Google goes SSL for searches

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • borked
    Totally Borked
    • Feb 2005
    • 6284

    #1

    Google goes SSL for searches

    https://www.google.com/

    does sod all to prevent the Chocolate Factory from profiling you, but it does stop your ISP from profiling you, if you're into that tinfoil hat stuff...

    For coding work - hit me up on andy // borkedcoder // com
    (consider figuring out the email as test #1)



    All models are wrong, but some are useful. George E.P. Box. p202
  • BigRod
    Confirmed User
    • Apr 2005
    • 3685

    #2
    I wonder if SSL still gives you personalized results?
    Rod Macdonald
    Mainstream Ad Agency Owner
    ICQ: 607306

    Comment

    • LoveSandra
      So Fucking Banned
      • Aug 2008
      • 10551

      #3
      bump 4 you

      Comment

      • darksoul
        Confirmed User
        • Apr 2002
        • 4997

        #4
        Originally posted by BigRod
        I wonder if SSL still gives you personalized results?
        SSL doesn't mean they can't track you, it means others like your ISP can't track you.
        so yes.
        1337 5y54|)m1n: 157717888
        BM-2cUBw4B2fgiYAfjkE7JvWaJMiUXD96n9tN
        Cambooth

        Comment

        • Serge Litehead
          Confirmed User
          • Dec 2002
          • 5190

          #5
          good move by google

          Comment

          • martinsc
            Too lazy to set a custom title
            • Jun 2005
            • 27047

            #6
            i like ssl....
            Make Money

            Comment

            • GirlsOnYou
              Confirmed User
              • Oct 2006
              • 618

              #7
              Oh this sucks big time!!

              "As another layer of privacy, SSL search turns off a browser's referrers. Web browsers typically turn off referrers when going from HTTPS to HTTP mode to provide extra privacy. By clicking on a search result that takes you to an HTTP site, you could disable any customizations that the website provides based on the referrer information."

              This means that web stats can't track if a user comes from SSL google and under what keyword. But I'm sure somehow google analytics still can. they seem to be forcing everyone to start using their spying stats tool.

              I really hope the SSL version of google won't become popular.
              Last edited by GirlsOnYou; 05-22-2010, 07:12 AM.
              * Selling my adult sites.
              Email: furaldbullon48aol9com - Replace 48 with @ and 9 with .

              Comment

              • borked
                Totally Borked
                • Feb 2005
                • 6284

                #8
                Originally posted by GirlsOnYou
                I really hope the SSL version of google won't become popular.
                I think they're aiming for it to become the default search page in the future....

                Originally posted by GoogleBlog
                "We hope to expand the functionality once we better understand how it affects users' search experience," the spokesman told us. "We expect that encrypted SSL search will slow down Google searches by a small degree, and we don?t like the idea of rolling this out to everyone before we?re able to test the performance effects and gather feedback from our users."

                For coding work - hit me up on andy // borkedcoder // com
                (consider figuring out the email as test #1)



                All models are wrong, but some are useful. George E.P. Box. p202

                Comment

                • PornMD
                  Mainstream Businessman
                  • Jan 2007
                  • 9291

                  #9
                  Originally posted by GirlsOnYou
                  This means that web stats can't track if a user comes from SSL google and under what keyword. But I'm sure somehow google analytics still can. they seem to be forcing everyone to start using their spying stats tool.
                  If they were smart and greedy, that would be their aim so that eventually they can start charging for analytics and given how much traffic their SE commands around the internet, smart marketers who test/track everything would be forced to buy it.
                  Want to crush it in mainstream with Facebook ads? Hit me up.

                  Comment

                  • Serge Litehead
                    Confirmed User
                    • Dec 2002
                    • 5190

                    #10
                    secure search environment is a good thing for end user regardless if webmasters appreciate it or not. it's nice and refreshing to see a company that cares for their users privacy. Doubt it will become default search anytime soon.

                    Comment

                    • borked
                      Totally Borked
                      • Feb 2005
                      • 6284

                      #11
                      Originally posted by holograph
                      it's nice and refreshing to see a company that cares for their users privacy.
                      You did hear right how the Google StreatView car was busted for collecting all public accessible WiFi info and data transferred across it while doing its rounds innocently photographing your neighbourhood right?

                      All Google is interested in is profiling its visitors so it can better target its ads. If that means while doing it, it can cut out its competitors, then it will do it.

                      For coding work - hit me up on andy // borkedcoder // com
                      (consider figuring out the email as test #1)



                      All models are wrong, but some are useful. George E.P. Box. p202

                      Comment

                      • PornMD
                        Mainstream Businessman
                        • Jan 2007
                        • 9291

                        #12
                        Originally posted by holograph
                        it's nice and refreshing to see a company that cares for their users privacy.
                        I guarantee you they aren't doing SSL search because they give a shit about users' privacy. This is the same company that auto-added people's most emailed contacts to their Google Buzz, basically unleashing a flood of private information on the world with one fell swoop without anyone's permission, not to mention the streetcar thing. I suppose they could be worse however. *coughFACEBOOKcough*
                        Want to crush it in mainstream with Facebook ads? Hit me up.

                        Comment

                        • Serge Litehead
                          Confirmed User
                          • Dec 2002
                          • 5190

                          #13
                          Originally posted by PornMD
                          I guarantee you they aren't doing SSL search because they give a shit about users' privacy. This is the same company that auto-added people's most emailed contacts to their Google Buzz, basically unleashing a flood of private information on the world with one fell swoop without anyone's permission, not to mention the streetcar thing. I suppose they could be worse however. *coughFACEBOOKcough*
                          my info and info of my contacts wasn't auto-added, I had complete control what and with whom I wanted to share in the Buzz and I was asked to confirm if I even wanted to bother with it at all ala opt-in to it. I've checked it out first day they released it. people don't read anything and they blame everything they can but themselves. and no I haven't heard about their StreetView car collecting public WiFis, btw is public WiFi private or public information? i think that's an interesting question

                          if you don't like google, think its an evil organization simply don't use it and block their spiders from your sites, problem solved

                          Comment

                          • borked
                            Totally Borked
                            • Feb 2005
                            • 6284

                            #14
                            Originally posted by holograph
                            no I haven't heard about their StreetView car collecting public WiFis, btw is public WiFi private or public information? i think that's an interesting question
                            We'll have to wait and see

                            In the blog post, Google called the payload data collection "a mistake," and the company said it would ask a third party to review its data collection software and to confirm that it deleted the data appropriately. It also said it would review its "procedures to ensure that our controls are sufficiently robust to address these kinds of problems in the future."

                            Today, in a statement sent to The Reg, Google said that it deleted data collected in Ireland, Austria, and Denmark, after data protection authorities in those countries requested its deletion. It also said that it's keeping data from Belgium, France, Italy, Spain, Germany, Switzerland, and the Czech Republic, after those countries requested it be kept. And it has now decided to keep all remaining data as well.

                            "Given that there is some uncertainty about deletion generally, for example one DPA [data protection authority] changed its instruction from delete to retain in the last 24 hours, we think it makes sense to keep the remaining country data while we work through these issues," the statement reads.

                            But the company was also under pressure from Privacy International and Brussels to halt deletion, and German authorities have already launched a preliminary criminal investigation into the data collection, as other countries consider such investigations, according to The FT.

                            In the US, lawmakers have called on the Federal Trade Commission to investigate the matter, and according to sources speaking with Reuters, both the FTC and the Department of Justice are considering the possibility. Meanwhile, two Americans have filed a class action suit against the company for intercepting their personal Wi-Fi data.

                            For coding work - hit me up on andy // borkedcoder // com
                            (consider figuring out the email as test #1)



                            All models are wrong, but some are useful. George E.P. Box. p202

                            Comment

                            • fuzebox
                              making it rain
                              • Oct 2003
                              • 22351

                              #15
                              "Chocolate factory"

                              Love it

                              Comment

                              • CamsMaster
                                Confirmed User
                                • Mar 2009
                                • 1200

                                #16
                                lately google has done some important strategic moves, for their benefit
                                Sex Chat Roulette | Adult Sex Chat | Cam Sites | Mature Cams | Director Web | Videochat | Webmaster | MediaEnterprise

                                Comment

                                • Serge Litehead
                                  Confirmed User
                                  • Dec 2002
                                  • 5190

                                  #17
                                  Originally posted by PornMD
                                  I suppose they could be worse however.
                                  Imagine if a porn webmaster was running it

                                  - blind clicks, popup hell, traffic schemes, installs, shady xsells, spamhell, selling user info - just a tip on an iceberg

                                  Comment

                                  • rowan
                                    Too lazy to set a custom title
                                    • Mar 2002
                                    • 17393

                                    #18
                                    Originally posted by GirlsOnYou
                                    This means that web stats can't track if a user comes from SSL google and under what keyword.
                                    I've always wondered about the trend of using GET rather than POST for search engine forms - which would also hide the keywords, and any other relevant variables.

                                    Comment

                                    • The Duck
                                      Adult Content Provider
                                      • May 2005
                                      • 18243

                                      #19
                                      Can't be bad.
                                      Skype Horusmaia
                                      ICQ 41555245
                                      Email [email protected]

                                      Comment

                                      • borked
                                        Totally Borked
                                        • Feb 2005
                                        • 6284

                                        #20
                                        Originally posted by CamsMaster
                                        lately google has done some important strategic moves, for their benefit
                                        I guess by definition, their strategic moves are always to their benefit

                                        For coding work - hit me up on andy // borkedcoder // com
                                        (consider figuring out the email as test #1)



                                        All models are wrong, but some are useful. George E.P. Box. p202

                                        Comment

                                        Working...