GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   PlugRush vs Juicy Ads (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=975823)

DVTimes 07-01-2010 11:48 AM

by the way, if you want to test out plugrush. this is the link.

DVTimes 07-01-2010 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jakez (Post 17297738)
Nice! I don't think PlugRush's traffic does well with the soft GF stuff, it's more for hardcore niches.

i just sined up:

http://www.juicyads.com/ref2.php?ref=8228

Dvtimes
Buy & Sell Ads on The Most Sexy Advertising Network on the Planet
http://www.juicyads.com/juicyads/120x60_orangebg.jpg
available ad spots | sign up now

Jakez 07-01-2010 03:20 PM

Ok.. drumroll please, lol.
http://i45.tinypic.com/jg1n42.jpg
Here are the stats from ccbill:

Juicy Ads
Spent about $12, 2596 uniques in 7 days, 21 "form clicks", 0 sales

PlugRush
Spent $30 (plus $1 for PayPal tax), 2393 uniques in 1 day, 14 "form clicks", 0 sales

ChokerTraffic
$30 free from Choker for the test (thx), 6007 uniques in a few days, 13 "form clicks", 0 sales

A reminder: all traffic was sent to seemygf's tour and certain sources may have performed better/worse being sent to a different niche. But there it is. Not a huge test but if anyone was just curious then here's at least some data. Since there were no sales you would probably consider this to just be feeder traffic, in which Choker clearly sent the most traffic for your :2 cents:

Choker 07-01-2010 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jakez (Post 17299635)
Ok.. drumroll please, lol.
http://i45.tinypic.com/jg1n42.jpg
Here are the stats from ccbill:

Juicy Ads
Spent about $12, 2596 uniques in 7 days, 21 "form clicks", 0 sales

PlugRush
Spent $30 (plus $1 for PayPal tax), 2393 uniques in 1 day, 14 "form clicks", 0 sales

ChokerTraffic
$30 free from Choker for the test (thx), 6007 uniques in a few days, 13 "form clicks", 0 sales

A reminder: all traffic was sent to seemygf's tour and certain sources may have performed better/worse being sent to a different niche. But there it is. Not a huge test but if anyone was just curious then here's at least some data. Since there were no sales you would probably consider this to just be feeder traffic, in which Choker clearly sent the most traffic for your :2 cents:

Pretty inconclusive. My traffic is best sent to a free site for filtering before sending on to a sponsor. It seems from what a lot of people post that Juicy adds can work with certain paysites really good. Plugrush well I don't know, I resepct anyone that comes up with a new and unique outside the box idea so my hat is off to them, whether the traffic they send is worth the money they charge I simply don't know.

D Ghost 07-01-2010 04:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DVTimes (Post 17297729)
i will have to have a go with juicyads

Feel free to contact me anytime with questions DVTimes...

DVTimes 07-01-2010 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ The Kid (Post 17299864)
Feel free to contact me anytime with questions DVTimes...

hi

thank you.

i will look at your site soon.

it looks nice and i signed up fine.

DVTimes 07-01-2010 05:17 PM

is it not the case that traffick is purchased from tgp/tube sites and so on.

often this is traffick thats been purchased before.

the bulk (99%) I presume or looking for free porn, and simply clicked on the link expecting to see free porn but finding a link to a site they did not want.

they ideal traffick is searched out traffick, ie, from google and other search engines as they may be more likly to buy.

IllTestYourGirls 07-01-2010 05:24 PM

Well if anyone wants to give me $500 worth of traffic for free, Ill give your ad/traffic networks a test run and leave a more definitive review


:banana:GFYBand:banana

fuzebox 07-01-2010 05:35 PM

Plugrush sends me the highest productivity traffic I've ever bought, but then I use it to feed my freesites... Don't think I'd ever try sending directly to a sponsor.

Choker 07-01-2010 06:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fuzebox (Post 17300099)
Plugrush sends me the highest productivity traffic I've ever bought, but then I use it to feed my freesites... Don't think I'd ever try sending directly to a sponsor.

traffic that costs $4 per k and is 100% productive on your site and traffic that is $12 per k and is 300% productive on your site cost the same. Google would be the most productive traffic on my sites but costs versus productivity it's simply not worth it. If it were I would have 1000 adwords campaigns going right now.

Jakez 07-01-2010 10:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DVTimes (Post 17300047)
they ideal traffick is searched out traffick, ie, from google and other search engines as they may be more likly to buy.

Yes exactly, what I do before buying an ad is I will look at the websites Alexa stats and see how much search engine traffic they are getting, and maybe what terms. the audience, etc.. Then decide if the ad purchase is worth it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by IllTestYourGirls (Post 17300062)
Well if anyone wants to give me $500 worth of traffic for free, Ill give your ad/traffic networks a test run and leave a more definitive review


:banana:GFYBand:banana

Haha nice!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Choker (Post 17300223)
traffic that costs $4 per k and is 100% productive on your site and traffic that is $12 per k and is 300% productive on your site cost the same. Google would be the most productive traffic on my sites but costs versus productivity it's simply not worth it. If it were I would have 1000 adwords campaigns going right now.

Yeah, I would rather buy traffic that clicks less (100% prod for example) and knows what they want and buys a subscription once they reach the join form, than traffic that clicks more (300%) and isn't finding what they're looking for or is just freeloading.. what kind of traffic's productivity is below 100% anyways? Tier 3?


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:52 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123