanks Dave I have emailed Diane and am waiting for an answer, as soon as I get one I will post it here

                                                                                                                                                      Regards

                                                                                                                                                      Get FREE website listings on Cryptocoinshops.net

                                                                                                                                                        Comment

                                                                                                                                                        • halfpint
                                                                                                                                                          GFY's Halfpint
                                                                                                                                                          • Jun 2007
                                                                                                                                                          • 15223
                                                                                                                                                          #39
                                                                                                                                                          Originally posted by markkernes
                                                                                                                                                          The closest thing the Brits have to Free Speech Coalition, since they have no constitutionally-guaranteed free speech rights, is Feminists Against Censorship. A good person to ask about it is Avedon Carol, who I believe is an officer of the group. Her excellent website, through which you can contact her, is The Sideshow ... which I'm not allowed to post the URL of, since I don't post here often.

                                                                                                                                                          Mark Kernes
                                                                                                                                                          Hi thanks for that Mark I will google it, see if I can get the website address and post it here

                                                                                                                                                          Regards

                                                                                                                                                          Get FREE website listings on Cryptocoinshops.net

                                                                                                                                                            Comment

                                                                                                                                                            • halfpint
                                                                                                                                                              GFY's Halfpint
                                                                                                                                                              • Jun 2007
                                                                                                                                                              • 15223
                                                                                                                                                              #40
                                                                                                                                                              Originally posted by halfpint
                                                                                                                                                              Hi thanks for that Mark I will google it, see if I can get the website address and post it here

                                                                                                                                                              Regards
                                                                                                                                                              Ok here is the address

                                                                                                                                                              http://www.fiawol.demon.co.uk/FAC/


                                                                                                                                                              regards

                                                                                                                                                              Get FREE website listings on Cryptocoinshops.net

                                                                                                                                                                Comment

                                                                                                                                                                • Brother Bilo
                                                                                                                                                                  Confirmed User
                                                                                                                                                                  • Jun 2007
                                                                                                                                                                  • 4193
                                                                                                                                                                  #41
                                                                                                                                                                  Important update to the 2257 issue here!!!

                                                                                                                                                                    Comment

                                                                                                                                                                    • Michaelious
                                                                                                                                                                      Confirmed User
                                                                                                                                                                      • Jan 2004
                                                                                                                                                                      • 6720
                                                                                                                                                                      #42
                                                                                                                                                                      Good article, good points raised

                                                                                                                                                                        Comment

                                                                                                                                                                        • davecummings
                                                                                                                                                                          Confirmed User
                                                                                                                                                                          • Oct 2003
                                                                                                                                                                          • 2922
                                                                                                                                                                          #43
                                                                                                                                                                          Originally posted by Brother Bilo
                                                                                                                                                                          Important update to the 2257 issue here!!!
                                                                                                                                                                          All I see is some music stuff--am I missing something (I'm not very computer-literate, so maybe I missed it)?

                                                                                                                                                                          Thanks

                                                                                                                                                                          Dave
                                                                                                                                                                          Dave Cummings
                                                                                                                                                                          www.davecummings.com
                                                                                                                                                                          www.davecummings.tv
                                                                                                                                                                          San Diego

                                                                                                                                                                          Email--- [email protected]

                                                                                                                                                                            Comment

                                                                                                                                                                            • Snake Doctor
                                                                                                                                                                              I'm Lenny2 Bitch
                                                                                                                                                                              • Mar 2001
                                                                                                                                                                              • 13449
                                                                                                                                                                              #44
                                                                                                                                                                              Originally posted by davecummings
                                                                                                                                                                              All I see is some music stuff--am I missing something (I'm not very computer-literate, so maybe I missed it)?

                                                                                                                                                                              Thanks

                                                                                                                                                                              Dave
                                                                                                                                                                              Nah, I think you got "Rick Rolled"

                                                                                                                                                                              Kids these days
                                                                                                                                                                              sig too big

                                                                                                                                                                                Comment

                                                                                                                                                                                • Matt 26z
                                                                                                                                                                                  So Fucking Banned
                                                                                                                                                                                  • Apr 2002
                                                                                                                                                                                  • 18481
                                                                                                                                                                                  #45
                                                                                                                                                                                  The FSC site says to comment on the costs associated with compliance. Shouldn't we also bring up things such as concern over interpritations that the full custodian of records address must appear on every single page and not just links?

                                                                                                                                                                                    Comment

                                                                                                                                                                                    • Peace
                                                                                                                                                                                      Confirmed User
                                                                                                                                                                                      • Sep 2004
                                                                                                                                                                                      • 5712
                                                                                                                                                                                      #46
                                                                                                                                                                                      Thanks a lot for sharing
                                                                                                                                                                                      Need custom or licensed content? PhotoVideoContent.com
                                                                                                                                                                                      Traffic/affiliates: PrimeAdult.net | ClassyContent relaunch
                                                                                                                                                                                      [email protected] | TG @romAtibet | Teams Peace888

                                                                                                                                                                                        Comment

                                                                                                                                                                                        • baycouples
                                                                                                                                                                                          Confirmed User
                                                                                                                                                                                          • Mar 2004
                                                                                                                                                                                          • 1341
                                                                                                                                                                                          #47
                                                                                                                                                                                          Dave,

                                                                                                                                                                                          Can you tell us if you really believe that FSC has really done a good job fighting the 2257 and the Adam Walsh act? And if somehow you actually do think so - can you tell us what are the things that could be any worse than they are now if FSC never fought this?

                                                                                                                                                                                          Thank you!

                                                                                                                                                                                            Comment

                                                                                                                                                                                            • Babagirls
                                                                                                                                                                                              Text Writer
                                                                                                                                                                                              • Feb 2001
                                                                                                                                                                                              • 18812
                                                                                                                                                                                              #48
                                                                                                                                                                                              Thanks Dave!




                                                                                                                                                                                              Need a Text Writer?
                                                                                                                                                                                              Blogs|Reviews|Descriptions|Paysites|TGP's|Stories
                                                                                                                                                                                              ICQ: 397892500

                                                                                                                                                                                                Comment

                                                                                                                                                                                                • crockett
                                                                                                                                                                                                  in a van by the river
                                                                                                                                                                                                  • May 2003
                                                                                                                                                                                                  • 76818
                                                                                                                                                                                                  #49
                                                                                                                                                                                                  Originally posted by markkernes
                                                                                                                                                                                                  FSC will be filing a lawsuit to "get the whole thing tossed" for, among other reasons, the very one you state above, as soon as the new regulations are in final form. It will also file for an injunction against enforcement of the requirement that secondary producers keep IDs, since secondary producers do not deal directly with performers.

                                                                                                                                                                                                  Mark Kernes
                                                                                                                                                                                                  I was thinking the same thing. They are basically trying to hold a secondary producer libel for something he can not control.

                                                                                                                                                                                                  The secondary producer never meets the model nor do they have a chance to inspect the models ID. For all we know a "scanned" ID was done in Photoshop.

                                                                                                                                                                                                  That's like trying to hold walmart libel because Niki used child labor to make shoes walmart sells.
                                                                                                                                                                                                  In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.

                                                                                                                                                                                                    Comment

                                                                                                                                                                                                    • davecummings
                                                                                                                                                                                                      Confirmed User
                                                                                                                                                                                                      • Oct 2003
                                                                                                                                                                                                      • 2922
                                                                                                                                                                                                      #50
                                                                                                                                                                                                      Originally posted by baycouples

                                                                                                                                                                                                      Dave,

                                                                                                                                                                                                      Can you tell us if you really believe that FSC has really done a good job fighting the 2257

                                                                                                                                                                                                      Yes--as a Plaintiff, I was there in the depositions, meetings, negotiations, court hearing, etc and witnessed FSC attorneys doing a GREAT job on behalf of the Secondary Producers and the Adult Industry.

                                                                                                                                                                                                      and the Adam Walsh act?

                                                                                                                                                                                                      IMO, that's a fight that's just starting (keep in mind that Congress passed the 2257 revisions part of it without so much as a hearing).

                                                                                                                                                                                                      And if somehow you actually do think so - can you tell us what are the things that could be any worse than they are now if FSC never fought this?

                                                                                                                                                                                                      IMO, had not the FSC won the TRO in 2005, Secondary Producers would have ALREADY been being inspected by the FBI.


                                                                                                                                                                                                      Thank you!

                                                                                                                                                                                                      You're welcome:-)

                                                                                                                                                                                                      Dave
                                                                                                                                                                                                      Dave Cummings
                                                                                                                                                                                                      www.davecummings.com
                                                                                                                                                                                                      www.davecummings.tv
                                                                                                                                                                                                      San Diego

                                                                                                                                                                                                      Email--- [email protected]

                                                                                                                                                                                                        Comment

                                                                                                                                                                                                        Previous 1 2 template Next
                                                                                                                                                                                                        Working...