GW Bush is the Best President in the last 100 years

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • $5 submissions
    I help you SUCCEED
    • Nov 2003
    • 32195

    #1

    GW Bush is the Best President in the last 100 years

    I wonder if a historian would write that in say 20 years? How about 50 years? 100?
  • PornMD
    Mainstream Businessman
    • Jan 2007
    • 9291

    #2
    It would have to be 2100 before someone would say that because it'd be hard to say Clinton was worse than him. We need to see at least a full term by Obama and probably the aftermath as well to know where he stands. People saying he's really good or really bad are kidding themselves...it hasn't been enough time to judge what he's done or the effects of what he's done. It doesn't LOOK good but still, will wait and see.
    Want to crush it in mainstream with Facebook ads? Hit me up.

    Comment

    • fatfoo
      ICQ:649699063
      • Mar 2003
      • 27763

      #3
      I went to New York in September 2009 and some man impersonated George Bush in a funny voice behind my back. Somehow, it was a comfort in the cold night.
      Send me an email: [email protected]

      Comment

      • sortie
        Confirmed User
        • Mar 2007
        • 7771

        #4
        Originally posted by $5 submissions
        I wonder if a historian would write that in say 20 years? How about 50 years? 100?
        Why not, it's not like the world will be free from idiots who can still write at that time.

        Comment

        • Ron Bennett
          Confirmed User
          • Oct 2003
          • 1653

          #5
          U.S. Presidents, as with most all politicians, are mouthpieces for the rich elite - they are ones who truly make policy. And hence, with that in mind, it's no surprise much of Obama administration policies / stances are so similar to that of the Bush administration.

          Choosing candidates, especially at the national level, is akin to choosing between Coke and Pepsi - nearly the same, not much difference; no real change. So saying a particular U.S. President is the "best" or "worst" is a pointless exercise ... keeps the population occupied / fighting among themselves while the rich elite operate by their own rules with impunity.

          Ron
          Domagon - Website Management and Domain Name Sales

          Comment

          • kane
            Too lazy to set a custom title
            • Aug 2001
            • 20684

            #6
            You can't cast judgment on Bush until the situation in Iraq plays itself out fully. He attacked a country that didn't attack us for reasons only known to him. He claimed that it would lead the middle east into democracy. If, 20,30, 50 years or however long from now, he is right and the middle east is a democracy and there is relative peace then the sins of economic collapse will be forgotten and he will be the remembered as the guy who had the guts to start the ball rolling.

            If not he will be remembered as a terrible president who started a war for no real reason and oversaw one of the largest economic collapses in modern times.

            Comment

            • BergyK
              Etology Project Manager
              • Aug 2004
              • 1001

              #7
              Originally posted by Ron Bennett
              U.S. Presidents, as with most all politicians, are mouthpieces for the rich elite - they are ones who truly make policy. And hence, with that in mind, it's no surprise much of Obama administration policies / stances are so similar to that of the Bush administration.

              Choosing candidates, especially at the national level, is akin to choosing between Coke and Pepsi - nearly the same, not much difference; no real change. So saying a particular U.S. President is the "best" or "worst" is a pointless exercise ... keeps the population occupied / fighting among themselves while the rich elite operate by their own rules with impunity.

              Ron
              Well said.

              Comment

              • seeandsee
                Check SIG!
                • Mar 2006
                • 50945

                #8
                what will be noted for best? best stupidity of man kind?
                BUY MY SIG - 50$/Year

                Contact here

                Comment

                • tony299
                  lurker
                  • Aug 2002
                  • 57021

                  #9
                  Last 100 yrs, you got FDR. I know that right have been rewriting history.The man was elected to four terms.

                  Comment

                  • Pics Traffic
                    Confirmed User
                    • Jun 2004
                    • 3055

                    #10
                    I think he's the best prez of all times.
                    My Network Is Waiting For Your Fuckin' Trade!

                    Comment

                    • Caligari
                      Confirmed User
                      • Oct 2009
                      • 5414

                      #11
                      GW Bush is the Best President in the last 100 years
                      and 2010 is the best year for the adult biz ever.
                      ATTN Webmasters Cruel Bucks - LIVE Gonzo Does Not Pay
                      ------------------------------------------------
                      Animal Rescue Click Here to Feed An Animal for Free

                      Comment

                      • Vendzilla
                        Biker Gnome
                        • Mar 2004
                        • 23200

                        #12
                        My favorite was Harry Truman
                        man was a class act
                        Didn't take offers after his presidency for speaking or selling products, didn't want secret service, didn't even get a pension from being the president till later
                        Carbon is not the problem, it makes up 0.041% of our atmosphere , 95% of that is from Volcanos and decomposing plants and stuff. So people in the US are responsible for 13% of the carbon in the atmosphere which 95% is not from Humans, like cars and trucks and stuff and they want to spend trillions to fix it while Solar Panel plants are powered by coal plants
                        think about that

                        Comment

                        • Amputate Your Head
                          There can be only one
                          • Aug 2001
                          • 39075

                          #13
                          GW Bush is the Best President in the last 100 years
                          GW can barely tie his own shoes.
                          SIG TOO BIG

                          Comment

                          • tony299
                            lurker
                            • Aug 2002
                            • 57021

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Vendzilla
                            My favorite was Harry Truman
                            man was a class act
                            Didn't take offers after his presidency for speaking or selling products, didn't want secret service, didn't even get a pension from being the president till later
                            Went back to live at his mother in laws house after leaving the white house.Talk about humbling and because of him, the president gets a pension(Harry was probably one of the last nonrich guys to become president). Because he wasnt a rich man, he left the presidency he didnt have much. He worked in a men's clothing store before politics.

                            Comment

                            • Chosen
                              • Aug 2001
                              • 63151

                              #15
                              Originally posted by $5 submissions
                              I wonder if a historian would write that in say 20 years? How about 50 years? 100?
                              I seriously doubt it...

                              Comment

                              • brassmonkey
                                Pay It Forward
                                • Sep 2005
                                • 77396

                                #16
                                do you have a crack habit? how much you burn in that glass dick? j/k nice title to get that attention.
                                TRUMP 2026 KEKAW!!! - The Laken Riley Act Is Law!
                                DACA ENDED - SUPPORT AZ HCR 2060 52R - email: brassballz-at-techie.com

                                Comment

                                • Penthouse Tony
                                  Confirmed User
                                  • Apr 2004
                                  • 5835

                                  #17
                                  The people that liked Bush will always say Regan was better. So unless the 100 year window doesn't include Regan's years I don't think Bush has a chance to be seen as best. Bookmark this thread and check it in 90 years.
                                  aamos AT FFN dot com
                                  Penthouse.com Business Development
                                  ICQ: 49090846 | Yahoo IM: ff_aamos

                                  Comment

                                  • Rochard
                                    Jägermeister Test Pilot
                                    • Dec 2001
                                    • 75733

                                    #18
                                    Originally posted by $5 submissions
                                    I wonder if a historian would write that in say 20 years? How about 50 years? 100?
                                    I'm not defending Bush in any way shape or form. I think he was horrible.

                                    But the truth is you can't judge a sitting President. You just can't. Just now we are starting to feel the full effects of the past eight years. That healthcare bill they passed - we won't see that for the next four years. This is the way our government works, they do what they want to do, but it's the next administration who pays for is.

                                    Look at President Truman who took office only when President Roosevelt died in 1945. Look at everything he did, and then note that when he left office he had the lowest approval rating ever - 22%. The truth was his policies weren't liked at the time, but did a world of good - Fair Deal, Berlin Airlift, Civil Rights, Korean War, NATO, Marshall Plan.... Now after history has judged him, he ranks as one of the top ten US Presidents.

                                    Bush... Maybe we'll look back at him differently. He made the US the only world super power. That's right. China? They can't do shit to us. Sixty percent of all oil produced in the Middle East doesn't go to the US, it goes to China. Six billion fucking Chinamen and not a single one in the Middle East.

                                    Bush might have handed us the worst economic situation ever, but he also guided us through the defining moment of our lifetime - 9/11. We are quick to forget that.

                                    We'll see in twenty years or so how we feel about it.
                                    Herschel Savage
                                    Brooklyn, NY

                                    Comment

                                    • jackknoff
                                      Confirmed User
                                      • Feb 2010
                                      • 545

                                      #19
                                      Subverting the Congress and Senate into war based on false premises is treason. History will judge him as such.


                                      Jack

                                      Comment

                                      • Poindexterity
                                        Confirmed User
                                        • Feb 2008
                                        • 882

                                        #20
                                        sure, why the hell not?

                                        but who the hell wants to sit and figure out what their least stinky turd they ever pooped out was?

                                        123not it.
                                        no sig

                                        Comment

                                        • gloryholeprincess
                                          Registered User
                                          • Jul 2009
                                          • 73

                                          #21
                                          Leave Jefferson out of that blanket statement. He tried to keep the banks at bay, way back then.
                                          Piper
                                          Originally posted by Ron Bennett
                                          U.S. Presidents, as with most all politicians, are mouthpieces for the rich elite - they are ones who truly make policy. And hence, with that in mind, it's no surprise much of Obama administration policies / stances are so similar to that of the Bush administration.

                                          Choosing candidates, especially at the national level, is akin to choosing between Coke and Pepsi - nearly the same, not much difference; no real change. So saying a particular U.S. President is the "best" or "worst" is a pointless exercise ... keeps the population occupied / fighting among themselves while the rich elite operate by their own rules with impunity.

                                          Ron

                                          Comment

                                          • Raf1
                                            Too lazy to set a custom title
                                            • Oct 2003
                                            • 12117

                                            #22
                                            he would have to be one of the few "insiders" that made serious money during the Bush years.
                                            80% Revshare or 30$ PPS on $1 trials: 200 Niches = Vidz.com Galleries / FLVs / Embeds
                                            3 & 5mins FLVs | RSS & Tube Feeds | Matching Thumbs | FLV Browser & Exporter | No Prechecked Xsales
                                            >> Mobile Redirection Script: mobile.vidz.com also paying 80% net Lifetime << ICQ: 198-394-557

                                            Comment

                                            • $5 submissions
                                              I help you SUCCEED
                                              • Nov 2003
                                              • 32195

                                              #23
                                              Originally posted by Rochard
                                              I'm not defending Bush in any way shape or form. I think he was horrible.

                                              But the truth is you can't judge a sitting President. You just can't. Just now we are starting to feel the full effects of the past eight years. That healthcare bill they passed - we won't see that for the next four years. This is the way our government works, they do what they want to do, but it's the next administration who pays for is.

                                              Look at President Truman who took office only when President Roosevelt died in 1945. Look at everything he did, and then note that when he left office he had the lowest approval rating ever - 22%. The truth was his policies weren't liked at the time, but did a world of good - Fair Deal, Berlin Airlift, Civil Rights, Korean War, NATO, Marshall Plan.... Now after history has judged him, he ranks as one of the top ten US Presidents.

                                              Bush... Maybe we'll look back at him differently. He made the US the only world super power. That's right. China? They can't do shit to us. Sixty percent of all oil produced in the Middle East doesn't go to the US, it goes to China. Six billion fucking Chinamen and not a single one in the Middle East.

                                              Bush might have handed us the worst economic situation ever, but he also guided us through the defining moment of our lifetime - 9/11. We are quick to forget that.

                                              We'll see in twenty years or so how we feel about it.


                                              Good call bringing up Truman. That's how columnist Charles Krauthammer views GWB. Kane raises a good point. It all depends how the Middle East turns out. Similar to Truman it was several years before people could objectively look at the impact of his policies.

                                              Comment

                                              • HD Content
                                                So Fucking Banned
                                                • Jul 2010
                                                • 316

                                                #24
                                                This kind of reminds me of a windshield wiper on a ducks ass

                                                Comment

                                                • Naechy
                                                  Confirmed User
                                                  • Sep 2007
                                                  • 6497

                                                  #25
                                                  i just can`t agree
                                                  Adult SEO Labs * Buying Links * SEO
                                                  666-874

                                                  Comment

                                                  • Vendot
                                                    Confirmed User
                                                    • May 2002
                                                    • 3376

                                                    #26
                                                    It would have to be a historian that had been dropped on his head as a baby, later had a frontal lobotomy, was high on crack and stoned on hashish......
                                                    "In a Time of Universal Deceit, Telling the Truth is a Revolutionary Act." - George Orwell

                                                    Comment

                                                    • Dirty Dane
                                                      Sick Fuck
                                                      • Feb 2004
                                                      • 9491

                                                      #27
                                                      Clinton lied about sex. Bush lied about weapons of mass destruction. I do not know what's worse.

                                                      Comment

                                                      • DaddyHalbucks
                                                        A freakin' legend!
                                                        • Feb 2004
                                                        • 18975

                                                        #28
                                                        Originally posted by jackknoff
                                                        Subverting the Congress and Senate into war based on false premises is treason. History will judge him as such.


                                                        Jack
                                                        Crazy talk. The Clinton Administration believed Saddam had WMD, so did Congress, so did our allies.
                                                        Boner Money

                                                        Comment

                                                        • DaddyHalbucks
                                                          A freakin' legend!
                                                          • Feb 2004
                                                          • 18975

                                                          #29
                                                          Originally posted by Dirty Dane
                                                          Clinton lied about sex. Bush lied about weapons of mass destruction. I do not know what's worse.
                                                          Bill Clinton, like Richard Nixon, abused his power for personal gain.

                                                          There is no evidence that Bush did that. GWB tried to protect his country.
                                                          Boner Money

                                                          Comment

                                                          • epitome
                                                            So Fucking Lame
                                                            • Jun 2009
                                                            • 12156

                                                            #30
                                                            This month's Vanity Fair has an excellent article on how any President is damned if he do, damned if he don't. No one will ever be able to keep campaign promises because of how dysfunctional Washington has become.

                                                            Comment

                                                            • Overload
                                                              Confirmed User
                                                              • Jul 2005
                                                              • 3185

                                                              #31
                                                              Originally posted by Rochard
                                                              China? They can't do shit to us. Sixty percent of all oil produced in the Middle East doesn't go to the US, it goes to China. Six billion fucking Chinamen and not a single one in the Middle East.
                                                              ehh? cant do shit? they can STRANGLE YOU TO DEATH! without their money the US wud be 3rd world country! YOU live on debts BIG TIME and owe china 300 BILLION bucks!!! you can live without them? TRY IT!
                                                              There aren't enough faces and palms on this planet for an appropriate reaction to religion.

                                                              Comment

                                                              • $5 submissions
                                                                I help you SUCCEED
                                                                • Nov 2003
                                                                • 32195

                                                                #32
                                                                Originally posted by DaddyHalbucks
                                                                Crazy talk. The Clinton Administration believed Saddam had WMD, so did Congress, so did our allies.
                                                                The Johnson administration did the same thing with the Gulf of Tonkin resolution

                                                                Comment

                                                                • MaDalton
                                                                  I am Amazing Content!
                                                                  • Feb 2004
                                                                  • 39861

                                                                  #33
                                                                  Originally posted by $5 submissions
                                                                  I wonder if a historian would write that in say 20 years? How about 50 years? 100?
                                                                  possible, i always said "Idiocracy" is in reality a documentary
                                                                  AmazingContent.com - providing only the best content and service since 2003
                                                                  Monetize your content on Veegaz.com - one of Germanies largest VOD sites
                                                                  Got German traffic? We convert it into money for you!
                                                                  Email: oltecconsult [at] gmail [dot] com

                                                                  Comment

                                                                  Working...