ok you "global warming is fraud" people - GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

X

Overload

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jul 2005

Posts: 3185
Share

Post
#1

ok you "global warming is fraud" people

08-21-2010, 01:36 PM

i have really had it with you ignorants ... there are TWO astronomical FACTS that will defuse all your gabbing ...

#1 - the earths orbit around the sun changes a bit every about 100k years ... right now we are in a HIGHER orbit which SHOULD cause a declination of temperatures - and yet the earth warms up!

#2 - we are currently undergoing a "mounder period" of solar spots which means less activity and SHOULD cause a declination of temperatures - and yet the earth warms up!

so, stop your ignorant rants plz

also, the artic ice shield, formerly covering the equal of the USA in size has shrunk by the states east of mississippi (22 states) and lost 1/3 of its thickness so plz do your homework NOW!

geez

i guess you will wake up when the methane hydrid in alaska combusts and is ignited by a lightning ... it will BLOW your ass outta the water

Last edited by Overload; 08-21-2010, 01:41 PM.

There aren't enough faces and palms on this planet for an appropriate reaction to religion.
Tags: None
u-Bob

there's no $$$ in porn

Join Date: Jul 2005

Posts: 33063
Share

Post
#2

08-21-2010, 01:41 PM

Whether or not global warming is real, whether or not global warming is man made, the real question is: Will the countermeasures proposed such as carbon credit trading do anything to stop it? or are they just a scheme to make a small group of people very rich at the expense of the rest of us?
Comment
ThunderBalls

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Oct 2002

Posts: 2926
Share

Post
#3

08-21-2010, 01:43 PM

Their leader, Sarah Palin, told them not to worry about such silly things, anything that happens Jesus will fix.
Comment
cambaby

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Feb 2003

Posts: 3141
Share

Post
#4

08-21-2010, 01:45 PM

u mad bro?
Comment
andrej_NDC

Registered User

Join Date: May 2004

Posts: 7760
Share

Post
#5

08-21-2010, 01:47 PM

People make assumptions on hundreds of years or temperature stats(maybe even around 100 years only), which is a joke compared to the earth's age, which is how much, 4 billion? We don't know shit and can't predict shit on the information we have. But its a great agenda to tax people on more bullshit.
Comment
Vendzilla

Biker Gnome

Join Date: Mar 2004

Posts: 23200
Share

Post
#6

08-21-2010, 01:51 PM

Al Gore just bought ocean front property, guess he thinks the ocean levels are going to be ok?

Webair died?
Carbon is not the problem, it makes up 0.041% of our atmosphere , 95% of that is from Volcanos and decomposing plants and stuff. So people in the US are responsible for 13% of the carbon in the atmosphere which 95% is not from Humans, like cars and trucks and stuff and they want to spend trillions to fix it while Solar Panel plants are powered by coal plants
think about that
Comment
Overload

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jul 2005

Posts: 3185
Share

Post
#7

08-21-2010, 01:56 PM

Originally posted by cambaby

u mad bro?

lol, someone with THAT kinda signature asking about it? say your prayers and move to florida so you will witness first

There aren't enough faces and palms on this planet for an appropriate reaction to religion.
Comment
cykoe6

Confirmed User

Join Date: Apr 2005

Posts: 4499
Share

Post
#8

08-21-2010, 01:57 PM

Originally posted by u-Bob

Whether or not global warming is real, whether or not global warming is man made, the real question is: Will the countermeasures proposed such as carbon credit trading do anything to stop it? or are they just a scheme to make a small group of people very rich at the expense of the rest of us?

At least someone gets it.

бабки, шлюхи, сила
Comment
Overload

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jul 2005

Posts: 3185
Share

Post
#9

08-21-2010, 02:00 PM

Originally posted by u-Bob

Whether or not global warming is real, whether or not global warming is man made, the real question is: Will the countermeasures proposed such as carbon credit trading do anything to stop it? or are they just a scheme to make a small group of people very rich at the expense of the rest of us?

i did NOT say its manmade! but lets face it; CO2 and methane DO have an effect on the climate, not? so, if we keep going like we do, we DO support the climate change ... and it soon could turn into a spiral we cannot stop anymore ... visit santa barbara channel and witness the methane bubbles there - it HAS begun --- and more methane means mother earth will heat up; causing MORE methane hydrid to melt ... and dont forget, there is an estimated amount of 10000 BILLION TONS of that shit on ground of the oceans! the impact right now may be small, but the more we ignore it, the worse it gets ... god wont help you

There aren't enough faces and palms on this planet for an appropriate reaction to religion.
Comment
Overload

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jul 2005

Posts: 3185
Share

Post
#10

08-21-2010, 02:03 PM

Originally posted by u-Bob

Whether or not global warming is real, whether or not global warming is man made, the real question is: Will the countermeasures proposed such as carbon credit trading do anything to stop it? or are they just a scheme to make a small group of people very rich at the expense of the rest of us?

fully agreed on that! THAT is pure BS and a money making scheme that wont help anyone - but the ones already stinking filthy rich

There aren't enough faces and palms on this planet for an appropriate reaction to religion.
Comment
SatansCandy

Confirmed User

Join Date: Mar 2007

Posts: 235
Share

Post
#11

08-21-2010, 02:10 PM

Sorry, I pick God's word over you anyday!

2 Peter 3:10 And the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up.

http://formerthings.com/global_warming.htm

"Behold, the Lord will turn the earth upside down and many of the inhabitants shall be burned up and few men left" - Isaiah 24

Coming Pole Reversal - NOVA's Magnetic Storm
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/magnetic/reversals.html

"Look You Deaf and Blind" - Isaiah 42

"The tares are the children of Satan, the Father of Lust. Bind the tares and burn them. Cast them into the everlasting fire" - Jesus
Comment
Ethersync

Confirmed User

Join Date: Mar 2008

Posts: 5289
Share

Post
#12

08-21-2010, 02:23 PM

Originally posted by Overload

i have really had it with you ignorants ... there are TWO astronomical FACTS that will defuse all your gabbing ...

#1 - the earths orbit around the sun changes a bit every about 100k years ... right now we are in a HIGHER orbit which SHOULD cause a declination of temperatures - and yet the earth warms up!

#2 - we are currently undergoing a "mounder period" of solar spots which means less activity and SHOULD cause a declination of temperatures - and yet the earth warms up!

so, stop your ignorant rants plz

also, the artic ice shield, formerly covering the equal of the USA in size has shrunk by the states east of mississippi (22 states) and lost 1/3 of its thickness so plz do your homework NOW!

geez

i guess you will wake up when the methane hydrid in alaska combusts and is ignited by a lightning ... it will BLOW your ass outta the water

OK, let's say you are right and the shit is about to hit the fan. What are you doing to stop it?

The best ePassporte replacement I have found: OKPAY
Comment
Dvae

Confirmed User

Join Date: Feb 2005

Posts: 5326
Share

Post
#13

08-21-2010, 02:44 PM

Originally posted by Overload

i have really had it with you ignorants ... there are TWO astronomical FACTS that will defuse all your gabbing ...

#1 - the earths orbit around the sun changes a bit every about 100k years ... right now we are in a HIGHER orbit which SHOULD cause a declination of temperatures - and yet the earth warms up!

#2 - we are currently undergoing a "mounder period" of solar spots which means less activity and SHOULD cause a declination of temperatures - and yet the earth warms up!

so, stop your ignorant rants plz

also, the artic ice shield, formerly covering the equal of the USA in size has shrunk by the states east of mississippi (22 states) and lost 1/3 of its thickness so plz do your homework NOW!

geez

i guess you will wake up when the methane hydrid in alaska combusts and is ignited by a lightning ... it will BLOW your ass outta the water

First of all you need to keep up with the latest news. Its no longer "global warming" its now "climate change"

Second until these "meteorologists" aka "weather guessers" can predict what the the weather will be like next week then theres no point in listening to them when they tell us what will happen in 50 or 100 yrs.

Last edited by Dvae; 08-21-2010, 02:46 PM.

.
.

Arguing with a troll is a lot like wrestling in the mud with a pig, after a couple of hours you realize the pig likes it.
Comment
stickyfingerz

Doin fine

Join Date: Oct 2005

Posts: 24984
Share

Post
#14

08-21-2010, 02:48 PM

shit... now I wish I had gotten that swine flu shot... oh wait.....

Shall we name a few other "iminent" environmental disasters that were 100% backed by the media and "scientists"?

Just in my remembered history...

Acid rain
Deforestation
Soil erosion
Ozone layer
An ice age is coming
Global warming

ALL were said to be a possible end to mankind. Thank GOD all those scientists know their shit, and aren't in it for the government grant money phew...
Comment
Overload

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jul 2005

Posts: 3185
Share

Post
#15

08-21-2010, 02:58 PM

Originally posted by Dvae

First of all you need to keep up with the latest news. Its no longer "global warming" its now "climate change"

Second until these "meteorologists" aka "weather guessers" can predict what the the weather will be like next week then theres no point in listening to them when they tell us what will happen in 50 or 100 yrs.

ehh? you fully miss it there its not about guessing ... 1000s of years old probes of ice give a clue how climate was back then; and the combination of gases SHOW what earth was LIKE back then - if we head for the SAME gas combination we will face the SAME environment ... its not about weather, its about climate - which is a HUGE difference or would you say those - how you call them - weather guessers just say there were ice ages and you say it never happened?! hmm? there is no more guessing at this point ... reread the facts about the arctic ice shield ... 33% lost within 30 years ... it will be 75% by 2050 (assuming the CO2 emissions DONT increase - which they do) ...

There aren't enough faces and palms on this planet for an appropriate reaction to religion.
Comment
Overload

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jul 2005

Posts: 3185
Share

Post
#16

08-21-2010, 03:03 PM

Originally posted by stickyfingerz

Just in my remembered history...

Acid rain
Deforestation
Soil erosion
Ozone layer
An ice age is coming
Global warming

that is a good example for ignorance!
acid rain: it stopped when filters and shit were applied to coal powerplants - defused
deforestastion: still continues but is now named desertification (even the chinese now have 1000s of ppl planting trees to STOP that) - defuse
soil erosion: it still goes on - with the raising of the sea level lotta land gets lost - defused
ozone layer: damage to it was significantly lowered by banning FCKW (flour chloride) widely in EU and US - defused

keep talking shit and close your eyes

There aren't enough faces and palms on this planet for an appropriate reaction to religion.
Comment
Cyber Fucker

Hmm

Join Date: Sep 2005

Posts: 12642
Share

Post
#17

08-21-2010, 03:07 PM

I think global warming is real... I don't know anything about the fraud stuff though.
Comment
MaDalton

I am Amazing Content!

Join Date: Feb 2004

Posts: 39861
Share

Post
#18

08-21-2010, 03:12 PM

one day i will find out what some people make so hysterically opposed to work on a cleaner environment. i shit on "global warming" and other scare tatics, but what is so bad about less pollution? i don't get it.

AmazingContent.com - providing only the best content and service since 2003
Monetize your content on Veegaz.com - one of Germanies largest VOD sites
Got German traffic? We convert it into money for you!
Email: oltecconsult [at] gmail [dot] com
Comment
IllTestYourGirls

Ah My Balls

Join Date: Feb 2007

Posts: 14311
Share

Post
#19

08-21-2010, 03:13 PM

If Al Gore or any of those nut jobs actually believed that global warming was man made they would not be doing what they are doing. They would be living in dirt huts screaming for others to do the same, not riding around in limos, private jets, buying more than one house that consumes a multitude more energy than 1 regular home, buying ocean front property, not flying in private jets, getting into limos, followed by body guards in SUVs to a "global warming summit" when it all can be done via video chat.
Comment
tony286

lurker

Join Date: Aug 2002

Posts: 57021
Share

Post
#20

08-21-2010, 03:21 PM

yep like those nutjobs at the pentagon said globe warming is problem. lol
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010...bilising-force
Comment
stickyfingerz

Doin fine

Join Date: Oct 2005

Posts: 24984
Share

Post
#21

08-21-2010, 03:23 PM

Originally posted by Overload

that is a good example for ignorance!
acid rain: it stopped when filters and shit were applied to coal powerplants - defused
deforestastion: still continues but is now named desertification (even the chinese now have 1000s of ppl planting trees to STOP that) - defuse
soil erosion: it still goes on - with the raising of the sea level lotta land gets lost - defused
ozone layer: damage to it was significantly lowered by banning FCKW (flour chloride) widely in EU and US - defused

keep talking shit and close your eyes

LMAO!!!!! Yes defused on ozone layer, yet it remains the same size as what it was in the 50's when it was discovered. Yes they managed to fix the problem by outlawing many types of freons, made new less effective coolants, and charge CRAZY prices for those. Hmm wonder who's pockets all that "new found" revenue goes into?

The ozone layer is roughly 130% thicker at the poles, and much thinner at the equator. WHERE is the supposed "hole" in the ozone layer located? Are you worried about the polar bears getting skin cancer now as well as them drowning from the caps melting?

Seriously you call anyone that doesn't believe the "hype" ignorant, yet you are HAPPY to follow the bullshit proclaimers down their primrose paths.

Its amazing how science has managed to defuse.... all these situations.

I just wish I hadn't bought that expensive suit to protect my skin from acid rain...
Comment
stickyfingerz

Doin fine

Join Date: Oct 2005

Posts: 24984
Share

Post
#22

08-21-2010, 03:24 PM

Originally posted by MaDalton

one day i will find out what some people make so hysterically opposed to work on a cleaner environment. i shit on "global warming" and other scare tatics, but what is so bad about less pollution? i don't get it.

Again where do you see anyone saying that conservation, and a clean environment is a bad thing?
Comment
ThunderBalls

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Oct 2002

Posts: 2926
Share

Post
#23

08-21-2010, 03:27 PM

Originally posted by MaDalton

one day i will find out what some people make so hysterically opposed to work on a cleaner environment. i shit on "global warming" and other scare tatics, but what is so bad about less pollution? i don't get it.

Less pollution means less people getting diseases which means less money for pharmaceutical companies and the health care industry. Having stricter laws on air and water pollution means more costs to some companies which equals less profit. Republicans will put a companies bottom line over peoples health and the environment.
Comment
IllTestYourGirls

Ah My Balls

Join Date: Feb 2007

Posts: 14311
Share

Post
#24

08-21-2010, 03:36 PM

Originally posted by ThunderBalls

Less pollution means less people getting diseases which means less money for pharmaceutical companies and the health care industry. Having stricter laws on air and water pollution means more costs to some companies which equals less profit. Republicans will put a companies bottom line over peoples health and the environment.

How do you pack so much conspiracy theory into so few lines? More costs to produce something does not mean less profit, it some cases it means more. They just pass the costs to you.
Comment
MaDalton

I am Amazing Content!

Join Date: Feb 2004

Posts: 39861
Share

Post
#25

08-21-2010, 03:42 PM

Originally posted by stickyfingerz

Again where do you see anyone saying that conservation, and a clean environment is a bad thing?

the problem is that you will not like my answer. you show up in every thread like this and belittle people that don't share your opinion. I for example believe that outlawing poisenous chemicals like the old coolant liquids and replacing them with more environmental friendly alternatives is a good thing. and you will now tell me that i am stupid for believing that the old ones did any harm. thats why a discussion is fruitless

Originally posted by ThunderBalls

Less pollution means less people getting diseases which means less money for pharmaceutical companies and the health care industry. Having stricter laws on air and water pollution means more costs to some companies which equals less profit. Republicans will put a companies bottom line over peoples health and the environment.

spot on. the thing is that the US is by now about 20 years behind a country like Germany in these things. All these discussions i remember from my childhood, just that here something was done. Gas is much more expensive, energy too. Emission laws are WAY more strict. And what happened? Air got better, rivers are much cleaner, less forrests are dying. And Germany is one of the leading countries in exporting "green" technologies and many jobs have been created that way.

you people keep telling that things will not work that have been proven to work since decades, you're just to arrogant to accept that someone is doing it better.

ah, and before i forget: your biggest problem BY FAR are the armies of lobbyists that are paid to keep things in the shitter where they are

AmazingContent.com - providing only the best content and service since 2003
Monetize your content on Veegaz.com - one of Germanies largest VOD sites
Got German traffic? We convert it into money for you!
Email: oltecconsult [at] gmail [dot] com
Comment
Dvae

Confirmed User

Join Date: Feb 2005

Posts: 5326
Share

Post
#26

08-21-2010, 03:59 PM

Originally posted by Overload

ehh? you fully miss it there its not about guessing ... 1000s of years old probes of ice give a clue how climate was back then; and the combination of gases SHOW what earth was LIKE back then - if we head for the SAME gas combination we will face the SAME environment ... its not about weather, its about climate - which is a HUGE difference or would you say those - how you call them - weather guessers just say there were ice ages and you say it never happened?! hmm? there is no more guessing at this point ... reread the facts about the arctic ice shield ... 33% lost within 30 years ... it will be 75% by 2050 (assuming the CO2 emissions DONT increase - which they do) ...

Sounds like your entire theory is based on ice yet you never mentioned the slight increase in ice coverage on Antarctica, conveniently you left that out.

.
.

Arguing with a troll is a lot like wrestling in the mud with a pig, after a couple of hours you realize the pig likes it.
Comment
TheDoc

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Jul 2001

Posts: 13827
Share

Post
#27

08-21-2010, 04:04 PM

The Ice Age ending and caused the ice to melt, now we're in a glacial period, which we've had before. All of which can melt all the ice like it has before or cover most of the planet in ice, as it has before - without an ice age. Less ice equals more co2, methane, and pesky things like water vapor and it means more sun hitting the oceans warming things up even more. Which creates a huge chain reaction. Of course it has been a great deal warmer before than what it is today... guess we did did that too. Which means we have had much more of these deadly gases we live on each day floating around. It's odd though how rain, oceans, dirt, storms, plants, rocks and lots of shit filter it out. It's almost like mother nature has had to deal with this before without killing everything on the planet.

~TheDoc - ICQ7765825
It's all disambiguation
Comment
ThunderBalls

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Oct 2002

Posts: 2926
Share

Post
#28

08-21-2010, 04:08 PM

Originally posted by IllTestYourGirls

How do you pack so much conspiracy theory into so few lines? More costs to produce something does not mean less profit, it some cases it means more. They just pass the costs to you.

Oh really? Why did BP take financial shortcuts which caused the worst spill in history? Maybe because it meant MORE PROFIT.

Why did Bush repeal Clintons policy to reduce the allowable concentration of arsenic (a chemical linked to cancer) in drinking water from 50 parts per billion to 10 parts per billion? He did the same thing with air pollution and turned around and called it The Clean Air Act. Why did Bush and the rest of the republicans do this? Thats no conspiracy, that is a fact.
Comment
stickyfingerz

Doin fine

Join Date: Oct 2005

Posts: 24984
Share

Post
#29

08-21-2010, 04:11 PM

Originally posted by TheDoc

The Ice Age ending and caused the ice to melt, now we're in a glacial period, which we've had before. All of which can melt all the ice like it has before or cover most of the planet in ice, as it has before - without an ice age. Less ice equals more co2, methane, and pesky things like water vapor and it means more sun hitting the oceans warming things up even more. Which creates a huge chain reaction. Of course it has been a great deal warmer before than what it is today... guess we did did that too. Which means we have had much more of these deadly gases we live on each day floating around. It's odd though how rain, oceans, dirt, storms, plants, rocks and lots of shit filter it out. It's almost like mother nature has had to deal with this before without killing everything on the planet.

At least we can agree on that if not the whole Obama thing

And to MaDalton blah blah, Germany is so progressive... blah blah.. they were very progressive in the 40's too... how did that work out?
Comment
JBlack

Confirmed User

Join Date: Mar 2010

Posts: 399
Share

Post
#30

08-21-2010, 04:17 PM

Originally posted by SatansCandy

Sorry, I pick God's word over you anyday!

2 Peter 3:10 And the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up.

http://formerthings.com/global_warming.htm

"Behold, the Lord will turn the earth upside down and many of the inhabitants shall be burned up and few men left" - Isaiah 24

Coming Pole Reversal - NOVA's Magnetic Storm
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/magnetic/reversals.html

I seriously would like to know what your religion says about spending all this time in a porn forum - Randy Katz 5:17pm
Comment
MaDalton

I am Amazing Content!

Join Date: Feb 2004

Posts: 39861
Share

Post
#31

08-21-2010, 04:21 PM

Originally posted by stickyfingerz

And to MaDalton blah blah, Germany is so progressive... blah blah.. they were very progressive in the 40's too... how did that work out?

see, that's why a discussion with you is fruitless, you choose to ignore everything that does not fit your agenda.
and yeah, the germans were pretty progressive: rockets, jet airplanes, nuclear research... without my captured nazi ancestors you would not have had a nuclear bomb and no mission to the moon. but at least you left some indians alive so that you can have casinos.

AmazingContent.com - providing only the best content and service since 2003
Monetize your content on Veegaz.com - one of Germanies largest VOD sites
Got German traffic? We convert it into money for you!
Email: oltecconsult [at] gmail [dot] com
Comment
IllTestYourGirls

Ah My Balls

Join Date: Feb 2007

Posts: 14311
Share

Post
#32

08-21-2010, 04:21 PM

Originally posted by ThunderBalls

Oh really? Why did BP take financial shortcuts which caused the worst spill in history? Maybe because it meant MORE PROFIT.

Why did Bush repeal Clintons policy to reduce the allowable concentration of arsenic (a chemical linked to cancer) in drinking water from 50 parts per billion to 10 parts per billion? He did the same thing with air pollution and turned around and called it The Clean Air Act. Why did Bush and the rest of the republicans do this? Thats no conspiracy, that is a fact.

Really grasping at straws here. Im not even going to bother.
Comment
SpongeBub

Confirmed User

Join Date: May 2005

Posts: 470
Share

Post
#33

08-21-2010, 04:25 PM

You have to remember that the bible-thumpers don't care what they do to the earth. They figure that once the rapture happens, it won't matter anymore, so if they destroy the quality of the air and water to enrich themselves now, so be it. Gawd put the earth here for them to use as they see fit and who cares about damage done? They see animals in the same way - just here for their amusement.
Comment
Grapesoda

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Jul 2003

Posts: 46238
Share

Post
#34

08-21-2010, 04:31 PM

Originally posted by Overload

i have really had it with you ignorants ... there are TWO astronomical FACTS that will defuse all your gabbing ...

#1 - the earths orbit around the sun changes a bit every about 100k years ... right now we are in a HIGHER orbit which SHOULD cause a declination of temperatures - and yet the earth warms up!

#2 - we are currently undergoing a "mounder period" of solar spots which means less activity and SHOULD cause a declination of temperatures - and yet the earth warms up!

so, stop your ignorant rants plz

also, the artic ice shield, formerly covering the equal of the USA in size has shrunk by the states east of mississippi (22 states) and lost 1/3 of its thickness so plz do your homework NOW!

geez

i guess you will wake up when the methane hydrid in alaska combusts and is ignited by a lightning ... it will BLOW your ass outta the water

we KNOW for a FACT that global warming as a fraud BECAUSE the earth is fucking FLAT!!!
Comment
TheDoc

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Jul 2001

Posts: 13827
Share

Post
#35

08-21-2010, 04:32 PM

Originally posted by SatansCandy

Sorry, I pick God's word over you anyday!

2 Peter 3:10 And the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up.

"Behold, the Lord will turn the earth upside down and many of the inhabitants shall be burned up and few men left" - Isaiah 24

Hehe... God's word, funny stuff. The above was written by a man named Isaiah. Hope I was able to clear up your confusion.

~TheDoc - ICQ7765825
It's all disambiguation
Comment
Grapesoda

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Jul 2003

Posts: 46238
Share

Post
#36

08-21-2010, 04:32 PM

Originally posted by MaDalton

see, that's why a discussion with you is fruitless, you choose to ignore everything that does not fit your agenda.
and yeah, the germans were pretty progressive: rockets, jet airplanes, nuclear research... without my captured nazi ancestors you would not have had a nuclear bomb and no mission to the moon. but at least you left some indians alive so that you can have casinos.

pretty sure the smart german jews left before the war was over to invert the bomb
Comment
dav3

Confirmed User

Join Date: May 2007

Posts: 7348
Share

Post
#37

08-21-2010, 04:34 PM

Mercury:

Venus:

Guess who's next!

That's right, Earth.

Earth is next in line to be a toasted piece of space rock orbiting our ever enlarging Sun.

So I guess that means we should speed up the process and pump out as many greenhouse gases as we can, so that we can trap more of the Sun's heat. Only libertarian hippy dumbasses would like to prolong imminent doom, so that they can turn Earth into hell, where they can smoke their pots with satan and his demons.

But seriously, now is the time to stop arguing petty semantics, start consuming less and start seriously considering inter-planetary travel and sustaining life in space.

Webmasters :: Juicy Ads :: ACWM :: Crak Revenue :: Money Tree
Comment
stickyfingerz

Doin fine

Join Date: Oct 2005

Posts: 24984
Share

Post
#38

08-21-2010, 04:39 PM

Originally posted by SpongeBub

You have to remember that the bible-thumpers don't care what they do to the earth. They figure that once the rapture happens, it won't matter anymore, so if they destroy the quality of the air and water to enrich themselves now, so be it. Gawd put the earth here for them to use as they see fit and who cares about damage done? They see animals in the same way - just here for their amusement.

Who in this thread is a bible thumper other than the obvious fake nick with nothing better to do?

And MaDalton you might wanna read up on "the manhattan project".. I assume you are referring to Szilard ?
Comment
IllTestYourGirls

Ah My Balls

Join Date: Feb 2007

Posts: 14311
Share

Post
#39

08-21-2010, 04:42 PM

Originally posted by dav3

But seriously, now is the time to stop arguing petty semantics, start consuming less and start seriously considering inter-planetary travel and sustaining life in space.

I think hell fire preachers like Al Gore and his nut job followers should practice what they preach and not worry so much about forcing others to do what they are not willing to do
Comment
TheDoc

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Jul 2001

Posts: 13827
Share

Post
#40

08-21-2010, 04:46 PM

Originally posted by dav3

So I guess that means we should speed up the process and pump out as many greenhouse gases as we can, so that we can trap more of the Sun's heat. Only libertarian hippy dumbasses would like to prolong imminent doom, so that they can turn Earth into hell, where they can smoke their pots with satan and his demons.

But seriously, now is the time to stop arguing petty semantics, start consuming less and start seriously considering inter-planetary travel and sustaining life in space.

Nothing wrong with cleaning up our local environment, making sure we don't over pollute, all that good crap. For our own sakes, our kids sakes, the food we eat, our water, etc.

But even if man just disappeared from earth tomorrow, nothing bad ever produced again. Earth is still going to warm up, the ice is still going to melt, and the exact same thing would have happened and still will happen either way, in the same time period.

It was happening before man ever could have created it to happen, it's happened before without man, and it will happen again with man.

~TheDoc - ICQ7765825
It's all disambiguation
Comment
Bill8

Confirmed User

Join Date: Oct 2001

Posts: 1901
Share

Post
#41

08-21-2010, 04:49 PM

Originally posted by Dvae

Sounds like your entire theory is based on ice yet you never mentioned the slight increase in ice coverage on Antarctica, conveniently you left that out.

presumably then you know the way that the current models predict and explain the slight antarctic increase?

I'd be interested in seeing if you have that level of knowledge of the topic - or are you just repeating something fox news told you to repeat? It's a simple answer, something that has been in the news over and over again - what is it?

...

ultimately it's pointless to try to argue something as complex as the science behind the models with people who have intentionally chosen to promote a simplistic political model.

you also have to accept that the science haters WILL win, in the short term.
Comment
Ethersync

Confirmed User

Join Date: Mar 2008

Posts: 5289
Share

Post
#42

08-21-2010, 05:10 PM

Originally posted by Overload

#1 - the earths orbit around the sun changes a bit every about 100k years ... right now we are in a HIGHER orbit which SHOULD cause a declination of temperatures - and yet the earth warms up!

So, when did we enter the higher orbit phase of this 100,000 year cycle?

Originally posted by Overload

#2 - we are currently undergoing a "mounder period" of solar spots which means less activity and SHOULD cause a declination of temperatures - and yet the earth warms up!

I believe you are referring to the Maunder Minimum which was between 1645–1715 during a "Little Ice Age".

Also, I believe that the recent period of little to no sun spots has ended recently and many say that the earth has been cooling the last 10 years.

Last edited by Ethersync; 08-21-2010, 05:13 PM.

The best ePassporte replacement I have found: OKPAY
Comment
Overload

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jul 2005

Posts: 3185
Share

Post
#43

08-21-2010, 05:34 PM

Originally posted by Dvae

Sounds like your entire theory is based on ice yet you never mentioned the slight increase in ice coverage on Antarctica, conveniently you left that out.

you ... what?! serious, you claim antarctic ice has BUILD UP!? OMFG! i cant believe it ... you skipped ALL the the latest docus and sciene reports bout that didnt ya? ppl like YOU are bringing it down to a total disaster

There aren't enough faces and palms on this planet for an appropriate reaction to religion.
Comment
Overload

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jul 2005

Posts: 3185
Share

Post
#44

08-21-2010, 05:45 PM

Originally posted by MaDalton

spot on. the thing is that the US is by now about 20 years behind a country like Germany in these things. All these discussions i remember from my childhood, just that here something was done. Gas is much more expensive, energy too. Emission laws are WAY more strict. And what happened? Air got better, rivers are much cleaner, less forrests are dying. And Germany is one of the leading countries in exporting "green" technologies and many jobs have been created that way.

you people keep telling that things will not work that have been proven to work since decades, you're just to arrogant to accept that someone is doing it better.

ah, and before i forget: your biggest problem BY FAR are the armies of lobbyists that are paid to keep things in the shitter where they are

bam! hammer to the nail! THAT is 100% my thots bout US ignorants (focus on RANTS, lol) ... they will know when everyone is doing better then them and then they start a war to catch up or bring others down its the problem of a country considering itself "above" ... germany did last century but we LEARNED instead of insisting on "what is good today will be good anytime" ... why do US folks think "green" is bad? (mind you, what color is a dollar?) ... because some idiots spill "information" it will kill jobs - whereas the OPPOSITE is the truth! inventing new technology to keep the environment clean CREATES jobs! and hey, you want yer kids to be in need for a gas mask when going out? hmm? what are ya going to tell them when they ask "why didnt ya do anything?" ... and yeah, lobbyism is a BIG US problem ... buggers dont even label their GE milk ... holy smoke - more ignorance can only be found looking at FUNDEMENTALISTS!

edit ... MaDalton - are you EU or DE?

Last edited by Overload; 08-21-2010, 05:48 PM.

There aren't enough faces and palms on this planet for an appropriate reaction to religion.
Comment
Ethersync

Confirmed User

Join Date: Mar 2008

Posts: 5289
Share

Post
#45

08-21-2010, 05:46 PM

Originally posted by Overload

you ... what?! serious, you claim antarctic ice has BUILD UP!? OMFG! i cant believe it ... you skipped ALL the the latest docus and sciene reports bout that didnt ya? ppl like YOU are bringing it down to a total disaster

It is. Even people supporting you position say it is: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...e-environment/

The best ePassporte replacement I have found: OKPAY
Comment
stickyfingerz

Doin fine

Join Date: Oct 2005

Posts: 24984
Share

Post
#46

08-21-2010, 06:06 PM

Originally posted by Overload

you ... what?! serious, you claim antarctic ice has BUILD UP!? OMFG! i cant believe it ... you skipped ALL the the latest docus and sciene reports bout that didnt ya? ppl like YOU are bringing it down to a total disaster

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencete...arts-here.html

http://www.washingtontimes.com/weblo...e-cap-growing/

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencete...oomsayers.html
Comment
Ethersync

Confirmed User

Join Date: Mar 2008

Posts: 5289
Share

Post
#47

08-21-2010, 06:09 PM

It is funny how many of the questions/comments in this thread that Overload just ignores.

The best ePassporte replacement I have found: OKPAY
Comment
stickyfingerz

Doin fine

Join Date: Oct 2005

Posts: 24984
Share

Post
#48

08-21-2010, 06:20 PM

Originally posted by Ethersync

It is funny how many of the questions/comments in this thread that Overload just ignores.

Thats cause we is all ignorants...
Comment
MaDalton

I am Amazing Content!

Join Date: Feb 2004

Posts: 39861
Share

Post
#49

08-21-2010, 06:21 PM

Originally posted by Overload

edit ... MaDalton - are you EU or DE?

DE in CZ

AmazingContent.com - providing only the best content and service since 2003
Monetize your content on Veegaz.com - one of Germanies largest VOD sites
Got German traffic? We convert it into money for you!
Email: oltecconsult [at] gmail [dot] com
Comment
Bill8

Confirmed User

Join Date: Oct 2001

Posts: 1901
Share

Post
#50

08-21-2010, 06:30 PM

Originally posted by Ethersync

It is. Even people supporting you position say it is: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...e-environment/

presumably then you also know the part of the global warming model that explains why this happens? and why more ice and snow in the antarctic is probably caused by global warming?

a news magazine like nat geo is not science, its news, but there does seem to be a slight increase in snow deposit in antartica, and the northern hemisphere, especially the northern arctic, does seem to be warming faster than the southern hemisphere and antarctic.
Comment

Previous 1 2 3 template Next

Working...