THIS IS PREFACE TO THIS THREAD
This dispute has been hashed out everywhere over the past week.
I am glad to say that we have resolved it right here on GFY today. And both parties are happy and I can recommend doing business with either party.
Now on with the thread:
-----------------------------------
I am ready to call a winner in this battle.
There's blood in the streets. I think this now is a losing battle for both parties.
HERE IS MY SOLUTION:
Here's how I would handle it if an intermediary said they were promised a 10% referral fee and my staff person denied it. I would agree to pay the 10% IF the traffic source agreed to send a matching # of signups (and the 10% would be paid on all the old and new signups).
If the intermediary doesn't have that much control over their client, then fine, no dice and I declare the sponsor the winner. If the intermediary says no on grounds of 'principle', then I would remind her that you have agreed to come off of your principles and should meet you half way (and I again declare the sponsor the winner if the intermediary is mired in principle).
If the sponsor is unwilling to make this offer, then I declare the intermediary the winner (smutcash, it's a win-win and if you can't profit from the arrangement, then just raise the recurring on their signups only by $10)
[This message has been edited by Lensman (edited 08-01-2001).]
This dispute has been hashed out everywhere over the past week.
I am glad to say that we have resolved it right here on GFY today. And both parties are happy and I can recommend doing business with either party.
Now on with the thread:
-----------------------------------
I am ready to call a winner in this battle.
There's blood in the streets. I think this now is a losing battle for both parties.
HERE IS MY SOLUTION:
Here's how I would handle it if an intermediary said they were promised a 10% referral fee and my staff person denied it. I would agree to pay the 10% IF the traffic source agreed to send a matching # of signups (and the 10% would be paid on all the old and new signups).
If the intermediary doesn't have that much control over their client, then fine, no dice and I declare the sponsor the winner. If the intermediary says no on grounds of 'principle', then I would remind her that you have agreed to come off of your principles and should meet you half way (and I again declare the sponsor the winner if the intermediary is mired in principle).
If the sponsor is unwilling to make this offer, then I declare the intermediary the winner (smutcash, it's a win-win and if you can't profit from the arrangement, then just raise the recurring on their signups only by $10)
[This message has been edited by Lensman (edited 08-01-2001).]
Comment