Political Condom Vendors Not Protected by 1st Amendment, Judge Rules

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Paul Markham
    Too old to care
    • Jun 2001
    • 52942

    #1

    Political Condom Vendors Not Protected by 1st Amendment, Judge Rules

    Political Condom Vendors Not Protected by 1st Amendment, Judge Rules

    NEW YORK — Two street vendors selling politically stirring condoms charged for not carrying vendor licenses cannot claim the 1st Amendment as a defense, a Manhattan judge has ruled.



    Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500.
    PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70
  • AtlantisCash
    Confirmed User
    • Dec 2005
    • 3179

    #2
    since im not an American, They would know it better but, whats wrong with that?
    Last edited by AtlantisCash; 08-06-2010, 07:01 AM.
    Kız telefonları
    |
    Telefonda seks sohbet

    Comment

    • Paul Markham
      Too old to care
      • Jun 2001
      • 52942

      #3
      Originally posted by MrBottomTooth
      They were too cheap to get a vendor's license. That's really all there is to the story.

      You'd think that a vendor's license would have been cheaper than all their legal fees.
      You would think, buy people don't always think first.



      Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500.
      PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70

      Comment

      • AtlantisCash
        Confirmed User
        • Dec 2005
        • 3179

        #4
        Originally posted by MrBottomTooth
        They were too cheap to get a vendor's license. That's really all there is to the story.

        You'd think that a vendor's license would have been cheaper than all their legal fees.

        They say it's not easy to get it, isn't it?
        Kız telefonları
        |
        Telefonda seks sohbet

        Comment

        • DamnGoodRatio
          Confirmed User
          • Feb 2003
          • 855

          #5
          Political Condom Vendors Not Protected by 1st Amendment, Judge Rules

          The Headline should be:
          Condom vendors fail to get license and try to justify it by saying it is a 1st amendment free speech issue.
          If they were giving them away free then it is political speech, if they are charging for them it is a business. . .
          Obama Said: "We can absorb a terrorist attack."

          Comment

          • alias
            aliasx
            • Apr 2001
            • 19010

            #6
            Originally posted by DamnGoodRatio
            Political Condom Vendors Not Protected by 1st Amendment, Judge Rules

            The Headline should be:
            Condom vendors fail to get license and try to justify it by saying it is a 1st amendment free speech issue.
            If they were giving them away free then it is political speech, if they are charging for them it is a business. . .
            Sums it up.
            https://porncorporation.com

            Comment

            • gideongallery
              Confirmed User
              • Aug 2003
              • 7082

              #7
              Originally posted by DamnGoodRatio
              Political Condom Vendors Not Protected by 1st Amendment, Judge Rules

              The Headline should be:
              Condom vendors fail to get license and try to justify it by saying it is a 1st amendment free speech issue.
              If they were giving them away free then it is political speech, if they are charging for them it is a business. . .
              yeah title totally misrepresents that actual jist of the story.

              it would be a free speech issue if they had bought the vendor licience.

              “When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak

              Comment

              • baddog
                So Fucking Banned
                • Apr 2001
                • 107089

                #8
                Your point?

                Comment

                • jackknoff
                  Confirmed User
                  • Feb 2010
                  • 545

                  #9
                  Charging for a product isn't free speech....


                  Jack

                  Comment

                  • fatfoo
                    ICQ:649699063
                    • Mar 2003
                    • 27763

                    #10
                    Licenses are required for ridiculous things sometimes, like a stripper license.
                    Send me an email: [email protected]

                    Comment

                    Working...