| Jakez |
07-01-2010 10:55 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by DVTimes
(Post 17300047)
they ideal traffick is searched out traffick, ie, from google and other search engines as they may be more likly to buy.
|
Yes exactly, what I do before buying an ad is I will look at the websites Alexa stats and see how much search engine traffic they are getting, and maybe what terms. the audience, etc.. Then decide if the ad purchase is worth it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by IllTestYourGirls
(Post 17300062)
Well if anyone wants to give me $500 worth of traffic for free, Ill give your ad/traffic networks a test run and leave a more definitive review
:banana:GFYBand:banana
|
Haha nice!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Choker
(Post 17300223)
traffic that costs $4 per k and is 100% productive on your site and traffic that is $12 per k and is 300% productive on your site cost the same. Google would be the most productive traffic on my sites but costs versus productivity it's simply not worth it. If it were I would have 1000 adwords campaigns going right now.
|
Yeah, I would rather buy traffic that clicks less (100% prod for example) and knows what they want and buys a subscription once they reach the join form, than traffic that clicks more (300%) and isn't finding what they're looking for or is just freeloading.. what kind of traffic's productivity is below 100% anyways? Tier 3? |
