Banning a user is a certain circumstance and other hosts like YouTube or Rapidshare remove all content from public if the user is banned. I can't see why a porn tube is different regarding DMCA. The user is no longer in control and can't respond on claims if you keep it online.
-
Last edited by Dirty Dane; 10-08-2010, 03:47 PM. -
ya if the content isnt owned by him, they should get removed, and whats with the users registering weeks ago, and last time they were online was a year ago, think you fucked up when registering fake nicks so you can get away with uploading stolen videos.Since 1999: 69 Adult Industry awards for Best Hosting Company and professional excellence.
Comment
-
Uh Oh Fabien/Nathian. You dun goofed!!!! Cyber police backtraced you and is coming for you. Fucking thief.AlanAgus1 at gmail dot com-------------------------------Comment
-
i think it just proves i just came on a sock.Comment
-
Not sure if this is really a normal user account or not but talk about MASSIVE pirate content:Doing a little search and found this guy.
http://www.pornhub.com/users/kb24
This is his profile.
* Joined: 4 days ago
* Last Login: 3 weeks ago
* Videos Watched: 226
* People have watched kb24 videos: 114611 times
So he joined 4 days ago but last logged in 3 weeks ago????????
But in that time 3 weeks or 4 days he's been a very busy boy. he has Public Videos (434) most over 20 minutes and some over 30 and a few over 40 minutes. Maybe he owns a studio or something.
So in 21 days he's uploaded 434 videos, over 20 videos a day. At an average of 25 minutes each for arguments sake. 500 minutes of video every day. Yes this guy is a very busy beaver. He's at it over 8 hours a day. Nathan should be paying him.
He also found time for Videos Watched: 226. A very busy boy.
http://www.pornhub.com/users/anonymous
Despite "Last Login: 11 Months ago"Joined: 3 years ago
Last Login: 11 months ago
Videos Watched: 174
People have watched anonymous videos: 911238160 times
Public Videos (16884)
Private Videos (2565)
Name: anonymous
Age: 29
Gender:
Relationship Status: Open
Interested In: Girls + Guys
Profile Viewed: 1190987 Times
This video: http://www.pornhub.com/view_video.php?viewkey=298394919 Claims to be "Added: 1 month ago"
And there are also private videos which claim to be added "2 weeks ago"
Here's another that Half man, Half Amazing brought up in the other topic:
http://www.pornhub.com/users/JJ09
But videos added "4 days ago" such as this one:
Joined: 1 year ago
Last Login: 5 days ago
Videos Watched: 225
People have watched JJ09 videos: 3494916 times
http://www.pornhub.com/view_video.php?viewkey=587044175
You don't like my posts? Put me on ignore or fuck right off. I'll say what I want.
Comment
-
-
"Think about it a little more and you'll agree with me, because you're smart and I'm right."
- Charlie MungerComment
-
DMCA does not say you have to allow a law breakers uploaded content to stay on your site. It says you can't select, there is no selection involved. The entire account is deleted, including all his uploaded content, for breaking the LAW. Not your TOS.
So now you can't say 100%. So what are the factors or/and certain circumstances that prohibit you from deleting a law breakers content?Comment
-
So you own the licenses on videos not owned by you or your company? How the fuck would you know that until you get a DMCA pointing out otherwise? On content you say you own and uploaded by someone not connected to you or your company.
You could clear up a lot of doubt by making your uploaders of your licensed content upload under your companies name. Not a list of nick names that mean nothing.
Here's an interesting find. http://www.pornhub.com/users/bryanc
Joined: 1 year ago
Last Login: 3 weeks ago
Videos Watched: 94
People have watched bryanc videos: 17,797,701 times
He's got a whole load of Back Seat Bangers videos, owned by Top Buck, 23 full length scenes. Of the 1045 videos this guy uploaded.
So does he work for you and uploading your licensed content, work for Top Bucks and uploading their licensed content or neither
If Top Bucks are allowing this video on your site, where is the link to their site. And do they sell the license of their content to be used on Tube sites?Comment
-
This was taken off another board:
"This is totally a non-event and nothing at all will come of it. No one (except maybe the FSC) can be so naive as to believe any of this. It's just an easy way for the Tubes to keep the wolves from their doors for a while longer.
I know 2 guys here in Montreal who's full-time job is to steal videos from websites and upload them as a user onto a few different Tube sites. They both have a large number of usernames to hide the fact that they are actually getting paid by the company. I won't name names, but it's easy to figure it all out.
I am actually sitting here, shaking my head, and the ridiculousness of that announcement. "Comment
-
Paul, look.. how ever much I would love to make you happy, I never can anyway. Even if we ran our tubes in a way which would make everyone here call them "legal tubes" (although they are perfectly legal already now) you would still complain. Just about something else. With some people here on GFY, its just a useless fight. I continue to reply to you still though since I even think you deserve answers...
But, please... Manwin is not some small 10 person shop... We are a company. A big one. We have rules and principles, we have guides to follow, and this kind of stuff is internals. I am not going to reveal all our business mechanics and internals to you just because you ask... If my answer is not enough for you, then I can not help you further, it is as much as I am happy and willing to give..."Think about it a little more and you'll agree with me, because you're smart and I'm right."
- Charlie MungerComment
Comment