GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Rand Paul Leader of the Teabaggers! (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=969525)

cykoe6 05-22-2010 04:39 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kane (Post 17164158)
There is a huge difference between a company failing or doing something stupid that causes its own downfall and a company doing something that causes one of the largest disasters in the history of our country.

So you think the government should just stay out of it and let the market handle this? You think that if people are mad enough about what is happening they will not buy BP products and BP will either go out of business or lose its US market share? That isn't realistic. The simple reality is that there are so many hands in the pie it is hard to know how all to boycott in order to not support those responsible for this disaster. Not to mention that one of the companies involved, Haliburton, gets billions in defense contracts from the US so we could never buy gas from BP again and they probably wouldn't be hurt.

There is no way to know just how much damage this spill will end up causing not just to the environment, but to our economy. In a case like this I think it is fine for the government to step in and demand some answers.

I am saying that BP should be held accountable for its liability under the law. That is a far difference from Obama promising to "put my boot heal on the throat of BP." There is a bankruptcy system in place that should have handled GM, Chrysler and AIG....... just like there are liability laws and courts in place which should be allowed to handle BP. Everyone deserves due process under the law without strong arm tactics and interference from the head of state. When the head of state determines the outcomes without regard to process then you live in a corporatist/fascist state as opposed to a constitutional republic. :2 cents:

Ethersync 05-22-2010 04:46 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kane (Post 17164162)
They also thought the dome would work and the siphon lines would work and a few other things would work. None of them have so far. Hell in three months the thing might be empty and the damage done in that time may be so large in scale it could never be fixed.
Those ideas were done more to make it appear that they are doing something than anything else. The relief wells were started immediately and they will most likely fix the problem, but not before a huge amount of damage is done. Between the clean up costs and all the lawsuits this could destroy BP which would not really upset me all that much... And, with or without the government's boot heel or more sometimes-enforced regulations, every company in the world drilling oil will be a whole hell of a lot more careful.

mayabong 05-22-2010 12:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cykoe6 (Post 17164065)
Since your only requirement for a candidate is that they will commit to unconditional surrender to the lslamists............. your options are going to be limited to Kucinich or Ron Paul I think. :1orglaugh
You are a great product of the Jewish controlled Media. Lets not forget all the times israel was caught dressed like arabs commiting false flag events to fool idiots like yourself. Yes anyone who says that nuking a country is an option is not somone I'd vote for I don't care who they're related to.

onwebcam 05-22-2010 12:39 PM
The only people I see playing the race card are those attacking Rand Paul. Pretty typical. If all else fails. Pull the race card from the sleeve. Can't have anyone outside the box in the Senate..

IllTestYourGirls 05-22-2010 12:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 17164858)
The only people I see playing the race card are those attacking Rand Paul. Pretty typical. If all else fails. Pull the race card from the sleeve. Can't have anyone outside the box in the Senate..
I heard Rand Paul hates white guys because he believes that whites should not be allowed in the CBC or NAACP :drinkup

onwebcam 05-22-2010 01:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by IllTestYourGirls (Post 17164869)
I heard Rand Paul hates white guys because he believes that whites should not be allowed in the CBC or NAACP :drinkup
I heard he was a bigot because he has more than two brain cells.

GregE 05-22-2010 02:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kane (Post 17164162)
The question is, will those work? They also thought the dome would work and the siphon lines would work and a few other things would work. None of them have so far. Hell in three months the thing might be empty and the damage done in that time may be so large in scale it could never be fixed.
There's no maybe about it. If that thing isn't capped and capped fast the damage will never be fixed.

And now this tool Rand Paul is going around saying that Obama is being too hard on BP.

The worst fiction writers on the planet will never come up with anything more implausible than this shit :disgust

directfiesta 05-22-2010 03:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cykoe6 (Post 17164061)
Personally I believe that private businesses should have the right to provide service or deny service on any basis they like.
Yep, would keep the jews out from my favorite bar so peanuts bowl would not be empty ... :winkwink:

baddog 05-22-2010 03:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fletch XXX (Post 17161393)
Its a simple question and a simple answer:

Quote:
"Do you think that a private business has the right to say, 'We don't serve black people?' " he was asked by MSNBC's Rachel Maddow on Wednesday.

"Yes.
Whatever he states after those words mean jack shit LOL
If you watch the video he did not say "yes." He started off on a different tangent and Rachael insisted that he answer the question. He said, "yeah" under his breath as in, "yeah okay, I will answer your question." Then he said he was not in favor of discrimination.

baddog 05-22-2010 03:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kane (Post 17164162)
The question is, will those work? They also thought the dome would work and the siphon lines would work and a few other things would work. None of them have so far. Hell in three months the thing might be empty and the damage done in that time may be so large in scale it could never be fixed.
I was under the impression this deposit was one of the biggest ever. I thought there was enough in it to keep leaking for a very long time. So yeah, get what you can so it doesn't leak is at least helpful.

Ethersync 05-22-2010 04:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GregE (Post 17164982)
There's no maybe about it. If that thing isn't capped and capped fast the damage will never be fixed.
Never? I agree it is a disaster, but never fixed? That is just ignorant.

Quote:
Originally Posted by GregE (Post 17164982)
And now this tool Rand Paul is going around saying that Obama is being too hard on BP.
This is what he said: "What I don't like from the President's administration is this sort of, you know, I'll put my boot heal on the throat of BP. I think that sounds really un-American in his criticism of business. I've heard nothing from BP about not paying for the spill and I think it's part of this sort of blame game society in the sense that it's always got to be someone's fault instead of the fact that maybe sometimes accidents happen."

Quote:
Originally Posted by GregE (Post 17164982)
The worst fiction writers on the planet will never come up with anything more implausible than this shit :disgust
Really?

u-Bob 05-23-2010 06:45 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kane (Post 17164158)
So you think the government should just stay out of it and let the market handle this? You think that if people are mad enough about what is happening they will not buy BP products and BP will either go out of business or lose its US market share? That isn't realistic. The simple reality is that there are so many hands in the pie it is hard to know how all to boycott in order to not support those responsible for this disaster. Not to mention that one of the companies involved, Haliburton, gets billions in defense contracts from the US so we could never buy gas from BP again and they probably wouldn't be hurt.
So what you just said is: gov should step in because the markets are unable to handle this because of government interference int he markets.

How about ending the gov interference in the markets (stop giving companies like Haliburton gov contracts) so the markets can do what they do best.

u-Bob 05-23-2010 06:47 AM
Why not feel sorry for BP?
http://mises.org/daily/4331

The Demon 05-23-2010 07:18 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by u-Bob (Post 17166233)
So what you just said is: gov should step in because the markets are unable to handle this because of government interference int he markets.

How about ending the gov interference in the markets (stop giving companies like Haliburton gov contracts) so the markets can do what they do best.
Ouch. Modern Liberals hate classical liberalism and the concept of free markets.

Ethersync 05-23-2010 08:13 AM

IllTestYourGirls 05-23-2010 08:14 AM

Ethersync 05-23-2010 08:28 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:40 PM.
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123