-
"Think about it a little more and you'll agree with me, because you're smart and I'm right."
- Charlie Munger -
you can't tos away fair use
which means if they take it down as TOS and the court ultimately rule that posting was covered by fair use (ala commentary was extended to include that) then manwin would be liable
if they wait for the DMCA then the copyright holder who issued the takedown notice has the liability
http://www.onlinepolicy.org/action/l...opg_v_diebold/
what nat is defending is just smart business, if the copyright holder truely believes that commentary will never be extended to that level, then let them take the liability for it
if they do let the content stay up.
manwin washes their hands of it accept non of the liability from either side of the arguement
he would be a world class moron to do anything else.
“When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve WozniakComment
-
Regardless of where anyone stands, good to see some spirited debate going on at the GFY....
Last edited by Wizzo; 10-11-2010, 12:45 PM.Looking for Opportunity!
Comment
-
no shit you mean tubes really steal content?!?!!!!!111111SupComment
-
Comment
-
gfy is my familySupComment
-
fabian is fatfooSupComment
-
Kenny -at- YourPaysitePartner.com
Skype: kennyb514
Do business with us:
Your Paysite Partner
Kenny's Pennies
Sticky Dollars
Radical Cash
Indie Bucks
Stand Ahead
Read My Ambush Interview HereComment
-
I hear that Nathan isnt even really a "managing partner"
He owns very little in this.Since 1999: 69 Adult Industry awards for Best Hosting Company and professional excellence.
Comment
-
Running? If I had 100 million dollars i'd have a team of midgets carrying me around in a sedan chair.↑ see post ↑
13101Comment
-
Comment