GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Fuck you, BP : James Cameron Rejected By BP to Lend Helping Hand with Oil Spill (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=971635)

stonehammer 06-04-2010 12:07 AM

chuck norris would have stuck his finger in and the oil would go down

martinsc 06-04-2010 12:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Meeper (Post 17206545)
Theres only one person left for the job IMO

http://screencrave.frsucrave.netdna-...3/macgyver.jpg

http://static.nettby.no/communities/...s/macgyver.jpg

v4 media 06-04-2010 12:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DateDoc (Post 17206388)
Maybe we can stuff him down the pipe to plug it!

see if he could convince the horse faced Canadian Celine Dion to stick her chin in the hole that would fill it.

eroticsexxx 06-04-2010 01:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Duck (Post 17206841)
Who does James Cameron think he is anyway?


mynameisjim 06-04-2010 01:24 AM

I think what this needs is a technical project manager and Cameron has shown that he is capable of that. The technology for his films wasn't purchased of the shelf. He brought in people from different fields and put it all together while managing a budget in the hundreds of millions of dollars. Not many people possess those skills.

What you see now at BP is just random half ass fixes being tried one after the other with no preparation, it lacks direction.

Not saying Cameron is the answer, but it is clear that this project has needed a competent person directing it from the start. Someone who can bring in all the best ideas and technology and then come up with the best solution to get the job done.

roly 06-04-2010 06:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mynameisjim (Post 17209891)
I think what this needs is a technical project manager and Cameron has shown that he is capable of that. The technology for his films wasn't purchased of the shelf. He brought in people from different fields and put it all together while managing a budget in the hundreds of millions of dollars. Not many people possess those skills.

when compared to bp, managing a budget of "hundreds of millions" is peanuts, bp's turnover is hundreds of billions per year.

Quote:

Originally Posted by mynameisjim (Post 17209891)
What you see now at BP is just random half ass fixes being tried one after the other with no preparation, it lacks direction.

Not saying Cameron is the answer, but it is clear that this project has needed a competent person directing it from the start. Someone who can bring in all the best ideas and technology and then come up with the best solution to get the job done.

so has cameron, considering his years of experience in the oil industry actually come forward with a better solution? no didn't think so. nor has anyone else come forward with a better solution.

it maybe one thing for cameron to film at great depths, to try and complete complex engineering at 5000ft is a completely different matter. the reason that this hasn't been fixed yet isn't because bp don't know what they're doing, its because what they're trying to do is so difficult and hasn't been done before at these depths.

borked 06-04-2010 10:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by $5 submissions (Post 17208841)
Seriously, what does Cameron bring to the table that BP doesn't already have access to?

It's called crowdsourcing and BP are reported to be seriously considering 235 ideas (of which 24 are how to plug the leak) on containment and decontamination submitted by the public.

Just cos they are specialists doesn't mean someone outside the arena can't come up with a better idea.
Shit, like's been said already, they haven't done a great job so far, so some fresh input might be what it takes...

:2 cents:

borked 06-04-2010 10:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by roly (Post 17210947)
the reason that this hasn't been fixed yet isn't because bp don't know what they're doing, its because what they're trying to do is so difficult and hasn't been done before at these depths.

Then they shouldn't have been drilling at that depth. Period.

roly 06-04-2010 10:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by borked (Post 17212217)
Then they shouldn't have been drilling at that depth. Period.

well that's another debate all of its own. there's a finite amount of oil in the world and its running out. there's only two solutions, continue deepwater drilling or reduce demand. and whereas most of the world is taking steps to reduce consumption the US seems to be lagging behind.

Jarmusch 06-04-2010 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by martinsc (Post 17209757)

Use a sock.

quiet 06-04-2010 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scott McD (Post 17206505)
The so called "experts" haven't done that great so far... :2 cents:

bingo...

RadicalSights 06-04-2010 02:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaptainHowdy (Post 17206433)
CGI effects can always help...

:1orglaugh He can make some CGI video showing the leak as being fixed already

borked 06-04-2010 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by roly (Post 17212294)
whereas most of the world is taking steps to reduce consumption the US seems to be lagging behind.

Yup, the US consumes 25% of the world's oil. Take seps to curb that and the rest will fall into place. Well, besides letting China take the stage...

mynameisjim 06-04-2010 03:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by roly (Post 17210947)
when compared to bp, managing a budget of "hundreds of millions" is peanuts, bp's turnover is hundreds of billions per year.

He doesn't need to run the entire company, just the operation to fix the leaking well which is in the hundreds of millions of dollars. So yes, he has experience at that level.



Quote:

Originally Posted by roly (Post 17210947)
so has cameron, considering his years of experience in the oil industry actually come forward with a better solution? no didn't think so. nor has anyone else come forward with a better solution..

Yes. His team of international experts who happen to consult for oil companies proposed an idea in which a top cap fitted with a special valve would allow for a top kill to work with much lower pressures. So a mix of a top cap and a top kill using a special valve to lower the pressure required for the top kill to work. That was just one idea.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:40 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123