Let me check the agency websites and start pointing out the ones who escort & the ones forced into it by ______ . Oh wait, can't talk about that ... yet.

No but if they are whores we are pimps.

Good post. :thumbsup

Some of the replies in this thread show a very dim view of girls having sex for fun or money. They remind me of the attitude in the 60s and 70s or from people who are not getting any.

So if a girl has sex for money or fun is a whore, what does that make the guy fucking her.

a douchebag?

the same difference between fair use and copyright infringement

one is legal and the other is not.

I think the pornstars get 'market value' compared to some skeezer. So they typically are paid more then your neighborhood skeezer.

it's exactly the same except that hookers WON'T get aids because they demand the use of condoms.

please don't take this wrong, I respect the work of both hookers and actresses and have absolutely no problem with what they do. But I stand my ground when I say that hookers are way safer!

Well,i see a lot of pornstars are also prostitutes,so there is no different.

So you've never had a one night stand or sex on the first date?

Because if the girl does that she's a slut and the guy's a douchebag. :1orglaugh

seeing how many pornstars also escort on the side, what does that make them?

Especially now with not much work at all for porn stars. So many are escorting. One porn star I know of who just started escorting says she can finally use condoms and she sees no difference with having sex on camera and with having sex in a hotel room.

With escorting, you never see the client again unless they become a regular. I know of one porn star who despises escorts and one reason being they have sex with married men. HELLO! She also has sex with the many married porn stars on camera, male and female. How many times do porn stars leave set and go home and have sex with who she was just with on set and his wife/girlfriend waiting at home and at all these porn parties? At least with escorting, you never see them again. And with that certain porn star throwing around the marriage excuse, she's friends with who she's with on camera and goes home with them and whoever else is waiting at home. Escorts don't do that. And is whoever else they're having sex with off camera also tested??

One porn star wrote on her blog that she only dates celebrities. Well that's being a prostitute, isn't it?? I wanted to ask her name one celebrity honey and not that one fighter that kept you hidden and that got rid of you after his fiance broke off their engagement after she went online making Youtube videos bragging that they were "dating".

What about a show like True Blood or a movie like Brown Bunny, where the stars had sex off-camera and later presumably on-camera? Does that make award-winning actresses like Anna Paquin or Chloë Sevigny prostitutes? I don't think so.

If someone brings a camera into a nightclub, I don't think that makes everyone shot doing something naughty into a pornstar or a prostitute.

While some talent may bring a prostitute mentality to shooting content, I think many are interested in either the crazy sex fantasy of it or the artistry or just being immortalized in some small way.

i lone whores so who cares.

I can tell you that Jesse Jane, contract girl of Digital Playground and star of many movies including 'Pirates', DOES do shows and signings at strip clubs still. Her strip shows are just as amazing.

And Sasha Grey does 'fuck-a-fan', as does Brandi Belle and many others. Sasha Grey even did live cam chat with customers and shows (with Kink.com).

As I said, they all cross the spectrum and do pretty much everything...

Strippers want to become pornstars, pornstars do cam chats and stripping, prostitutes wish they got the fame of pornstars and some strip at clubs... and Hooter girls like to show to get money and tips. lol. (Sorry, had to throw that in)

A Camera makes the whole distinction a 'freedom of speech and expression" issue. Fucking for money you could do in an alleyway, but fucking in front of a camera? That's 'acting', or even 'art'.

ask LA Direct

http://www.theluxurycompanion.com

does it have to be an expensive HD cam? or can somone be in the back alleyway with..lets say...there cell phone cam and a prostitute ..then claim its art/porn ?:helpme

Danza you speak the truth, and you crack me up!

Yup, a cameraphone in the alleyway totally works - IF the "actress" signs a model release and the footage is used in either an artsy way, on a website, in some commercial use, or even for a "private collector".

The 1st Amendment is a wonderful thing.

Who cares really??

so what if hookers or johns just kept a pre-made contract on them during the "meet" ?

Freeman v. California seems to apply here --Google it?

In answer to the thread title...no...in the sense that they both exchange sex for money.

thats the one I was talking about

Well, if the "johns" had a fucking brain then they WOULD carry a model release with them. Getting the hooker to sign her real name, give her addy & contact info, may be the real tricky part. I suppose you could always tell them it was a "don't arrest list" or some bullshit. haha!

Drugs
Whores

Legalize 'em.
/thread

Hookers will fuck me, Pornstars Won't fuck me.

There is a few differences, you wouldn't have to start a thread to realize it :)

but i did and got alot of different opinoins..kind of the reason forums like these exist:2 cents: