SWAT invades family's home, kills their dogs and terrorizes their kids all over a joint? WTF! VIDEO - GoFuckYourself.com

05-06-2010, 07:05 AM

I'm sure the judge just gave out the search warrant for no reason and they are all just there because they hate joints and prefer bongs. Thats exactly the kind of thing that SWAT teams spend time planning operations to do.

L-Pink · 05-06-2010, 07:05 AM

over a joint .............

.

Jman · 05-06-2010, 07:08 AM

That is horrible, fucking dog killers

u-Bob · 05-06-2010, 07:08 AM

land of the free....

sperbonzo · 05-06-2010, 07:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vexes

I'm sure the judge just gave out the search warrant for no reason and they are all just there because they hate joints and prefer bongs. Thats exactly the kind of thing that SWAT teams spend time planning operations to do.

Exactly... I smell Bulls**t here. No one has the budget to send a SWAT team in for a mere joint.

BUT IT'S ON THE INTERNET, IT MUST BE TRUE!!!

Dirty Lord · 05-06-2010, 07:11 AM

what the fuck?

Ethersync · 05-06-2010, 07:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vexes

I'm sure the judge just gave out the search warrant for no reason and they are all just there because they hate joints and prefer bongs. Thats exactly the kind of thing that SWAT teams spend time planning operations to do.

SWAT raids like this over small amounts of drugs are actually quite common

Quote:

Originally Posted by sperbonzo

Exactly... I smell Bulls**t here. No one has the budget to send a SWAT team in for a mere joint.

BUT IT'S ON THE INTERNET, IT MUST BE TRUE!!!

It must be OK because it was the police. Trust your government.

Read on...

Quote:

Video of SWAT Raid on Missouri Family
Radley Balko | May 5, 2010

In February, I wrote the following about a drug raid in Missouri:

SWAT team breaks into home, fires seven rounds at family's pit bull and corgi (?!) as a seven-year-old looks on.

They found a "small amount" of marijuana, enough for a misdemeanor charge. The parents were then charged with child endangerment.

So smoking pot = "child endangerment." Storming a home with guns, then firing bullets into the family pets as a child looks on = necessary police procedures to ensure everyone's safety.

Just so we're clear.

Now there's video, which you can watch below. It's horrifying, but I'd urge you to watch it, and to send it to the drug warriors in your life. This is the blunt-end result of all the war imagery and militaristic rhetoric politicians have been spewing for the last 30 years?cops dressed like soldiers, barreling through the front door middle of the night, slaughtering the family pets, filling the house with bullets in the presence of children, then having the audacity to charge the parents with endangering their own kid. There are 100-150 of these raids every day in America, the vast, vast majority like this one, to serve a warrant for a consensual crime.

But they did prevent Jonathan Whitworth from smoking the pot they found in his possession. So I guess this mission was a success.

I've exchanged emails with the mother of the family, who was in the home at the time of the raid. I'm waiting on her permission to publish her account of what happened.

http://reason.com/blog/2010/05/05/vi...id-on-missouri

RaiderCash_Dominik · 05-06-2010, 07:14 AM

Looks like he was a dealer. At least according to DAs.

By Brennan David
Monday, May 3, 2010

A man whose home Columbia police raided in February on a narcotics search warrant has pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge and is contemplating a civil action against the department for shooting his two dogs during the raid.
Jonathan E. Whitworth, 25, of 1501 Kinloch Court entered into a plea agreement with the state to drop charges of possession of marijuana and second-degree child endangerment for a guilty plea to possession of drug paraphernalia.
Investigators believed Whitworth was in possession of a large amount of marijuana and was considered a distributor, Deputy Chief Tom Dresner said in February. Police, who found a grinder, a pipe and a small amount of marijuana, shot two dogs upon entering Whitworth’s home around 8:30 p.m. Feb. 11.
SWAT team members encountered a pit bull upon entry, held back and then fatally shot the dog, police say. Officers said the dog was acting in an uncontrollably aggressive manner. A video of the raid shows that a shot was fired upon entry, but the pit bull was not wounded until later.
Whitworth was arrested, and his wife and 7-year-old son were present during the raid. Both his wife and child were living in the residence at the time, said Jeff Hilbrenner, Whitworth’s attorney. Dresner previously said that intelligence gathered before the raid did not indicate the child was in the home.
A second dog was shot in the leg but was not killed. The corgi is seen in the video and does not appear to be wounded. There is no indication when the dog was shot, and Dresner previously said he was unsure when the animal was wounded.
“Their focus right now is to get this behind them,” Hilbrenner said of the Whitworth family. “Obviously, this was a traumatic event for his wife and son. A final decision has not been made, but they are evaluating all of their options.”
Hilbrenner previously said the family was concerned with what happened and that they thought police actions were inappropriate.
After the arrest, Dresner said he believed SWAT team members followed protocol and was awaiting an Internal Affairs investigation. Investigations are conducted each time a weapon is used by officers, said spokeswoman Officer Jessie Haden.
The investigation is expected to be completed within the next two weeks and has been prolonged because a SWAT team member is out of town for training. Internal Affairs is conducting the review because the incident involved multiple shots and was inside an occupied residence, Haden said. This allows Internal Affairs sergeants to review the incident independent from the SWAT command.
The Whitworths have not filed a complaint with the department concerning the incident.

Phoenix · 05-06-2010, 07:15 AM

hmm doesnt seem right

geedub · 05-06-2010, 07:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sperbonzo

Exactly... I smell Bulls**t here. No one has the budget to send a SWAT team in for a mere joint.

There's no need for budget anymore, they don't give a flying fuck.. Swat gets sent out all the time for shit it's not needed for.

Ethersync · 05-06-2010, 07:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RaiderCash_Dominik

Looks like he was a dealer. At least according to DAs.

By Brennan David
Monday, May 3, 2010

A man whose home Columbia police raided in February on a narcotics search warrant has pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge and is contemplating a civil action against the department for shooting his two dogs during the raid.
Jonathan E. Whitworth, 25, of 1501 Kinloch Court entered into a plea agreement with the state to drop charges of possession of marijuana and second-degree child endangerment for a guilty plea to possession of drug paraphernalia.
Investigators believed Whitworth was in possession of a large amount of marijuana and was considered a distributor, Deputy Chief Tom Dresner said in February. Police, who found a grinder, a pipe and a small amount of marijuana, shot two dogs upon entering Whitworth?s home around 8:30 p.m. Feb. 11.
SWAT team members encountered a pit bull upon entry, held back and then fatally shot the dog, police say. Officers said the dog was acting in an uncontrollably aggressive manner. A video of the raid shows that a shot was fired upon entry, but the pit bull was not wounded until later.
Whitworth was arrested, and his wife and 7-year-old son were present during the raid. Both his wife and child were living in the residence at the time, said Jeff Hilbrenner, Whitworth?s attorney. Dresner previously said that intelligence gathered before the raid did not indicate the child was in the home.
A second dog was shot in the leg but was not killed. The corgi is seen in the video and does not appear to be wounded. There is no indication when the dog was shot, and Dresner previously said he was unsure when the animal was wounded.
?Their focus right now is to get this behind them,? Hilbrenner said of the Whitworth family. ?Obviously, this was a traumatic event for his wife and son. A final decision has not been made, but they are evaluating all of their options.?
Hilbrenner previously said the family was concerned with what happened and that they thought police actions were inappropriate.
After the arrest, Dresner said he believed SWAT team members followed protocol and was awaiting an Internal Affairs investigation. Investigations are conducted each time a weapon is used by officers, said spokeswoman Officer Jessie Haden.
The investigation is expected to be completed within the next two weeks and has been prolonged because a SWAT team member is out of town for training. Internal Affairs is conducting the review because the incident involved multiple shots and was inside an occupied residence, Haden said. This allows Internal Affairs sergeants to review the incident independent from the SWAT command.
The Whitworths have not filed a complaint with the department concerning the incident.

Looks like they thought he was a dealer.

The pit bull was in a fucking cage!

sperbonzo · 05-06-2010, 07:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ethersync

SWAT raids like this over small amounts of drugs are actually quite common

It must be OK because it was the police. Trust your government.

Read on...

Don't get me wrong, I love my country, but my government scares the crap out of me... and being a libertarian, I think that any idiot that wants to do drugs has the right to

Having said that though, I was a reserve deputy sheriff for a couple of years, and I can tell you that the search warrants signed by judges that allow a major felony entry like that are not over "a joint"

Do search warrants get served when there is no evidence at the time of the raid? Absolutely, and the officers, especially the lead detective, end up with egg all over their face, but the original intent of the warrant is not "over a joint"

I'm also a big believer that if the police break the rules, they need to get punished, and go to jail if need be.

Arnox · 05-06-2010, 07:25 AM

I think it's disgusting you guys are willing to defend someone who's bringing up a child in an environment surrounded by drugs.

Phoenix · 05-06-2010, 07:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Arnox

I think it's disgusting you guys are willing to defend someone who's bringing up a child in an environment surrounded by drugs.

seems he was not a drug dealer at all

and the dog was in a cage...they let it out?

Angry Jew Cat - Banned for Life · 05-06-2010, 07:35 AM

My only disappointment is that no cops got shot in the process...

Martin · 05-06-2010, 07:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Arnox

I think it's disgusting you guys are willing to defend someone who's bringing up a child in an environment surrounded by drugs.

Most likely you would rat out your neighbors to the cops if you caught a little whiff of a grass burning coming from next door too.

Ethersync · 05-06-2010, 07:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sperbonzo

Don't get me wrong, I love my country, but my government scares the crap out of me... and being a libertarian, I think that any idiot that wants to do drugs has the right to

I agree.

Quote:

Originally Posted by sperbonzo

Having said that though, I was a reserve deputy sheriff for a couple of years, and I can tell you that the search warrants signed by judges that allow a major felony entry like that are not over "a joint"

I am sure they told the judge he was a dealer and without a second thought he signed the warrant.

Quote:

Originally Posted by sperbonzo

Do search warrants get served when there is no evidence at the time of the raid? Absolutely, and the officers, especially the lead detective, end up with egg all over their face, but the original intent of the warrant is not "over a joint"

They are not charging him with drug possession. They are only charging him with possession of drug paraphernalia. So it was not all over a joint, but rather all over a bong or pipe...

mmcfadden · 05-06-2010, 07:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Arnox

I think it's disgusting you guys are willing to defend someone who's bringing up a child in an environment surrounded by drugs.

i hope you do not have any beers/wine/alcohol whatsoever around kids if you have any. Smoking weed is the same thing tight ass

seeandsee · 05-06-2010, 07:44 AM

riotsssssssssss

Ethersync · 05-06-2010, 07:56 AM

This doesn't appear to be a one off...

Quote:

The Drug War Goes to the Dogs

by Radley Balko

In the course of researching paramilitary drug raids, I?ve found some pretty disturbing stuff. There was a case where a SWAT officer stepped on a baby?s head while looking for drugs in a drop ceiling. There was one where an 11-year-old boy was shot at point-blank range. Police have broken down doors, screamed obscenities, and held innocent people at gunpoint only to discover that what they thought were marijuana plants were really sunflowers, hibiscus, ragweed, tomatoes, or elderberry bushes. (It?s happened with all five.)

Yet among hundreds of botched raids, the ones that get me most worked up are the ones where the SWAT officers shoot and kill the family dog.

I have two dogs, which may have something to do with it. But I?m not alone. A colleague tells me that when he and other libertarian commentators speak about the 1993 raid on the Branch Davidian compound in Waco many people tend to doubt the idea that the government was out of line when it invaded, demolished, and set fire to a home of peaceful and mostly innocent people. But when the speaker mentions that the government also slaughtered two dogs during the siege, eyes light up, the indifferent get angry, and skeptics come around. Puppycide, apparently, goes too far.

Radley Balko is a policy analyst specializing in "nanny state" issues and author of the forthcoming study "Overkill: The Rise of Paramilitary Drug Raids in America."

One of the most appalling cases occurred in Maricopa County, Arizona, the home of Joe Arpaio, self-proclaimed ?toughest sheriff in America.? In 2004 one of Arpaio?s SWAT teams conducted a bumbling raid in a Phoenix suburb. Among other weapons, it used tear gas and an armored personnel carrier that later rolled down the street and smashed into a car. The operation ended with the targeted home in flames and exactly one suspect in custody?for outstanding traffic violations.

But for all that, the image that sticks in your head, as described by John Dougherty in the alternative weekly Phoenix New Times, is that of a puppy trying to escape the fire and a SWAT officer chasing him back into the burning building with puffs from a fire extinguisher. The dog burned to death.

In a massive 1998 raid at a San Francisco housing co-op, cops shot a family dog in front of its family, then dragged it outside and shot it again.

When police in Fremont, California, raided the home of medical marijuana patient Robert Filgo, they shot his pet Akita nine times. Filgo himself was never charged.

Last October police in Alabama raided a home on suspicion of marijuana possession, shot and killed both family dogs, then joked about the kill in front of the family. They seized eight grams of marijuana, equal in weight to a ketchup packet.

In January a cop en route to a drug raid in Tampa, Florida, took a short cut across a neighboring lawn and shot the neighbor?s two pooches on his way. And last May, an officer in Syracuse, New York, squeezed off several shots at a family dog during a drug raid, one of which ricocheted and struck a 13-year-old boy in the leg. The boy was handcuffed at gunpoint at the time.

There was a dog in the ragweed bust I mentioned, too. He got lucky: He was only kicked across the room.

I guess the P.R. lesson here for drug war opponents and civil libertarians is to emphasize the plight of the pooch. America?s law-and-order populace may not be ready to condemn the practice of busting up recreational pot smokers with ostentatiously armed paramilitary police squads, even when the SWAT team periodically breaks into the wrong house or accidentally shoots a kid. I mean, somebody was probably breaking the law, right?

But the dog? That loyal, slobbery, lovable, wide-eyed, fur-lined bag of unconditional love?

Dammit, he deserves better.

http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=6339

sperbonzo · 05-06-2010, 07:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ethersync

I agree.

I am sure they told the judge he was a dealer and without a second thought he signed the warrant.

They are not charging him with drug possession. They are only charging him with possession of drug paraphernalia. So it was not all over a joint, but rather all over a bong or pipe...

You have to do more than just "tell the judge that he is a dealer", You have to show sufficient probable cause....and also the Narcotics squad in your average police force is overwhelmed with open files that need to be closed. They don't have the time to follow up on cases that they think are simply misdemeanors, nor can they get the SWAT team out for those. If they did that, the big files would go unclosed, and they would end up being transferred, lose promotion opportunities, etc.... When the head of a department has to report that they have used up so much overtime on raids for misdemeanors, while big felony cases go without an arrest, asses get hung out to dry.

The reason why he was only charged as he was, was because at the time of the raid, the expected evidence was not recovered, so there was no way to charge him with anything more. Remember, Charges are filed AFTER you are arrested.

.

JamesK · 05-06-2010, 08:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Arnox

I think it's disgusting you guys are willing to defend someone who's bringing up a child in an environment surrounded by drugs.

You might want to turn off your sig when you go off spouting shit like that.

sperbonzo · 05-06-2010, 08:01 AM

If you are going to blame anyone for this crap, you need to blame the lawmakers for pushing law enforcement chiefs into this kind of crap. Cops would love to not have to arrest people for Pot.... It would make their lives much easier. It's the people writing the laws, and the local governments pushing the police to enforce them, that should be blamed.

.

Ethersync · 05-06-2010, 08:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sperbonzo

You have to do more than just "tell the judge that he is a dealer", You have to show sufficient probable cause....

Yes, in this case an informant gave them a tip and that was considered probable cause.

Quote:

Originally Posted by sperbonzo

They don't have the time to follow up on cases that they think are simply misdemeanors, nor can they get the SWAT team out for those.

I never said they did that. They thought, based on a tip from an informant, that he was a dealer.

Quote:

Originally Posted by sperbonzo

The reason why he was only charged as he was, was because at the time of the raid, the expected evidence was not recovered, so there was no way to charge him with anything more.

They could have charged him with misdemeanor drug possession. I am sure that now that this case and video are getting so much attention they just want it to go away so they are charging him with a minimal offense. They are also probably hoping he does not sue them.

Quote:

Originally Posted by sperbonzo

Remember, Charges are filed AFTER you are arrested.

No shit...

I have half a dozen relatives who are or were in law enforcement on both the state and federal level. I know how this stuff works very well

John-ACWM · 05-06-2010, 08:15 AM

Robin Hood....

Fletch XXX · 05-06-2010, 08:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ethersync

Looks like they thought he was a dealer.

exactly.

"Investigators believed Whitworth was in possession of a large amount of marijuana and was considered a distributor, Deputy Chief Tom Dresner said in February. Police, who found a grinder, a pipe and a small amount of marijuana, shot two dogs upon entering Whitworth?s home "

what they thoughts and what they found are totally diff.

Ethersync · 05-06-2010, 08:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sperbonzo

If you are going to blame anyone for this crap, you need to blame the lawmakers for pushing law enforcement chiefs into this kind of crap. Cops would love to not have to arrest people for Pot.... It would make their lives much easier.

Sorry, but some cops get off on this shit. They love playing Rambo. Some cops would love to not arrest people for pot.

Quote:

Originally Posted by sperbonzo

It's the people writing the laws, and the local governments pushing the police to enforce them, that should be blamed.

Show me a law that says it's OK to execute a family pet like this. Show me an example of local governments pushing cops to kill animals like this. Sorry, but I blame the meat head cops who pulled the trigger for their actions. It is shit like this that makes good cops get a bad reputation.

BestXXXPorn · 05-06-2010, 08:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sperbonzo

If you are going to blame anyone for this crap, you need to blame the lawmakers for pushing law enforcement chiefs into this kind of crap. Cops would love to not have to arrest people for Pot.... It would make their lives much easier. It's the people writing the laws, and the local governments pushing the police to enforce them, that should be blamed.

http://www.leap.cc/cms/index.php

And in regards to the video, that's just fucked up... the SWAT team did NOT need to kill the guy's dogs... If cops decide to raid my house they'd better expect to show some ID and let me review the warrant. I have firearms, I'm better trained than they are, I have home court advantage and I WILL consider a raid on my home with no ID shown to be an unlawful attack on my person and my property.

punkpred · 05-06-2010, 08:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by u-Bob

land of the free....

So who's the criminals in this video? The home owner or the asshats in black that broke in?

Oracle Porn · 05-06-2010, 08:38 AM

shut up pig

you only need 1 snitch to get you ass raided like that

MrBottomTooth · 05-06-2010, 09:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Arnox

I think it's disgusting you guys are willing to defend someone who's bringing up a child in an environment surrounded by drugs.

Give me a break. The parents smoke weed. Big deal. If they were crack or methheads then I could see your point.

Cyber Fucker · 05-06-2010, 09:07 AM

That's how the police acts.... pigs.

_Richard_ · 05-06-2010, 09:10 AM

"THEY CAME FIRST for the Communists,
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist.

THEN THEY CAME for the Jews,
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew.

THEN THEY CAME for the trade unionists,
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist.

THEN THEY CAME for me
and by that time no one was left to speak up."

will76 · 05-06-2010, 09:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ethersync

SWAT raids like this over small amounts of drugs are actually quite common

says you ?

ok, if you say so it must be true. I'll take your word for it.

bronco67 · 05-06-2010, 09:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ethersync

This doesn't appear to be a one off...

http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=6339

thanks for making me cry today.

bronco67 · 05-06-2010, 09:16 AM

I'm for the most part, someone who you will never see saying "fuck the police". I generally support the police and think they have a thankless and tough job. But, even knowing the real truth and the full story(ok he was a dealer), this makes me sick and has ruined my day.

spazlabz · 05-06-2010, 09:17 AM

did you hear the pain in that guys voice over the loss of his dog, man that is so raw. Hit me hard

_Richard_ · 05-06-2010, 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Arnox

I think it's disgusting you guys are willing to defend someone who's bringing up a child in an environment surrounded by drugs.

that guy got his house raided for the equivalent of a pack of beer

you have booze in the house by chance? ever?

kristin · 05-06-2010, 09:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by _Richard_

that guy got his house raided for the equivalent of a pack of beer

you have booze in the house by chance? ever?

Yeah, pot helps you deal with your kids more easily, whereas drunks can be douches.

MaDalton · 05-06-2010, 09:41 AM

to serve and protect...

FilthyRob · 05-06-2010, 09:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by _Richard_

"THEY CAME FIRST for the Communists,
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist.

THEN THEY CAME for the Jews,
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew.

THEN THEY CAME for the trade unionists,
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist.

THEN THEY CAME for me
and by that time no one was left to speak up."

Great quote Richard!

Tom_PM · 05-06-2010, 09:44 AM

Thats not representative of the country I grew up in. But I'm aware of what it's been allowed to become.

Ethersync · 05-06-2010, 09:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco67

I'm for the most part, someone who you will never see saying "fuck the police". I generally support the police and think they have a thankless and tough job. But, even knowing the real truth and the full story(ok he was a dealer), this makes me sick and has ruined my day.

I would never say "fuck the police", but I am saying "fuck these police"

And he was not a dealer. Some informant gave them a tip that he was a dealer. It ended up not being true.

Tom_PM · 05-06-2010, 09:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ethersync

I would never say "fuck the police", but I am saying "fuck these police"

And he was not a dealer. Some informant gave them a tip that he was a dealer. It ended up not being true.

Wonder if they shot the informants dog too? Sounds like the informant wasted a lot of time, money, lives..

Ethersync · 05-06-2010, 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spazlabz

did you hear the pain in that guys voice over the loss of his dog, man that is so raw. Hit me hard

Yeah, bone chilling.

TeenCat · 05-06-2010, 10:02 AM

every marijuana smoker have to be killed, as its almost sure its president killer or suicide bomber

u-Bob · 05-06-2010, 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ethersync

Show me a law that says it's OK to execute a family pet like this. Show me an example of local governments pushing cops to kill animals like this. Sorry, but I blame the meat head cops who pulled the trigger for their actions. It is shit like this that makes good cops get a bad reputation.

These days they are training cops to use torture devices (like tasers) even when a person poses no physical threat.

These days they are training cops to view a person who refers to his constitutional rights as a terrorist.

These days they are training cops to regard any question asked instead of a "yes, sir" or "no, sir" answer given as a sign of aggression.

These days they are telling cops, it's OK to lie in court.

these days...

Well, in a few years there won't be any good cops left....

Angry Jew Cat - Banned for Life · 05-06-2010, 10:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by u-Bob

These days they are training cops to use torture devices (like tasers) even when a person poses no physical threat.

These days they are training cops to view a person who refers to his constitutional rights as a terrorist.

These days they are training cops to regard any question asked instead of a "yes, sir" or "no, sir" answer given as a sign of aggression.

These days they are telling cops, it's OK to lie in court.

these days...

Well, in a few years there won't be any good cops left....

My little brother got some tour of the RCMP training facility because he was a honor role student, and he came back and couldn't wait to tell me what he had learned on his trip. He was happy to inform me that during police training they are told to suspect anyone with long hair and facial hair to be suspicious character or a drug abuser. Then he laughed, obviously because I had long hair and a beard. I guess long hair + beard = criminal in the RCMP's books.

I guess I now know how it feels to be black...

Either way, you're GUILTY until proven innocent these days, not vice versa. Anything you can and will be used as grounds for a shitkicking, If the cops are wrong the sweep whatever they can under the rug and hope you don't alert the media.

Ayla_SquareTurtle · 05-06-2010, 10:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JamesK

You might want to turn off your sig when you go off spouting shit like that.

05-06-2010, 07:02 AM	#1
Ethersync Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: London, Saint-Tropez, Bermuda, Moscow Posts: 5,289	SWAT invades family's home, kills their dogs and terrorizes their kids all over a joint? WTF! VIDEO

05-06-2010, 07:05 AM	#2
Vexes Guest Posts: n/a	I'm sure the judge just gave out the search warrant for no reason and they are all just there because they hate joints and prefer bongs. Thats exactly the kind of thing that SWAT teams spend time planning operations to do. Last edited by Vexes; 05-06-2010 at 07:07 AM..

05-06-2010, 07:08 AM	#4
Jman Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Canuckstikan Posts: 22,768	That is horrible, fucking dog killers __________________ email: [email protected] Best AI Affiliate Program We also do WL at $0.00 upfront costs FantasyXXX.AI Teams: jean.francois.laverdiere TG: @jman1216

05-06-2010, 07:11 AM	#7
Dirty Lord Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2007 Posts: 2,681	what the fuck? __________________

05-06-2010, 07:15 AM	#10
Phoenix BACON BACON BACON Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Poems everybody, the laddie fancies himself a poet Posts: 35,462	hmm doesnt seem right __________________ Skype Phoenixskype1 Telegram PhoenixBrad https://quantads.io

05-06-2010, 07:05 AM	#3
L-Pink working on my tan Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Florida/Kentucky Posts: 39,151	over a joint ............. .

05-06-2010, 07:08 AM	#5
u-Bob there's no $$$ in porn Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: icq: 195./568.-230 (btw: not getting offline msgs) Posts: 33,063	land of the free....

05-06-2010, 07:14 AM	#9
RaiderCash_Dominik Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 1,145	Looks like he was a dealer. At least according to DAs. By Brennan David Monday, May 3, 2010 A man whose home Columbia police raided in February on a narcotics search warrant has pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge and is contemplating a civil action against the department for shooting his two dogs during the raid. Jonathan E. Whitworth, 25, of 1501 Kinloch Court entered into a plea agreement with the state to drop charges of possession of marijuana and second-degree child endangerment for a guilty plea to possession of drug paraphernalia. Investigators believed Whitworth was in possession of a large amount of marijuana and was considered a distributor, Deputy Chief Tom Dresner said in February. Police, who found a grinder, a pipe and a small amount of marijuana, shot two dogs upon entering Whitworth’s home around 8:30 p.m. Feb. 11. SWAT team members encountered a pit bull upon entry, held back and then fatally shot the dog, police say. Officers said the dog was acting in an uncontrollably aggressive manner. A video of the raid shows that a shot was fired upon entry, but the pit bull was not wounded until later. Whitworth was arrested, and his wife and 7-year-old son were present during the raid. Both his wife and child were living in the residence at the time, said Jeff Hilbrenner, Whitworth’s attorney. Dresner previously said that intelligence gathered before the raid did not indicate the child was in the home. A second dog was shot in the leg but was not killed. The corgi is seen in the video and does not appear to be wounded. There is no indication when the dog was shot, and Dresner previously said he was unsure when the animal was wounded. “Their focus right now is to get this behind them,” Hilbrenner said of the Whitworth family. “Obviously, this was a traumatic event for his wife and son. A final decision has not been made, but they are evaluating all of their options.” Hilbrenner previously said the family was concerned with what happened and that they thought police actions were inappropriate. After the arrest, Dresner said he believed SWAT team members followed protocol and was awaiting an Internal Affairs investigation. Investigations are conducted each time a weapon is used by officers, said spokeswoman Officer Jessie Haden. The investigation is expected to be completed within the next two weeks and has been prolonged because a SWAT team member is out of town for training. Internal Affairs is conducting the review because the incident involved multiple shots and was inside an occupied residence, Haden said. This allows Internal Affairs sergeants to review the incident independent from the SWAT command. The Whitworths have not filed a complaint with the department concerning the incident.

05-06-2010, 07:25 AM	#14
Arnox Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Radelaide Posts: 2,164	I think it's disgusting you guys are willing to defend someone who's bringing up a child in an environment surrounded by drugs. __________________ Need Text? X Copywriters \| Adult Writing Service - [email protected]

05-06-2010, 07:35 AM	#16
Angry Jew Cat - Banned for Life (felis madjewicus) Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: In Mom & Dad's Basement Posts: 20,368	My only disappointment is that no cops got shot in the process...

05-06-2010, 07:44 AM	#20
seeandsee Check SIG! Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Europe (Skype: gojkoas) Posts: 50,945	riotsssssssssss __________________ BUY MY SIG - 50$/Year Contact here

05-06-2010, 08:01 AM	#24
sperbonzo I'd rather be on my boat. Industry Role: Join Date: May 2003 Location: Miami, FL Posts: 9,748	If you are going to blame anyone for this crap, you need to blame the lawmakers for pushing law enforcement chiefs into this kind of crap. Cops would love to not have to arrest people for Pot.... It would make their lives much easier. It's the people writing the laws, and the local governments pushing the police to enforce them, that should be blamed. . __________________ Michael Sperber / Acella Financial LLC/ Online Payment Processing [email protected] / http://Acellafinancial.com/ ICQ 177961090 / Tel +1 909 NET BILL / Skype msperber

05-06-2010, 08:15 AM	#26
John-ACWM Work Work Work Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: EU Posts: 20,060	Robin Hood.... __________________ Video Chat Forum

05-06-2010, 08:38 AM	#31
Oracle Porn Affiliate Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Icq: 94-399-723 Posts: 24,433	shut up pig you only need 1 snitch to get you ass raided like that __________________

05-06-2010, 09:07 AM	#33
Cyber Fucker Hmm Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: On an endless road around the world for rock and roll. Posts: 12,642	That's how the police acts.... pigs. __________________

05-06-2010, 09:10 AM	#34
_Richard_ Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Earth Posts: 30,989	"THEY CAME FIRST for the Communists, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist. THEN THEY CAME for the Jews, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew. THEN THEY CAME for the trade unionists, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist. THEN THEY CAME for me and by that time no one was left to speak up."

05-06-2010, 09:16 AM	#37
bronco67 Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 29,032	I'm for the most part, someone who you will never see saying "fuck the police". I generally support the police and think they have a thankless and tough job. But, even knowing the real truth and the full story(ok he was a dealer), this makes me sick and has ruined my day. __________________

05-06-2010, 09:17 AM	#38
spazlabz Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Kentucky Posts: 6,548	did you hear the pain in that guys voice over the loss of his dog, man that is so raw. Hit me hard

05-06-2010, 09:41 AM	#41
MaDalton I am Amazing Content! Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 39,829	to serve and protect... __________________ AmazingContent.com - providing only the best content and service since 2003 Monetize your content on Veegaz.com - one of Germanies largest VOD sites Got German traffic? We convert it into money for you! Skype: madalton02826 - Email: oltecconsult [at] gmail [dot] com

05-06-2010, 09:44 AM	#43
Tom_PM Porn Meister Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 16,443	Thats not representative of the country I grew up in. But I'm aware of what it's been allowed to become. __________________ 43-922-863 Shut up and play your guitar.

05-06-2010, 10:02 AM	#47
TeenCat Too lazy to set a koala Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: CZ/EU forever! Posts: 16,139	every marijuana smoker have to be killed, as its almost sure its president killer or suicide bomber __________________ 6bot / Coming again very soon! Svit Zlin Radio 24/7!