Sorry Republicunts - Olbermann going back on air Tuesday.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jezebelz
    Registered User
    • Aug 2004
    • 44

    #31
    Comcast will eventually clean house over at MSNBC. The network has ratings in the tank, revenue problems, and obvious left wing bias. I stopped watching that channel years ago. You can't sit through 5 minutes of their programming without being told what to think. Boring....
    What's totally funny about watching the left whine about Fox News is that all of these media outlets are free enterprises. NBC, CBS, ABC, CNN ... they all chose the platform their respective channels / networks promote. No one is forcing them to stay with that platform. Fox went the other direction and has made a fortune doing so. If these networks had any business sense they would let revenue dictate which direction they choose, not ideology. CBS is beginning to see the light. They have become FAR more objective than they have been in years past. The other's will adapt as well...or die.

    I wanted to add I'm specifically referring to their NEWS platforms. Doesn't apply to any of the commentary / editorial shows, sitcoms or the like. News is supposed to be that..news.
    Last edited by jezebelz; 11-08-2010, 11:40 AM. Reason: added a comment

    Comment

    • Vendzilla
      Biker Gnome
      • Mar 2004
      • 23200

      #32
      Originally posted by SuckOnThis
      The facts are 'availble' to those who are capable of reading more than a sentence. Here's a clue, page 9/25. You want me to draw you a picture with crayons? Will that help?
      If that's all you got, go ahead and use crayons, but all I see is michelepac which is Michele Bachmann's thing, no where did I see your crayons underlining where it said O'Reilly contributed.

      Even if this did say anything, whats the source? This is just a printed page without a source.
      Carbon is not the problem, it makes up 0.041% of our atmosphere , 95% of that is from Volcanos and decomposing plants and stuff. So people in the US are responsible for 13% of the carbon in the atmosphere which 95% is not from Humans, like cars and trucks and stuff and they want to spend trillions to fix it while Solar Panel plants are powered by coal plants
      think about that

      Comment

      • Gouge
        Confirmed User
        • Mar 2005
        • 1438

        #33
        Originally posted by SuckOnThis
        Obviously Federal Election forms are to complicated for you two to understand. Maybe you should consider spending your time getting an education instead of spending day and night on a porn board trying to sell counterfeit cigarettes.
        Stop the presses, hold the phone, its a world wide revelation, holy shit!

        Sean Hannity made a donation to Michele Bachmann's official Political Action Committee.

        Wow, i mean just WOW!

        Comment

        • Vendzilla
          Biker Gnome
          • Mar 2004
          • 23200

          #34
          Originally posted by Gouge
          Stop the presses, hold the phone, its a world wide revelation, holy shit!

          Sean Hannity made a donation to Michele Bachmann's official Political Action Committee.

          Wow, i mean just WOW!
          Wait, the guy posted a 25 page deal and I couldn't find Sean Hannity anywhere, not that I really care, nor do I care about Olbermann
          Carbon is not the problem, it makes up 0.041% of our atmosphere , 95% of that is from Volcanos and decomposing plants and stuff. So people in the US are responsible for 13% of the carbon in the atmosphere which 95% is not from Humans, like cars and trucks and stuff and they want to spend trillions to fix it while Solar Panel plants are powered by coal plants
          think about that

          Comment

          • Vendzilla
            Biker Gnome
            • Mar 2004
            • 23200

            #35
            OK I found it, shit for brains couldn't just point to a news article, I don't think he can read?
            http://www.salon.com/news/politics/w...nnity_donation

            this actually addressed it

            I guess Fox doesn't have the same rules as MSNBC, but who you donate to should be your own.
            Everyone knows Olbermann is liberal and Hannity is Conservative
            Carbon is not the problem, it makes up 0.041% of our atmosphere , 95% of that is from Volcanos and decomposing plants and stuff. So people in the US are responsible for 13% of the carbon in the atmosphere which 95% is not from Humans, like cars and trucks and stuff and they want to spend trillions to fix it while Solar Panel plants are powered by coal plants
            think about that

            Comment

            • Sly
              Let's do some business!
              • Sep 2004
              • 31375

              #36
              Originally posted by SuckOnThis
              No problem though with FOX's parent company, News Corp donating $1 million to republican candidates, FOX News commentators doing fundraisers every weekend for republican candidates, openly endorsing candidates on the air, and the fact that Hannity, Oreilly, Beck, and the rest of them have contributed 10 times the money Olbermann has to republicans. Thats the difference between a political station and a news station, one is ok to do these things, the other gets punished when they do.
              A news station doesn't constantly harass Sarah Palin, Michelle Bachman (sp), etc, etc. I don't care all that much that Olbermann and Matthews like giving the ladies shit, they usually deserve it anyway, but let's be real. MSNBC, and its diehard viewers, need to stop pretending that Fox is the anti-christ and MSNBC represents proper journalism. Come on. Just say what you are, it's no big deal, come out of the closet already.

              I wouldn't go to either of those sources for "news," and I don't.
              Vacares - Web Hosting, Domains, O365, Security & More - Paxum and BTC Accepted

              Windows VPS now available
              Great for TSS, Nifty Stats, remote work, virtual assistants, etc.
              Click here for more details.

              Comment

              • cykoe6
                Confirmed User
                • Apr 2005
                • 4499

                #37
                I have no problem with Olbermann being back on the air. I believe he serves the useful purpose of reminding people just how ugly, spiteful, and juvenile the radical left truly is. He does a public service........ and furthermore MSNBC should be able to put any lunatic on the air they want....... it is called freedom of the press.
                бабки, шлюхи, сила

                Comment

                • Gouge
                  Confirmed User
                  • Mar 2005
                  • 1438

                  #38
                  Originally posted by Vendzilla
                  Wait, the guy posted a 25 page deal and I couldn't find Sean Hannity anywhere, not that I really care, nor do I care about Olbermann
                  Sean and his wife Jill are both on there, i just find it odd that this is the 5th thread about Olbermann that has somehow reverted back to blaming Fox News for something.

                  Fox News this, Fox News that. Its a one trick pony show with these guys, all they do is either blame Fox News or Republicans for all the worlds problems.

                  Fucktards, all of them!

                  Comment

                  • dyna mo
                    just a fucking jerk
                    • Dec 2008
                    • 68184

                    #39
                    he's the newscaster, not the news.

                    Comment

                    • SuckOnThis
                      So Fucking Banned
                      • Oct 2003
                      • 6844

                      #40
                      Originally posted by Vendzilla
                      OK I found it, shit for brains couldn't just point to a news article, I don't think he can read?
                      http://www.salon.com/news/politics/w...nnity_donation

                      this actually addressed it

                      I guess Fox doesn't have the same rules as MSNBC, but who you donate to should be your own.
                      Everyone knows Olbermann is liberal and Hannity is Conservative

                      Thanks for proving my point. In the future it may benefit you to do your own research before you spend an hour arguing a losing stance, that time might have been more productive for you selling your fake cigarettes at your local anti-abortion rally.

                      Comment

                      • funkywizard
                        Registered User
                        • Sep 2008
                        • 39

                        #41
                        so many lols so little reason for it. Who really cares either way?

                        IOFLOOD.com offers Xen VPS and dedicated hosting optimized for porn!
                        Packages available with per-customer-dedicated hard drives, SSD storage, and unmetered bandwidth.
                        Perfect for hosting high performance tube sites, paysites, or galleries

                        Comment

                        • Vendzilla
                          Biker Gnome
                          • Mar 2004
                          • 23200

                          #42
                          Originally posted by SuckOnThis
                          Thanks for proving my point. In the future it may benefit you to do your own research before you spend an hour arguing a losing stance, that time might have been more productive for you selling your fake cigarettes at your local anti-abortion rally.
                          Hey dip shit, what stance did I lose? I asked for links and you are TOO FUCKING STUPID to find any, you would have done better to put this link up http://google.com
                          What a fucking retard
                          And the cigarettes are thru a Native American collective selling US cigarettes made in the US. And when did I say anything about abortion, I see you're just making shit up because you're too fucking stupid to debate me.

                          Are you related to LC?
                          Carbon is not the problem, it makes up 0.041% of our atmosphere , 95% of that is from Volcanos and decomposing plants and stuff. So people in the US are responsible for 13% of the carbon in the atmosphere which 95% is not from Humans, like cars and trucks and stuff and they want to spend trillions to fix it while Solar Panel plants are powered by coal plants
                          think about that

                          Comment

                          • Vendzilla
                            Biker Gnome
                            • Mar 2004
                            • 23200

                            #43
                            Originally posted by Gouge
                            Sean and his wife Jill are both on there, i just find it odd that this is the 5th thread about Olbermann that has somehow reverted back to blaming Fox News for something.

                            Fox News this, Fox News that. Its a one trick pony show with these guys, all they do is either blame Fox News or Republicans for all the worlds problems.

                            Fucktards, all of them!
                            What is really funny is that for a long time, liberals cornered the market on activism, when the Tea Party came out, they didn't know how to handle it, so they labeled it. How you can put a label on 2800 individual chapters that have no leader is just showing how desparate they are.

                            They complain about the Big Business shipping jobs overseas and well guess where the president is right now and what he's doing?
                            Carbon is not the problem, it makes up 0.041% of our atmosphere , 95% of that is from Volcanos and decomposing plants and stuff. So people in the US are responsible for 13% of the carbon in the atmosphere which 95% is not from Humans, like cars and trucks and stuff and they want to spend trillions to fix it while Solar Panel plants are powered by coal plants
                            think about that

                            Comment

                            • 2MuchMark
                              Mark of 2Much.net
                              • Aug 2004
                              • 50966

                              #44
                              Originally posted by SuzzyQ
                              If a Republican doesn't like guns, he doesn?t buy one.
                              If a Democrat doesn't like guns, he wants all guns outlawed.

                              If a Republican is a vegetarian, he doesn?t eat meat.
                              If a Democrat is a vegetarian, he wants all meat products banned for everyone.

                              If a Republican is homosexual, he quietly leads his life.
                              If a Democrat is homosexual, he demands legislated respect.

                              If a Republican is down-and-out, he thinks about how to better his situation.
                              A Democrat wonders who is going to take care of him.

                              If a Republican is a non-believer, he doesn't go to church.
                              A Democrat non-believer wants any mention of God and religion silenced.

                              If a Republican decides he needs health care, he goes about shopping for it, or may choose a job that provides it.
                              A Democrat demands that the rest of us pay for his.

                              If a Republican reads this, he'll forward it so his friends can have a good laugh.
                              A Democrat will delete it because he's "offended".
                              You forgot one:

                              A republican Darwin-denying religious nut who believes that "Intelligent design" is based on actual science doesn't like feeling stupid, he will go out of his way to try to ban text books to make others just as stupid as he is.

                              A democrat will just laugh at that republican.

                              Comment

                              • baddog
                                So Fucking Banned
                                • Apr 2001
                                • 107089

                                #45
                                Originally posted by MarkPrince
                                You forgot one:

                                A republican Darwin-denying religious nut who believes that "Intelligent design" is based on actual science doesn't like feeling stupid, he will go out of his way to try to ban text books to make others just as stupid as he is.

                                A democrat will just laugh at that republican.
                                You forgot one:

                                A Darwin-denying, religious nut Democrat who believes that "Intelligent design" is based on actual science doesn't like feeling stupid, will go out of his way to try to ban text books in an effort to make others just as stupid as he is.

                                A Republican will just laugh at that Democrat.
                                Last edited by baddog; 11-08-2010, 01:23 PM.

                                Comment

                                Working...