I married a chick that was once a catholic school girl. She grew up, met me, got married, I cleansed her mind of the religious poisoning she was indoctrinated with, lost the battle of baptism up against her family, so went against her father's wishes and had the kids baptised Lutheran just to piss him off, (and it worked), then never took them to church again.

This is how you eradicate religion folks. You gotta get in the trenches and undo the twisted programming with your own hands. Slamming the door in the faces of religious nuts selling god door-to-door is always a treat, but if you want to reduce their numbers, you gotta de-program them manually. :2 cents:

50 terrorist training school madrassas being built on the graves on 9/11.

The sad thing is, you equate religion to "religious nuts" automatically, and once again, claim freedom of religion when they want to build a mosque in the vicinity of the WTC. I think you might be dumber than TheDoc after all and that takes skill. Congratulations. :thumbsup:thumbsup

well said.

the Christian porn model that thought dinosaur bones were fake and planted by Satan left my house, after a long reasoned discussion, with a small clue in her head that maybe just maybe her parents and pastor had been lying to her all this time.

I give a fuck about religious freedom Einstein. I want all of them eradicated. Especially christianity. And yes... I do equate all religious to "religious nuts". If you believe in an invisible man in the clouds, yes... you are a nut.

Gotta love secularist liberals. Believing in mankind while throwing out emotional, exaggerated keywords instead of logical arguments. Good show amputate.:1orglaugh

Thank you.

Judging by your posts this week alone, I can't tell who's dumber; you or the model?

YEA

these poor muslims are just trying to insure there is no future terrorist attack in the future

no way these crazy islamic radicals would attack their own mosque, err, community center

just like we wouldn't attack our own churches, err, hospital with chapels.

Believing that a contrived political wedge issue is real... When will you learn not to be used?

You either believe in the constitution, or you dont. It's remarkably simple.

Cowards are afraid of others being equal to them. Suck it up. You'll be fine.

Dumb Liberals™


Registered Trademark Reply of The Demon Inc. 2010.

how did you sleep with someone who didn't believe in evolution?

i have been faced with this pickle before

Imagine how easy it is to say "it's in the constitution you either believe it or you don't!!!" without understanding either what the founding fathers had in mind or events they did not anticipate. But at the same time, those clamoring that conservatives are against the constitution are the same idiots who support government spending and the expansion of fiat currencies and the federal reserve, both of which violate the constitution. The ignorance and hypocrisy is staggering, thanks Tom:)

As opposed to "murders, bigots, racists, religious fanatics!"

Your IQ makes me laugh Coup.:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

The question is, how dumb and igorant are you to think that evolution and the bible don't go hand in hand, or that the bible and science actually contradict one another? That's what I love about atheists or secularists. They don't know anything about the subject yet they continue preaching. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

science killed the bible, the body just hasn't been claimed yet.

The bible is about as historical as anything published under 'Dr. Seuss' or 'Disney'

I don't know why this is directed at me because I never said anything regarding this, but then again, you're as intelligent as Lindsey Lohan, but at least she has the jugs going for her, I think. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Oh of course. Whats written in the constitution is not whats important. It's what the founding fathers had in MIND that's important. And luckily, only the republican tea party knows what that is. Whew. Puts the mind at ease.

Oh totally, because people would be dumb enough to trust the Democratic Party to tell us what the Founding Fathers had in mind. :1orglaugh

Oh, well you've been tossing out your big boy words here today like, "they"....

I'm nearly certain I fall under the "they" category, and so my direct response to you is just.

I've observed how you respond to nearly any post in any thread. It's always the same. You were an easy one to figure out Demon. You're about as deep as a chafing dish.

Sadly, your attempts to sound intelligent have failed in every thread you've ever posted in. I've been trying to decipher that post for any reasons why you would include the bible in a historical context but I can't for the life of me figure it out. The fact that quoting me had nothing to do with anything validates this fact. This is too easy amputate, please try harder. :winkwink:

Dont go getting mad just because you're bigoted against the Muslim faith

I've done what I needed to do here.... you may continue with your nonsense now. I'm out. :)

I rest my case. Liberals and logic/fact/intelligence would be an oxymoron as you've just proven. You would prefer to exaggerate something and appeal to an emotion, ignoring the fact that your "appeal" has nothing to do with reality.

Sure, just as you always have, which is getting your ass spanked by your superiors:) Now go pretend to have a life before you come back and make more humorous/useless threads and posts.:thumbsup

Atleast I'm not a bigot like you are.

You all realize that Obama believes the bible and believes that for his salvation he must have a collective salvation right? Meaning he needs to save your soul, meaning you must accept the word of Christ. You do understand that right?

i have no idea how dumb they have to be. i think that it might not be a matter of 'dumb', simply uninformed on a personal choice level via necessity of experience and exposure.

however your second sentence kinda contradicts the first one so i'm not sure what you're saying, in terms of atheists, more power to them. I think they aren't looking at the bigger picture when it comes to religion and perhaps missing the fact that being an atheist is simply another step towards God

secularists are a manifestation of a whole lotta wrong done in the name of God. There is reasons its how western governments run and we should remember those reasons

these threads are right fucking queer.

That happens in all war... it sucks. But trying to compare the civilian death rates to Bush is a bit nuts. First, Bush did not focus on Afghan, he focused on Iraq. Sadly, Bush has killed far more people.

95,888 ? 104,595 civilian deaths as a result of the Iraq conflict.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casualties_of_the_Iraq_War

or

"that at least 392,979 Iraqi civilians had been killed in the occupation"
http://brusselstribunal.org/pdf/lancet111006.pdf (a study)

VS.

575. That's how many U.S. soldiers have lost their lives in the Afghanistan war since Barack Obama became President at noon on January 20, 2009 - It's higher than that though.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert..._b_683441.html

You may want to flush the news articles down the drain saying Obama has killed more Civilians in Afghan than Bush has.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civilia...2%80%93present)

Just from 01-03 direct & indirect civilian deaths: 6,300 - 23,600 - That's what happens when you carpet bomb an entire Country with 5000lb bombs. And total, direct civilian deaths: at least 11,443 - 14,240.

I understand that the GOP is preparing a bill to amend the constitution and ban queer threads.

I am comparing the civilian deaths in a country we are not at war with PAKISTAN. Obama has TARGETED civilian HOMES AND FUNERALS. Obama has killed more civilians in PAKISTIAN than Bush. That is fact.

So, the right war in your mind is one where we target civilian homes, in a country we are not at war with, killing 1 ALLEGED terrorist for every 10 to 20 civilians killed, making more terrorist than we are killing, in "part of a war" that Obama's generals say there is no winning. :Oh crap

What's wrong with you people?

Nobody should be trying tell anyone what the founding fathers "had in mind." That's the problem, nobody has any idea what they had in mind. At that, only an idiot would think the founding father(S) all had the same thing in mind, when we already know they didn't.

where's my coffee?

There's no contradiction because both groups try to poke holes in religion based on science, not understanding that there IS no contradiction between those two as much as they sort of complement one another.

No, you're a moron who uses terms he does not understand because he can't think logically.

the founding fathers would not have put up with this thread faggotry.

Fox is spinning out of control on the mosque issue, and their biggest minority shareholder has donated money to the imam in question.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_upshot...mosque-planner

Yes, because Bush was fighting a war with Afghan, when we aren't at war with Afghan. When you take the war to the proper place, Civilians die.

Let's take a look at those attacks in Pakistan.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drone_attacks_in_Pakistan

04-08 - 405 deaths by Drones - 42 strikes for 10.37%
09-10 - 1013 deaths by Drones - 106 strikes for 10.46%

Well, looks like Obama's numbers aren't that bad after all, more attacks would naturally equal more deaths.

Then looking over the articles, it looks like July of this year to current 87 estimated militants deaths and 7 civilians. Just to compare the listed ones.

I just don't see the numbers you're saying...

there's no legitimate argument against the building of this mosque. The entire anti-mosque argument amounts to "what if feelings get hurt? :'("

If you're against the mosque chances are you're just bigoted against the Muslim faith.

Its called religious freedom and its in an important document. And show me ONE article of a church not being built. Just one, any one, one, maybe

it's not a fucking mosque.

Oppression: Radical Anglo AmeriKKKa's war against Islam

That's like saying "If you support the building, you're a fucking idiot". I know you're a simple minded buffoon who I think is less than 18 years old, but you'll eventually realize that your first part of the sentence has nothing to do with the second part, and it's not a mosque you queer.

i am really beginning to like you..

you call yourself intelligent, yet you call everyone else idiots instead of trying to have any type of coherent debate..

you think your viewpoints are the only ones that make any sense, but you only come off like a person trying to cover up their insecurities because of the constant name calling...

i'm just glad you're here to amuse me and i will continue to look forward to all of the infinite wisdom you have bestowed on this adult forum.... :1orglaugh

are you rush limbaugh?




.




.

Queer? Are you also bigoted against Homosexuals as well as Muslims?

700 civilians killed in 2009 alone
http://news.antiwar.com/2010/01/02/u...rikes-in-2009/

Drone attacks creating more terrorist? Are drone attacks a form of terrorism?

http://english.aljazeera.net/focus/2...138783448.html

I think you've already amused us with your hilarious posts, and this is no different. Let's pick apart your ignorant post, shall we? First, I don't see you criticizing anyone that shares YOUR viewpoints and also tries to impose them on other people, thereby making you biased and reducing your credibility to 0, because you were already unintelligent before we realized you were biased. Secondly, Coup wasn't having any kind of coherent debate. Instead, he was shouting emotional keywords in order NOT to have a coherent debate. So I can only assume that you're both biased, and lack reading comprehension. Or you just don't like me and can't stand the fact that I'm right. Yea, I'm going to go with the 3rd option. And finally, I don't call everyone else idiots, only those that say shit like "If you don't agree with me, you're a bigot!!", courtesy of our forum clown of the week, Coup. So once again, bias+lack of reading comprehension+lack of intelligent=you. Understand? I don't think I can dumb it down any further.:1orglaugh:1orglaugh