Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
|
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
Thread Tools |
03-06-2012, 08:19 PM | #451 | |
So Fucking Banned
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Happy 4th of July :)
Posts: 6,082
|
Quote:
The ? is was there enough gravity or inertia or momentum or weight in motion to start a pancaking on a fairly healthy structure where most had not been touched by fire. People were 30 floors up for sure and came back with no fire or structural damage on the lower floors. So that is the question. So we need to know more. Yes it is huge but there are also lots of verticle beams too. Also if I pancake an erector set with a heavy enough weight it will indeed pancake straight down but it must be very heavy in relation to the standing structure. I may be missing something. If so I apologize But I am usually not wrong. lol |
|
03-06-2012, 08:54 PM | #452 | |
So Fucking Banned
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Happy 4th of July :)
Posts: 6,082
|
Quote:
I am no expert, just dont think it could pancake like that from the damage done. I may be wrong. Anyhow, good discussion all. |
|
03-06-2012, 09:09 PM | #453 |
So Fucking Banned
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Happy 4th of July :)
Posts: 6,082
|
The thing is.. if there was a controlled dem then Bin Laden was either a patsy or a cohort but then there HAS to be a conspiracy between the planes and the demolishers and that is where it gets sticky...
Anyone want to tackle that hehe We do know that a certain someone saved a lot of money by having things go as they did... following the money says guilty. |
03-06-2012, 09:43 PM | #454 | |
So Fucking Banned
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Happy 4th of July :)
Posts: 6,082
|
Quote:
The q is do the beams run up higher than one floor or are they just boxes (floors) built on boxes. I would think the beams would go verticle many stories which means no "floor" supports anything but rather the frame supports the floors independent if a floor gives way. If a floor gives way the frame does not compress straight down into powder. With enough weight maybe but not with what was above and not from the SLOW momentum that (supposedly) started it all going. One thing's for sure. It pancaked.. either by weight and some momentum combined with weakened structure OR by demolition. |
|
03-06-2012, 09:49 PM | #455 |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 10,166
|
go read the thousands of pages that have been written by engineers and so on exactly why the towers fell. there is no reason to get caught up with the illiterate controlled demolition bullshit.
|
03-06-2012, 10:04 PM | #456 |
So Fucking Banned
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Happy 4th of July :)
Posts: 6,082
|
BTW why was building 7 so conveinently "wired" for demolition and demolished I believe the next day.
What are the odds? Any gamblers here. All I can say is WTF? And that one came down the same way.. perfect pancake. I mean that is clear as day. Coincidence? Please Billy. |
03-06-2012, 10:07 PM | #457 |
So Fucking Banned
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Happy 4th of July :)
Posts: 6,082
|
They all three (buildings) HAD to go. Anyone tell me why? I know but I value my life LOL
|
03-06-2012, 10:12 PM | #458 | |
So Fucking Banned
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Happy 4th of July :)
Posts: 6,082
|
Quote:
Seriously, you have read Eng reports as to how they fell? Or is this board rederick |
|
03-06-2012, 10:24 PM | #459 |
So Fucking Banned
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Happy 4th of July :)
Posts: 6,082
|
Hey Johnny, good common sense points you been making. Been meaning to say so.
Yeah the whole melting really doesnt fly to get a perfect pancake. The "non-truthers" have to hang their hat on the fact that it pancaked on sheer weight. I wonder if any of these guys ever built with an erector set and those were not M-Beams. They can take a lot of verticle stress. It just doesnt add up to anyone with a mechanical head that it could pancake and turn those M-Beams to powder. Go down like dominos and no beams shoot out? They all collapse straight down at the same speed as the last floor? Didnt all the Beams get disintegrated I heard? That is a key point. They carted it all away so we will never know. Looking at those beams tells it all but where is the Church Lady, "how convenient" they are gone and never examined. Must say as it falls their is no structural support in the beams fighting. They appear to be cut through like a controlled dem. No large beams shooting out or bending. All neatly cut. Each floor falls the same as the last. Critical mass I guess. ok.. let me get a beer and lets look at this fall.. I will find some vid stuff.. nuff talk.. |
03-06-2012, 10:39 PM | #460 |
So Fucking Banned
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Happy 4th of July :)
Posts: 6,082
|
wow this is fucking amazing, I dont know what to say
must see first 30 seconds at least the scale of that coming down is so huge maybe it was too much weight it is one helluva demolition IF it was but then again so was bldg 7. |
03-06-2012, 11:01 PM | #461 |
So Fucking Banned
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Happy 4th of July :)
Posts: 6,082
|
Basicly it collapsed like it was made of Lego blocks rather than M-Beams.
It goes through floors at like 1/10 second per floor. Hard to believe a bldg could ever be that susceptable to pancaking. Size is relative and really should be discounted as it contains the same structural steel for it's size as a smaller building. |
03-06-2012, 11:32 PM | #462 |
Jägermeister Test Pilot
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NORCAL
Posts: 70,970
|
Each floor of the WTC was 627 tons. Are you honestly telling me when 627 tons falls fifteen feet, it's not going to destroy everything below it?
__________________
“The choice is no longer between right or left. The choice is between normal and crazy.” - Sarah Huckabee Sanders YNOT MAIL | THE BEST ADULT MAILING SOLUTION |
03-06-2012, 11:35 PM | #463 | |
So Fucking Banned
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Happy 4th of July :)
Posts: 6,082
|
Quote:
I am sure there are codes for weight versus steel. Believe me everything in Eng is highly thought out. Maybe just the mass of it all falling was never considered when building it. That is poss but hard to believe with all the codes and Eng theory that goes into construction. |
|
03-06-2012, 11:41 PM | #464 | |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 10,166
|
Quote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collaps...rs.27_collapse how can you attempt to debunk something you seem ignorant about? |
|
03-06-2012, 11:46 PM | #465 |
So Fucking Banned
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Happy 4th of July :)
Posts: 6,082
|
If each floor was 627 tons then how many M-Beams (or whatever) were there and how many tons were they rated for. What if there were 1200 beams and well over the 627 ton mark rating.
Yes momentum got it going but 1200 verticle beams should be able to take 627 tons falling 15 feet. Size is relative. |
03-06-2012, 11:49 PM | #466 | |
Jägermeister Test Pilot
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NORCAL
Posts: 70,970
|
Quote:
The towers were built to withstand in impact of a 1960s 707 at 180mph. While the size and weight of the 767 planes that hit WTC towers, there is a staggering difference here - The 767 went into service twenty years after the 707 planes, were much stronger, and different aviation fuel than existed in the 1960s when the towers were built. Also, the original study didn't factor in that people would intentionally slam planes into the towers - It was expected the planes would be doing under 200mph, not the 500mph when the planes hit.
__________________
“The choice is no longer between right or left. The choice is between normal and crazy.” - Sarah Huckabee Sanders YNOT MAIL | THE BEST ADULT MAILING SOLUTION |
|
03-06-2012, 11:51 PM | #467 | |
So Fucking Banned
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Happy 4th of July :)
Posts: 6,082
|
Quote:
Admit it, you spent 30 mins looking for that and you havnt even read it. hehe That is some boring shit. Allright Ill f'n read (some of) it. |
|
03-06-2012, 11:57 PM | #468 |
So Fucking Banned
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Happy 4th of July :)
Posts: 6,082
|
"While they were designed to support enormous static loads, they provided little resistance to the moving mass of the sections above the floors where the collapses initiated. Structural systems respond very differently to static and dynamic loads, and since the motion of the falling portion began as a free fall through the height of at least one story (roughly three meters or 10 feet), the structure beneath them was unable to stop the collapses once they began. Indeed, a fall of only half a meter (about 20 inches) would have been enough to release the necessary energy to begin an unstoppable collapse"
There ya go. Maybe I was wrong Maybe it collapsed on it's own. I am only after the truth. |
03-06-2012, 11:59 PM | #469 |
So Fucking Banned
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Happy 4th of July :)
Posts: 6,082
|
We all need a Jew to steer us gentiles in the right direction hehe
|
03-07-2012, 12:00 AM | #470 | |
Jägermeister Test Pilot
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NORCAL
Posts: 70,970
|
Quote:
The beams were designed to support an individual floor and then some. The beams were not designed to support the individual floor AND the floor above it. The beams were also not designed to carry the individual floor, and the floor above it being dropped from fifteen or twenty feet down. In other words, a 600 ton piece of concrete that falls fifteen or twenty feet is more like three times that weight when it impacts. Now factor in that we are adding the weight of an airplane, AND four or five floors. The plane weights 100 tons (174,000 lbs really), and when the plane hit it took out four or five stories. So you had the added weight of the extra floors above any given floor PLUS the airplane. But that's only the weight. What percentage of the beams were taken out on the first floor to fall when the towers itself fell? I remember one corner of a tower was missing, which is what held those precious beams in place - the floors were mounted to the outer wall, and an entire corner PLUS was missing. Now.... Factor in that the rest of the beams were weakened from the fire. The beams couldn't support what was above it in the best of circumstances, had lost a fair percentage of it's support with the outer walls missing, and was weakened by a fire. How the fuck did the buildings not fall down sooner?
__________________
“The choice is no longer between right or left. The choice is between normal and crazy.” - Sarah Huckabee Sanders YNOT MAIL | THE BEST ADULT MAILING SOLUTION |
|
03-07-2012, 12:15 AM | #471 | |
So Fucking Banned
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Happy 4th of July :)
Posts: 6,082
|
Quote:
Also maybe if you "split" a smaller building by taking a floor out and dropping it as i said it would be diff than splitting a large building. Maybe the forces are not linear but exponential* the bigger the building as the whole works as one. Not sure on that (* there's a nickle word for ya ) |
|
03-07-2012, 12:20 AM | #472 |
Not making A Comeback
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 10,216
|
|
03-07-2012, 12:30 AM | #473 |
So Fucking Banned
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Happy 4th of July :)
Posts: 6,082
|
in essence we got concrete hammering on steel
i had too, i been in this thread all night |
03-07-2012, 12:33 AM | #474 | |
So Fucking Banned
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Happy 4th of July :)
Posts: 6,082
|
Quote:
My faith in humanity is slightly restored. I am open minded. |
|
03-07-2012, 12:43 AM | #475 |
So Fucking Banned
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Happy 4th of July :)
Posts: 6,082
|
I am out of the argument and "in limbo" until a "Truther" convinces me that Wiki is BS or that Rochard is with the CIA or something. lol
I like Media Guy tho and rebels are fun I like his tatoo on the back of his head or whatever that is. I am in limbo ready to desert my Truther status unless a Truther rescues me from my mind indoctrination at the hands of a clever Jew and his gang of "maintain the status quo" (probably right wing) men. |
03-07-2012, 01:05 AM | #476 |
So Fucking Banned
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Happy 4th of July :)
Posts: 6,082
|
In other words goodnight I did sort of change my mind tho tonight. Wiki is God in my book
In Wiki we trust. OK Good night |
03-07-2012, 03:16 AM | #477 | |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 59,204
|
Quote:
|
|
03-07-2012, 06:42 AM | #478 |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 9,058
|
with regards to the buildings? yes we do, MILLIONS saw it live on tv.
or did they edit the live footage too? you ass clowns should put the sci-fi down, it's clearly ruined your lives instead of inspiring.
__________________
webmaster at pimproll dot com |
03-07-2012, 07:49 AM | #479 | ||
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Montrealquebecanada
Posts: 5,500
|
Quote:
Quote:
:D
__________________
YOU Are Industry News! Press Releases: pr[at]payoutmag.com Facebook: Payout Magazine! Facebook: MIKEB! ICQ: 248843947 Skype: Mediaguy1 |
||
03-07-2012, 08:09 AM | #480 | |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,393
|
Quote:
__________________
Sig Free |
|
03-07-2012, 08:12 AM | #481 | |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,393
|
Quote:
__________________
Sig Free |
|
03-07-2012, 08:18 AM | #482 | |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,393
|
Quote:
So with zero evidence or documentation how would you expect anyone to think what you are saying isn't gibberish?
__________________
Sig Free |
|
03-07-2012, 08:21 AM | #483 | |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 59,204
|
Quote:
Jesus christ! Can one of you nutters just tell me where that fucking building is supposed to go when it collapses? Is it that fucking difficult to answer? |
|
03-07-2012, 08:22 AM | #484 | |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 59,204
|
Quote:
|
|
03-07-2012, 08:24 AM | #485 |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 59,204
|
|
03-07-2012, 08:24 AM | #486 |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 59,204
|
On ignore you go, together with your nutjob buddy Johnny. Fucking freaks.
|
03-07-2012, 08:30 AM | #487 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,393
|
Good old, Rochard. A gfy vet, denying reality about 911 myths. You posted the best fake image that 911 fakery produced, but, the right engine is still too close to the fuselage much like the one I posted previous, that you ignored. It has no markings, is black with no windows, therefore, it's fake, and would be laughed by open minded humans being told the truth about how they were fucked by the media and government on 911.
Here's the worst fake plane image I've come across. It was labeled techmac and has no right wing and it convienenty crops out the impossible turn and zooms out after that impossibility. See, the fake image is too far north, to actually impact the southeast corner of T2 because it's south and east of T1.
__________________
Sig Free |
03-07-2012, 08:33 AM | #488 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,393
|
You are such a dumbass that you don't the know when to use a instead of an.
__________________
Sig Free |
03-07-2012, 08:34 AM | #489 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,393
|
Go ahead and put me on ignore, ya pussy.
__________________
Sig Free |
03-07-2012, 08:37 AM | #490 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,393
|
That's not dirty frank, correct? That is some schmuck who bought his name?
__________________
Sig Free |
03-07-2012, 08:45 AM | #491 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,393
|
Why would people from Europe be obsessed with silly govenrment coverups from the states? More importantly, why would silly americans defend 911 fiction when that fiction covers them completely? That's the saddest part...politically correct pornographers.
__________________
Sig Free |
03-07-2012, 08:47 AM | #492 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,393
|
I told the truth and you don't have another explanation for it. Just 100% truth.
__________________
Sig Free |
03-07-2012, 08:53 AM | #493 | |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,393
|
Quote:
__________________
Sig Free |
|
03-07-2012, 08:54 AM | #494 |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 59,204
|
Look at the imbeciles jerking eachother off |
03-07-2012, 08:57 AM | #495 |
Let slip the dogs of war.
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bermuda
Posts: 17,263
|
You two Einsteins do realize that English isn't Frank's first language, right? How many languages do you speak fluently? That's what I thought.
__________________
. |
03-07-2012, 09:01 AM | #496 |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 59,204
|
|
03-07-2012, 09:21 AM | #497 | |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,393
|
Quote:
"We just saw another live picture of, duhhh, what I believe, duhhh, was a plane that just hit another plane?" So, it went from an unidentifiable chopper, to, duh, what she knew had to be a plane, because that's what was supposed to happen, but didn't, unless there were two things involved for tower 2? https://youtube.com/watch?v=Obt-1...e= plpp_video
__________________
Sig Free |
|
03-07-2012, 09:26 AM | #498 | |
Let slip the dogs of war.
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bermuda
Posts: 17,263
|
Quote:
__________________
. |
|
03-07-2012, 09:29 AM | #499 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,393
|
I do like my commas and wonder if I use them properly.
__________________
Sig Free |
03-07-2012, 09:31 AM | #500 |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: 12th & Tree
Posts: 1,208
|
So what really happened? Was it a controlled demolition or did "orbs" fly into the buildings? If it was done by the government, what was the motive? To invade Iraq? Everybody has all this "evidence" of a government conspiracy, but none of it leads to a conclusion. kind of like the Kennedy assassination.
Surely one of the 100's of government and military personnel it would have taken to pull something like this off would have leaked evidence or come forward in some way. Not to mention all these radio and TV executives and reporters that were supposedly ordered to go along with the cover-up, right? Maybe Wikileaks cables or anonymous hackers will uncover the truth soon? |