Sigalicious!
Should Barefootsies follow the same rules everyone else does?
Collapse
X
-
My Affiliate Programs:
Porn Nerd Cash | Porn Showcase | Aggressive Gold
Over 90 paysites to promote!
Now on Teams: peabodymedia -
ok...
OK I admit it, my name is a fake nick, I am really Steve.... Lightspeed !
Now promote all my sites biatches ! Make me rich... again !
Trashy Content - High Res Images - HD Video
SlutBank.com Home of THOT PORN
[email protected] - - Skype - bangbangsteve
Great Content Deals Available @ TRASHY CONTENTComment
-
Since no rules were broken, no banning (at least for me) would be warranted.
FACT: No One Was Called a Scammer
Carry on.
Comment
-
FACT: No One Was Called a Scammer

Sorry bud. The facts, in context of the day and events, prove otherwise.
*shrug*Last edited by Barefootsies; 04-28-2010, 10:05 AM.Comment
-
Amazing. Time to move on.you know what Eric answered when asked about Barefootsies accusations?
"let BigDeanEvans proove he is not Batts."
how ridiculous does that sound? now you can go start threads accusing everyone being scammers the you don't have to prove anything! now THEY have to prove they aren't scammers!- Free Premium Domain Lists and Tools at Clickmojo.com
- For Sale: Obscenity.com
Comment
-
Nope. Since the vote was weighted, it was an unfair vote.
- Ban him. He's not exempt.
- No. He is exempt from the rules.
The explanations after Yes/No, added unfair and subjective weight to the vote

Well done.
--edit
just to clarify in case you don't understand logic, I would have voted No, because I think he did nothing wrong and I did not see him call anyone a scammer. Nobody is above the rules (unless of course you are top advertiser perhaps), and so I couldn't have voted "No, he is exempt from the rules".
You see?Last edited by borked; 04-28-2010, 11:03 AM.
For coding work - hit me up on andy // borkedcoder // com
(consider figuring out the email as test #1)
All models are wrong, but some are useful. George E.P. Box. p202Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment

BUY MY SIG - 50$/Year
Comment