![]() |
Quote:
you think it's 'empty-minded' to seek out truth? and the use of the internet, something still 'uncontrolled', if you will, as a method of doing so? it amuses me when people try to shut other people down with big words, when they don't do anything themselves much like a great catharsis |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
is tired of all this bullshit talk ..im going fishin
http://smackedstupid.files.wordpress...-explosion.jpg |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Here are just a handful of stupid uses Mom says Patriot Act stripped son of due process www.wral.com/news/local/story/5049867/ Sneak-and-peek warrants debated Patriot Act used to search for evidence in cockfighting case http://www.knoxnews.com/news/2007/au...rants-debated/ Patriot Act used to prosecute U.S. civilian http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles...patriotact.htm Patriot Act Used to Clear Out Homeless http://hightimes.com/news/ht_admin/1840 Or just do some reading here "On March 9, 2007, a Justice Department audit found that the FBI had "improperly and, in some cases, illegally used the USA PATRIOT Act to secretly obtain personal information" about United States citizens. [1] On June 15, 2007, following an internal audit finding that FBI agents abused the USA PATRIOT Act power more than 1000 times, U.S. District Judge John D. Bates ordered the agency to begin turning over thousands of pages of documents related to the agency's national security letters program.[2]" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Controv...SA_PATRIOT_Act |
I used to know a guy from Afghanistan and his named was Abdul.
He told me they can get a driving license for a car at 12 years old. Wtf? They also like to play cricket. |
Quote:
:helpme |
Quote:
|
Quote:
"We have no rights under the Patriot Act to even defend them, because the Patriot Act basically supersedes the Constitution," she said. "It wasn't intended to drag your barely 16-year-old, 120-pound son out in the middle of the night on a charge that we can't even defend." "All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution, are null and void." Chief Justice Marshall, Marbury v. Madison, 5, U.S. (Cranch) 137, 174,176 |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The "owner" of the WTC (at that time) has never been investigated. He is one of the biggest beneficiaries of 911. There will never be a fair investigation until he is seriously investigated. Why do people assume the building owner was not invovled?? Maybe he hired those guys to fly planes into the buildings because he did not want to pay for asbestos removal and in order to collect insurance money. Makes sense to me. Stop believing everything in the mainsteam news is the truth, whole truth, and nothing but the truth. |
Quote:
|
nvermnd......
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
fucking Rothschilds are the sons of Satan. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
especially if you are a military supporter. they are killing our youth to fight Israels wars. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Gotta know the dark side if you wanna know the light side I guess. |
Quote:
Larry Silverstein sued his insurers because he was not satisfied with their payout. He took them to court. Insurance companies can not simply deny claims because they merely suspect fraud. If they do, you can sue an insurance company in court and win if there is no proof (or at least major evidence) of fraud. How can the insurance company prove fraud against Silverstein if the police won't investigate him for fraud?? It's not easy to do with only private investigators hired by his insurers. To be honest, I dont know if his insurers even tried to investigate him for fraud. I suspect international terrorism might be too much too handle for an insurance company. |
Here's a good example of something which looks like an inside job.
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=91b_1187998483 The police "dont have any suspects" (uhh....what about the employees and the owner?). Isn't that amazing!! Makes you wonder how much care and effort the police put into insurance fraud investigations. If the insurance company refuses to payout, the owner can sue his insurer and say in court "the police investigated and never even accused me of fraud". Same as Silverstein can say "the government investigated 911 but never even accused me of involvement or fraud, so pay me". |
Yes, of course I believe it. Islamic terrorists blew things up before and after 9/11, but they wouldn't do that to USA. They love USA.
|
911 threads seem a bit like poking your head in a wasps nest.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
do you think you are cool by being sarcastic? https://youtube.com/watch?v=H2CVAnRByfg look anyone with half a brain understands why it was Israel. Keep supporting the terror state. ---- did you know Israel was built by the very same people who funded the nazi war? go do some research. you will understand. but you wont because you are to smart to do research of your own aren't you? |
i still would like to know why mossad chose to go with 9/11 as the instrument to get u.s. to invade iraq instead of planting WMDs in iraq, which is what prompted the invasion.
a youtube video would be nice, an article at infowars, something- where's the connecting the dots on this plan/scheme? |
|
Quote:
um what? how do you plan on driving a truck of nukes into Iraq and planting them? 911 is the perfect push for the american public. when you create hate for a group you can go to war against them for generations because you convince society they are evil. |
Quote:
yes they are. why? because at that point the spin against the muslims was complete and to the average american it didnt matter about the reason anymore. all that matter was them being labeled "terrorists". reasons dont matter if you convince people something is evil or good. either way. if you convince people of a base issue the truth behind it no longer matters. it becomes a truth if enough people support it. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
you dont understand. it is about public support, a terrorist attack has to happen to drill up public support. nothing pisses people off than something that happens in their own backdoor. finding WMDs people would want them to bomb and leave, when you tie in a terrorist twist it gives you an excuse to stay there forever because you are "preventing future terrorist attacks". if you somehow think planting bombs is easier then obtaining phony passports you are nuts. i am not "um whating" you in a bad way either. dont take it personally. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Iran is next. you create a terrorist attack you piss people off. people will turn a blind eye after that. finding WMDs is not enough of an excuse to attack multiple countries. everything ties back to "terror" now. read above also. |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:56 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123