Nathan / Fabian - Please step inside. Time to step up to the plate.

All of you, have not understood DMCA. It clearly says we can not select. So no, the USER has editorial rights, we do not, that's the whole point of a tube. We do have the right to screen for illegal content.

Possibly removing all content when banning a user for dmca is ok, but until I discuss it with our lawyers I can not comment on it.

You know _NOTHING_ about me

Per PornHub.com TOS ~
"[I]You agree that Pornhub may at its sole discretion have the right to refuse to publish, remove, or block access to any User Submission that is available via the Website or other Pornhub network or services at any time, for any reason, or for no reason at all, with or without notice.

it is not a problem at youtube ,google,twitter,facebook or any other law abiding company fyi. I have never seen a law that requires you to host files for people you have reason to believe are criminals.

But let's not beat around the bush , you can delete any file for any reason you want. You would delete a video if a person appeared underage right ? without proof right ? because it is the right thing to do , so don't play games, do the right thing, don't look the other way for criminals because it makes you more profit.

Based on the photo that was posted of you before, I _KNOW_ you are pretty enough to want to fuck. And I mean that.

I could look at your pretty face for hours. It's so feminine and smooth looking. Your skin is so pale and soft, like a school boy. Seriously, you give me wood. And while I _DO_ believe in violence, real bad third world violence, I would _NEVER_ want to hurt you. Just the opposite. I would treat you like a like a fragile virgin school boy. Even your name, "Fabian," makes me hot for you. You're just like an innocent, bratty, little boy. Do you mind if I start calling you Pretty Boy Fabian? That gets me hard.

You don't have to answer this here (ICQ is fine), but have you ever had a more masculine and slightly older man cum inside your ass before? I think you would like it once you were comfortable with a big strong cock in your ass.

All piracy, thieving, lying, cheating and scum-baggery aside, if you ever want to hook up, ICQ me. I _WILL_ turn you out.

I've owned websites a LOT longer than you have. And I've owned content a LOT longer than you have...unless you were a big site owner dating back to the mid-1990's.

And you are looking really dumb when you say you can't take something down off of your own site. Bullshit. And everyone knows that. There is NO law in existence that says you have to have anything on Pornhub. You could delete the entire site right now if you wanted to. You could decide to shut it down and take it offline if you wanted to...or does DMCA say you "can't" LOL

WTF kind of b.s. is this? Pornhub is just a website. One of millions. It isn't some kind of national treasure that must be protected at all costs. You can delete every video right now if you want to.

You could find JESUS today and decide it's going to be an all religious tube from now on and go in there and delete every porn video in the data base and replace them all with Christian videos. No law says you can't.

No way you're this damn dumb. I think you are just doing another version of trolling to piss people off.

not sure if you would still like my ass so much when you see me in person I'm afraid :/

Ron,

As you pasted, YouTube does not say they remove all videos once they terminate access, they also do not say what a repeat infringer is. Unless I missed that part obviously.

And no, editorial rights, as per DMCA, is selecting content. We can for example not choose what content we like that gets uploaded and what we do not and then not let certain things come online. This is illegal as per DMCA. Deleting videos after the fact with a reason like "you uploaded 2000 videos and 2 were DMCA'd, obviously all other 1998 are infringing although interestingly enough we have only received 2 DMCA's in the last 2 months" does not sound so great to me. Of course we could just guess... but let's imagine this...

There is a user, he runs a service which uploads videos to tubes for content owners. The content owners hire him to upload. One of the content owners changes his mind and DMCA's the 2 videos he had him upload. So now we delete the other 1000 videos the user uploaded... We had no reason to do so in the end. Actually, in theory, one of the content owners could sue us because of unfair competition caused when we removed their video from our site and thus cost them branding views.

I know, I know, everyone will now again call me a thief and stupid and that I have no clue and that obviously I am just playing... still, I have the urge to comment... stupid me.

Nathan, if someone violates your TOS, I would think you could delete, ban or anything you want based on that TOS violation. Otherwise, why bother have a TOS in the first place? It then becomes a TOS violation and not a DMCA issue.



I know if I could spend 100+ million dollars on a company and had the kind of wealth you supposedly have, I would have my attorney on speed dial and he would take my calls 24/7. At the very least, take my call in the daytime.

I don't even have 1 million dollars and my attorney will do that for me.

I'm afraid that pic that was posted is rather old So I am not sure if you would still like my ass so much when you see me in person I'm afraid :/

If you could spend 100+ million dollars to buy a company would you be going back and forth on GFY? But maybe if you are paid to play someone who paid 100+ million dollars then being a GFY is just the avg work day.