U.S. Army Jeep Rear-Ends A Nuke - GoFuckYourself.com

CAHEK · 11-04-2015, 11:08 AM

This is how America transports its nuclear weapons.

However, as this onlooker captures, amid police harrassment for filming, it appears one of the military trucks was just a little too close and rear-ends a truck carrying a nuclear missile.

j3rkules · 11-04-2015, 01:16 PM

Wehateporn approves it.

Sarn · 11-04-2015, 02:53 PM

Joe Obenberger · 11-04-2015, 03:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CAHEK

This is how America transports its nuclear weapons.

However, as this onlooker captures, amid police harrassment for filming, it appears one of the military trucks was just a little too close and rear-ends a truck carrying a nuclear missile.

Who says that there was a "nuclear missile" in that semi?

Phoenix · 11-04-2015, 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joe Obenberger

Who says that there was a "nuclear missile" in that semi?

Even if there was you could hit it all day and it would not go off.

Sly · 11-04-2015, 05:16 PM

While it's a bit silly, the thing isn't going to go off by tapping it. It's not a bullet. Looks like the semi stopped quick, driver of the armored vehicle must not have been paying attention.

dyna mo · 11-04-2015, 05:34 PM

trailer, this is ghostrider requesting a drive-by.

negative ghostrider, the pattern is full.

Joe Obenberger · 11-04-2015, 06:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix

Even if there was you could hit it all day and it would not go off.

That's of course true, and that's why the question is misleading. But that's not very interesting. (Of course, the dangerous consequences of physical damage to a special weapon are not limited to events that detonate the explosives inside the device in a way that starts a nuclear chain reaction. Plutonium is a most toxic and dangerous substance.)

But the really interesting question is that which I posted earlier: Who says that this involves a nuclear weapon? And why would someone with no information about the contents of that semi pose a question assuming that it contains a nuclear weapon - something that he doesn't know? What's the motive? To discredit our country, maybe? Given the imperfections and troubles of the US that are real and provable, why would someone (who labels himself with "CCCP") invent/concoct some hazard of a nuclear event without proof of his smeer?

For one year of my life, it was my job in the Army JAG Corps to deal with issues involving the handling, storage, transportation, and use of nuclear-tipped Pershing missiles then deployed in Germany (they are long gone now), and to work face-to-face with the men who worked with and commanded those missiles, sometimes in the field, about incidents arising from all of that. There really might be some GFY posters here who have had a closer connection to nuclear weapons, but looking around, I doubt it. Look, everyone who gets close to these weapons is profoundly serious about them and they each take it as a grave responsibility, so seriously that they'd give up their lives to prevent harm. All of them. Really. And if they are merely suspected of any different attitude, their proximity to special weapons is terminated in a heartbeat.

AllAboutCams · 11-04-2015, 06:25 PM

Funny looking jeep

Sarn · 11-04-2015, 06:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joe Obenberger

That's of course true, and that's why the question is misleading. But that's not very interesting. (Of course, the dangerous consequences of physical damage to a special weapon are not limited to events that detonate the explosives inside the device in a way that starts a nuclear chain reaction. Plutonium is a most toxic and dangerous substance.)

But the really interesting question is that which I posted earlier: Who says that this involves a nuclear weapon? And why would someone with no information about the contents of that semi pose a question assuming that it contains a nuclear weapon - something that he doesn't know? What's the motive? To discredit our country, maybe? Given the imperfections and troubles of the US that are real and provable, why would someone (who labels himself with "CCCP") invent/concoct some hazard of a nuclear event without proof of his smeer?

For one year of my life, it was my job in the Army JAG Corps to deal with issues involving the handling, storage, transportation, and use of nuclear-tipped Pershing missiles then deployed in Germany (they are long gone now), and to work face-to-face with the men who worked with and commanded those missiles, sometimes in the field, about incidents arising from all of that. There really might be some GFY posters here who have had a closer connection to nuclear weapons, but looking around, I doubt it. Look, everyone who gets close to these weapons is profoundly serious about them and they each take it as a grave responsibility, so seriously that they'd give up their lives to prevent harm. All of them. Really. And if they are merely suspected of any different attitude, their proximity to special weapons is terminated in a heartbeat.

the military always see around enemies and conspiracies.

Joe Obenberger · 11-04-2015, 07:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sarn

the military always see around enemies and conspiracies.

I served in the Army for four years and a few months during a term that ended about 32 years ago and I am hardly "the military". I've practiced law continuously for 36 years. Matters of proof, evidence, and motive to falsify are always interesting to an American lawyer - and through having conducted many, many jury trials, I've learned that these are the same issues interesting to jurors - ordinary people, nonlawyers, who make decisions about facts in our courtrooms. Ordinary people understand that when people make scary allegations against others - without knowing that they are true - that person's credibility, his believability is impaired. Anyone naturally wonders, what is the motive? And that's why I ask, why would someone claim that there was a nuclear weapon in that trailer without knowing?

dyna mo · 11-04-2015, 08:01 PM

Joe Obenberger, I agree with you that there is no way of confirming what's in that tractor trailer, especially a nuke. But how do you account for the civilian knowing that there was a pretty serious military transport coming through?

DBS.US · 11-04-2015, 08:54 PM

Hillary Clinton's makeup truck

Joe Obenberger · 11-04-2015, 09:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

Joe Obenberger, I agree with you that there is no way of confirming what's in that tractor trailer, especially a nuke. But how do you account for the civilian knowing that there was a pretty serious military transport coming through?

No doubt of that! But the implication was that there were Nuclear Weapons in jeapardy. That's what he posted. In truth, a sensitive radar ot encryption system or antenna array or sensitive aircraft parts would get similar security.

Sarn · 11-05-2015, 05:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joe Obenberger

I served in the Army for four years and a few months during a term that ended about 32 years ago and I am hardly "the military". I've practiced law continuously for 36 years. Matters of proof, evidence, and motive to falsify are always interesting to an American lawyer - and through having conducted many, many jury trials, I've learned that these are the same issues interesting to jurors - ordinary people, nonlawyers, who make decisions about facts in our courtrooms.

4 years in the army are change the mentality, of a young man.
in young age laid the prism through which one looks at this world)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joe Obenberger

Ordinary people understand that when people make scary allegations against others - without knowing that they are true - that person's credibility, his believability is impaired. ? Anyone naturally wonders, what is the motive? And that's why I ask, why would someone claim that there was a nuclear weapon in that trailer without knowing?

Internet blogger does not need credibility he needs views

is there a nuclear warhead or is not present is not so important.
and here in the forum simply trolling fanatic American patriots who come and would justify US

_Richard_ · 11-05-2015, 05:37 AM

looks like they hit the curb

filipus891 · 11-05-2015, 05:45 AM

so interesting. citizen journalism at it's best!

Jay-Rock · 11-05-2015, 07:07 AM

Who gives a fuck If I wanted new I would have went to CNN.

11-04-2015, 11:08 AM	#1
CAHEK C.C.C.P. Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Novorossiya Posts: 6,787	U.S. Army Jeep Rear-Ends A Nuke This is how America transports its nuclear weapons. However, as this onlooker captures, amid police harrassment for filming, it appears one of the military trucks was just a little too close and rear-ends a truck carrying a nuclear missile. __________________ Pharma from True-Meds. High converting shop in Europe and USA, fast payouts via BTC !!!

11-04-2015, 01:16 PM	#2
j3rkules VIP Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2013 Posts: 22,111	Wehateporn approves it. __________________ How To Build A Porn Site And Make Money \| My Best $$$ Cam Sponsor \| New Webcam Script 3 Top Adult Hosting Providers

11-04-2015, 05:16 PM	#6
Sly Let's do some business! Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Austin, TX Posts: 31,296	While it's a bit silly, the thing isn't going to go off by tapping it. It's not a bullet. Looks like the semi stopped quick, driver of the armored vehicle must not have been paying attention. __________________ Vacares - Web Hosting, Domains, O365, Security & More - Paxum and BTC Accepted Windows VPS now available - just $50/mo Wanted: CCBill pay sites for sale

11-04-2015, 06:25 PM	#9
AllAboutCams Femcams.com Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: bjcam.com Posts: 12,220	Funny looking jeep __________________ Binance - Blockchain and Crypto Asset Exchange Chaturbate make money in cams

11-04-2015, 08:54 PM	#13
DBS.US Geo Cities Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: North Captiva Island, Florida USA Posts: 11,830	Hillary Clinton's makeup truck __________________ Make a Free Chaturbate White Label site in 34 minutes and be making money tonight

11-04-2015, 02:53 PM	#3
Sarn Say for stagnation Yes!!1 Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2015 Location: Russia Posts: 11,106

11-04-2015, 05:34 PM	#7
dyna mo The People's Post Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: invisible 7-11 Posts: 64,230	trailer, this is ghostrider requesting a drive-by. negative ghostrider, the pattern is full.

11-04-2015, 08:01 PM	#12
dyna mo The People's Post Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: invisible 7-11 Posts: 64,230	Joe Obenberger, I agree with you that there is no way of confirming what's in that tractor trailer, especially a nuke. But how do you account for the civilian knowing that there was a pretty serious military transport coming through?

11-05-2015, 05:37 AM	#16
_Richard_ Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Vancouver Posts: 30,985	looks like they hit the curb

11-05-2015, 05:45 AM	#17
filipus891 Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2015 Location: London Posts: 165	so interesting. citizen journalism at it's best!

11-05-2015, 07:07 AM	#18
Jay-Rock Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Porn Valley Posts: 2,779	Who gives a fuck If I wanted new I would have went to CNN. __________________ HD and 4k Content Production by JayRock http://jayspov.net http://blackforwife.com http://cospimps.com SKYPE JAYROCKCONTENT [email protected] Twitter @jayrockcontent