cool, how about you post the sales stats instead of traffic stats which means shit.
The point is that the image traffic is making it onto the site (probably due to Googles new image viewing style) and visiting content and not just looking at the image and hitting the back button. The sales stats don't matter here because they're the same kind of visitor as any other. The traffic is 98% US so why would the sales stats mean anything in this thread? I either convert the traffic or I don't.
I can't post stats solely on the image traffic because the referrer isn't carried over that far. However the traffic is on the site clicking onto 7+ pages, feeding trades, etc. and generating sales as a whole so what you're trying to get at is besides the point. Take if for what it is I'm not replying to you anymore.
No kidding. If you name you files right for SEO purposes its a gem. Image search is no different that any other SEO.
What do you think has the most weight on getting the image traffic: file names or title/alt tags? I do have nicely SEO'd image naming on these pages so I think I need to stop naming images 1.jpg, 2.jpg, 3.jpg elsewhere lol.
big fan of Google image traffic, it can be very valuable, but you do need to pay attention to your analytics, if it negatively effects your bounce, pages viewed, time spent on site, etc, it can effect your over all SERPS
Comment