San Francisco Circumcision Ban

What a load of BS.

Don't US politicians have bigger problems to concern themselves with?

Anyway good luck with this guy getting backing from the Jewish community in the future, he just fucked that vote and money.

everyone will say what they have is better..all i can say is thank god this barbaric ritual is not (so much) practiced in eu as it is in usa. i mean ok, in theory it could be beneficial to hygiene but that was mostly true in ancient times and in mostly for poor people..if you wash you cock regularly you have no problems.

what is gross and what not can be debated - erect cock is probably little more aesthetically looking than erect uncut but circumcised flaccid cock just looks ridiculous..

like every skin that is not protected by something hardens. so there are theories that circumcision takes away some sensation on the most sensitive part pf the penis.So giving away sensation for aesthetic reasons - no thank you.

and lastly and most importantly - i cant but pity some male porn stars when i see them jerking off with circumsized cocks.(straight porn) god it is pathetic and painful to watch when they cant jerk properly since there is no skin to move and what they do is just kinda squeeze their cock with their hand or move the skin they have left 1cm up or down ,damn this looks so painful...

"no amount of money" would make me cripple the most pleasurable part of my body!

But since we cant have both we usually dont know how other party feels or what they are "missing" so we just see positive things in our situation..

Interesting news, thanks for sharing!

I don't think I've ever heard a cut guy say "man, that hurt so much when I was a baby I can't believe they subjected me to such barbarianism!"

I've never heard a cut guy argue against being cut either.

So who exactly is filing all of these complaints? Who is upset by this? Is it a group of guys that was cut that wish they never were cut? Or is it a group of people, non-cut, that need something to bitch about?

Also, comparing male circumcision to female seems a bit of a stretch. Are there any long term side effects of male circumcision? I haven't found any text indicating the male version has anything like the female version does.

I at least appreciate the fact that so many retarded idiots gathered to live in one city, so I can avoid them all.

Where do you live? Mutilateyourbabyville?

I live in the small town of "People Who Mind Their Own Fucking Business and Have Better Shit To Worry About".

My fiance is circumcised, as is my 9-year-old son... and I still agree with Sarah.

Why isn't circumcision on boys considered sexual mutilation just as circumcision on girls is? Does anyone know?

there's a thing called evolution, that has decided that the penis is healthier with a foreskin. end of story. if it wasn't beneficial we wouldn't have one.

Calling a circumcision a mutilation is the dumbest fucking thing I've heard this year...

It's like calling a face lift or liposuction mutilation...

Personally, I find uncut cocks pretty revolting... but that's just me. Either way to outlaw it is absolutely ridiculous.

That's not even a valid argument. That's like saying we should just toss out all medicines and surgical procedures because evolution didn't create them... Give me a fucking break.

if you understood what evolutiuon was you would know it was a valid argument. medicines and surgery help out when things go wrong. your circumsising when there's no medical need.

I have an appendix and tonsils.

Good for you, the tonsils protect you against infection and the appendix has been found to "Researchers in the United States say the appendix produces and protects good germs for the gut by "rebooting" the digestive system".

anything that we have on our body that we don't need is left over from a time when we did need it, like the coccyx.