Nathan / Fabian - Please step inside. Time to step up to the plate.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ottopottomouse
    She is ugly, bad luck.
    • Jan 2010
    • 13177

    #316
    This thread seems to be going in circles.
    ↑ see post ↑
    13101

    Comment

    • Nathan
      Confirmed User
      • Jul 2003
      • 3108

      #317
      Originally posted by Dirty Dane
      Why does your TOS say something different than you say here:

      You can remove submission for NO reason at all, but here you say you can't?
      DMCA law (or any law for that matter) supersedes our TOS.
      "Think about it a little more and you'll agree with me, because you're smart and I'm right."
      - Charlie Munger

      Comment

      • gideongallery
        Confirmed User
        • Aug 2003
        • 7082

        #318
        Originally posted by Dirty Dane
        Comparing allowing kiddie porn to disallowing repeated infringement abuse is mumbojumbo. No one have never gone to jail or lost their safe harbor for booting a member for violating their TOS (which is another reason than the infringement itself)

        you just said
        No one have to prove anything, everyone know their TOS doesn't violate the law and that's the point: They can remove user submissions for ANY or NO reason (as they state). But here they claim they can't. It's not about law but policy, so saying two different things is lying.
        so then start a tube site, take my submission and claim that your removeing them because i am a visable minority

        see how quickly i win that lawsuit.

        microsoft could not TOS away backup rights


        and there was no free speech arguement to worry about

        and you think a porn site is going to get away with it


        if they censored a legit post they most certainly get sued, just because they wouldn't lose the safe harbor provision or go to jail doesn't mean there is zero liablity.



        You can't have it both ways, gideongallery. That's what bring people into trouble. The best example is piratebay, first they said fuck you to DMCA, next day in court, they argue and beg for DMCA protection. It doesn't work that way...

        wtf are you talking about the pirate bay never begged for DMCA protection, they claimed what they were doing was non infringing based on swedish law.

        swedish law doesn't have a take down process like america

        they got convicted for contributing to infringement for something where the evidence didn't even prove they were involved at all (DHT was turn on).
        Last edited by gideongallery; 11-10-2010, 01:08 PM.

        “When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak

        Comment

        • DWB
          Registered User
          • Jul 2003
          • 31779

          #319
          Originally posted by charlie g
          The whole fucking point of this tap dance gideon and nathan is that you PROFIT from STOLEN content. It is NOT in your BEST interest to do the RIGHT thing. You know very well an INDIVIDUAL surfer posting stolen content is not going to drag you into court for banning his account after multiple dmca complaints. There is absolutely no benefit for him to do that. BUT, it gives you perfect cover to rip, ravage and rape your competitors.

          As I said before, I would have tons of respect for you if you said this was a business decision. We are going to stretch the laws to our benefit and try to put as many of our competitors out of the business before the laws are changed. But I guess your "attorneys" told you to deny deny deny. They probably told you to shut the fuck up too and quit posting on this board. But you won't do that because you have some sort of inner need not to be "a bad guy". Nathan/Fabian... you are the bad guy. You are the one hurting more people than you could ever imagine. Own the bad guy in you and tell us to fuck off and quit whining. You are the big dick in the room. You have the cheese bro, own it.!

          I truly believe if someone with balls and enough money could take you to court (and not bow down to suck your cock with a nice pay day settlement) it would change this industry for the better. The days of getting your employees to rip off entire member areas would be over if someone ripped you a new one publicly. But money talks and now we have some useless digital thumbprint that the people you are killing with your UNETHICAL business practices could never afford to use(and you probably profit from with some back room agreement made during your last payoff).

          Anyways, kudos to you man. You rock Dont worry about karma or hell, that's why you over-pay your lawyers. Sleep well knowing you are a fucking leech.
          I have to agree with you. If you're gonna be the bad guy, own it and be the bad guy. You have to respect someone who walks it like he talks it. I don't have to agree with your business model, but for fuck sake, man up to what you're doing and tell it like it is.

          But don't keep blowing smoke up everyone's ass while trying to convince them it's not smoke because we're all too stupid to even know what smoke is. That is where you lose all respect and make me want to smash a brick on the side of your head. I hate pansies with every fiber of my being. Grow a pair.

          Comment

          • Nathan
            Confirmed User
            • Jul 2003
            • 3108

            #320
            Originally posted by charlie g
            The whole fucking point of this tap dance gideon and nathan is that you PROFIT from STOLEN content. It is NOT in your BEST interest to do the RIGHT thing. You know very well an INDIVIDUAL surfer posting stolen content is not going to drag you into court for banning his account after multiple dmca complaints. There is absolutely no benefit for him to do that. BUT, it gives you perfect cover to rip, ravage and rape your competitors.
            The part you do not seem to understand is that a ton of studios are uploading their own content to our tubes. A bunch of amateurs are uploading their own content to our tubes, and yes, some users claim they are from company X and they upload the companie's own content but in fact it is not true. THIS is why DMCA exists. Becuase WE should not be held accountable for users lieing to us and should not need the burden on us to prove every single submission is ok. So sure, we might know that someone DEFINATELY NOT EMPLOYED OR CONTRACTED by a studio is not allowed to uploaded content XYZ, _BUT_ if they claim they are, we can NOT "know very well". This is why we use Vobile, this is why we follow DMCA, to make it as easy as possible for studios to make sure content they never want to see there either never gets there or easily can be removed.

            Originally posted by charlie g

            As I said before, I would have tons of respect for you if you said this was a business decision. We are going to stretch the laws to our benefit and try to put as many of our competitors out of the business before the laws are changed. But I guess your "attorneys" told you to deny deny deny. They probably told you to shut the fuck up too and quit posting on this board. But you won't do that because you have some sort of inner need not to be "a bad guy". Nathan/Fabian... you are the bad guy. You are the one hurting more people than you could ever imagine. Own the bad guy in you and tell us to fuck off and quit whining. You are the big dick in the room. You have the cheese bro, own it.!
            I disagree, I am sorry, but I do. We help more companies than we hurt. By far. We have hundreds of studios submitting content. We license millions worth of content from studios. We are implementing Vobile. We are not target specific competitors to take them out of business, that's complete bullshit. We work with a ton of our competitors, a ton of them are good friends of ours. The people bitching around here would bitch even if I turned off the tubes, they would start bitching about moviebox giving users access to too much content for a low fee and they can not compete, they would be bitching about brazzers paying too much for ad spots so they can not compete, they would be bitching that we are not fair to affiliates for some reason. They always find something, because all they can do is bitch.

            Originally posted by charlie g

            I truly believe if someone with balls and enough money could take you to court (and not bow down to suck your cock with a nice pay day settlement) it would change this industry for the better. The days of getting your employees to rip off entire member areas would be over if someone ripped you a new one publicly. But money talks and now we have some useless digital thumbprint that the people you are killing with your UNETHICAL business practices could never afford to use(and you probably profit from with some back room agreement made during your last payoff).
            Nobody would win against us in court, because we ARE NOT BREAKING ANY LAWS. We also did not do any weird deals with Vobile or FSC. We pay quite a bit of money to Vobile every single month to even use their system, both for brazzers/mofos and for the tubes! Also, Vobile is NOT too expensive! It's NOT something people "could never afford to use", that's just rediculous. It adds a TINY premium on top of exclusively produced content.

            Most importantly, your continous bullshit about us ripping other people's content.. WE DO NOT. We do not upload content we do not license directly, we do not rip members areas, we do not steal content. Other tubes we know very well that they do, but WE DO NOT.
            "Think about it a little more and you'll agree with me, because you're smart and I'm right."
            - Charlie Munger

            Comment

            • Robbie
              Leaner, Meaner, Faster
              • Aug 2002
              • 20960

              #321
              DWB you're right.

              And for the second time I'm gonna have to admit to being a hypocrite. I kept gideongallery around because he made me laugh. But I have to follow my own code so I was forced to put him on ignore.

              He's a clown and doesn't have the abilities to ever be able to enable me to make money with him. So off to IGNORE he went.

              Nathan/Fabian is the same damn thing. A clown who won't make a dime for me. He's useless and has no knowledge of this business. I almost choked on my soda when he said HE is going to lecture to US about the DMCA law!!!

              He's been a "managing partner" for a few months and he's an expert? But he can't answer any questions? LOL! Fucking clown!

              Goodbye Nathan/Fabian. You were insignificant before and now you return there because you don't exist to me. Welcome to my ignore list.
              -Robbie
              ClaudiaMarie.Com

              Comment

              • Nathan
                Confirmed User
                • Jul 2003
                • 3108

                #322
                Ouch, that hurts, I do not exist for Robbie :/ poor me...
                "Think about it a little more and you'll agree with me, because you're smart and I'm right."
                - Charlie Munger

                Comment

                • Dirty Dane
                  Sick Fuck
                  • Feb 2004
                  • 9491

                  #323
                  Originally posted by Nathan
                  DMCA law (or any law for that matter) supersedes our TOS.
                  Where in DMCA does it say that you can't boot a user and his submission for any or no reason, and why aren't you telling the uploaders the same as you tell here?

                  Comment

                  • DWB
                    Registered User
                    • Jul 2003
                    • 31779

                    #324
                    Originally posted by Nathan
                    DMCA law (or any law for that matter) supersedes our TOS.
                    Curious, when one of your users loads a video onto one of your sites of a minor, do you just ban him, or do you just delete that one video, or delete all of his videos? Since a minor is involved, I would expect a different reaction than to a copyright issue.

                    Comment

                    • Quentin
                      Confirmed User
                      • Dec 2002
                      • 1280

                      #325
                      Originally posted by ottopottomouse
                      This thread seems to be going in circles.
                      Eh.... maybe more like concentric ovoids; the same points approached from a slightly different angle in each subsequent repitition.

                      Or maybe it's like the message board version of the instructions on a shampoo bottle: "blather, rinse, repeat." ;-)
                      Q. Boyer

                      Comment

                      • Dirty Dane
                        Sick Fuck
                        • Feb 2004
                        • 9491

                        #326
                        Originally posted by gideongallery
                        so then start a tube site, take my submission and claim that your removeing them because i am a visable minority

                        see how quickly i win that lawsuit.

                        microsoft could not TOS away backup rights


                        and there was no free speech arguement to worry about

                        and you think a porn site is going to get away with it


                        if they censored a legit post they most certainly get sued, just because they wouldn't lose the safe harbor provision or go to jail doesn't mean there is zero liablity.
                        I could remove your movies for ANY reason, if you agreed to that contract between us. Any private company or individual running a website or service can set their own rules and limit free speech. They can say "you are not granted unlimited backup "rights" on our servers" (ie they can also remove it for NO or ANY reason if they agreed). In case you didn't know, that's called a legal contract. You would not win any lawsuit, because you signed the contract.

                        Comment

                        • DWB
                          Registered User
                          • Jul 2003
                          • 31779

                          #327
                          Originally posted by Quentin
                          Eh.... maybe more like concentric ovoids; the same points approached from a slightly different angle in each subsequent repitition.

                          Or maybe it's like the message board version of the instructions on a shampoo bottle: "blather, rinse, repeat." ;-)
                          That is exactly what it is. I know for myself, I enjoy watching Nathan's replies and how he dances around. We place bets here in the office on what he will say to boogie around a topic. "The Nathan Side Step" we call it. Almost better than playing Call Of Duty.

                          But most of all I enjoy wasting his time. He'll never get that back and it's the one thing I can steal from him with no recourse. Every minute he wastes on GFY being a smart ass and not spending time with his family, is a stolen minute. It's one more minute stolen from his life. He'll regret all the time he spent here later on. It's the least I can do for all the time I've wasted sending DMCAs to his sites. I render videos while I post so I'm still being productive, so no skin off my back.

                          Everyone who posts in these threads knows nothing will change. It never does. But we all love to waste his time and enjoy watching him dance. He's quite the ballerina.

                          Comment

                          • datatank
                            Confirmed User
                            • Aug 2004
                            • 5471

                            #328
                            DWB and Robbie why dont you stop wasting your time and try to work with Nathan?

                            He could send you both serious sales and traffic.
                            Tubes are going no where. They have sucked up all the traffic that 10000's of little tgps used to control.
                            Deal with it.

                            Comment

                            • Robbie
                              Leaner, Meaner, Faster
                              • Aug 2002
                              • 20960

                              #329
                              Originally posted by datatank
                              DWB and Robbie why dont you stop wasting your time and try to work with Nathan?

                              He could send you both serious sales and traffic.
                              Tubes are going no where. They have sucked up all the traffic that 10000's of little tgps used to control.
                              Deal with it.
                              Already tried that. I put up 6 videos (pornhub is an affiliate of mine). The videos together have so far been viewed 2,131,924 times over the last 9 months.

                              From all those views on pornhub it has sent a TOTAL of 13464 uniques and SEVEN signups in NINE MONTHS.

                              I get more than that in type-ins in 15 minutes.

                              Do you think I haven't already checked all of this out, and I'm just talking out of my ass? Well, I'm not. This is a business and I'm damn good at making money at it. Pornhub is USELESS to sell paysite memberships off of the videos.

                              Two reasons...
                              1. They don't know how to promote it (the page is so full of pre-paid ads that you can't see the trees for the forest of spammy shit...also there's nothing to promote the actual site but a TINY text link above the vid)

                              2. The people that go to Pornhub have now been conditioned to think that they don't have to pay for porn anymore.

                              Here is one of my vids on pornhub...see for yourself...I can get more traffic to the site from the lowliest blog post than all of pornhub can send:

                              http://www.pornhub.com/view_video.ph...key=1028809565
                              -Robbie
                              ClaudiaMarie.Com

                              Comment

                              • signupdamnit
                                Confirmed User
                                • Aug 2007
                                • 6697

                                #330
                                Originally posted by Robbie
                                Already tried that. I put up 6 videos (pornhub is an affiliate of mine). The videos together have so far been viewed 2,131,924 times over the last 9 months.

                                From all those views on pornhub it has sent a TOTAL of 13464 uniques and SEVEN signups in NINE MONTHS.

                                I get more than that in type-ins in 15 minutes.
                                I wonder of those seven signups how many are just surfers who typed your main terms in google and clicked on the pornhub link to see what they could get for free before signing up. That is, people who probably would have bought a membership anyway.

                                You don't like my posts? Put me on ignore or fuck right off. I'll say what I want.

                                Comment

                                Working...