Nathan / Fabian - Please step inside. Time to step up to the plate.
Collapse
X
-
-
I'm sure he was told they could legally remove the videos since the user clearly violated their terms of service on multiple occasions. However, Nathan will dance around some other shit and have reasons for why they can't, probably insulting us along the way with the usual condescending tone, leaving off exactly where it all started.
I'm looking forward to it. He's so predictable.Comment
-
Maybe today Fabian will post the results of his consultations with his attorneys?Comment
-
only if they are clueless lawyers who know nothing about fair use and copyright law
if the lawyers are the kind of guys who were involved on any of the fair use cases over the last few years (timeshifting/formatshifting/backup/recovery)
they would tell him about the huge potential liablity of removing the video without notification from the actual copyright lawyer.
if your so sure that there is no liability why not stand security for the liability thenHowever, Nathan will dance around some other shit and have reasons for why they can't, probably insulting us along the way with the usual condescending tone, leaving off exactly where it all started.
I'm looking forward to it. He's so predictable.
putting up your house/and everything you earn for a liability that will never exist is a no brainer.Comment
-
Write a script. Spider all 2300 videos uploaded by rampaux and file a DMCA with each of the urls listed. They HAVE to respond, and remove all the videos/urls unless a counter is filed.- Free Premium Domain Lists and Tools at Clickmojo.com
- For Sale: Obscenity.com
Comment
-
* Joined: <lastlogind ate>
* Last Login: <joindate>
* Videos Watched: 226
* People have watched kb24 videos: 114611 times
as i pointed out to paul before
most likely just a transpositional in the variable posting
see above
of course paul wants to try and argue that is proof the account was faked and that it was an internal employee who posted the videos.
let not destroy his fantasy that he has found proof of wrong doing, it not like he is smart enough to actually come up with a good new idea.Comment
-
-
Comment
-
-
Youtube removes all movies if the user is banned. Rapidshare is doing the same. Webhosts do not remove part of a website, they remove all on the account if their user is banned. Are you telling their laywers have no clue?only if they are clueless lawyers who know nothing about fair use and copyright law
if the lawyers are the kind of guys who were involved on any of the fair use cases over the last few years (timeshifting/formatshifting/backup/recovery)
they would tell him about the huge potential liablity of removing the video without notification from the actual copyright lawyer.Last edited by Dirty Dane; 10-22-2010, 10:08 AM.Comment
-
No gideongallery is merely reminding you that HE personally has no clue about anything to do with any of this. The only thing he knows how to do is use a bit torrent to back up his obsession for watching television.
What we have is a couch potato who watches hours and hours of television trying to armchair lawyer.
In reality...shouldn't gideongallery be busy writing that email to thedoc that he's been working on now for MONTHS? Oh that's right...gideongallery is OWNED by thedoc and is thedoc's BITCH.



-Robbie
ClaudiaMarie.ComComment
-
There's an IGNORE function on this forum and it's really the perfect way to deal with trolls like Gideon...I suggest everyone use it.Is this gonna get ugly, now? Huh? I hope not. Because I thought what we were here, racial differences notwithstanding, was just a couple of old friends. You know, just both of us Californians.Comment
-
Maybe either he and/or his attorneys were on vacation last week, and he'll tell us today about his consultations with them?Comment
-
Is Nathan/Fabian/Manwin ignoring us who are interested in his replay???Comment


Comment