Who said Google image traffic sucks?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Jakez
    Confirmed User
    • Jan 2004
    • 5656

    #1

    Who said Google image traffic sucks?

    Better than most regular traffic.


    Slightly lower/better in some places than the sites overall traffic:
    Last edited by Jakez; 10-07-2010, 02:59 PM.
    [email protected] - jakezdumb - 573689400

    Killuminati
  • 2intense
    Too lazy to set a custom title
    • Dec 2009
    • 12495

    #2
    avg. time on site 2 min ,cool
    Most Affordable Firewall & Malware Protection for Linux Servers

    Comment

    • Jakez
      Confirmed User
      • Jan 2004
      • 5656

      #3
      Originally posted by 2intense
      avg. time on site 2 min ,cool
      What's funny?? 30 seconds could be great and 5 minutes could be bad depending on many things.

      It only takes 10-15 seconds to browse a page, 2 minutes is actually very decent for IMAGE TRAFFIC or traffic in general.
      Last edited by Jakez; 10-07-2010, 03:05 PM.
      [email protected] - jakezdumb - 573689400

      Killuminati

      Comment

      • sexdatesj
        Confirmed User
        • Jun 2009
        • 1078

        #4
        hmm interesting
        http://www.SexDateCash.com
        up to $90 Per Signup ~ WE USE NATS ~
        18 Niche Dating Sites!

        Comment

        • baddog
          So Fucking Banned
          • Apr 2001
          • 107089

          #5
          Who said it sucked?

          Comment

          • SykkBoy
            Jesus loves bacon
            • Feb 2001
            • 19969

            #6
            Originally posted by baddog
            Who said it sucked?
            People who don't want other people to know about it ;-)
            Support my new movie “The Second Coming”

            Comment

            • baddog
              So Fucking Banned
              • Apr 2001
              • 107089

              #7
              Originally posted by SykkBoy
              People who don't want other people to know about it ;-)
              Oh, those guys can never be trusted.

              Comment

              • mechanicvirus
                Confirmed User
                • Feb 2005
                • 4219

                #8
                cool, how about you post the sales stats instead of traffic stats which means shit.

                Comment

                • Jakez
                  Confirmed User
                  • Jan 2004
                  • 5656

                  #9
                  Originally posted by mechanicvirus
                  cool, how about you post the sales stats instead of traffic stats which means shit.
                  The point is that the image traffic is making it onto the site (probably due to Googles new image viewing style) and visiting content and not just looking at the image and hitting the back button. The sales stats don't matter here because they're the same kind of visitor as any other. The traffic is 98% US so why would the sales stats mean anything in this thread? I either convert the traffic or I don't.
                  Last edited by Jakez; 10-07-2010, 06:09 PM.
                  [email protected] - jakezdumb - 573689400

                  Killuminati

                  Comment

                  • mechanicvirus
                    Confirmed User
                    • Feb 2005
                    • 4219

                    #10
                    then post the sales stats if it really converts

                    Comment

                    • Jakez
                      Confirmed User
                      • Jan 2004
                      • 5656

                      #11
                      Originally posted by mechanicvirus
                      then post the sales stats if it really converts
                      I can't post stats solely on the image traffic because the referrer isn't carried over that far. However the traffic is on the site clicking onto 7+ pages, feeding trades, etc. and generating sales as a whole so what you're trying to get at is besides the point. Take if for what it is I'm not replying to you anymore.
                      [email protected] - jakezdumb - 573689400

                      Killuminati

                      Comment

                      • HomerSimpson
                        Too lazy to set a custom title
                        • Sep 2005
                        • 13826

                        #12
                        I'm getting sales from that traffic constantly on some blogs...
                        Make a bank with Chaturbate - the best selling webcam program
                        Ads that can't be block with AdBlockers !!! /// Best paying popup program (Bitcoin payouts) !!!

                        PHP, MySql, Smarty, CodeIgniter, Laravel, WordPress, NATS... fixing stuff, server migrations & optimizations... My ICQ: 27429884 | Email:

                        Comment

                        • Jakez
                          Confirmed User
                          • Jan 2004
                          • 5656

                          #13
                          Originally posted by HomerSimpson
                          I'm getting sales from that traffic constantly on some blogs...
                          Nice, now Mech can troll you for stats.
                          [email protected] - jakezdumb - 573689400

                          Killuminati

                          Comment

                          • RaiderCash_Dominik
                            Confirmed User
                            • Jan 2010
                            • 1145

                            #14
                            Originally posted by baddog
                            Who said it sucked?
                            No kidding. If you name you files right for SEO purposes its a gem. Image search is no different that any other SEO.

                            Comment

                            • RaiderCash_Dominik
                              Confirmed User
                              • Jan 2010
                              • 1145

                              #15
                              Originally posted by mechanicvirus
                              then post the sales stats if it really converts
                              We have a lot direct hits and sales with ref links of google images as entry page.

                              Comment

                              • Jakez
                                Confirmed User
                                • Jan 2004
                                • 5656

                                #16
                                Originally posted by RaiderCash_Dominik
                                No kidding. If you name you files right for SEO purposes its a gem. Image search is no different that any other SEO.
                                What do you think has the most weight on getting the image traffic: file names or title/alt tags? I do have nicely SEO'd image naming on these pages so I think I need to stop naming images 1.jpg, 2.jpg, 3.jpg elsewhere lol.
                                [email protected] - jakezdumb - 573689400

                                Killuminati

                                Comment

                                • trannysphere
                                  Confirmed User
                                  • Jul 2010
                                  • 519

                                  #17
                                  any more technique/style to utilize google image traffic?

                                  DESIGN IS FILTHY DESIGN DEALS + ICQ:624499299 + designs {at} designisfilthy.com

                                  $8 BANNER DESIGN | $299 for 50 BANNERS | $449 for 100 BANNERS
                                  $15 DOLLAR GALLERY DESIGN | $129 for 10 GALLERIES | $199 for 20 GALLERIES

                                  Comment

                                  • fris
                                    Too lazy to set a custom title
                                    • Aug 2002
                                    • 55690

                                    #18
                                    41% bounce rate is aweful, chinese traffic does better than that
                                    Since 1999: 69 Adult Industry awards for Best Hosting Company and professional excellence.

                                    Comment

                                    • Nicky
                                      Too lazy to set a custom title
                                      • Mar 2003
                                      • 30071

                                      #19
                                      Originally posted by fris
                                      41% bounce rate is aweful, chinese traffic does better than that
                                      Now you're just being mean

                                      gfynicky @ gmail.com

                                      Comment

                                      • pimp3611
                                        Confirmed User
                                        • Aug 2005
                                        • 357

                                        #20
                                        I've lost loads of traffic since google made changes to image search. Break out of frames no longer works.

                                        Anyone find out a way around this?
                                        :: ICQ: 272 198 634 ::

                                        Comment

                                        • Machete_
                                          WINNING!
                                          • Oct 2002
                                          • 14579

                                          #21
                                          every since google rolled out the new images page style i hate it

                                          Comment

                                          • topsiteking
                                            ICQ: 470687453
                                            • Dec 2007
                                            • 3571

                                            #22
                                            Originally posted by RaiderCash_Dominik
                                            No kidding. If you name you files right for SEO purposes its a gem. Image search is no different that any other SEO.
                                            ICQ: 470687453
                                            EMAIL: [email protected]

                                            Comment

                                            • Rankings
                                              • Jan 2004
                                              • 10633

                                              #23
                                              big fan of Google image traffic, it can be very valuable, but you do need to pay attention to your analytics, if it negatively effects your bounce, pages viewed, time spent on site, etc, it can effect your over all SERPS
                                              Your leader for Adult SEO Services

                                              19+ Years Serving the Adult/SEO Industry

                                              ICQ: 610-814
                                              Skype: xratedseo

                                              Comment

                                              • Supz
                                                Arthur Flegenheimer
                                                • Jul 2006
                                                • 11057

                                                #24
                                                Originally posted by pimp3611
                                                I've lost loads of traffic since google made changes to image search. Break out of frames no longer works.

                                                Anyone find out a way around this?
                                                Hasnt seem to change for me. Since now it automatically does it if they close the picture.

                                                Comment

                                                Working...