Interesting.
http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/politi...103-17dz6.html
"AT A Republican victory party suffused with vengeful glee, the man who bodysurfed the anti-establishment wave to become the next speaker of the US House of Representatives was looking very establishment.
Even though it was predicted, it was still a shock to see voters humiliate a brilliant and spellbinding young president who'd had such a Kennedy-like beginning, while electing a lot of conservative nuts and promoting this central-casting congressman as the face of the future: a Republican who had vowed in a written pledge to restore America to old-fashioned values, returning to a gauzy ''Leave It to Beaver'' image that never existed, even on the set of Leave It to Beaver.
Republicans outcommunicated a silver-tongued president who was supposed to be Ronald Reagan's heir in the communications department.
They were able to convince a lot of Americans that the couple in the White House was not American enough, not quite ''normal'', too communist, too radical, too Great Society. All that Ivy League schooling had made them think they knew better than average American folks, not to mention the founding fathers.
The speaker-in-waiting sounded the alarm: the elites in the White House were snuffing out the America he grew up in. It took only two years to realise that their direction for the country was simply, as he put it, ''a contradiction with the vast majority of Americans''.
No one gets to take America away from Americans - not even the American president!
''What the American people were saying is 'Enough!' '' the speaker-to-be told me, as he savoured his own win and his party's landslide victory, which he said was ''a historical tide, not just a partisan election''.
Washington had not been listening, Washington had been scorning the deepest beliefs of Americans, and now that would have to change.
''American people are clearly fed up with what they see as the decay of American society,'' he declared.
The new leader of the House took a more black-and-white approach than the nuanced president. It is enshrined in the US Declaration of Independence that you need the consent of the governed, and the governed did not consent.
Ascending to third in the line of succession to the presidency, he was a working-class kid who rose in the House of Representatives as a rabble-rouser willing to throw bombs to score points against powerful Democrats. Now he'd be helping to run the country, saving it from what he saw as an arrogant and out-of-touch clique of elites.
In the revolutionary flush of the electoral map glowing red, he was working hard to avoid gloating. But he could not resist taking a few jabs at the ''liberal media elite'' distorting things, and a few more at a puffed-up White House that got punished for not paying enough attention to people's anxieties.
''They had an enormous opportunity to bring about change and they failed, and I don't say that harshly,'' he said, adding: ''They really are left-wing elitists and they really thought the country didn't get it and, therefore, it was their job to give the country the government that they thought the country needed, even if they didn't want it. That's the whole history of the health plan.''
There was a lot of talk, as in the campaign, about the misbegotten healthcare plan, about balancing the budget, about lowering the deficit and taxes, about doing something on abortion and bloated government.
The next House speaker felt that the humbled president should take the election as a cue to be conciliatory, and he proposed they talk. He offered to reach out to Democrats who wanted to work with his party, but also noted that the president would not be wise to stand in the way of the conservative agenda.
''I prefer to believe that this president, who is clearly very smart, is quite capable of thinking clearly about a message sent by the American people,'' he said.
He said he would not use his subpoena power to rain down a series of investigations on the Democratic administration. No witch-hunts, he said, only legitimate investigations.
Yeah, that all worked out for Newt Gingrich. The quotes above came from Gingrich, when I covered his heady victory in the 1994 Republican landslide that made him speaker.
And, obviously, the Republican House only pursued ''legitimate'' investigations of Bill Clinton. Sixteen years later, as John Boehner is on the cusp of dethroning Nancy Pelosi to become speaker, the new crop of anarchic conservatives is saying all the same things.
God help the republic."
