Way to go OC Modeling : Re the current HIV mess..
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
-
besides our differences i am going to agree and disagree with you for whatever that's worth..OC Modeling didnt do anything, nor does any agency out there. With all the shit that is transmitted why isnt there a screening process to prevent gay actors or gay for pay actors from working with straight. My 2 cents. I have absolutelyy no problem with homo sexuality. Gay Marrige or anything like that. I do however say they should stay with thier own.
first, you made a thread saying "Way To Go OC Modeling", so by that title it would appear that you are blaming OC.
Is it really up to the talent agencies to monitor models STD's? Isn't that what AIM is supposed to do?
second, i believe that bisexuals, especially male bi's, are the main cause for the spread of HIV to heterosexual females which ultimately leads to the spread of HIV to straight males.
of course iv drug users are a major cause of spreading bloodborne diseases, but i think the case in point here is within the adult film industry..
with that being said, why on earth would a studio or female actress take the chance of shooting with a gay/bi male performer when the incubation period of HIV is still a question mark?
the other major problem i have with testing is that you only need a recent test to shoot scenes that does not factor in the fact that a performer could have had unprotected sex with an infected partner days before a shoot and therefore may be infected and still have a clean test..
to me, the system has always been flawed and i am surprised that there have not been more issues in the past..
how many events like this are going to be needed before stricter standards are put into place?
maybe if the studio owners had to have unprotected sex with performers before the shoot. there would be more concern...
.Comment
-
Testing is a lot more common these days. Many studios use the same 20 minute oral swab that the free clinics use. 99.9% accuracy with that 0.1% usually being false positives ... but I'd rather have a false positive than being a false negative.Can't compare the two IMO. In the gay community, HIV has been an issue for almost 30 years now. Shooting bareback in gay porn means a backlash from the gay consumer. That's a fact; in addition, I spoke with a gay producer a few years back when I was still green to all this, and he told me "there would be no gay porn if the performers had to test."
I agree 100% that we should be using condoms in straight movies, btw.
I prefer using the free clinic for the same swab and making a $35 donation which covers their cost plus a few dollars. They'd be more than happy to do it for free though.
Then you can sero match, which means HIV+ actors can still perform, but only with other HIV+ actors -- and still with condoms so that in case they have different strands they do not re-infect.
Indeed, there is a backlash against bareback videos ... overall. It still has its fans though. Most of my consumer friends like bareback videos because they're forced to use condoms in everyday life and it's a way to enjoy it without putting themselves at risk. Of course, the models are still at risk.
HIV isn't all models have to worry about. Hepatitis makes life a real bitch and sometimes kill.
All can be avoided with condoms.Comment
-
the porn industry here in the valley is pretty 'clean' considering how it is in other places... AIM does a great jobFor those of you sitting in porn valley sweating over a few HIV+ performers, I'd love to have you come over to Thailand and see what a real HIV+ cluster fuck is like.
Not sure what all of you expect. Your guys are fucking guys and your girls are escorts on the side, some of them barebacking for extra money (god bless them). The fact that you've only had a few positive tests over the years is very surprising to me.Comment
-
Can you post a pic? I'd fuck you. When's the next tradeshow?Not that this isn't a serious matter..but at the end of the day the percentage of HIV cases in the industry is minute compared to the number of performers shooting day after day. I would much rather take my chances fucking performers in the industry over the typical LA guy/girl off the street.Comment
-
Interesting, the last patient 0 is an escort as well.The Only Time When Success Comes Before Work Is In A Dictionary.
Did you ever notice: When you put the 2 words 'The' and 'IRS' together it spells 'Theirs.'Comment
-
Everyone seems to be focused on gay sex as the initial exposure. Ever think that maybe patient zero had a heroine problem? Sharing needles is another way to be exposed to AIDS. Just floating around another possible scenario, playing devils advocate. How many of you in the business have seen some serious drug use by those in the industry? They really haven't identified who patient zero is yet, so far it's only rumors... It'll come out soon enough. I really hope no one else is infected, wishful thinking...
Spanx!
JackComment
-
No doubt, that's what I'm saying. Though, I'm leaning more towards luck than AIM, because AIM only catches them once they have HIV. My surprise comes from how little HIV cases there have been.Comment
-
outside of high risk groups HIV isn't really that common. it's the 'special interest lobbies' that make HIV seem like a common occurrence.
http://www.avert.org/usa-race-age.htm
statistics suggest that most HIV cases in the US are homosexual and or black.
'The overall 5-year relative lung cancer survival rate for 1995-2002 was 15 percent.'
and like someone here in this thread did suggest I would be happy to have HIV instead of lung cancer.
Last edited by Grapesoda; 10-14-2010, 06:24 PM.Comment
-
as i understand AIM does not test for Hepatitis, which i never understood. just as life threatening but much easier to spread.
but the condom thing only works if at least 80% of the big and medium size companies are inComment
-
who is he dating?Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Looks like 4 girls have been removed since the google cache. 3 of them are very new to the bizComment


Comment