you're a fucking moron.

QFT:2 cents:

Let the acrimony begin (continue?) ...

All I care is that it's over and we don't have to listen to Venzilla's shit day in and day out.

But I'd be willing to bet he can't keep his trap shut on the subject.

Oh man. So the big D gains in 2006 and 2008 were a huge hoopla and accomplishment, complete rejection of the evil Dictator Dubya's policies... but in 2010, meh, business as usual!

You're right, it will. In 2012 I'm guessing it will balance out pretty close. Everyone will hate everyone again. Wee!

Parliamentary democracy is an spectacle, get over it...

You guys are odd... most of the seats were a dead shoe in for the Republicans, they could have won if they slept through the race. They only had to win a few extra places to take a jump like this.

And the fact that the crazy bitch from NV almost made it and Rand Paul did make it, proves how flippin crazy and stupid some Americans truly are.

It was Clinton who started the unhealthy investment policy, wasn't it?

SHHHHH! You'll upset the Liberals :smiling_b

Are you talking about the one that opened the free market up to Companies being able to merge?

Or the Community Reinvestment Act?

Know what the odd thing about the Community Reinvestment Act was? Credit Unions got the same benefits, did the same loans..... but never had the same problems. That's because the the CU's weren't doing shady shit.



Naa... you guys would have to add to a conversion for that to stand a chance of happening.

Bingo! even heard them say this on fox news last night which was kinda of a shocker lol

9:46 AM and im already sick of hearing about Obama "hearing the people"

I just love threads like this.

:2 cents: I'm certainly not holding my breath expecting anything to change. Still a shitload of politicians that don't really care about the people.

I don't know so much about the details in US policy, but I learned that it was Clintons policy that originally made people investing more than they could pay back. On short it benefits the economy (and Clinton) but not sustainable.

True. People are flippin crazy and stupid when they disagree with you.

The fact that the "crazy bitch" did as well as she did should tell you something other than people are stupid.

Wait, do people actually think ANYTHING will change now?

It will be business as usual.

It will be interesting to see how these TP-backed members vote on defense spending bills.

Like every other politician, I predict they will start making exceptions for this and that, which will make them ... gasp ... a typical politician.

Did I say anything about disagreeing with me? Disagree if you like, but at least backup your disagreement with information that shows her ideas aren't extreme.

People voting for her, proves far less about 'something' else, and shows greatly how stupid people are when it comes understanding what her whacked out ideas could have done, damage wise to our Country and Nevada.

I would love to hear the educated reasoning behind voting against one person that may not be doing the best job and for another person with extremely different views that do not match the people she is attempting to represent.

So unless Nv is the craziest ass group of people, ever... they almost voted a person in that totally doesn't Represent the real view points of the people.

That... is stupidity at its finest.

exactly. except it was 16years ago
do you know what happened next?
the biggest wave of prosperity we've ever seen in our lifetimes.

dear halfwit, Sly can't disagree with claims you never made. he's right, you're wrong. move on.

if you think she has extreme positions, post them. then we'll either agree or disagree. however, you're wrong, Sly is right.

I'm right, you're wrong.. that makes me the winner, better than you, your leader, your upper, your Superior, your god... Now bow down and suck my balls.

p.s... he did disagree with me didn't he?

I don't think she has extreme positions, I know it without question - just like everyone here knows it other than complete failed idiots like yourself.

one.. step.. closer..

just to recap, you're wrong and sly is right.

As a reminder, I'm right because you're wrong... :1orglaugh

:2 cents::2 cents:

How are people not seeing this? The Dems as a whole barely campaigned.

the biggest offering of credit of our lifetimes..plenty of money flowing but it was false...as long as USA is a consumer and NOT a manufacturer...we will be up shit creek now..the chickens are coming home to roost..newsflash, you can't borrow cash on the fucking house anymore

oh, I see.

tell me then, was there ever prosperity in america? :1orglaugh

if so, when?

yea when we actually MADE some shit and the world was buying it...now WE buy everything from the world ( China) on CREDIT..
I've learned the hard way to "cash and carry" for the past few years, all cars in cash, rent house, take no credit cards or loans...save $$$

:thumbsup
Really? What the hell wee all those TV commercials, radio ads and spam in my mailbox then?

I don't disagree that she is out there. Would I have voted for her? No. If she was elected would she have any real power? No. She would have been sitting on the sidelines and would be done in six years.

So... I guess you can vote for this woman because you can't stand Reid or you can vote for Reid because you can't stand this woman. They are one in the same. But you say that people should continue voting for a person that they can't stand, just because the alternate is something they don't know and probably more "extreme?"

People constantly talk about voting for the lesser of two evils. Some people think she is a lesser of those two evils. People thought the same thing in 2004 when they voted for Kerry (who lost) and many thought the same in 2008 when Obama won. Those are all crazy stupid people, too?

I really don't get it. In 2008 everyone was on board with Hope, Change, and drastic changes. Now a few Tea Party folk make a run, that will most likely never turn into anything substantial at all, and "oh my God, idiots everywhere!"

People are pissed off. Still. If you don't like your politician, you vote them out. That's how it works. A lot of times the alternate really sucks. You piss your people off enough, regardless of how terrible the alternate is, you get booted. Mike Castle learned that the hard way, Reid made it through... now you have to wonder if he will make changes or stay the same. My guess is stay the same and retire in six years. Not a bad option for him. Shitty for the people.

I saw one pundit make a point for keeping the bastards versus throwing out the bastards. I dont know if I agree with it, but it was this.

Would you prefer the old dog who knows exactly where all of the bones are buried, or a new dog who will tear up the entire yard?

WRONG, democrat numbers have been going down in a big way, GOP is growing a little, independent in a huge way, where do you get your info, Cracker Jacks Prize?

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/publ...ssional_ballot
Have you read some of the peoples answers I've been responding too?

Republicans and Democrats both have low numbers, the only thing that made a change was the Tea Party, that really has to hurt you, doesn't it?

Sorry to hear thats the extent of you conversation, might I suggest you try reading something once in a while to expand on your answers?

I been saying this shit for over a year, I was right

Or how powerful a bunch of racist, fringe tea party people are? LMAO

Have you been stoned for the last 3 months?

It was Clinton that gave US NAFTA

I've heard that argument a lot. I've thought a lot about it.

I'd rather have a hungry dog looking for a bone than a fat dog sitting on the edge of the yard laughing while the hungry dog digs. If the hungry dog is too stupid to find that bone, we'll find another dog.

I agree. The Republicans just lost the White House in 2012.

What just happened is people are pissed because they all expected Obama boy to flip a fucking switch and everything would be better. What the general public doesn't understand is that this is going to take a long time to get better, maybe a decade. When 2012 rolls around everything will still be crappy, and then the Dems can blame the Republicans.

In the mean time, both sides will just continue to fight each other. Business as usual.

What if the fat dog eats the hungry dog? What then?

They usually do. I like the underdog.

Umm.... the Tea Party movement in this election was a complete fail at everything other than yelling.

They kept the Republicans from taking a good bit more of the right power. The Tea Party won in the places that it was without question expected as the opposition had totally dropped the ball, outside of some local areas - it was a huge bust for the Tea Party.

If you're standing behind the TP now, you're getting laughed at.

People should be voting based on the politician that can represent those people, the closest. That's what this election is about....

She is far right of even the Conservative base, yet drew Dem/lib votes and Rep - yet Her views don't align with any of them. And you're right - it would be 6 years of nothing, vs... 6 years of influence. It's even more crazy.

2008, Obama, even Kerry - represent a major group of people. Those people voting that way, supported what was said - supported - what - he - said. With Reid vs. Angle, people don't agree with Angle - but they voted for her anyway.

That's just crazy....