Nathan / Fabian - Please step inside. Time to step up to the plate.

yes please sounds like fun

Robbie didnt Nathan put together 40million bucks to buy brazzers?

LOL

Will check with my attorney and get back to you about that.

But I think he's going to say something along the lines of, probably not.

http://www.courrierlaval.com/Societe...artier-cossu/1

Posted on April 2, 2010
Nathalie Villeneuve

Residents of residential Bergerac III are worried. Since last fall, the private security guards driving SUVs with tinted windows monitor the area, round the clock, 7 days 7. Why? Nobody answers. Here is the first in a series of three articles published by the Courrier Laval.

On 18 November, on Jean-Paul Sartre, at dusk. A dark Ford Explorer, with a plate F is parked outside a house, engine off, lights out. On the driver's seat, a silhouette profile.

For nearly five months, residents of the neighborhood attend helplessly as the mysterious comings and goings of vehicles of a kind.
Similar evidence
"I am the first to have called the police," said one area resident who wishes to remain anonymous as all other citizens interviewed by the Courier Laval.
Their stories are consistent. The carousel they describe is disturbing. Most often, two, three, even four vehicles patrolling the area, day or night.

Why do some of their neighbors they need protection so important? That is the question they ask themselves with terror.
Unanswered
"Often they are parked on the street Simone de Beauvoir at the entrance of the development, said the same resident. I fear for the safety of my family. I have four children. "
One of his neighbors said they had located "four or five houses" that appear to be targeted by the guards in SUVs. "There are movements of people between the houses," he said. People were escorted to a house to another. "

A third citizen said that sometimes visitors who go home are followed. It all began in October, "he recalls. "Many families have called police since. I even went to the headquarters. They say: "Do not worry '."

An answer that satisfies no one. Councilman District, Yvon Bromley, is also aware of the issue but no action is taken, provide the citizens questioned. Mr Bromley did not return calls Courrier Laval.
Mansef Productions
Two residents said they spoke with the driver of the mysterious vehicle. In both cases, the business card they were tense was called Mansef Productions. The company owns a network of pornographic sites. The only thing reassuring person.
Department of Laval police are only valid for residents of the area have hired private security guards. "According to information we have, people do not have to worry about," says Lt. Daniel Guerin, head of communications. "The situation is unusual," he concedes, while sparing of comments about the information collected from individuals who engage the services of security guards. "They were victims of threats and intimidation. They also appealed to the Montreal police. "

Are these private agents monitor several houses? How? Investigators have they looked at the activities in these houses? "We found the comings and goings, we looked at the issue in every sense," Mr Guerin.

Despite this, SUVs are still circulating in the neighborhood, recently confirmed a resident.

Please do. And when he advises you come back to the board and tell us. Don't tell us what he advised tho. Thanks

AHHHH HAAAAA!! Finally some proof!?!?!!!

Great find.

They have to role with security because they know they have fucked over just about everyone and sooner or later someone is gonna pull their card.

I wonder how much Nathan is really getting paid to take the heat away from these guys? To put the security of your family on the line over some porn sites really says a lot about a person.

youtube doesn't remove all the videos when they bann an account, you are baldface lying about that.

The fact is youtube does exactly the same thing NAT is doing, take down the account and ONLY the videos with complaints against them

they leave up the complaint less videos up.

I only need to produce 1 example to prove you lied.

All your videos got removed because you had a complaint for each an every video, maybe some of the complaints were bogus, and you could have got them reverses if you had filled out the 5 pages of paper work to see the complaints and responded to them, maybe it would have ment nothing.

But doesn't change the fact that

Youtube doesn't remove all the videos when they bann an account

It's kind of funny to watch Robbie all up in here playing the big shot against a company the size of Mansef. Yes Robbie, we get it you're proud of Claudia Maria, and so you should be. You've done pretty well with that site.

I also know you're pretty ignorant about how much money tubes actually make. You believe, without any first hand knowledge, that their primary revenue streams are soley dating and webcams.

Back to what I was saying. I'd bet Pornhub alone makes more in a month than you do in a year. That's just one of their tubes. So yes Robbie, you may indeed a be a "true pornographer" (congrats on that btw?) with a history in this business dating back to to the 1990's. At the end of the day, after all of that work, the grand total of your online assets isn't even close to Mansef.

Just a small remark regarding the great article posted:

1) This article is about owners of Mansef not owners of Manwin... and as we all know, Brazzers et al is owned by Manwin et al;
2) This article was posted beginning of April, while the sale of Mansef assets was not widely public;
3) As far as I know, the security mentioned there is no longer in use and has not been for quite some time;
4) I have no security, people that actually know me in person will know that too;
5) The article proves absolutely nothing.

gideon, thx for your posts, but there really is no need, the people still posting in here are completely out of sync with reality, its sadly a useless waste of time...

Not going to comment on any of the other crap posted lately...

They can. I've seen it done on multiple occasions. If you were someone worthy of respect, or could even be taken seriously, I'd share my Youtube records with you so you can see everything that happened, step by step.

Why they may do one account and not another is their call, not yours or mine. But they have the authority to do so and that is the point.



Checking with my attorney about all of that. Supposed to have a meeting with him on Thursday.


You are also still posting here, and you keep coming back.

Is that what they pay you to do?

DWB, sadly, noone pays me to post on this or any other board :/ It's 10am in Europe, I am watching TV, reading reports and contracts and reading GFY and posting in fun threads like this one to amuse myself... I usually do not get very busy until after lunch...

At some point, even you will have to accept the facts... I know it will happen, it will just take horribly long with you... ;)

It's always fun to reply to you and read your funny posts though.. so go on if you want to

You seem like a good guy fabien. Suppose somebody from russia posts a shitload of videos with very young looking girls. Do you pull those down or do you wait for a DMCA complaint? I am sure you have already consulted with the lawyers, but could you share with me? This is an absolute honest question.

It would most likely not even go up, and if it goes up, it would be pulled down by the community quickly.

funny i know you didn't fill out the paper work to get the reason for each videos banning, because if you did you would know youtube covers their ass better than anyone

they don't take shit down unless they have someone or something else to blame for it.


bullshit you can't TOS your legal liablities to th law, youtube covers their ass for everything better than anyone, they always have someone else to blame for all their actions, they never take down shit unless they have something else to point to

a law that is unequivically being broken (and no copyright infringement is not unequivalent because of fair use)
a complaint form someone else
etc.


if the you could basically say fuck you to the law just because of TOS
eharmony would have been sued by gay and lesbian groups for deciding to segment the market with their services.

they own a patent on martix math for dating, and as a result no gay/lesbian dating site can match you on 29 points of compatibility and they got sued because their TOS violated the law.

http://mashable.com/2010/01/28/eharmony-lawsuit/

2 million dollar in damages that would never have happened if TOS actually allowed you to bipass the laws.