Ron Paul owns Bernanke

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • The Demon
    Confirmed User
    • Apr 2003
    • 7336

    #1

    Ron Paul owns Bernanke

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CD6d_...layer_embedded

    I lost count how many times Ron Paul has owned both Bernanke and Greenspan in the past 10 years. Props to the Free Market/Austrian School economists.
    Greed is Good
  • Barefootsies
    Choice is an Illusion
    • Feb 2005
    • 42635

    #2
    Sweet justice.
    Should You Email Your Members?

    Link1 | Link2 | Link3

    Enough Said.

    "Would you rather live like a king for a year or like a prince forever?"

    Comment

    • buzzard
      Confirmed User
      • Aug 2002
      • 1276

      #3
      Amazing how many people don't get it... The fact that we need to follow the constitution. Ron Paul Owns. Props.

      Comment

      • DateDoc
        Outside looking in.
        • Feb 2005
        • 14243

        #4
        Ron Paul For President!

        Comment

        • mgtarheels
          Confirmed User
          • Mar 2010
          • 1317

          #5
          hmm, lady gaga fan?

          Comment

          • tiger
            Confirmed User
            • Apr 2002
            • 6986

            #6
            Ron Paul owns all. I don't agree with him 100% but at least he fucking tells it like it is.

            Comment

            • Ethersync
              Confirmed User
              • Mar 2008
              • 5289

              #7
              I hope he runs again in 2012.
              The best ePassporte replacement I have found: OKPAY

              Comment

              • Jakez
                Confirmed User
                • Jan 2004
                • 5656

                #8
                When Ron Paul dies I will cry.
                [email protected] - jakezdumb - 573689400

                Killuminati

                Comment

                • elitelist
                  So Fucking Banned
                  • Aug 2002
                  • 210

                  #9
                  Raul Paul says it behooves him

                  Comment

                  • seeandsee
                    Check SIG!
                    • Mar 2006
                    • 50945

                    #10
                    Ron Paul 2012, or never! ronnnnnnnnnnnnnn
                    BUY MY SIG - 50$/Year

                    Contact here

                    Comment

                    • charlie g
                      Confirmed User
                      • Aug 2006
                      • 2759

                      #11
                      You guys remember 2008 how R. Paul was attacked on this board. I have yet see some of the crackpots chime in about how "kooky" he is. Maybe it's sign of the times. Maybe people might listen to what he says this time around.
                      AlanAgus1 at gmail dot com
                      -------------------------------

                      Comment

                      • IllTestYourGirls
                        Ah My Balls
                        • Feb 2007
                        • 14311

                        #12
                        Originally posted by charlie g
                        You guys remember 2008 how R. Paul was attacked on this board. I have yet see some of the crackpots chime in about how "kooky" he is. Maybe it's sign of the times. Maybe people might listen to what he says this time around.
                        It is hard to call someone kooky when he was right about most everything

                        Comment

                        • Socks
                          Confirmed User
                          • May 2002
                          • 8475

                          #13
                          Originally posted by IllTestYourGirls
                          It is hard to call someone kooky when he was right about most everything
                          Apparently it's easy for people to call someone kooky. All you have to do is be on the other team really.

                          The last time around all the other candidates seemed to me to be people propped up by their parties to run for the party, whereas Ron clearly was running by himself as a leader. I don't really know what the other candidates think, they just say what they're supposed to. Ron Paul actually thinks, then responds. Quite amazing.

                          Comment

                          • kane
                            Too lazy to set a custom title
                            • Aug 2001
                            • 20684

                            #14
                            It is just too bad that he really doesn't want to be president or at least isn't serious about running a campaign that can lead to him winning the presidency or he might actually get to put some of these words into action.

                            Comment

                            • D Ghost
                              null
                              • May 2006
                              • 9820

                              #15
                              Originally posted by The Demon
                              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CD6d_...layer_embedded

                              I lost count how many times Ron Paul has owned both Bernanke and Greenspan in the past 10 years. Props to the Free Market/Austrian School economists.
                              yeah I was coming in here to basically say that Ron Paul owns Bernanke on the regular lol

                              Ron Paul is a pimp.

                              Comment

                              • _Richard_
                                Too lazy to set a custom title
                                • Oct 2006
                                • 30991

                                #16
                                Originally posted by The Demon
                                http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CD6d_...layer_embedded

                                I lost count how many times Ron Paul has owned both Bernanke and Greenspan in the past 10 years. Props to the Free Market/Austrian School economists.
                                maybe it's time we started listening to him

                                400k per unemployed person is insane.

                                Comment

                                • Jakez
                                  Confirmed User
                                  • Jan 2004
                                  • 5656

                                  #17
                                  That's ~$12,000 per US citizen. I'm sure $1,000/mo could help plenty of people with their mortgage/rent for a year so they can use the extra cash to stimulate buying.
                                  [email protected] - jakezdumb - 573689400

                                  Killuminati

                                  Comment

                                  • IllTestYourGirls
                                    Ah My Balls
                                    • Feb 2007
                                    • 14311

                                    #18
                                    Originally posted by Jakez
                                    That's ~$12,000 per US citizen. I'm sure $1,000/mo could help plenty of people with their mortgage/rent for a year so they can use the extra cash to stimulate buying.
                                    We have spent 3.7 trillion on bail outs, that would have bought out 1/3 of ALL mortgages! It is just fucking insane.

                                    Comment

                                    • dynastoned
                                      mmm yeah!
                                      • Feb 2005
                                      • 5061

                                      #19
                                      rofl

                                      ron paul is the man. i like how as soon as shit gets real they say thats all the time he has.

                                      the whole thing just sounds like ron paul asking valid questions making valid arguments and getting nothing but excuses as a response.

                                      Comment

                                      • $5 submissions
                                        I help you SUCCEED
                                        • Nov 2003
                                        • 32195

                                        #20
                                        Do you guys think America would be in much better shape had Ron Paul won the presidency? How?

                                        Comment

                                        • AsianDivaGirlsWebDude
                                          Purveyor, Fine Asian Porn
                                          • Jul 2004
                                          • 38323

                                          #21
                                          I thought AIG owned Bernanke...







                                          ADG
                                          Asian Diva Girls - Exclusive Photos and Videos



                                          Asian Diva Girls Affiliate Program (50% ccBill Revshare)

                                          Comment

                                          • Vendzilla
                                            Biker Gnome
                                            • Mar 2004
                                            • 23200

                                            #22
                                            I was thinking about Ross Perot today, he got more votes as a third party candidate than anyone ever, if he wouldn't have pulled out like he did, ruining his chances, we would probably have a completely different political environment today and voting someone into office because they weren't Bush may not have happened and we wouldn't be in this fucked up mess of the Obamanation. We probably wouldn't have two wars either
                                            Carbon is not the problem, it makes up 0.041% of our atmosphere , 95% of that is from Volcanos and decomposing plants and stuff. So people in the US are responsible for 13% of the carbon in the atmosphere which 95% is not from Humans, like cars and trucks and stuff and they want to spend trillions to fix it while Solar Panel plants are powered by coal plants
                                            think about that

                                            Comment

                                            • kane
                                              Too lazy to set a custom title
                                              • Aug 2001
                                              • 20684

                                              #23
                                              Originally posted by Vendzilla
                                              I was thinking about Ross Perot today, he got more votes as a third party candidate than anyone ever, if he wouldn't have pulled out like he did, ruining his chances, we would probably have a completely different political environment today and voting someone into office because they weren't Bush may not have happened and we wouldn't be in this fucked up mess of the Obamanation. We probably wouldn't have two wars either
                                              I sometimes wonder that myself. Even if Perot hadn't have won, what if the Reform party had stuck together, raised money and continued to grow. They had some success getting local and state reps elected and they also got Jesse Ventura elected governor, but then they started to splinter and fall apart.

                                              What if 1/3rd of the house and senate were reform party members? then no party could run roughshot over it and they would all have to get along and work together.

                                              Comment

                                              • IllTestYourGirls
                                                Ah My Balls
                                                • Feb 2007
                                                • 14311

                                                #24
                                                Originally posted by $5 submissions
                                                Do you guys think America would be in much better shape had Ron Paul won the presidency? How?
                                                First and foremost our troops would be home.

                                                Comment

                                                • The Demon
                                                  Confirmed User
                                                  • Apr 2003
                                                  • 7336

                                                  #25
                                                  Originally posted by IllTestYourGirls
                                                  It is hard to call someone kooky when he was right about most everything
                                                  Well, he's not kooky as much as unrealistic. I would love to go on the gold standard but nobody is going to support him getting rid of the FED and IRS. THat's just not realistic. Also, his foreign policies will get us invaded.
                                                  Greed is Good

                                                  Comment

                                                  • Relentless
                                                    www.EngineFood.com
                                                    • Aug 2006
                                                    • 5697

                                                    #26
                                                    Perot was done as soon as Stockdale failed in the VP debate.


                                                    Website Secure | Engine Food
                                                    ICQ# 266-942-896

                                                    Comment

                                                    • charlie g
                                                      Confirmed User
                                                      • Aug 2006
                                                      • 2759

                                                      #27
                                                      Originally posted by The Demon
                                                      Well, he's not kooky as much as unrealistic. I would love to go on the gold standard but nobody is going to support him getting rid of the FED and IRS. THat's just not realistic. Also, his foreign policies will get us invaded.
                                                      The Fed and IRS need to go. The IRS should be replaced by a flat consumption tax. The more you spend, the more you pay. The purpose now is social engineering and behavior control. It is evil. Just look at that blowhard Kerry and his yacht. This guy ought to have his as kicked. He is a fucking weazel.

                                                      The Federal Reserve system has gotten us into the mess we are in today. Tinkering with interest rates and printing money hand over fist has almost bankrupted the country. If the truth were known about how weak the economy really is there would be a run on the banks. Alan Greenspan was a shill for the country club crowd as I am sure Bernanke is and just as I am sure all his predecessors.

                                                      I happen to agree with his foreign policy. Do you realize how many billions of dollars are wasted on defense spending? How many bases we have in foreign countries where they don't want us? Let Israel take care of the middle east. Why cant we concentrate on border control and intelligence to keep another 9-11 happening? It's ridiculous for us to have a base in Europe.

                                                      Why can't we go back on the gold standard? Why is that crazy? It is something that has value.... paper money does not. What is wrong with the government only spending what it has? Why do we need a currency that can be manipulated by politics?

                                                      These are not unrealistic ideas. They are ideas that make sense. If you think there will be pain in making these changes now, just wait until we run the course we are on now. The boomers are starting to retire. And when they find out that there retirement money is gone, Medicare is gone, there are going to be grey haired white people taking to the streets. The watts riots will look like Sunday school.
                                                      AlanAgus1 at gmail dot com
                                                      -------------------------------

                                                      Comment

                                                      • dig420
                                                        Confirmed User
                                                        • May 2001
                                                        • 9240

                                                        #28
                                                        Originally posted by The Demon
                                                        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CD6d_...layer_embedded

                                                        I lost count how many times Ron Paul has owned both Bernanke and Greenspan in the past 10 years. Props to the Free Market/Austrian School economists.
                                                        It's TOO MUCH of a free market that put us in the situation we're in today vis a vis the banks, and the fact that we effectively live in an oligarchy dominated and controlled by financial institutions. That and the fact that you 'free market' conservatives refuse to support any regulation of these institutions.

                                                        So thanks for that.

                                                        Comment

                                                        • IllTestYourGirls
                                                          Ah My Balls
                                                          • Feb 2007
                                                          • 14311

                                                          #29
                                                          Originally posted by dig420
                                                          It's TOO MUCH of a free market that put us in the situation we're in today vis a vis the banks, and the fact that we effectively live in an oligarchy dominated and controlled by financial institutions. That and the fact that you 'free market' conservatives refuse to support any regulation of these institutions.

                                                          So thanks for that.

                                                          Comment

                                                          • charlie g
                                                            Confirmed User
                                                            • Aug 2006
                                                            • 2759

                                                            #30
                                                            Originally posted by dig420
                                                            It's TOO MUCH of a free market that put us in the situation we're in today vis a vis the banks, and the fact that we effectively live in an oligarchy dominated and controlled by financial institutions. That and the fact that you 'free market' conservatives refuse to support any regulation of these institutions.

                                                            So thanks for that.
                                                            I think you can blame the politicization of the oversight and regulation on the political structure we currently have. Everything is for sale in Washington. Special interest throwing money at politicians is not freedom of speech; it's plain out bribery.

                                                            Don't lose sight of the ball. The democrats and republicans are to blame. To separate the two is a mistake. They want to make politics a sport so we all choose a side and not notice or care when "my side " fucks up. The "other side" gets angry that things are fucked up, so the mobilize and get "their side" back in power. Nobody wins because we all lose. Special interests funnel the money and our representatives fuck us over. But as long as it's "our guy", it doesn't matter. It's just a sport.
                                                            AlanAgus1 at gmail dot com
                                                            -------------------------------

                                                            Comment

                                                            • dig420
                                                              Confirmed User
                                                              • May 2001
                                                              • 9240

                                                              #31
                                                              Originally posted by charlie g
                                                              I think you can blame the politicization of the oversight and regulation on the political structure we currently have. Everything is for sale in Washington. Special interest throwing money at politicians is not freedom of speech; it's plain out bribery.

                                                              Don't lose sight of the ball. The democrats and republicans are to blame. To separate the two is a mistake. They want to make politics a sport so we all choose a side and not notice or care when "my side " fucks up. The "other side" gets angry that things are fucked up, so the mobilize and get "their side" back in power. Nobody wins because we all lose. Special interests funnel the money and our representatives fuck us over. But as long as it's "our guy", it doesn't matter. It's just a sport.
                                                              If it's just a sport and sides don't matter, why is it the Repugnicans trying to rob social security, conservatards fighting the appt. of a truly effective leader for the consumer protection bureau, conservatives apologizing to BP, conservatives fighting regulation of big business, conservatives trying to eliminate taxes on the obscenely wealthy?

                                                              Don't kid yourself. There's a difference. Saying in an oh so blase tone that there's not betrays an intellectual laziness and no real grasp of what's actually going on.

                                                              Comment

                                                              • IllTestYourGirls
                                                                Ah My Balls
                                                                • Feb 2007
                                                                • 14311

                                                                #32
                                                                Originally posted by dig420
                                                                If it's just a sport and sides don't matter, why is it the Repugnicans trying to rob social security, conservatards fighting the appt. of a truly effective leader for the consumer protection bureau, conservatives apologizing to BP, conservatives fighting regulation of big business, conservatives trying to eliminate taxes on the obscenely wealthy?

                                                                Don't kid yourself. There's a difference. Saying in an oh so blase tone that there's not betrays an intellectual laziness and no real grasp of what's actually going on.


                                                                Have some more kool aid

                                                                End of Bush tax cuts = 50% tax hike for lowest earners
                                                                End of Bush tax cuts = 10% tax hike for wealthiest

                                                                Both parties are working together to screw you and get money to their corporate friends
                                                                Last edited by IllTestYourGirls; 07-25-2010, 09:06 AM.

                                                                Comment

                                                                • dig420
                                                                  Confirmed User
                                                                  • May 2001
                                                                  • 9240

                                                                  #33
                                                                  Originally posted by IllTestYourGirls


                                                                  Have some more kool aid

                                                                  End of Bush tax cuts = 50% tax hike for lowest earners
                                                                  End of Bush tax cuts = 10% tax hike for wealthiest

                                                                  Both parties are working together to screw you and get money to their corporate friends
                                                                  without even fact checking, that claim is so oddball ridiculous that I can tell it came from Glenn Beck or Rush Limbaugh, the great right wing propagandists.

                                                                  Comment

                                                                  • charlie g
                                                                    Confirmed User
                                                                    • Aug 2006
                                                                    • 2759

                                                                    #34
                                                                    Originally posted by dig420
                                                                    If it's just a sport and sides don't matter, why is it the Repugnicans trying to rob social security, conservatards fighting the appt. of a truly effective leader for the consumer protection bureau, conservatives apologizing to BP, conservatives fighting regulation of big business, conservatives trying to eliminate taxes on the obscenely wealthy?

                                                                    Don't kid yourself. There's a difference. Saying in an oh so blase tone that there's not betrays an intellectual laziness and no real grasp of what's actually going on.
                                                                    Look, if you want to blame one side or the other you are part of the problem. These guys are cut from the same cloth and they are both taking money from BP and trial lawyers and tobacco companies and every other industry that doesn't give 2 fucks for you or anyone you know. You are kidding yourself if you think either wants to change the status quo. These guys hang out in the same bars slapping eachother on the back and trading interns to fuck. It's a grand life on the hill.

                                                                    *edit* oh, and we are getting to foot the bill for this big party. You don't think John Kerry wants to waste his tax money on whores, booze and cocaine? Oh yeah, he doesn't pay taxes, my bad.
                                                                    Last edited by charlie g; 07-25-2010, 09:23 AM.
                                                                    AlanAgus1 at gmail dot com
                                                                    -------------------------------

                                                                    Comment

                                                                    • IllTestYourGirls
                                                                      Ah My Balls
                                                                      • Feb 2007
                                                                      • 14311

                                                                      #35
                                                                      Originally posted by dig420
                                                                      without even fact checking, that claim is so oddball ridiculous that I can tell it came from Glenn Beck or Rush Limbaugh, the great right wing propagandists.
                                                                      Try fact checking

                                                                      http://www.unionleader.com/article.a...c-bdaa935256d3

                                                                      "(t)he lowest bracket for the personal income tax, for instance, moves up 50 percent -- to 15 percent from 10 percent. The next lowest bracket -- 25 percent -- will rise to 28 percent, and the old 28 percent bracket will be 31 percent. At the higher end, the 33 percent bracket is pushed to 36 percent and the 35 percent bracket becomes 39.6 percent."

                                                                      Comment

                                                                      • dig420
                                                                        Confirmed User
                                                                        • May 2001
                                                                        • 9240

                                                                        #36
                                                                        Originally posted by charlie g
                                                                        Look, if you want to blame one side or the other you are part of the problem. These guys are cut from the same cloth and they are both taking money from BP and trial lawyers and tobacco companies and every other industry that doesn't give 2 fucks for you or anyone you know. You are kidding yourself if you think either wants to change the status quo. These guys hang out in the same bars slapping eachother on the back and trading interns to fuck. It's a grand life on the hill.
                                                                        If you're too lazy to actually find out what the situation is, then you're part of the problem. Especially when you're so eager to chime in with your world-weary, oh so wise comments about how they're all the same. It's that dumb resigned attitude that allows this kind of shit to happen.

                                                                        Testyourgirls, what you're saying is about as likely as there being a worldwide jew conspiracy to take over the world. It doesn't even merit a reasoned response. It's a joke. Ridiculous. How can you believe shit like that?

                                                                        Comment

                                                                        • bushwacker
                                                                          Confirmed User
                                                                          • Jun 2002
                                                                          • 2817

                                                                          #37
                                                                          Originally posted by The Demon
                                                                          Well, he's not kooky as much as unrealistic. I would love to go on the gold standard but nobody is going to support him getting rid of the FED and IRS. THat's just not realistic. Also, his foreign policies will get us invaded.

                                                                          Demon what don't you like about ron pauls foreign poilicy? I'm not familiar with his stance on the issue.

                                                                          Comment

                                                                          • charlie g
                                                                            Confirmed User
                                                                            • Aug 2006
                                                                            • 2759

                                                                            #38
                                                                            Originally posted by dig420
                                                                            If you're too lazy to actually find out what the situation is, then you're part of the problem. Especially when you're so eager to chime in with your world-weary, oh so wise comments about how they're all the same. It's that dumb resigned attitude that allows this kind of shit to happen.

                                                                            Testyourgirls, what you're saying is about as likely as there being a worldwide jew conspiracy to take over the world. It doesn't even merit a reasoned response. It's a joke. Ridiculous. How can you believe shit like that?
                                                                            Look fuckstick, read the fucking link he posted. 10% to 15% is 50% The lowest bracket taxpayer doesn't have the loopholes to hide income... like john kerry. If that douche bag says "rich pay their fair share" again I will barf. IF ANYTHING, THIS IS A REGRESSIVE TAX INCREASE ON THE POOR AN MIDDLE CLASS!

                                                                            I am not so sure what "world-weary" means. But I am weary of fucking politicians pissing on my back and telling me it's raining. It's obvious that you are a brainwashed "tool" for the democrats because you won't even look at the link.

                                                                            By all mean, please enlighten us with what the democrats are doing to change the country.
                                                                            AlanAgus1 at gmail dot com
                                                                            -------------------------------

                                                                            Comment

                                                                            • IllTestYourGirls
                                                                              Ah My Balls
                                                                              • Feb 2007
                                                                              • 14311

                                                                              #39
                                                                              Originally posted by dig420

                                                                              Testyourgirls, what you're saying is about as likely as there being a worldwide jew conspiracy to take over the world. It doesn't even merit a reasoned response. It's a joke. Ridiculous. How can you believe shit like that?
                                                                              Simple math is ridiculous? WSJ has the same numbers

                                                                              http://online.wsj.com/article/NA_WSJ...862552246.html

                                                                              Although their propaganda piece does not show that the lowest will be increased from 10 to 15% but has the wealthy going from 35 to 39.5

                                                                              Comment

                                                                              • Vendzilla
                                                                                Biker Gnome
                                                                                • Mar 2004
                                                                                • 23200

                                                                                #40
                                                                                Originally posted by Relentless
                                                                                Perot was done as soon as Stockdale failed in the VP debate.
                                                                                A much fun as it was to watch Perot debate, it hurt to watch Stockdale debat
                                                                                Carbon is not the problem, it makes up 0.041% of our atmosphere , 95% of that is from Volcanos and decomposing plants and stuff. So people in the US are responsible for 13% of the carbon in the atmosphere which 95% is not from Humans, like cars and trucks and stuff and they want to spend trillions to fix it while Solar Panel plants are powered by coal plants
                                                                                think about that

                                                                                Comment

                                                                                • The Demon
                                                                                  Confirmed User
                                                                                  • Apr 2003
                                                                                  • 7336

                                                                                  #41
                                                                                  Originally posted by dig420
                                                                                  It's TOO MUCH of a free market that put us in the situation we're in today vis a vis the banks, and the fact that we effectively live in an oligarchy dominated and controlled by financial institutions. That and the fact that you 'free market' conservatives refuse to support any regulation of these institutions.

                                                                                  So thanks for that.
                                                                                  I found the bolded line interesting. Yes, we free market conservatives refuse to support regulation. THAT IS WHAT FREE MARKET MEANS. Wow, I don't want to call you stupid, but damn.

                                                                                  And it wasn't a lack of regulation that got us here, that's just what the Democrats want everyone to think. It was a mixture of fiscal and monetary mismanagement by the FED and careless spending by the consumers that got us here.
                                                                                  Greed is Good

                                                                                  Comment

                                                                                  • The Demon
                                                                                    Confirmed User
                                                                                    • Apr 2003
                                                                                    • 7336

                                                                                    #42
                                                                                    Originally posted by dig420
                                                                                    If it's just a sport and sides don't matter, why is it the Repugnicans trying to rob social security, conservatards fighting the appt. of a truly effective leader for the consumer protection bureau, conservatives apologizing to BP, conservatives fighting regulation of big business, conservatives trying to eliminate taxes on the obscenely wealthy?

                                                                                    Don't kid yourself. There's a difference. Saying in an oh so blase tone that there's not betrays an intellectual laziness and no real grasp of what's actually going on.
                                                                                    I was wrong, you most certainly are a stupid brainwashed liberal.
                                                                                    Greed is Good

                                                                                    Comment

                                                                                    • Coup
                                                                                      🚨 PBBC International 🚨
                                                                                      • Apr 2010
                                                                                      • 9931

                                                                                      #43


                                                                                      vOTE rON pAUL '08

                                                                                      Comment

                                                                                      Working...