Nathan / Fabian - Please step inside. Time to step up to the plate.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • gideongallery
    Confirmed User
    • Aug 2003
    • 7082

    #106
    Originally posted by Robbie
    I've owned websites a LOT longer than you have. And I've owned content a LOT longer than you have...unless you were a big site owner dating back to the mid-1990's.

    And you are looking really dumb when you say you can't take something down off of your own site. Bullshit. And everyone knows that. There is NO law in existence that says you have to have anything on Pornhub. You could delete the entire site right now if you wanted to. You could decide to shut it down and take it offline if you wanted to...or does DMCA say you "can't" LOL

    WTF kind of b.s. is this? Pornhub is just a website. One of millions. It isn't some kind of national treasure that must be protected at all costs. You can delete every video right now if you want to.

    You could find JESUS today and decide it's going to be an all religious tube from now on and go in there and delete every porn video in the data base and replace them all with Christian videos. No law says you can't.

    No way you're this damn dumb. I think you are just doing another version of trolling to piss people off.
    owning a hosting type site is significantly different then owning a link list or a tgp.

    you remove a link your only reducing traffic your not censoring anyone, the persons content is still up on their own server.

    the host taking the site down (which tube sites have to comply with since that the whole point of getting DMCA protection) has completely different liablities. The act of taking down the content actually censors the free speach associated with it.

    so your totally wrong again.

    your the guy who hires a divorce lawyer to do your copyright lawsuits
    i would not trust the legal advice your giving.

    “When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak

    Comment

    • Robbie
      Leaner, Meaner, Faster
      • Aug 2002
      • 20960

      #107
      Originally posted by gideongallery
      gobbledygook and babbling
      gideongallery...you have no idea what the fuck you are talking about.

      I haven't hired any "divorce" lawyer. lol

      The guy I have taking care of collecting money for me is the same guy doing it for Hustler.

      You are a complete moron.

      Now get the fuck out of here! TheDoc OWNS YOU. He already proved that you are full of shit and you are his bitch.

      Now please let the adults talk.
      -Robbie
      ClaudiaMarie.Com

      Comment

      • borked
        Totally Borked
        • Feb 2005
        • 6284

        #108
        Originally posted by gideongallery
        The act of taking down the content actually censors the free speach associated with it.
        hahahahahaha. See - I can't say that on GFY but I wanted to as free speech says I am allowed to, as long as I'm not inciting violence or something.

        Surely what gets put up *on a private website* has the means to be vetted and edited and deleted according to the rules of the owner of that private website.

        Shit, this isn't Speaker's Corner in Hyde Park we're talking about...

        For coding work - hit me up on andy // borkedcoder // com
        (consider figuring out the email as test #1)



        All models are wrong, but some are useful. George E.P. Box. p202

        Comment

        • Nathan
          Confirmed User
          • Jul 2003
          • 3108

          #109
          Robbie,

          as I have said, I will be talking to our lawyers about the subject and react accordingly.

          If you think that is not reasonable, then so be it.

          BTW, Robbie, just because 10 or so people on GFY complain about us, TopBucks or FSC regarding this subject, does not mean the world hates us. We have many many people working with us from this industry. You might not like that but thats how it is.

          Also, your continued tries to claim that you are somehow special in your knowledge of the adult entertainment industry and that I am somehow not allowed to know anything about it since I am "just a programmer" are getting ridiculous. You are not special, I am not special.

          signupdamnit, thx for the reasonable and constructive posts.
          "Think about it a little more and you'll agree with me, because you're smart and I'm right."
          - Charlie Munger

          Comment

          • Robbie
            Leaner, Meaner, Faster
            • Aug 2002
            • 20960

            #110
            Fabian, I never said anybody was "special"

            I merely said your expertise is NOT in what you are currently being presented to the world to be.

            You are a programmer. You have never and will never be a true pornographer. Just as I have never and will never be a programmer. You don't even know how things work yet. You're just being told and doing what you're told by a few different people obviously.

            That's cool.

            Even now you're double talking. You are an amazing character. YouTube's rules and how they do it were just pointed out to you.

            But yet you can't understand that. You must ask your lawyers if it's legal to take down a video? Get the fuck out of here!

            If you don't already know the answer to that is "yes, you can" then that just goes to show that you don't have a clue about what you're doing. That's why you can't seem to answer much of anything.

            If you look back at your posts you are always telling people that you need to "find out" about specific questions.

            Brother...I know EVERY detail of what I do and my company does.

            And before you start telling me how "big" your company is... Bottom line is you have Brazzers, a few dead tgps, and some tube sites. If you think that's just too massive for you to have knowledge of everything...then I'm sorry. I know I would.

            I personally think that the real folks there know exactly how things work and exactly what to have you say.

            But IF I'm crazy, and IF a programmer for NATS somehow came up with millions of dollars to buy a company in the middle of a worldwide economic crisis AND being sued AND having the govt. come after them....well, in that case I suggest you stop posting and go LEARN your damn business and your company.
            Last edited by Robbie; 10-10-2010, 02:06 PM.
            -Robbie
            ClaudiaMarie.Com

            Comment

            • gideongallery
              Confirmed User
              • Aug 2003
              • 7082

              #111
              Originally posted by borked
              hahahahahaha. See - I can't say that on GFY but I wanted to as free speech says I am allowed to, as long as I'm not inciting violence or something.

              Surely what gets put up *on a private website* has the means to be vetted and edited and deleted according to the rules of the owner of that private website.

              Shit, this isn't Speaker's Corner in Hyde Park we're talking about...
              assuming that 1998 videos that were not DMCA down are automatically infringing is not the same thing as blocking something that violates TOS.

              The point is proof, you word got blocked because it is proven to be a violation of the TOS (it a banned word)

              a porn tube acts as a host (it has too to get the safe harbor provision) so consider that when you define the "privat website" should a host of say claudia-marie.com be allowed to take down the site willy nilly with no consequences simply because think she is old and flabby (doesn't get them hard in robbie's quote).

              should robbie be denied the right to sue for the damages cause by that willy nilly takedown.


              that the point, nat right, the rules are different then a board, a tgp, a link list,

              they are more akin to what a hosting provider has to do, and if you believe that robbie host can simply take down his domain willy nilly with no consequence you are sadly mistake.

              “When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak

              Comment

              • Nathan
                Confirmed User
                • Jul 2003
                • 3108

                #112
                Robbie, you are hilarious...

                I am not going to answer until I have talked to my lawyers about it, that's just how it is, accept it or not, I do not care. There is reasons for why I do it this way, and you will have to just accept this, it's in the end, none of your business how I get this done. I am saying I am getting it done though...

                You know _NOTHING_ about me, you know _NOTHING_ about the lawsuits against Mansef, you know _NOTHING_ about Manwin... That is the only stuff you make blatantly obvious here. I have no need to explain myself to you. Just because I own a company, does not mean I know every single little detail about every single little aspect of the way it runs.

                We own far more than "Brazzers, a few dead tgps and some tube sites"... I fully understand that you, running your small website(s) does not understand the scale of this, and the reasons for why I do not know all the ins and outs by heart and I do not blame you, we are completely different kinds of people. As you said, you are a true pornographer. Sure, I do not shoot content myself, I do nolonger code myself, I nolonger setup websites myself, I simply do not have the time for that nor would it be feasible in such a big corporation. But this is something you as a true pornographer will never understand. Simply because you do not see the bigger picture here.

                BTW, regarding your "worldwide economoic crisis" ... do you realize that because of this crisis, there is a TON of money flowing around just LOOKING for someone to take it because all the funds out there have lost the places to invest in? Should think about that a little, if you can. Very few people here understand the mechanics of the deals that I have made, but trust me, its doable, and I'm continuing to do them. Obviously I could sit here and spell it all out for you, but honestly, I have no need to justify myself towards you. It might piss me off that you can not wrap your head around the process and therefor are making false claims, but this rant will have to do... since it's none of your business.

                As I also said before, you know NOTHING about the lawsuits against Mansef. I spent days on just those lawsuits before I signed the purchase agreement. And I can assure you, _I_ know more about it than you.
                "Think about it a little more and you'll agree with me, because you're smart and I'm right."
                - Charlie Munger

                Comment

                • Robbie
                  Leaner, Meaner, Faster
                  • Aug 2002
                  • 20960

                  #113
                  Originally posted by gideongallery
                  claudia-marie.com

                  robbie's

                  robbie

                  robbie .
                  Obsess much? Now get out of here. TheDoc is STILL waiting for your email months and months later. Get out of here you attention whore. TheDoc OWNS you.
                  -Robbie
                  ClaudiaMarie.Com

                  Comment

                  • borked
                    Totally Borked
                    • Feb 2005
                    • 6284

                    #114
                    OK, I admit I'm no tin this field to know the ins and outs of DMCA - never said I did, but the hosting analogy seems wrong. If I was doing something illegal with my server, the ISP would be the first to know and they'd shut me off, right? I then went back to that ISP and got a new server and did the same, they'd shut me off again. The third time, they'd probably not take my business at all since they knew I was only in it to do things illegally.

                    Same with the law of my land and ADOPI.

                    For coding work - hit me up on andy // borkedcoder // com
                    (consider figuring out the email as test #1)



                    All models are wrong, but some are useful. George E.P. Box. p202

                    Comment

                    • Half man, Half Amazing
                      Confirmed User
                      • Feb 2008
                      • 372

                      #115
                      Originally posted by Nathan

                      There is a user, he runs a service which uploads videos to tubes for content owners. The content owners hire him to upload. One of the content owners changes his mind and DMCA's the 2 videos he had him upload. So now we delete the other 1000 videos the user uploaded... We had no reason to do so in the end. Actually, in theory, one of the content owners could sue us because of unfair competition caused when we removed their video from our site and thus cost them branding views.
                      For someone that claims to know everything about DMCA law you are completely hoping that no one in here is aware of the "counter claim" provision of the DMCA. Your "user" in this case could counter-claim for the other 1000 videos and you could restore them.

                      Case closed.

                      What's great is we're getting a lot of statements from you on the record. Keep 'em coming sucker.
                      Is this gonna get ugly, now? Huh? I hope not. Because I thought what we were here, racial differences notwithstanding, was just a couple of old friends. You know, just both of us Californians.

                      Comment

                      • Half man, Half Amazing
                        Confirmed User
                        • Feb 2008
                        • 372

                        #116
                        Originally posted by Nathan

                        BTW, Robbie, just because 10 or so people on GFY complain about us, TopBucks or FSC regarding this subject, does not mean the world hates us. We have many many people working with us from this industry. You might not like that but thats how it is.
                        Hey Fabian...should I post the newspaper articles from Montreal where O U I S S A M, Manos and Keezer have to live with 24 hour armed security and how much their neighbors can't stand to live in the neighborhood anymore because of them?

                        Yeah you guys are really popular. Idiot.
                        Is this gonna get ugly, now? Huh? I hope not. Because I thought what we were here, racial differences notwithstanding, was just a couple of old friends. You know, just both of us Californians.

                        Comment

                        • Half man, Half Amazing
                          Confirmed User
                          • Feb 2008
                          • 372

                          #117
                          Originally posted by Nathan
                          do you realize that because of this crisis, there is a TON of money flowing around just LOOKING for someone to take it because all the funds out there have lost the places to invest in?
                          How's the money laundering case going?
                          Is this gonna get ugly, now? Huh? I hope not. Because I thought what we were here, racial differences notwithstanding, was just a couple of old friends. You know, just both of us Californians.

                          Comment

                          • Robbie
                            Leaner, Meaner, Faster
                            • Aug 2002
                            • 20960

                            #118
                            Originally posted by Nathan
                            Robbie, you are hilarious...

                            in the end, none of your business

                            You know _NOTHING

                            I have no need to explain myself to you. Just because I own a company, does not mean I know every single little detail about every single little aspect of the way it runs.

                            We own far more than "Brazzers, a few dead tgps and some tube sites"

                            But this is something you as a true pornographer will never understand. Simply because you do not see the bigger picture here.

                            Should think about that a little, if you can. Very few people here understand the mechanics of the deals that I have made, but trust me, its doable, and I'm continuing to do them.

                            it's none of your business.
                            1. You're right it is none of my business. And you have every right to say so.

                            2.. I don't know anything about the day to day business of that company. But I have forgotten more about how to run my own companies than you have ever learned.

                            3. You absolutely don't have to explain yourself to me...BUT you damn sure should know that company inside and out. It ain't that big. A lot of money? Yeah. But actual work to be done and scope...YES you can know all about it.

                            4. No, you don't own "far more" than Brazzers, a few dead tgps, and some tube sites. That IS your entire adult business. You would think you at least understand that.

                            5. I've been running my own multi-million dollar adult companies since the mid 1990's when you were...who knows? And on through when you were an EMPLOYEE of NATS in the 2000's. Up until right now where you are still an employee sent here to be the scapegoat. How's that working out for ya?

                            6. The "mechanics" of the deals "you" made? Whatever Fabian. I can guarantee you I've bought and sold more shit than YOU have ever dreamed of in your little worker bee life. Especially real estate holdings I've bought and sold with money I've made from adult. I'm very much aware of what it takes to get those loans and the amount of money I had to have in my account and in annual income to be able to secure a Jumbo loan. I doubt VERY seriously you've ever made that kind of money in your entire life programmer. But if you say so...

                            As you said back at "1" It's none of my business


                            So let's just keep it to what I DO know. You CAN take down those videos. You ARE making Top Bucks/Pink Visual and the FSC look like fools. And you are making money off of stolen content.

                            I'll leave you alone. Again, I hope only the best for you and Brazzers. And I hope at the same time complete and utter ruin for you and Pornhub.
                            Enjoy yourself with this whole thing.
                            -Robbie
                            ClaudiaMarie.Com

                            Comment

                            • gideongallery
                              Confirmed User
                              • Aug 2003
                              • 7082

                              #119
                              Originally posted by Half man, Half Amazing
                              For someone that claims to know everything about DMCA law you are completely hoping that no one in here is aware of the "counter claim" provision of the DMCA. Your "user" in this case could counter-claim for the other 1000 videos and you could restore them.

                              Case closed.

                              What's great is we're getting a lot of statements from you on the record. Keep 'em coming sucker.
                              the counter claim provision of the DMCA is for counter claims to takedown requests.

                              Your asking him to take down the content WITHOUT the takedown request.

                              if you think otherwise why don't you back the cost of lawsuit that may happen .

                              “When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak

                              Comment

                              • Robbie
                                Leaner, Meaner, Faster
                                • Aug 2002
                                • 20960

                                #120
                                gideon thedoc is looking for you. He OWNS you.
                                -Robbie
                                ClaudiaMarie.Com

                                Comment

                                Working...