the only tubes making money are the ones in top10 for "porn"

no SE traffic = you BW bills will kill you

What about *************************?

Loses money month after month. We had a decent growth spurt this month tho.

According to "some other webmaster forum" they were doing around 1.2 million/year gross.

10 mill would be impossible.

Also, they are a "tube paysite". They earn FAR more than a regular "affiliate upsell" type tubesite.

To borrow a classic line from Pulp Fiction "Don't suck each others dicks just yet"--it was a DEFAULT judgment. The value of this is that it does send a message. The question is does the message reach those who hide behind offshore servers and have no US contacts?

If they had 5000 paying monthly members, they would be taking in 100k$ on those subscriptions alone. Add some advertisement along this, and 100K$ sounds doable to me?

The "pay for access" tube model is vastly different than a free for all tube....

"summary judgment"

may be great news.... may just be posturing for an argument on grounds of improper notice or some other legal loophole. They didn't respond to the pleadings... there are many reasons a company would choose to do that and 'surrender' is only one of them. :2 cents:

Those guys will not pay a dime. Just my .02

rapidshare provides direct links not torrents so it a hell of a lot closer to tube streaming

this case has more to do with showing up vs not showing up.

although the rapidshare case would go a long way in the appeal because even in a case where the defendent doesn't show a judge doesn't have a right to ignore the relevent laws.

That sucks for tubes with copyright infringement.

My thoughts exactly.

I wish!! Right in the middle of the conversation he motions to the pool behind him and says... "you see the 3 guys in the pool directly behind me... it's the two guys not wearing a hat" :1orglaugh


Nice sig BTW! :thumbsup

too bad straight studios dont do shit
gay studios are ON IT ! glad to hear,,,