Tax Cuts Side by Side - D's vs R's

Easy fix, abolish the income tax and it will be fair. But you love being bribed and pitted against your fellow American with your own money.

The chart is the chart! Agreed. It shows what it shows, and not what it doesn't. I dont know how else to respond.

YOU ignored the fact that the Bush tax cuts were NOT in place under Clinton!

Your spin as to who was or wasn't in charge under Clinton, completely ignores the topic, as usual.

Okay, let's pretend Clinton's 8 years were successful, all thanks to the GOP. That spin still doesn't explain why we need the Bush tax cuts, which have NOT produced anything worthwhile since their inception, as OPPOSED to the period of prosperity, under Clinton - WITHOUT the Bush tax breaks.

That may be the fucking FUNNIEST thing I have EVER read!

700 BILLION - thats what the TOP 2 Percent of highest income earners will put in their pocket - thats 700 BILLION that could go towards jobs and infrastructure...

Go back to watching Hannity and Bill O'Reilly Vendzilla you fucking CLOWN!

Actually it's at least $700 Billion over 10 years - not the first year - but it is still unfunded long term debt, regardless. You know, the VERY THING the rich conservatives are supposedly against - as long as it does not apply to them of course.

Cutting social services for the poor is okay though...

One could argue, like Obama is arguing now, that Clinton passed on Bush a terrible bubble economy and bush was trying to stop the damage the best he could. Not that I would argue that, but that is the same argument Obama and the useful idiots are using.

Having the government under one party control usually leads to bullshit in the US unfortunately.

I like that the House is now under GOP control with Obama/Senate still Dems.

Clinton didn't do well because he was a Dem nor because Congress was GOP.

He did "well" because both of them were willing to work together. Though the dot com bubble was pure chance... then the housing crash has been in the making for over 20 years... yet people still blame Bush..

Silly, silly. Stop playing partisan politics, kids. It's not sports.

Your chart is a lie bft3k, just like all the other shut you sell.
As explained before. The chart is showing a 10% difference on 1mil of earnings.
No one is talking about 10%. the actual number is 4.6%
you've been duped again.

Also, it's trash like you who think paying $350,000 a year for the same services YOU get for free is not enough of a contribution.
It's trash like you that is all that's wring with our country

Hahaha, what drivel!
I guess the tax cuts for everyone else are somehow funded.

You need to start baa-ing at the end of each post, sheep

Instead of Obama dealing with what people were truly concerned about, ending the wars, and the Economy and not focusing all his efforts on entitlements and spending on a stimulus package that didn't work because of the bureaucracy that's inherent in government. He lost more power than any democrat president has had in decades. Why, because the economy has suffered under his presidency, because it suffered under democrat control of the house and senate for 4 years. Not in over 70 years has a president taken a beating like Obama did in the midterms.
You can blame Bush, you can Blame the GOP, but they were not in power. When you take the job, it's you who are to blame.
When they Democrats lost Kennedy's seat in the election, they should have got the message, but when they didn't they pissed off the American voters and paid for it.
It's simple what the American people want, they want the government to spend less, more in their pockets and more jobs in the US. Jobs that supplied by those that make over 250K.
That was that little group of people that got together in almost 3000 individual groups and called them selves the Tea Party. Even the GOP is scared of them. Why? because they are the people and they are organized. And all the left could do was belittle themselves and call them racist, even though a couple of the candidates they back were black and now for the first time in history, the Black caucus is going to have a couple GOP members.


When the GOP asked about working with the stimulus bill , Obama said "I WON", now he has "LOST"

A good spinner could blame the Clinton bubble over the deregulation of Wall Street under Reagan - and then follow that up with the fact that the mortgage bubble that burst under Bush, could be blamed on banking deregulations.

The rich still made out like bandits in both cases, while the middle and lower classes felt the pinch, from all of this irresponsible behavior.

Semi-unrelated to this post topic: Obama has passed legislation to curb both of those special interests, and the heat is on. Those with enough power and wealth to protect, want Obama out, so their games can continue without supervision, which will not help almost ANY of us!

They have convinced MILLIONS of Americans to, once again, vote against their own best interests, to benefit the very few.

i better keep my income below $500k then

Sucks to berhe bottom 2% doesn't it?

Translation: If the facts don't work for me, I will spew out meaningless insults and drivel.