OK, let's compare. I looked at the URL to your site that you provided above and noticed that you do not have any ICRA or RTA label in the source code.

http://i29.tinypic.com/wrn81g.jpg

Then I went to the first 2 tube sites I could think of...

Here is the warning page for YouPorn:

http://i27.tinypic.com/30a536f.jpg

And here you can see YouPorn put an RTA rating in their source code:

http://i32.tinypic.com/2mierc.jpg

Then I went to Xtube and I found they have a warning page too:

http://i32.tinypic.com/26231o6.jpg

Then I looked at the source code and found they have both an RTA rating and an ICRA rating.

http://i31.tinypic.com/nlwe14.jpg

Now let's look at the warning page on your site that you provide a link for:

http://i29.tinypic.com/seb05k.jpg

It seems to me that YouPorn and Xtube do a much better job than you at making it clear on their warning pages that kids should not be there. On your warning page you have to read the fine print to get the warning.

I also noticed that when I go to CyberAge.com I do not actually see your warning page at all, but I do see a lot of naked girls. It is only after I click a picture of a naked girl masturbating that I actually get your warning page.

http://www.cyberage.com/

I also noticed that your gay site UGAS.com is quite graphic and there is absolutely no warning anywhere on it! There is also no RTA or ICRA rating anywhere.

http://www.ugas.com/

I am not trying to say that all tube sites do what YouPorn and Xtube do, but it does seem to be that you should at least have your own house in order before you go off bragging about how much better you are.

It also seems to me that the only thing protecting minors from CyberAge.com and UGAS.com is that they get almost no traffic... :2 cents:

Now that's pimpin!

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

I can think of a few things that I would not like to see in public that are shoved down our throat such as,

Gay parades.. not only do they receive funding from the gov but they are encouraged to show their gay love antics, loud and proud as children walk the same streets they parade on. Try to make a beef about that and god forbid you are now a homophobic being full of hatred, you are the bad guy...

Anti abortionists who have 6 foot tall signs on public roads showing pictures of bloddy chopped up baby parts, guts and all, but try to raise a stink and nothing will change since it is their right to protest etc...

So many more...

Seeing a truck pass by with a woman posing nude (not involved in any sex act or perversion) on it, I find it hard to determine how this would be so offensive. I see plenty of huge signs on strip clubs in town on public roads with women almost completly nude, and many contain lesbian themes. This has been common place for many years.

A truck with a nude model on it not involved in any sort of sexual act really does not appear as being offensive, especially when compared to the examples I wrote.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh