27 year old teacher sleeps with 16 year old..
 

http://www.mlive.com/news/sanews/ind...171.xml&coll=9

16 year old 8TH GRADER, I think we have found the problem..


But honestly, I must have been going to the wrong school.

What A Freak

not hard to become a teacher
hard to find good teachers when they can apply their knowledge and make 4x the money in the real world. just a bunch of shitty teachers now

If its the same one I saw on the news the other night, she's friggin gorgeous too.

is this a new case? if so WTF is going on

If this was a 27 year old man with a 16 year old girl we would want him gone forever or put to death. It funny how this trend seems to go on and on. Young female teacher and student, no out rage just get make it go away.
I guess the lawyers,judges and parents wish it was them, sad but sick :2 cents:

If she was in the U.K.. then all would be well. I'm suprised the age of consent is still 18 in the U.S.

Oh I like this news article about it

http://www.freep.com/news/statewire/...1_20050811.htm

The superintendant says she's "innocent until proven guilty" --Even though she's already confessed the deed to her husband and the pastor.

Why didnt that happened to me ???

That is one lucky kid

Kids a lucky bastard

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive...1kristen1.html

It wont happen to anyone white thats for sure, all these teachers want young black male cock.

Oh and its funny cause the legal age of consent in Michigan is 16.

They said there is some law against a teacher having sexual relations with a student under 18 attending the same school the teacher teaches at.

There's surely something to be said about people in positions of authority using that position to manipulate thier charges into 'compromising positions'.

But lets be real here. I dunno about you, but when I was 16 there was a SMOKIN' hot girls gym teacher that all the guys would have given a limb to take a poke at. I know that at 16 *I* certainly wouldn't have been done any harm. Shit, it would have made me a goddamn celebrity.

Supposedly it's different the other way around because young women are supposed to be virginal and naive and wouldn't want to do the same things a 16 year young man would (ie. get laid by an attractive older person as a trophy or just cuz she's horny). The only way it could happen is if she was enticed or coerced or 'svengali'd into it. Again, going back to when I was sixteen, I'd overhear very graphic details of what some of the girls wanted to do with one particular english teacher. Seems pretty unlikely that any of THEM would have been exploited in any way except willingly, either.

Not that I'm saying it's this way everywhere, just extrapolating from my personal experience.

At my school the female gym teacher wanted to look at the girls naked as much as I did :(

Mmm... now I'm getting a mental image of me and that gym teacher checking out the locker room, peeking through a crack in the window... :eek2

Hang on a sec.





:jerkoff

:thumbsup

Now then, where were we?

I fucked a 35 year old chick when I was 17...so what?

Hey, you were the one who solved my LSAT insane logic question from another thread. That was very hard but I can't believe you solved it. You should consider going to law school or something...

Or not....

I considered it, but decided against it.

Back in my surveilance/countersurveilance days, we'd have to deal with lawyers regularly for sweeps and surveilance devices (bugs, for lack of a better term). These guys were serious money, and obviously engaged in greasy enough business that they both feared external interference and wanted dirt on people to ensure thier own place at the table. I drew the conclusion that, if I really wanted to make it rich in law, I'd have to sell my morals and dignity down the river. When was the last time you saw a rich public defender? :helpme I figure I can strike it rich in porn without selling my soul.

How often do you get to hear THAT? :thumbsup

Besides, I can barely deal with my OWN bullshit... I could only imagine what would happen if I had to deal with OTHER people's bullshit on a daily basis. Probably events culminating with a news story that contained the phrase "... before turning the gun on himself." :winkwink:

I'm waiting for someone to say "Boneprone fucked her". :1orglaugh

Can I see that question? Do you have link? I've read thru LSAT prep manuals before and they're always really interesting.

The only thing that really makes this bad is that she's a teacher, a person in authority that is there to teach the students and nothing more. Once you sleep with the teacher, that student-teacher relationship is affected (may get preferential treatment etc). But to say a 16 year old male teenager is damaged in any way by this is laughable.

hmm....if that's really her I'm not that jealous anymore :)

Here's the original thread. Don't go down too far though if you want to take a stab at it, cuz my solution's a few posts past pho69's.

An additional hints that aren't mentioned in pho's original posting: There's 5 couples. Each couple shares one pie.

Have fun. :winkwink:

Bad face day? :1orglaugh

Sure... here is one http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showth...highlight=lsat

here is another one
http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showth...highlight=lsat

there was another one but i couldn't find it.. i hate those q's they are so hard. You have to draw a diagram and all, to me it's very similar to math; I am not good in math either. I think anyone who can solve those type of q's is a genius!

When I was bored i also read sample questions from a test law students would take ( I found them in google) Wow, they were insane, 10x worse than the 2 q's I posted above and 1 q's is over a page long...

Q's were all hypothetical like a puzzle very similar to one of those logics q's. Horrible! I was just researching what certain majors/graduate programs were like and what they require and teach in class...

Here's another fun one for you if you are bored

Exactly six trade representatives negotiate a treaty: Klosnik, Londi, Manley, Neri, Osata, Poirier. There are exactly six chairs evenly spaced around a circular table. The chairs are numbered 1 through 6, with successively numbered chairs next to each other and chair number 1 next to chair number 6. Each chair is occupied by exactly one of the representatives. The following conditions apply:

Poirier sits immediately next to Neri.
Londi sits immediately next to Manley, Neri, or both. Klosnik does not sit immediately next to Manley. If Osata sits immediately next to Poirier, Osata does not sit immediately next to Manley.

1. Which one of the following seating arrangements of the six representative in chairs 1 through 6 would NOT violate the stated conditions?

* (A) Klosnik, Poirier, Neri, Manley, Osata, Londi
* (B) Klosnik, Londi, Manley, Poirier, Neri, Osata
* (C) Klosnik, Londi, Manley, Osata, Poirier, Neri
* (D) Klosnik, Osata, Poirier, Neri, Londi, Manley
* (E) Klosnik, Neri, Londi, Osata, Manley, Poirier.


2. If Londi sits immediately next to Poirier, which one of the following is a pair of representatives who must sit immediately next to each other? (

* A) Klosnik and Osata
* (B) Londi and Neri
* (C) Londi and Osata
* (D) Manley and Neri
* (E) Manley and Poirier

3. If Klosnik sits directly between Londi and Poirier, then Manley must sit directly between

* (A) Londi and Neri
* (B) Londi and Osata
* (C) Neri and Osata
* (D) Neri and Poirier
* (E) Osata and Poirier

Don't ask me for the answer beause I have no clue.. You're on your own there!

1. B
2. A
3. B

I believe ;)

Nice! I have a question as I'm not familiar with the format of these types of question. Is there only one answer to this particular type of question? Because I tried and got a slightly different answer (granted at the last minute I switched wifes because one of the pies couldn't fit unless I did). But I've re-read each sentence and logically mine can work unless I've made a mistake.

Sitting at Table#1
Phil + Darla -> Apple
Larry + Fran -> Cherry Cream
Hank + Bonnie -> Peach Cream

Sitting at Table #2
Dave + Kathleen -> Banana Cream
Bob + Nancy -> Blueberry


It meets the criteria:
1. Bob did not eat a cream pie (check: he ate blueberry)

2. Neither Hank nor Nancy's husband ate banana cream pie. (check: Hank ate Peach Cream, and Bob ate Blueberry)

3. The three couples at table number one were Phil and his wife; Fran and her husband; and the man who had cherry cream pie
and his wife. (Check: Phil, Fran, and man who ate cherry pie are sitting at Table #1, and Larry indeed is eating Cherry Cream Pie)

At table number two were Dave and his wife, who is not Bonnie; and Kathleen and her husband, who did not eat apple pie. (Check: Dave is indeed sitting at Table#2, as is Kathleen and Kathleen's husband is indeed not eating Apple, he's eating Banana Cream)

4. Larry sat between Darla's husband (who did not eat a cream pie) and Hank. (Check: Yes, Larry is sitting between Darla's husband who is Phil and Hank).

?????

The one from Acer also seems to work according to the information given:

Phil + Darla = apple
Larry + Fran = banana cream
Hank + Bonnie = Cherry Cream

Table 2
Dave + Nancy = Peach cream
Bob + Kathleen= Banana


Did acer and I miss something. So far there are 3 answers. How did you guys determine the one to be right? I know I'm going to feel like an idiot soon for overlooking something.

I am pretty sure you're right... good job! :winkwink:

How much time on average would you have to solve these questions when taking the LSAT?

Ok I know where I screwed up. On #3 it says three couples, therefore Larry could not be eating Cherry pie. But I think I could just make Hank eat Cherry and Larry eat Peach.

From here http://www.lsat-center.com/lsat-page3.html

A 35-Minute LSAT Analytical Reasoning Section
Logic Game #1 (5-8 questions)
Logic Game #2 (5-8 questions)
Logic Game #3 (5-8 questions)
Logic Game #4 (5-8 questions)
Total of 24 Questions

so i guess that's 24 q's in 35 min :helpme

I need 35 min just to solve one... lol

Anyone notice that the kid is 16 and they are unable to confirm if he is going into 8th or 9th grade. I think she was dating on the short bus.

well id pics always look that way.
I guess when she is dressed up probably she might be sexy :)

And we havent seen the pupil yet , maybe he's a greek so he hit a jackpot with her.
However such a special service would certainly let me go more likely to school :)

Yep, if she wanted to fuck a 16 year old she should have picked one from another school. :upsidedow

lol
yeah they have to be in a different school